Special issue on forest investments profitability

In this special issue, a sample of the papers presented and discussions held are provided. The selected articles are partly presented in the context of the cost-benefit analysis of forests investments. Public budgeting process nowadays requires in most countries a thorough economic analysis of the a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental economics and policy 2015-01, Vol.4 (2), p.125-128
Main Authors: Stenger, Anne, Harou, Patrice
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
cost-benefit
externality
forests
investment
Life Sciences
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-16a27c09739e36ee236636b5607493d0f588231e85eaa43296fb1f4f6ac041393
container_end_page 128
container_issue 2
container_start_page 125
container_title Journal of environmental economics and policy
container_volume 4
creator Stenger, Anne
Harou, Patrice
description In this special issue, a sample of the papers presented and discussions held are provided. The selected articles are partly presented in the context of the cost-benefit analysis of forests investments. Public budgeting process nowadays requires in most countries a thorough economic analysis of the annual projects and programmes. Forestry institutions are no exception. However, in the public arena and international organisations, the records of appropriate cost-benefit of forestry projects are scant. A recent review of the use of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) by the Independent Evaluation Group of the World Bank which spread the use of CBA to justify development projects, shows that the economic analysis of projects has been diminishing compared to their uses in the 70s. For natural resources, and forestry in particular, the presence of recognised positive externalities seems to have diminished the reason to undertake this analysis. In the context of budgeting constraints encountered by many countries following the 2008 financial crisis, the need for a proper analysis of natural resources investments has been made more acute.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/21606544.2014.990520
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01536558v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_01536558v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-16a27c09739e36ee236636b5607493d0f588231e85eaa43296fb1f4f6ac041393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJg0f4DD3v1sPW9fHVzklLUCgUP6jm8bhOMbDclWSv99-6y2qPvMo9hZmCGsRuEGUIFdxw1aCXljAPKmTGgOJyxyUCXWil-fvqlvGTTnD-hPw1KVWrC8HXv6kBNEXL-ckVsCx-Ty10R2kMPO9d2udin6ENHm9CE7njNLjw12U1_8Yq9Pz68LVfl-uXpeblYl7Xg2JWoic9rMHNhnNDOcaG10BulYS6N2IJXVcUFuko5Iim40X6DXnpNNUgURlyx2zH3gxq7T2FH6WgjBbtarO3AASrRF6wO2GvlqK1TzDk5fzIg2GEl-7eSHVay40q97X60hbZvvaPvmJqt7ejYxOQTtXXIVvyb8AOmvGuf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Special issue on forest investments profitability</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Stenger, Anne ; Harou, Patrice</creator><creatorcontrib>Stenger, Anne ; Harou, Patrice</creatorcontrib><description>In this special issue, a sample of the papers presented and discussions held are provided. The selected articles are partly presented in the context of the cost-benefit analysis of forests investments. Public budgeting process nowadays requires in most countries a thorough economic analysis of the annual projects and programmes. Forestry institutions are no exception. However, in the public arena and international organisations, the records of appropriate cost-benefit of forestry projects are scant. A recent review of the use of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) by the Independent Evaluation Group of the World Bank which spread the use of CBA to justify development projects, shows that the economic analysis of projects has been diminishing compared to their uses in the 70s. For natural resources, and forestry in particular, the presence of recognised positive externalities seems to have diminished the reason to undertake this analysis. In the context of budgeting constraints encountered by many countries following the 2008 financial crisis, the need for a proper analysis of natural resources investments has been made more acute.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2160-6544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2160-6552</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/21606544.2014.990520</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>cost-benefit ; externality ; forests ; investment ; Life Sciences</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental economics and policy, 2015-01, Vol.4 (2), p.125-128</ispartof><rights>2014 Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy Ltd 2014</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-16a27c09739e36ee236636b5607493d0f588231e85eaa43296fb1f4f6ac041393</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4506-5129</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27898,27899</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01536558$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stenger, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harou, Patrice</creatorcontrib><title>Special issue on forest investments profitability</title><title>Journal of environmental economics and policy</title><description>In this special