Loading…

When do fearful faces override inhibition of return?

Inhibition of return (IOR) occurs when more than about 300ms elapses between the cue and the target in atypical peripheral cueing task: reaction times (RTs) become longer when the cue and target locations are the same versus different. IOR could serve the adaptive role of optimizing visual search by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta psychologica 2016-01, Vol.163, p.124-134
Main Authors: Silvert, Laetitia, Funes, María J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b28fdaf1477d12f39f1d87e5a37ab54b59539646fdb476303d5674072296eb163
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b28fdaf1477d12f39f1d87e5a37ab54b59539646fdb476303d5674072296eb163
container_end_page 134
container_issue
container_start_page 124
container_title Acta psychologica
container_volume 163
creator Silvert, Laetitia
Funes, María J.
description Inhibition of return (IOR) occurs when more than about 300ms elapses between the cue and the target in atypical peripheral cueing task: reaction times (RTs) become longer when the cue and target locations are the same versus different. IOR could serve the adaptive role of optimizing visual search by discouraging the re-inspection of previously attended locations. As such, IOR should not reduce our chances of noticing relevant event information and emotional stimuli, in particular. However, previous studies have led to inconsistent results. The present study offers a systematic investigation of the conditions under which target fearful faces can modulate either the magnitude or the time course of the IOR effect. Notably, we manipulated the depth of facial processing required to perform the task and/or the task relevance of the facial expressions. When participants localized target faces (Experiment 1) or discriminated them from non-face stimuli (Experiment 2), their emotional expression had no impact on IOR whatsoever. However, IOR occurred later for fearful versus neutral faces when the participants performed emotion (Experiment 3) or gender (Experiment 4) discrimination tasks. These findings are discussed with regard to the mechanisms responsible for IOR and to the processing of emotional facial expressions. •Neutral and fearful target faces were presented in exogenous spatial cueing tasks.•Fear had no impact on IOR in localization and face/non-face discrimination tasks.•IOR was delayed for fearful faces in emotion and gender discrimination tasks.•The impact of fear on IOR depends on the depth of facial processing.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01643428v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001691815300743</els_id><sourcerecordid>1752353083</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b28fdaf1477d12f39f1d87e5a37ab54b59539646fdb476303d5674072296eb163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpSTZp_kEpPjYHOxpJluxLQgj5goVeWnoUsjVitXitrWQv5N9Hi5MccxpmeN534CHkB9AKKMirbWX6aZ9eKkahrgAqStkXsoJG8VKyVn0lK0oplLKF5pScpbTNq4AWTsgpk1IwxtSKiH8bHAsbCocmunkonOkxFeGAMXqLhR83vvOTD2MRXBFxmuN48518c2ZIePE2z8nfh_s_d0_l-vfj893tuux5K6eyY42zxoFQygJzvHVgG4W14cp0tejqts6ckM52QklOua2lElQx1krsQPJzcrn0bsyg99HvTHzRwXj9dLvWx1v2ILhgzQEy-2th9zH8nzFNeudTj8NgRgxz0qBqxmtOG55RsaB9DClFdB_dQPXRrd7qxa0-utUAOrvNsZ9vH-Zuh_Yj9C4zA9cLgNnJwWPUqfc49mh9xH7SNvjPP7wCHjmJmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1752353083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When do fearful faces override inhibition of return?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Silvert, Laetitia ; Funes, María J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Silvert, Laetitia ; Funes, María J.</creatorcontrib><description>Inhibition of return (IOR) occurs when more than about 300ms elapses between the cue and the target in atypical peripheral cueing task: reaction times (RTs) become longer when the cue and target locations are the same versus different. IOR could serve the adaptive role of optimizing visual search by discouraging the re-inspection of previously attended locations. As such, IOR should not reduce our chances of noticing relevant event information and emotional stimuli, in particular. However, previous studies have led to inconsistent results. The present study offers a systematic investigation of the conditions under which target fearful faces can modulate either the magnitude or the time course of the IOR effect. Notably, we manipulated the depth of facial processing required to perform the task and/or the task relevance of the facial expressions. When participants localized target faces (Experiment 1) or discriminated them from non-face stimuli (Experiment 2), their emotional expression had no impact on IOR whatsoever. However, IOR occurred later for fearful versus neutral faces when the participants performed emotion (Experiment 3) or gender (Experiment 4) discrimination tasks. These findings are discussed with regard to the mechanisms responsible for IOR and to the processing of emotional facial expressions. •Neutral and fearful target faces were presented in exogenous spatial cueing tasks.•Fear had no impact on IOR in localization and face/non-face discrimination tasks.•IOR was delayed for fearful faces in emotion and gender discrimination tasks.•The impact of fear on IOR depends on the depth of facial processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26642227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Cognitive science ; Cues ; Emotion ; Facial Expression ; Facial Recognition - physiology ; Fear - physiology ; Fearful faces ; Female ; Humans ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Inhibition of return ; Male ; Psychology ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Visual orienting ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Acta psychologica, 2016-01, Vol.163, p.124-134</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b28fdaf1477d12f39f1d87e5a37ab54b59539646fdb476303d5674072296eb163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b28fdaf1477d12f39f1d87e5a37ab54b59539646fdb476303d5674072296eb163</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6414-7739</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691815300743$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27901,27902,45756</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26642227$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01643428$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silvert, Laetitia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funes, María J.</creatorcontrib><title>When do fearful faces override inhibition of return?