Loading…

Antenatal prognostic factor of fetal echogenic bowel

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to identify antenatal prognostic factors of neonatal outcomes in cases of fetal echogenic bowel (FEB). Study design A retrospective study in three tertiary referral centers including fetal echogenic bowel over a 10-year period (from January 2003 to Decemb...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2017-05, Vol.212, p.166-170
Main Authors: Ronin, Candice, Mace, Pierre, Stenard, Fabien, Loundou, Anderson, Capelle, Marianne, Mortier, Isabelle, Pellissier, Marie Christine, Sigaudy, Sabine, Levy, Annie, D’ercole, Claude, Hoffmann, Pascale, Merrot, Thierry, Lopater, Jonathan, De Lagausie, Pascal, Philip, Nicole, Bretelle, Florence
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-9699d44ab86a5cca8e860dc7d81ee81f80074f23bc5ca5436c3eac773378ab903
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-9699d44ab86a5cca8e860dc7d81ee81f80074f23bc5ca5436c3eac773378ab903
container_end_page 170
container_issue
container_start_page 166
container_title European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
container_volume 212
creator Ronin, Candice
Mace, Pierre
Stenard, Fabien
Loundou, Anderson
Capelle, Marianne
Mortier, Isabelle
Pellissier, Marie Christine
Sigaudy, Sabine
Levy, Annie
D’ercole, Claude
Hoffmann, Pascale
Merrot, Thierry
Lopater, Jonathan
De Lagausie, Pascal
Philip, Nicole
Bretelle, Florence
description Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to identify antenatal prognostic factors of neonatal outcomes in cases of fetal echogenic bowel (FEB). Study design A retrospective study in three tertiary referral centers including fetal echogenic bowel over a 10-year period (from January 2003 to December 2013). The echogenicity of the fetal bowel was graded from 1 to 3, according to Slotnick's definition. Associated echographic findings such as bowel dilations, gallbladder abnormalities, calcifications, extra-abdominal abnormalities, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and a decrease in amniotic fluid volume, if present were also recorded. This was followed by the FEB's sonographic evolution. The sonographic evolution was considered favorable if it was stable or decreasing and unfavorable if the echogenicity of the bowel increased or if additional sonographic findings appeared. Neonates had a pediatric examination in the delivery room and upon discharge from the maternity hospital. An outcome was considered good in the case of on-term delivery of a newborn with normal clinical examination and meconium elimination. Results Complete pregnancy outcome data were available for 409 pregnancies. 338 newborns had uneventful outcomes (82.6%). Antenatal exploration diagnosed 4 cases of aneuploidy (1 case of trisomy 13, 1 case of trisomy 18 and 2 cases of triploidies), 16 cases of congenital infections, 9 cases of cystic fibrosis and 11 cases of bowel abnormalities. After a multivariate analysis, we discovered the sonographic grade of the echogenic bowel was not a prognostic factor of neonatal outcome. The isolated fetal echogenic bowel had a 6.6-fold increase chance of uneventful outcomes (adjusted odd ratio (aOR) 6.6, 95% CI 3–14.4). Notably, favorable sonographic evolution (aOR 8.1, 95% CI 4.1–16) and late gestational age at the time of the diagnosis (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07–1.27) are independent, good prognostic factors of good neonatal outcomes. None of the 180 fetuses with isolated fetal echogenic bowel and favorable sonographic evolution had adverse outcomes. Among these, 4 cases (0.98%) of aneuploïdy, 17 cases (4.2%) of congenital infections and 9 cases (2.2%) of cystic fibroses were also diagnosed. No cases of Down syndrome (DS) were reported. Conclusion Our study shows that the grade should not be considered a prognostic factor of neonatal outcomes. Our data suggests the need to reevaluate the concept of systematic amniocentesis. Sonographic evolution of feta
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.060
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01573807v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301211517300726</els_id><sourcerecordid>1886346397</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-9699d44ab86a5cca8e860dc7d81ee81f80074f23bc5ca5436c3eac773378ab903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhDRDaIxwSPLFjOxekVQUUaaUeWs6WM5lsHbJxsbNFffs6SumBC75Y8nwzv_wNY--Bl8BBfR5KGsIhtmXFQZccSq74C7YBo6tCq1q-ZBsuOBQVQH3G3qQ08HyEaF6zs8qIBkBUGyZ300yTm924vYvhMIU0e9z2DucQt6Hf9rSUCG_DgaZcacMfGt-yV70bE717us_Zz29fby4ui_3V9x8Xu32Bsoa5aFTTdFK61ihXIzpDRvEOdWeAyEBvONeyr0SLNbpaCoWCHGothDaubbg4Z5_WubdutHfRH118sMF5e7nb2-WNQ62F4foeMvtxZfM3fp8ozfboE9I4uonCKVkwRgmpRKMzKlcUY0gpUv88G7hd3NrBrm7t4jan2Ow2t314Sji1R-qem_7KzMCXFaDs5N5TtAk9TUidj4Sz7YL_X8K_A3D02bobf9EDpSGc4pR9W7CpstxeL_td1gtaZJWVEo9A_p8r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1886346397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antenatal prognostic factor of fetal echogenic bowel</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ronin, Candice ; Mace, Pierre ; Stenard, Fabien ; Loundou, Anderson ; Capelle, Marianne ; Mortier, Isabelle ; Pellissier, Marie Christine ; Sigaudy, Sabine ; Levy, Annie ; D’ercole, Claude ; Hoffmann, Pascale ; Merrot, Thierry ; Lopater, Jonathan ; De Lagausie, Pascal ; Philip, Nicole ; Bretelle, Florence</creator><creatorcontrib>Ronin, Candice ; Mace, Pierre ; Stenard, Fabien ; Loundou, Anderson ; Capelle, Marianne ; Mortier, Isabelle ; Pellissier, Marie