Loading…
Minimum-variance control of astronomical adaptive optic systems with actuator dynamics under synchronous and asynchronous sampling
Adaptive optic (AO) systems are now routinely used in ground‐based telescopes to counter the effects of atmospheric turbulence. A deformable mirror (DM) generates a correction wavefront, which is subtracted from the turbulent wavefront using measurements of the residual phase provided by a wavefront...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of robust and nonlinear control 2011-05, Vol.21 (7), p.768-789 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3695-21b4718101a3ff1905d284b623e35eb6bdc2e6a192fe9c9fae89e7b5af5655993 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3695-21b4718101a3ff1905d284b623e35eb6bdc2e6a192fe9c9fae89e7b5af5655993 |
container_end_page | 789 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 768 |
container_title | International journal of robust and nonlinear control |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Raynaud, H.-F. Correia, C. Kulcsár, C. Conan, J.-M. |
description | Adaptive optic (AO) systems are now routinely used in ground‐based telescopes to counter the effects of atmospheric turbulence. A deformable mirror (DM) generates a correction wavefront, which is subtracted from the turbulent wavefront using measurements of the residual phase provided by a wavefront sensor (WFS). Minimizing the variance of the residual phase defines a sampled data control problem combining a continuous time minimum‐variance (MV) performance criterion with a discrete‐time controller. For a fairly general class of linear time‐invariant DM and turbulence WFS models, this control problem can be transformed into an equivalent discrete‐time LQ optimization problem involving a set of (discrete‐time) control‐sufficient statistics of the incoming continuous‐time turbulence. This paper shows how to constructively solve this MV problem in the presence of DM's dynamics, starting from continuous‐time models of DM and turbulence. This result is extended to the case of asynchronous DM/WFS sampling. An illustrative application to optimal control of tip‐tilt turbulent modes for the European extremely large telescope in the presence of first‐order DM's dynamics is presented. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rnc.1625 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01590239v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>901656382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3695-21b4718101a3ff1905d284b623e35eb6bdc2e6a192fe9c9fae89e7b5af5655993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10Utr3DAQB3BTUsijhXwE3dIenOix0nqOYWkesJtCSUnpRYxluavUlraSvcle-8kjsyW0h55mGP34I2aK4pTRc0Ypv4jenDPF5ZviiFGAknEBB1M_g7ICLg6L45QeKc1vfHZU_F457_qxL7cYHXpjiQl-iKEjoSWYcudD7wx2BBvcDG5rScjFkLRLg-0TeXLDmqAZRhxCJM3OY-aJjL6xMSNv1lPEmAj6Jgf-NUjYbzrnf7wr3rbYJfv-Tz0pvl59ul_clMvP17eLy2VphAJZclbP5qxilKFoWwZUNrya1YoLK6StVd0YbhUy4K0FAy3aCuy8lthKJSWAOCk-7nPX2OlNdD3GnQ7o9M3lUk8zyiTQvK4ty_Zsbzcx_BptGnTvkrFdh97mv2ugTEklKp7lh700MaQUbfsazaieLqLzRfR0kUzLPX1ynd391-kvd4t_vcurfn71GH9qNRdzqR_urvV3gNX96mGpv4kXRc2fOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>901656382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimum-variance control of astronomical adaptive optic systems with actuator dynamics under synchronous and asynchronous sampling</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Raynaud, H.-F. ; Correia, C. ; Kulcsár, C. ; Conan, J.-M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Raynaud, H.-F. ; Correia, C. ; Kulcsár, C. ; Conan, J.-M.</creatorcontrib><description>Adaptive optic (AO) systems are now routinely used in ground‐based telescopes to counter the effects of atmospheric turbulence. A deformable mirror (DM) generates a correction wavefront, which is subtracted from the turbulent wavefront using measurements of the residual phase provided by a wavefront sensor (WFS). Minimizing the variance of the residual phase defines a sampled data control problem combining a continuous time minimum‐variance (MV) performance criterion with a discrete‐time controller. For a fairly general class of linear time‐invariant DM and turbulence WFS models, this control problem can be transformed into an equivalent discrete‐time LQ optimization problem involving a set of (discrete‐time) control‐sufficient statistics of the incoming continuous‐time turbulence. This paper shows how to constructively solve this MV problem in the presence of DM's dynamics, starting from continuous‐time models of DM and turbulence. This result is extended to the case of asynchronous DM/WFS sampling. An illustrative application to optimal control of tip‐tilt turbulent modes for the European extremely large telescope in the presence of first‐order DM's dynamics is presented. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-8923</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1099-1239</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1239</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rnc.1625</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptive optics ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Dynamical systems ; Fluid flow ; LQG control ; minimum-variance control ; Nonlinear dynamics ; Optics ; optimal control ; Physics ; sampled data systems ; Turbulence ; Turbulent flow ; Wave fronts</subject><ispartof>International journal of robust and nonlinear control, 2011-05, Vol.21 (7), p.768-789</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3695-21b4718101a3ff1905d284b623e35eb6bdc2e6a192fe9c9fae89e7b5af5655993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3695-21b4718101a3ff1905d284b623e35eb6bdc2e6a192fe9c9fae89e7b5af5655993</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2840-2111</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01590239$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raynaud, H.-F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulcsár, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conan, J.-M.