Loading…
When do fearful faces override inhibition of return?
Inhibition of return (IOR) occurs when more than about 300ms elapses between the cue and the target in atypical peripheral cueing task: reaction times (RTs) become longer when the cue and target locations are the same versus different. IOR could serve the adaptive role of optimizing visual search by...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta psychologica 2016-01, Vol.163, p.124-134 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b28fdaf1477d12f39f1d87e5a37ab54b59539646fdb476303d5674072296eb163 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b28fdaf1477d12f39f1d87e5a37ab54b59539646fdb476303d5674072296eb163 |
container_end_page | 134 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 124 |
container_title | Acta psychologica |
container_volume | 163 |
creator | Silvert, Laetitia Funes, María J. |
description | Inhibition of return (IOR) occurs when more than about 300ms elapses between the cue and the target in atypical peripheral cueing task: reaction times (RTs) become longer when the cue and target locations are the same versus different. IOR could serve the adaptive role of optimizing visual search by discouraging the re-inspection of previously attended locations. As such, IOR should not reduce our chances of noticing relevant event information and emotional stimuli, in particular. However, previous studies have led to inconsistent results. The present study offers a systematic investigation of the conditions under which target fearful faces can modulate either the magnitude or the time course of the IOR effect. Notably, we manipulated the depth of facial processing required to perform the task and/or the task relevance of the facial expressions. When participants localized target faces (Experiment 1) or discriminated them from non-face stimuli (Experiment 2), their emotional expression had no impact on IOR whatsoever. However, IOR occurred later for fearful versus neutral faces when the participants performed emotion (Experiment 3) or gender (Experiment 4) discrimination tasks. These findings are discussed with regard to the mechanisms responsible for IOR and to the processing of emotional facial expressions.
•Neutral and fearful target faces were presented in exogenous spatial cueing tasks.•Fear had no impact on IOR in localization and face/non-face discrimination tasks.•IOR was delayed for fearful faces in emotion and gender discrimination tasks.•The impact of fear on IOR depends on the depth of facial processing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.002 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01643428v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001691815300743</els_id><sourcerecordid>1752353083</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b28fdaf1477d12f39f1d87e5a37ab54b59539646fdb476303d5674072296eb163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpSTZp_kEpPjYHOxpJluxLQgj5goVeWnoUsjVitXitrWQv5N9Hi5MccxpmeN534CHkB9AKKMirbWX6aZ9eKkahrgAqStkXsoJG8VKyVn0lK0oplLKF5pScpbTNq4AWTsgpk1IwxtSKiH8bHAsbCocmunkonOkxFeGAMXqLhR83vvOTD2MRXBFxmuN48518c2ZIePE2z8nfh_s_d0_l-vfj893tuux5K6eyY42zxoFQygJzvHVgG4W14cp0tejqts6ckM52QklOua2lElQx1krsQPJzcrn0bsyg99HvTHzRwXj9dLvWx1v2ILhgzQEy-2th9zH8nzFNeudTj8NgRgxz0qBqxmtOG55RsaB9DClFdB_dQPXRrd7qxa0-utUAOrvNsZ9vH-Zuh_Yj9C4zA9cLgNnJwWPUqfc49mh9xH7SNvjPP7wCHjmJmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1752353083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When do fearful faces override inhibition of return?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Silvert, Laetitia ; Funes, María J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Silvert, Laetitia ; Funes, María J.</creatorcontrib><description>Inhibition of return (IOR) occurs when more than about 300ms elapses between the cue and the target in atypical peripheral cueing task: reaction times (RTs) become longer when the cue and target locations are the same versus different. IOR could serve the adaptive role of optimizing visual search by discouraging the re-inspection of previously attended locations. As such, IOR should not reduce our chances of noticing relevant event information and emotional stimuli, in particular. However, previous studies have led to inconsistent results. The present study offers a systematic investigation of the conditions under which target fearful faces can modulate either the magnitude or the time course of the IOR effect. Notably, we manipulated the depth of facial processing required to perform the task and/or the task relevance of the facial expressions. When participants localized target faces (Experiment 1) or discriminated them from non-face stimuli (Experiment 2), their emotional expression had no impact on IOR whatsoever. However, IOR occurred later for fearful versus neutral faces when the participants performed emotion (Experiment 3) or gender (Experiment 4) discrimination tasks. These findings are discussed with regard to the mechanisms responsible for IOR and to the processing of emotional facial expressions.
•Neutral and fearful target faces were presented in exogenous spatial cueing tasks.•Fear had no impact on IOR in localization and face/non-face discrimination tasks.•IOR was delayed for fearful faces in emotion and gender discrimination tasks.•The impact of fear on IOR depends on the depth of facial processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26642227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Cognitive science ; Cues ; Emotion ; Facial Expression ; Facial Recognition - physiology ; Fear - physiology ; Fearful faces ; Female ; Humans ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Inhibition of return ; Male ; Psychology ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Visual orienting ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Acta psychologica, 2016-01, Vol.163, p.124-134</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b28fdaf1477d12f39f1d87e5a37ab54b59539646fdb476303d5674072296eb163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b28fdaf1477d12f39f1d87e5a37ab54b59539646fdb476303d5674072296eb163</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6414-7739</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691815300743$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27901,27902,45756</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26642227$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01643428$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silvert, Laetitia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funes, María J.</creatorcontrib><title>When do fearful faces override inhibition of return?</title><title>Acta psychologica</title><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><description>Inhibition of return (IOR) occurs when more than about 300ms elapses between the cue and the target in atypical peripheral cueing task: reaction times (RTs) become longer when the cue and target locations are the same versus different. IOR could serve the adaptive role of optimizing visual search by discouraging the re-inspection of previously attended locations. As such, IOR should not reduce our chances of noticing relevant event information and emotional stimuli, in particular. However, previous studies have led to inconsistent results. The present study offers a systematic investigation of the conditions under which target fearful faces can modulate either the magnitude or the time course of the IOR effect. Notably, we manipulated the depth of facial processing required to perform the task and/or the task relevance of the facial expressions. When participants localized target faces (Experiment 1) or discriminated them from non-face stimuli (Experiment 2), their emotional expression had no impact on IOR whatsoever. However, IOR occurred later for fearful versus neutral faces when the participants performed emotion (Experiment 3) or gender (Experiment 4) discrimination tasks. These findings are discussed with regard to the mechanisms responsible for IOR and to the processing of emotional facial expressions.