Christine ; Sigaudy, Sabine ; Levy, Annie ; D’ercole, Claude ; Hoffmann, Pascale ; Merrot, Thierry ; Lopater, Jonathan ; De Lagausie, Pascal ; Philip, Nicole ; Bretelle, Florence</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to identify antenatal prognostic factors of neonatal outcomes in cases of fetal echogenic bowel (FEB). Study design A retrospective study in three tertiary referral centers including fetal echogenic bowel over a 10-year period (from January 2003 to December 2013). The echogenicity of the fetal bowel was graded from 1 to 3, according to Slotnick's definition. Associated echographic findings such as bowel dilations, gallbladder abnormalities, calcifications, extra-abdominal abnormalities, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and a decrease in amniotic fluid volume, if present were also recorded. This was followed by the FEB's sonographic evolution. The sonographic evolution was considered favorable if it was stable or decreasing and unfavorable if the echogenicity of the bowel increased or if additional sonographic findings appeared. Neonates had a pediatric examination in the delivery room and upon discharge from the maternity hospital. An outcome was considered good in the case of on-term delivery of a newborn with normal clinical examination and meconium elimination. Results Complete pregnancy outcome data were available for 409 pregnancies. 338 newborns had uneventful outcomes (82.6%). Antenatal exploration diagnosed 4 cases of aneuploidy (1 case of trisomy 13, 1 case of trisomy 18 and 2 cases of triploidies), 16 cases of congenital infections, 9 cases of cystic fibrosis and 11 cases of bowel abnormalities. After a multivariate analysis, we discovered the sonographic grade of the echogenic bowel was not a prognostic factor of neonatal outcome. The isolated fetal echogenic bowel had a 6.6-fold increase chance of uneventful outcomes (adjusted odd ratio (aOR) 6.6, 95% CI 3–14.4). Notably, favorable sonographic evolution (aOR 8.1, 95% CI 4.1–16) and late gestational age at the time of the diagnosis (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07–1.27) are independent, good prognostic factors of good neonatal outcomes. None of the 180 fetuses with isolated fetal echogenic bowel and favorable sonographic evolution had adverse outcomes. Among these, 4 cases (0.98%) of aneuploïdy, 17 cases (4.2%) of congenital infections and 9 cases (2.2%) of cystic fibroses were also diagnosed. No cases of Down syndrome (DS) were reported. Conclusion Our study shows that the grade should not be considered a prognostic factor of neonatal outcomes. Our data suggests the need to reevaluate the concept of systematic amniocentesis. Sonographic evolution of fetal bowel is an independent, strong prognostic factor for good neonatal outcomes. It also better defines the FEB prognostic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2590-1613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.060</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28391132</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Echogenic bowel ; Echogenic Bowel - classification ; Echogenic Bowel - diagnostic imaging ; Echogenic Bowel - mortality ; Female ; Gestational Age ; Human health and pathology ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infectious diseases ; Life Sciences ; Neonatal outcome ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Prognostic factors ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sonographic evolution ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><ispartof>European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2017-05, Vol.212, p.166-170</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-9699d44ab86a5cca8e860dc7d81ee81f80074f23bc5ca5436c3eac773378ab903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-9699d44ab86a5cca8e860dc7d81ee81f80074f23bc5ca5436c3eac773378ab903</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4301-9476</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28391132$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01573807$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ronin, Candice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mace, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenard, Fabien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loundou, Anderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capelle, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortier, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellissier, Marie Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigaudy, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Annie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’ercole, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merrot, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopater, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Lagausie, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philip, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bretelle, Florence</creatorcontrib><title>Antenatal prognostic factor of fetal echogenic bowel</title><title>European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to identify antenatal prognostic factors of neonatal outcomes in cases of fetal echogenic bowel (FEB). Study design A retrospective study in three tertiary referral centers including fetal echogenic bowel over a 10-year period (from January 2003 to December 2013). The echogenicity of the fetal bowel was graded from 1 to 3, according to Slotnick's definition. Associated echographic findings such as bowel dilations, gallbladder abnormalities, calcifications, extra-abdominal abnormalities, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and a decrease in amniotic fluid volume, if present were also recorded. This was followed by the FEB's sonographic evolution. The sonographic evolution was considered favorable if it was stable or decreasing and unfavorable if the echogenicity of the bowel increased or if additional sonographic findings appeared. Neonates had a pediatric examination in the delivery room and upon discharge from the maternity hospital. An outcome was considered good in the case of on-term delivery of a newborn with normal clinical examination and meconium elimination. Results Complete pregnancy outcome data were available for 409 pregnancies. 