</creatorcontrib><title>Minimum-variance control of astronomical adaptive optic systems with actuator dynamics under synchronous and asynchronous sampling</title><title>International journal of robust and nonlinear control</title><addtitle>Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control</addtitle><description>Adaptive optic (AO) systems are now routinely used in ground‐based telescopes to counter the effects of atmospheric turbulence. A deformable mirror (DM) generates a correction wavefront, which is subtracted from the turbulent wavefront using measurements of the residual phase provided by a wavefront sensor (WFS). Minimizing the variance of the residual phase defines a sampled data control problem combining a continuous time minimum‐variance (MV) performance criterion with a discrete‐time controller. For a fairly general class of linear time‐invariant DM and turbulence WFS models, this control problem can be transformed into an equivalent discrete‐time LQ optimization problem involving a set of (discrete‐time) control‐sufficient statistics of the incoming continuous‐time turbulence. This paper shows how to constructively solve this MV problem in the presence of DM's dynamics, starting from continuous‐time models of DM and turbulence. This result is extended to the case of asynchronous DM/WFS sampling. An illustrative application to optimal control of tip‐tilt turbulent modes for the European extremely large telescope in the presence of first‐order DM's dynamics is presented. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Adaptive optics</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>LQG control</subject><subject>minimum-variance control</subject><subject>Nonlinear dynamics</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>optimal control</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>sampled data systems</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Turbulent flow</subject><subject>Wave fronts</subject><issn>1049-8923</issn><issn>1099-1239</issn><issn>1099-1239</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10Utr3DAQB3BTUsijhXwE3dIenOix0nqOYWkesJtCSUnpRYxluavUlraSvcle-8kjsyW0h55mGP34I2aK4pTRc0Ypv4jenDPF5ZviiFGAknEBB1M_g7ICLg6L45QeKc1vfHZU_F457_qxL7cYHXpjiQl-iKEjoSWYcudD7wx2BBvcDG5rScjFkLRLg-0TeXLDmqAZRhxCJM3OY-aJjL6xMSNv1lPEmAj6Jgf-NUjYbzrnf7wr3rbYJfv-Tz0pvl59ul_clMvP17eLy2VphAJZclbP5qxilKFoWwZUNrya1YoLK6StVd0YbhUy4K0FAy3aCuy8lthKJSWAOCk-7nPX2OlNdD3GnQ7o9M3lUk8zyiTQvK4ty_Zsbzcx_BptGnTvkrFdh97mv2ugTEklKp7lh700MaQUbfsazaieLqLzRfR0kUzLPX1ynd391-kvd4t_vcurfn71GH9qNRdzqR_urvV3gNX96mGpv4kXRc2fOQ</recordid><startdate>20110510</startdate><enddate>20110510</enddate><creator>Raynaud, H.-F.</creator><creator>Correia, C.</creator><creator>Kulcsár, C.</creator><creator>Conan, J.-M.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2840-2111</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20110510</creationdate><title>Minimum-variance control of astronomical adaptive optic systems with actuator dynamics under synchronous and asynchronous sampling</title><author>Raynaud, H.-F. ; Correia, C. ; Kulcsár, C. ; Conan, J.-M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3695-21b4718101a3ff1905d284b623e35eb6bdc2e6a192fe9c9fae89e7b5af5655993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adaptive optics</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>LQG control</topic><topic>minimum-variance control</topic><topic>Nonlinear dynamics</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>optimal control</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>sampled data systems</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Turbulent flow</topic><topic>Wave fronts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raynaud, H.-F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulcsár, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conan, J.-M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>International journal of robust and nonlinear control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raynaud, H.-F.</au><au>Correia, C.</au><au>Kulcsár, C.</au><au>Conan, J.-M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimum-variance control of astronomical adaptive optic systems with actuator dynamics under synchronous and asynchronous sampling</atitle><jtitle>International journal of robust and nonlinear control</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control</addtitle><date>2011-05-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>768</spage><epage>789</epage><pages>768-789</pages><issn>1049-8923</issn><issn>1099-1239</issn><eissn>1099-1239</eissn><abstract>Adaptive optic (AO) systems are now routinely used in ground‐based telescopes to counter the effects of atmospheric turbulence. A deformable mirror (DM) generates a correction wavefront, which is subtracted from the turbulent wavefront using measurements of the residual phase provided by a wavefront sensor (WFS). Minimizing the variance of the residual phase defines a sampled data control problem combining a continuous time minimum‐variance (MV) performance criterion with a discrete‐time controller. For a fairly general class of linear time‐invariant DM and turbulence WFS models, this control problem can be transformed into an equivalent discrete‐time LQ optimization problem involving a set of (discrete‐time) control‐sufficient statistics of the incoming continuous‐time turbulence. This paper shows how to constructively solve this MV problem in the presence of DM's dynamics, starting from continuous‐time models of DM and turbulence. This result is extended to the case of asynchronous DM/WFS sampling. An illustrative application to optimal control of tip‐tilt turbulent modes for the European extremely large telescope in the presence of first‐order DM's dynamics is presented. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/rnc.1625</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2840-2111</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-8923 |
ispartof | International journal of robust and nonlinear control, 2011-05, Vol.21 (7), p.768-789 |
issn | 1049-8923 1099-1239 1099-1239 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01590239v1 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Adaptive optics Computational fluid dynamics Dynamical systems Fluid flow LQG control minimum-variance control Nonlinear dynamics Optics optimal control Physics sampled data systems Turbulence Turbulent flow Wave fronts |
title | Minimum-variance control of astronomical adaptive optic systems with actuator dynamics under synchronous and asynchronous sampling |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A29%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimum-variance%20control%20of%20astronomical%20adaptive%20optic%20systems%20with%20actuator%20dynamics%20under%20synchronous%20and%20asynchronous%20sampling&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20robust%20and%20nonlinear%20control&rft.au=Raynaud,%20H.-F.&rft.date=2011-05-10&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=768&rft.epage=789&rft.pages=768-789&rft.issn=1049-8923&rft.eissn=1099-1239&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rnc.1625&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E901656382%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3695-21b4718101a3ff1905d284b623e35eb6bdc2e6a192fe9c9fae89e7b5af5655993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=901656382&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |