Loading…
Numerical methods for immersed FSI with thin-walled structures
•Nitsche-XFEM method tested for the first time in a fully non-linear framework.•Best accuracy results obtained with the Nitsche-XFEM method.•Accuracy issues in fictitious domains methods driven by artificial mass loss.•Modification of the fluid stabilization overcomes this issue but yields illcondit...
Saved in:
Published in: | Computers & fluids 2019-01, Vol.179, p.744-763 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Nitsche-XFEM method tested for the first time in a fully non-linear framework.•Best accuracy results obtained with the Nitsche-XFEM method.•Accuracy issues in fictitious domains methods driven by artificial mass loss.•Modification of the fluid stabilization overcomes this issue but yields illconditioning.•Robust fictitious domains methods remain to be developed for low-order approximations.
The numerical simulation of a thin-walled structure immersed in an incompressible fluid can be addressed by various methods. In this paper, three of them are considered: the Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) method, the Fictitious Domain/Lagrange multipliers (FD) method and the Nitsche-XFEM method. Taking ALE as a reference, the advantages and limitations of FD and Nitsche-XFEM are carefully discussed on three benchmark test cases which have been chosen to be representative of typical difficulties encountered in valves or living cells simulations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0045-7930 1879-0747 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.05.024 |