338 newborns had uneventful outcomes (82.6%). Antenatal exploration diagnosed 4 cases of aneuploidy (1 case of trisomy 13, 1 case of trisomy 18 and 2 cases of triploidies), 16 cases of congenital infections, 9 cases of cystic fibrosis and 11 cases of bowel abnormalities. After a multivariate analysis, we discovered the sonographic grade of the echogenic bowel was not a prognostic factor of neonatal outcome. The isolated fetal echogenic bowel had a 6.6-fold increase chance of uneventful outcomes (adjusted odd ratio (aOR) 6.6, 95% CI 3–14.4). Notably, favorable sonographic evolution (aOR 8.1, 95% CI 4.1–16) and late gestational age at the time of the diagnosis (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07–1.27) are independent, good prognostic factors of good neonatal outcomes. None of the 180 fetuses with isolated fetal echogenic bowel and favorable sonographic evolution had adverse outcomes. Among these, 4 cases (0.98%) of aneuploïdy, 17 cases (4.2%) of congenital infections and 9 cases (2.2%) of cystic fibroses were also diagnosed. No cases of Down syndrome (DS) were reported. Conclusion Our study shows that the grade should not be considered a prognostic factor of neonatal outcomes. Our data suggests the need to reevaluate the concept of systematic amniocentesis. Sonographic evolution of fetal bowel is an independent, strong prognostic factor for good neonatal outcomes. It also better defines the FEB prognostic.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Echogenic bowel</subject><subject>Echogenic Bowel - classification</subject><subject>Echogenic Bowel - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Echogenic Bowel - mortality</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Neonatal outcome</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Prognostic factors</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sonographic evolution</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><issn>2590-1613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhDRDaIxwSPLFjOxekVQUUaaUeWs6WM5lsHbJxsbNFffs6SumBC75Y8nwzv_wNY--Bl8BBfR5KGsIhtmXFQZccSq74C7YBo6tCq1q-ZBsuOBQVQH3G3qQ08HyEaF6zs8qIBkBUGyZ300yTm924vYvhMIU0e9z2DucQt6Hf9rSUCG_DgaZcacMfGt-yV70bE717us_Zz29fby4ui_3V9x8Xu32Bsoa5aFTTdFK61ihXIzpDRvEOdWeAyEBvONeyr0SLNbpaCoWCHGothDaubbg4Z5_WubdutHfRH118sMF5e7nb2-WNQ62F4foeMvtxZfM3fp8ozfboE9I4uonCKVkwRgmpRKMzKlcUY0gpUv88G7hd3NrBrm7t4jan2Ow2t314Sji1R-qem_7KzMCXFaDs5N5TtAk9TUidj4Sz7YL_X8K_A3D02bobf9EDpSGc4pR9W7CpstxeL_td1gtaZJWVEo9A_p8r</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Ronin, Candice</creator><creator>Mace, Pierre</creator><creator>Stenard, Fabien</creator><creator>Loundou, Anderson</creator><creator>Capelle, Marianne</creator><creator>Mortier, Isabelle</creator><creator>Pellissier, Marie Christine</creator><creator>Sigaudy, Sabine</creator><creator>Levy, Annie</creator><creator>D’ercole, Claude</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Pascale</creator><creator>Merrot, Thierry</creator><creator>Lopater, Jonathan</creator><creator>De Lagausie, Pascal</creator><creator>Philip, Nicole</creator><creator>Bretelle, Florence</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4301-9476</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Antenatal prognostic factor of fetal echogenic bowel</title><author>Ronin, Candice ; Mace, Pierre ; Stenard, Fabien ; Loundou, Anderson ; Capelle, Marianne ; Mortier, Isabelle ; Pellissier, Marie Christine ; Sigaudy, Sabine ; Levy, Annie ; D’ercole, Claude ; Hoffmann, Pascale ; Merrot, Thierry ; Lopater, Jonathan ; De Lagausie, Pascal ; Philip, Nicole ; Bretelle, Florence</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-9699d44ab86a5cca8e860dc7d81ee81f80074f23bc5ca5436c3eac773378ab903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Echogenic bowel</topic><topic>Echogenic Bowel - classification</topic><topic>Echogenic Bowel - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Echogenic Bowel - mortality</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Neonatal outcome</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Prognostic factors</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sonographic