Loading…

Cluster counts: Calibration issue or new physics?

In recent years, the amplitude of matter fluctuations inferred from low-redshift probes has been found to be generally lower than the value derived from cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations in the ΛCDM model. This tension has been exemplified by Sunyaev-Zel’dovich and X-ray cluster counts...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin) 2018-12, Vol.620, p.A78
Main Authors: Sakr, Ziad, Ilić, Stéphane, Blanchard, Alain, Bittar, Jamal, Farah, Wehbeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-af396d42593e2e86a19a2766a14278a2fdc898ca41e91e29b7ce1971541b9ad73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-af396d42593e2e86a19a2766a14278a2fdc898ca41e91e29b7ce1971541b9ad73
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page A78
container_title Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)
container_volume 620
creator Sakr, Ziad
Ilić, Stéphane
Blanchard, Alain
Bittar, Jamal
Farah, Wehbeh
description In recent years, the amplitude of matter fluctuations inferred from low-redshift probes has been found to be generally lower than the value derived from cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations in the ΛCDM model. This tension has been exemplified by Sunyaev-Zel’dovich and X-ray cluster counts which, when using their Planck standard cluster mass calibration, yield a value of σ8, appreciably lower than estimations based on the latest Planck CMB measurements. In this work we examine whether non-minimal neutrino masses can alleviate this tension substantially. We used the cluster X-ray temperature distribution function derived from a flux-limited sample of local X-ray clusters, combined with Planck CMB measurements. These datasets were compared to ΛCDM predictions based on recent mass function, adapted to account for the effects of massive neutrinos. Treating the clusters mass calibration as a free parameter, we examined whether the data favours neutrino masses appreciably higher than the minimal 0.06 eV value. Using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, we found no significant correlation between the mass calibration of clusters and the sum of neutrino masses, meaning that massive neutrinos do not noticeably alleviate the above-mentioned Planck CMB–clusters tension. The addition of other datasets (baryon acoustic oscillations and Ly-α) reinforces those conclusions. As an alternative possible solution to the tension, we introduced a simple, phenomenological modification of gravity by letting the growth index γ vary as an additional free parameter. We find that the cluster mass calibration is robustly correlated with the γ parameter, insensitively to the presence of massive neutrinos or/and additional data used. We conclude that the standard Planck mass calibration of clusters, if consolidated, would represent evidence for new physics beyond ΛCDM with massive neutrinos.
doi_str_mv 10.1051/0004-6361/201833151
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01768168v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2161938807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-af396d42593e2e86a19a2766a14278a2fdc898ca41e91e29b7ce1971541b9ad73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKe_wJuCV17U5SRpPryRUTanFETw4zJkXcoyazuTVt2_t6XSq8M5PO_L4UHoEvAN4ARmGGMWc8phRjBISiGBIzQBRkmMBePHaDISp-gshF23kg6cIEjLNjTWR3ndVk24jVJTurU3jauryIXQ2qj2UWV_ov32EFwe7s7RSWHKYC_-5xS9Lhcv6SrOnu4f0nkW54zjJjYFVXzDSKKoJVZyA8oQwbvJiJCGFJtcKpkbBlaBJWotcgtKQMJgrcxG0Cm6Hnq3ptR77z6NP-jaOL2aZ7q_YRBcApff0LFXA7v39VdrQ6N3deur7j1NgIOiUuK-kQ5U7usQvC3GWsC696h7S7q3pEePXSoeUq7z9DtGjP_QXFCRaInfdSbeHp_pMtGK_gFoL3El</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161938807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cluster counts: Calibration issue or new physics?</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sakr, Ziad ; Ilić, Stéphane ; Blanchard, Alain ; Bittar, Jamal ; Farah, Wehbeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakr, Ziad ; Ilić, Stéphane ; Blanchard, Alain ; Bittar, Jamal ; Farah, Wehbeh</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, the amplitude of matter fluctuations inferred from low-redshift probes has been found to be generally lower than the value derived from cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations in the ΛCDM model. This tension has been exemplified by Sunyaev-Zel’dovich and X-ray cluster counts which, when using their Planck standard cluster mass calibration, yield a value of σ8, appreciably lower than estimations based on the latest Planck CMB measurements. In this work we examine whether non-minimal neutrino masses can alleviate this tension substantially. We used the cluster X-ray temperature distribution function derived from a flux-limited sample of local X-ray clusters, combined with Planck CMB measurements. These datasets were compared to ΛCDM predictions based on recent mass function, adapted to account for the effects of massive neutrinos. Treating the clusters mass calibration as a free parameter, we examined whether the data favours neutrino masses appreciably higher than the minimal 0.06 eV value. Using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, we found no significant correlation between the mass calibration of clusters and the sum of neutrino masses, meaning that massive neutrinos do not noticeably alleviate the above-mentioned Planck CMB–clusters tension. The addition of other datasets (baryon acoustic oscillations and Ly-α) reinforces those conclusions. As an alternative possible solution to the tension, we introduced a simple, phenomenological modification of gravity by letting the growth index γ vary as an additional free parameter. We find that the cluster mass calibration is robustly correlated with the γ parameter, insensitively to the presence of massive neutrinos or/and additional data used. We conclude that the standard Planck mass calibration of clusters, if consolidated, would represent evidence for new physics beyond ΛCDM with massive neutrinos.