issue, a sample of the papers presented and discussions held are provided. The selected articles are partly presented in the context of the cost-benefit analysis of forests investments. Public budgeting process nowadays requires in most countries a thorough economic analysis of the annual projects and programmes. Forestry institutions are no exception. However, in the public arena and international organisations, the records of appropriate cost-benefit of forestry projects are scant. A recent review of the use of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) by the Independent Evaluation Group of the World Bank which spread the use of CBA to justify development projects, shows that the economic analysis of projects has been diminishing compared to their uses in the 70s. For natural resources, and forestry in particular, the presence of recognised positive externalities seems to have diminished the reason to undertake this analysis. In the context of budgeting constraints encountered by many countries following the 2008 financial crisis, the need for a proper analysis of natural resources investments has been made more acute.</description><subject>cost-benefit</subject><subject>externality</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>investment</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><issn>2160-6544</issn><issn>2160-6552</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJg0f4DD3v1sPW9fHVzklLUCgUP6jm8bhOMbDclWSv99-6y2qPvMo9hZmCGsRuEGUIFdxw1aCXljAPKmTGgOJyxyUCXWil-fvqlvGTTnD-hPw1KVWrC8HXv6kBNEXL-ckVsCx-Ty10R2kMPO9d2udin6ENHm9CE7njNLjw12U1_8Yq9Pz68LVfl-uXpeblYl7Xg2JWoic9rMHNhnNDOcaG10BulYS6N2IJXVcUFuko5Iim40X6DXnpNNUgURlyx2zH3gxq7T2FH6WgjBbtarO3AASrRF6wO2GvlqK1TzDk5fzIg2GEl-7eSHVay40q97X60hbZvvaPvmJqt7ejYxOQTtXXIVvyb8AOmvGuf</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Stenger, Anne</creator><creator>Harou, Patrice</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4506-5129</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Special issue on forest investments profitability</title><author>Stenger, Anne ; Harou, Patrice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-16a27c09739e36ee236636b5607493d0f588231e85eaa43296fb1f4f6ac041393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>cost-benefit</topic><topic>externality</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>investment</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stenger, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harou, Patrice</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental economics and policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stenger, Anne</au><au>Harou, Patrice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Special issue on forest investments profitability</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental economics and policy</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>125-128</pages><issn>2160-6544</issn><eissn>2160-6552</eissn><abstract>In this special issue, a sample of the papers presented and discussions held are provided. The selected articles are partly presented in the context of the cost-benefit analysis of forests investments. Public budgeting process nowadays requires in most countries a thorough economic analysis of the annual projects and programmes. Forestry institutions are no exception. However, in the public arena and international organisations, the records of appropriate cost-benefit of forestry projects are scant. A recent review of the use of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) by the Independent Evaluation Group of the World Bank which spread the use of CBA to justify development projects, shows that the economic analysis of projects has been diminishing compared to their uses in the 70s. For natural resources, and forestry in particular, the presence of recognised positive externalities seems to have diminished the reason to undertake this analysis. In the context of budgeting constraints encountered by many countries following the 2008 financial crisis, the need for a proper analysis of natural resources investments has been made more acute.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/21606544.2014.990520</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4506-5129</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2160-6544
ispartof Journal of environmental economics and policy, 2015-01, Vol.4 (2), p.125-128
issn 2160-6544
2160-6552
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01536558v1
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects cost-benefit
externality
forests
investment
Life Sciences
title Special issue on forest investments profitability
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-04T11%3A53%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Special%20issue%20on%20forest%20investments%20profitability&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20economics%20and%20policy&rft.au=Stenger,%20Anne&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=125-128&rft.issn=2160-6544&rft.eissn=2160-6552&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/21606544.2014.990520&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_01536558v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-16a27c09739e36ee236636b5607493d0f588231e85eaa43296fb1f4f6ac041393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true