evolution</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ronin, Candice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mace, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenard, Fabien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loundou, Anderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capelle, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortier, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellissier, Marie Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigaudy, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Annie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’ercole, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merrot, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopater, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Lagausie, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philip, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bretelle, Florence</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ronin, Candice</au><au>Mace, Pierre</au><au>Stenard, Fabien</au><au>Loundou, Anderson</au><au>Capelle, Marianne</au><au>Mortier, Isabelle</au><au>Pellissier, Marie Christine</au><au>Sigaudy, Sabine</au><au>Levy, Annie</au><au>D’ercole, Claude</au><au>Hoffmann, Pascale</au><au>Merrot, Thierry</au><au>Lopater, Jonathan</au><au>De Lagausie, Pascal</au><au>Philip, Nicole</au><au>Bretelle, Florence</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antenatal prognostic factor of fetal echogenic bowel</atitle><jtitle>European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>212</volume><spage>166</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>166-170</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><eissn>2590-1613</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to identify antenatal prognostic factors of neonatal outcomes in cases of fetal echogenic bowel (FEB). Study design A retrospective study in three tertiary referral centers including fetal echogenic bowel over a 10-year period (from January 2003 to December 2013). The echogenicity of the fetal bowel was graded from 1 to 3, according to Slotnick's definition. Associated echographic findings such as bowel dilations, gallbladder abnormalities, calcifications, extra-abdominal abnormalities, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and a decrease in amniotic fluid volume, if present were also recorded. This was followed by the FEB's sonographic evolution. The sonographic evolution was considered favorable if it was stable or decreasing and unfavorable if the echogenicity of the bowel increased or if additional sonographic findings appeared. Neonates had a pediatric examination in the delivery room and upon discharge from the maternity hospital. An outcome was considered good in the case of on-term delivery of a newborn with normal clinical examination and meconium elimination. Results Complete pregnancy outcome data were available for 409 pregnancies. 338 newborns had uneventful outcomes (82.6%). Antenatal exploration diagnosed 4 cases of aneuploidy (1 case of trisomy 13, 1 case of trisomy 18 and 2 cases of triploidies), 16 cases of congenital infections, 9 cases of cystic fibrosis and 11 cases of bowel abnormalities. After a multivariate analysis, we discovered the sonographic grade of the echogenic bowel was not a prognostic factor of neonatal outcome. The isolated fetal echogenic bowel had a 6.6-fold increase chance of uneventful outcomes (adjusted odd ratio (aOR) 6.6, 95% CI 3–14.4). Notably, favorable sonographic evolution (aOR 8.1, 95% CI 4.1–16) and late gestational age at the time of the diagnosis (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07–1.27) are independent, good prognostic factors of good neonatal outcomes. None of the 180 fetuses with isolated fetal echogenic bowel and favorable sonographic evolution had adverse outcomes. Among these, 4 cases (0.98%) of aneuploïdy, 17 cases (4.2%) of congenital infections and 9 cases (2.2%) of cystic fibroses were also diagnosed. No cases of Down syndrome (DS) were reported. Conclusion Our study shows that the grade should not be considered a prognostic factor of neonatal outcomes. Our data suggests the need to reevaluate the concept of systematic amniocentesis. Sonographic evolution of fetal bowel is an independent, strong prognostic factor for good neonatal outcomes. It also better defines the FEB prognostic.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28391132</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.060</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4301-9476</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-2115
ispartof European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2017-05, Vol.212, p.166-170
issn 0301-2115
1872-7654
2590-1613
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01573807v1
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Echogenic bowel
Echogenic Bowel - classification
Echogenic Bowel - diagnostic imaging
Echogenic Bowel - mortality
Female
Gestational Age
Human health and pathology
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infectious diseases
Life Sciences
Neonatal outcome
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Prognostic factors
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Sonographic evolution
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
title Antenatal prognostic factor of fetal echogenic bowel
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A33%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antenatal%20prognostic%20factor%20of%20fetal%20echogenic%20bowel&rft.jtitle=European%20Journal%20of%20Obstetrics%20&%20Gynecology%20and%20Reproductive%20Biology&rft.au=Ronin,%20Candice&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=212&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=166-170&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1886346397%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-9699d44ab86a5cca8e860dc7d81ee81f80074f23bc5ca5436c3eac773378ab903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1886346397&rft_id=info:pmid/28391132&rfr_iscdi=true