</title><title>Acta psychologica</title><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><description>Inhibition of return (IOR) occurs when more than about 300ms elapses between the cue and the target in atypical peripheral cueing task: reaction times (RTs) become longer when the cue and target locations are the same versus different. IOR could serve the adaptive role of optimizing visual search by discouraging the re-inspection of previously attended locations. As such, IOR should not reduce our chances of noticing relevant event information and emotional stimuli, in particular. However, previous studies have led to inconsistent results. The present study offers a systematic investigation of the conditions under which target fearful faces can modulate either the magnitude or the time course of the IOR effect. Notably, we manipulated the depth of facial processing required to perform the task and/or the task relevance of the facial expressions. When participants localized target faces (Experiment 1) or discriminated them from non-face stimuli (Experiment 2), their emotional expression had no impact on IOR whatsoever. However, IOR occurred later for fearful versus neutral faces when the participants performed emotion (Experiment 3) or gender (Experiment 4) discrimination tasks. These findings are discussed with regard to the mechanisms responsible for IOR and to the processing of emotional facial expressions. •Neutral and fearful target faces were presented in exogenous spatial cueing tasks.•Fear had no impact on IOR in localization and face/non-face discrimination tasks.•IOR was delayed for fearful faces in emotion and gender discrimination tasks.•The impact of fear on IOR depends on the depth of facial processing.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Emotion</subject><subject>Facial Expression</subject><subject>Facial Recognition - physiology</subject><subject>Fear - physiology</subject><subject>Fearful faces</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Inhibition of return</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Visual orienting</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-6918</issn><issn>1873-6297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpSTZp_kEpPjYHOxpJluxLQgj5goVeWnoUsjVitXitrWQv5N9Hi5MccxpmeN534CHkB9AKKMirbWX6aZ9eKkahrgAqStkXsoJG8VKyVn0lK0oplLKF5pScpbTNq4AWTsgpk1IwxtSKiH8bHAsbCocmunkonOkxFeGAMXqLhR83vvOTD2MRXBFxmuN48518c2ZIePE2z8nfh_s_d0_l-vfj893tuux5K6eyY42zxoFQygJzvHVgG4W14cp0tejqts6ckM52QklOua2lElQx1krsQPJzcrn0bsyg99HvTHzRwXj9dLvWx1v2ILhgzQEy-2th9zH8nzFNeudTj8NgRgxz0qBqxmtOG55RsaB9DClFdB_dQPXRrd7qxa0-utUAOrvNsZ9vH-Zuh_Yj9C4zA9cLgNnJwWPUqfc49mh9xH7SNvjPP7wCHjmJmw</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Silvert, Laetitia</creator><creator>Funes, María J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6414-7739</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>When do fearful faces override inhibition of return?</title><author>Silvert, Laetitia ; Funes, María J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b28fdaf1477d12f39f1d87e5a37ab54b59539646fdb476303d5674072296eb163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Emotion</topic><topic>Facial Expression</topic><topic>Facial Recognition - physiology</topic><topic>Fear - physiology</topic><topic>Fearful faces</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Inhibition of return</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Visual orienting</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silvert, Laetitia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funes, María J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silvert, Laetitia</au><au>Funes, María J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When do fearful faces override inhibition of return?</atitle><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>163</volume><spage>124</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>124-134</pages><issn>0001-6918</issn><eissn>1873-6297</eissn><abstract>Inhibition of return (IOR) occurs when more than about 300ms elapses between the cue and the target in atypical peripheral cueing task: reaction times (RTs) become longer when the cue and target locations are the same versus different. IOR could serve the adaptive role of optimizing visual search by discouraging the re-inspection of previously attended locations. As such, IOR should not reduce our chances of noticing relevant event information and emotional stimuli, in particular. However, previous studies have led to inconsistent results. The present study offers a systematic investigation of the conditions under which target fearful faces can modulate either the magnitude or the time course of the IOR effect. Notably, we manipulated the depth of facial processing required to perform the task and/or the task relevance of the facial expressions. When participants localized target faces (Experiment 1) or discriminated them from non-face stimuli (Experiment 2), their emotional expression had no impact on IOR whatsoever. However, IOR occurred later for fearful versus neutral faces when the participants performed emotion (Experiment 3) or gender (Experiment 4) discrimination tasks. These findings are discussed with regard to the mechanisms responsible for IOR and to the processing of emotional facial expressions. •Neutral and fearful target faces were presented in exogenous spatial cueing tasks.•Fear had no impact on IOR in localization and face/non-face discrimination tasks.•IOR was delayed for fearful faces in emotion and gender discrimination tasks.•The impact of fear on IOR depends on the depth of facial processing.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>26642227</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.002</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6414-7739</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-6918
ispartof Acta psychologica, 2016-01, Vol.163, p.124-134
issn 0001-6918
1873-6297
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01643428v1
source ScienceDirect Journals; Elsevier
subjects Adult
Attention
Attention - physiology
Cognitive science
Cues
Emotion
Facial Expression
Facial Recognition - physiology
Fear - physiology
Fearful faces
Female
Humans
Inhibition (Psychology)
Inhibition of return
Male
Psychology
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Visual orienting
Visual Perception - physiology
Young Adult
title When do fearful faces override inhibition of return?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T13%3A51%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20do%20fearful%20faces%20override%20inhibition%20of%20return?&rft.jtitle=Acta%20psychologica&rft.au=Silvert,%20Laetitia&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=163&rft.spage=124&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=124-134&rft.issn=0001-6918&rft.eissn=1873-6297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1752353083%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b28fdaf1477d12f39f1d87e5a37ab54b59539646fdb476303d5674072296eb163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1752353083&rft_id=info:pmid/26642227&rfr_iscdi=true