Loading…
Cardiac rehabilitation and 5-year mortality after acute coronary syndromes: The 2005 French FAST-MI study
Summary Background Clinical studies have shown a beneficial effect of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on mortality. Objective To study the effect of CR prescription at discharge on 5-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods Participants, from the 2005 French FAST-MI hos...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of cardiovascular diseases 2016-03, Vol.109 (3), p.178-187 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Summary Background Clinical studies have shown a beneficial effect of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on mortality. Objective To study the effect of CR prescription at discharge on 5-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods Participants, from the 2005 French FAST-MI hospital registry, were 2894 survivors at discharge, divided according to AMI type: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI; n = 1523) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI; n = 1371). The effect of CR prescription on mortality was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results At discharge, 22.1% of patients had a CR prescription. Patients referred to CR were younger (62.4 vs. 67.5 years), were more frequently men and more had presented with STEMI (67.8% vs. 48.3%) than non-referred patients. Ninety-four (14.7%) deaths occurred among patients referred to CR and 585 (25.9%) among non-referred patients ( P < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, the association between CR and mortality remained significant (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60–0.96). Analyses stratified by sex, age (< 60 vs. ≥ 60 years) and AMI type showed that the inverse association was stronger in men (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48–0.87) than in women (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.64–1.39), in younger (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15–0.77) than in older patients (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.65–1.07) and in NSTEMI (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.46–0.88) than in STEMI (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.69–1.40). Conclusion After hospitalization for AMI, referral to CR remains a significant predictor of improved patient survival; some subgroups seem to gain greater benefit. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1875-2136 1875-2128 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.09.009 |