•Neutral and fearful target faces were presented in exogenous spatial cueing tasks.•Fear had no impact on IOR in localization and face/non-face discrimination tasks.•IOR was delayed for fearful faces in emotion and gender discrimination tasks.•The impact of fear on IOR depends on the depth of facial processing.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Emotion</subject><subject>Facial Expression</subject><subject>Facial Recognition - physiology</subject><subject>Fear - physiology</subject><subject>Fearful faces</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Inhibition of return</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Visual orienting</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-6918</issn><issn>1873-6297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpSTZp_kEpPjYHOxpJluxLQgj5goVeWnoUsjVitXitrWQv5N9Hi5MccxpmeN534CHkB9AKKMirbWX6aZ9eKkahrgAqStkXsoJG8VKyVn0lK0oplLKF5pScpbTNq4AWTsgpk1IwxtSKiH8bHAsbCocmunkonOkxFeGAMXqLhR83vvOTD2MRXBFxmuN48518c2ZIePE2z8nfh_s_d0_l-vfj893tuux5K6eyY42zxoFQygJzvHVgG4W14cp0tejqts6ckM52QklOua2lElQx1krsQPJzcrn0bsyg99HvTHzRwXj9dLvWx1v2ILhgzQEy-2th9zH8nzFNeudTj8NgRgxz0qBqxmtOG55RsaB9DClFdB_dQPXRrd7qxa0-utUAOrvNsZ9vH-Zuh_Yj9C4zA9cLgNnJwWPUqfc49mh9xH7SNvjPP7wCHjmJmw</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Silvert, Laetitia</creator><creator>Funes, María J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6414-7739</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>When do fearful faces override inhibition of return?</title><author>Silvert, Laetitia ; Funes, María J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b28fdaf1477d12f39f1d87e5a37ab54b59539646fdb476303d5674072296eb163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Emotion</topic><topic>Facial Expression</topic><topic>Facial Recognition - physiology</topic><topic>Fear - physiology</topic><topic>Fearful faces</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Inhibition of return</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Visual orienting</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silvert, Laetitia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funes, María J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silvert, Laetitia</au><au>Funes, María J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When do fearful faces override inhibition of return?</atitle><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>163</volume><spage>124</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>124-134</pages><issn>0001-6918</issn><eissn>1873-6297</eissn><abstract>Inhibition of return (IOR) occurs when more than about 300ms elapses between the cue and the target in atypical peripheral cueing task: reaction times (RTs) become longer when the cue and target locations are the same versus different. IOR could serve the adaptive role of optimizing visual search by discouraging the re-inspection of previously attended locations. As such, IOR should not reduce our chances of noticing relevant event information and emotional stimuli, in particular. However, previous studies have led to inconsistent results. The present study offers a systematic investigation of the conditions under which target fearful faces can modulate either the magnitude or the time course of the IOR effect. Notably, we manipulated the depth of facial processing required to perform the task and/or the task relevance of the facial expressions. When participants localized target faces (Experiment 1) or discriminated them from non-face stimuli (Experiment 2), their emotional expression had no impact on IOR whatsoever. However, IOR occurred later for fearful versus neutral faces when the participants performed emotion (Experiment 3) or gender (Experiment 4) discrimination tasks. These findings are discussed with regard to the mechanisms responsible for IOR and to the processing of emotional facial expressions.
•Neutral and fearful target faces were presented in exogenous spatial cueing tasks.•Fear had no impact on IOR in localization and face/non-face discrimination tasks.•IOR was delayed for fearful faces in emotion and gender discrimination tasks.•The impact of fear on IOR depends on the depth of facial processing.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>26642227</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.002</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6414-7739</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-6918 |
ispartof | Acta psychologica, 2016-01, Vol.163, p.124-134 |
issn | 0001-6918 1873-6297 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01643428v1 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals; Elsevier |
subjects | Adult Attention Attention - physiology Cognitive science Cues Emotion Facial Expression Facial Recognition - physiology Fear - physiology Fearful faces Female Humans Inhibition (Psychology) Inhibition of return Male Psychology Psychomotor Performance - physiology Visual orienting Visual Perception - physiology Young Adult |
title | When do fearful faces override inhibition of return? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T13%3A51%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20do%20fearful%20faces%20override%20inhibition%20of%20return?&rft.jtitle=Acta%20psychologica&rft.au=Silvert,%20Laetitia&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=163&rft.spage=124&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=124-134&rft.issn=0001-6918&rft.eissn=1873-6297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1752353083%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b28fdaf1477d12f39f1d87e5a37ab54b59539646fdb476303d5674072296eb163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1752353083&rft_id=info:pmid/26642227&rfr_iscdi=true |