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-6361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: EDP Sciences</publisher><subject>Astrophysics ; Calibration ; Clusters ; Computer simulation ; cosmic background radiation ; Cosmic microwave background ; cosmological parameters ; Datasets ; Distribution functions ; galaxies: clusters: general ; large-scale structure of Universe ; Markov analysis ; Markov chains ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Neutrinos ; Physics ; Red shift ; Temperature distribution ; Tension ; Variation</subject><ispartof>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2018-12, Vol.620, p.A78</ispartof><rights>Copyright EDP Sciences Dec 2018</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-af396d42593e2e86a19a2766a14278a2fdc898ca41e91e29b7ce1971541b9ad73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-af396d42593e2e86a19a2766a14278a2fdc898ca41e91e29b7ce1971541b9ad73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8555-9003</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01768168$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakr, Ziad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilić, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bittar, Jamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farah, Wehbeh</creatorcontrib><title>Cluster counts: Calibration issue or new physics?</title><title>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</title><description>In recent years, the amplitude of matter fluctuations inferred from low-redshift probes has been found to be generally lower than the value derived from cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations in the ΛCDM model. This tension has been exemplified by Sunyaev-Zel’dovich and X-ray cluster counts which, when using their Planck standard cluster mass calibration, yield a value of σ8, appreciably lower than estimations based on the latest Planck CMB measurements. In this work we examine whether non-minimal neutrino masses can alleviate this tension substantially. We used the cluster X-ray temperature distribution function derived from a flux-limited sample of local X-ray clusters, combined with Planck CMB measurements. These datasets were compared to ΛCDM predictions based on recent mass function, adapted to account for the effects of massive neutrinos. Treating the clusters mass calibration as a free parameter, we examined whether the data favours neutrino masses appreciably higher than the minimal 0.06 eV value. Using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, we found no significant correlation between the mass calibration of clusters and the sum of neutrino masses, meaning that massive neutrinos do not noticeably alleviate the above-mentioned Planck CMB–clusters tension. The addition of other datasets (baryon acoustic oscillations and Ly-α) reinforces those conclusions. As an alternative possible solution to the tension, we introduced a simple, phenomenological modification of gravity by letting the growth index γ vary as an additional free parameter. We find that the cluster mass calibration is robustly correlated with the γ parameter, insensitively to the presence of massive neutrinos or/and additional data used. We conclude that the standard Planck mass calibration of clusters, if consolidated, would represent evidence for new physics beyond ΛCDM with massive neutrinos.</description><subject>Astrophysics</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Clusters</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>cosmic background radiation</subject><subject>Cosmic microwave background</subject><subject>cosmological parameters</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Distribution functions</subject><subject>galaxies: clusters: general</subject><subject>large-scale structure of Universe</subject><subject>Markov analysis</subject><subject>Markov chains</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Neutrinos</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Red shift</subject><subject>Temperature distribution</subject><subject>Tension</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>0004-6361</issn><issn>1432-0746</issn><issn>1432-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKe_wJuCV17U5SRpPryRUTanFETw4zJkXcoyazuTVt2_t6XSq8M5PO_L4UHoEvAN4ARmGGMWc8phRjBISiGBIzQBRkmMBePHaDISp-gshF23kg6cIEjLNjTWR3ndVk24jVJTurU3jauryIXQ2qj2UWV_ov32EFwe7s7RSWHKYC_-5xS9Lhcv6SrOnu4f0nkW54zjJjYFVXzDSKKoJVZyA8oQwbvJiJCGFJtcKpkbBlaBJWotcgtKQMJgrcxG0Cm6Hnq3ptR77z6NP-jaOL2aZ7q_YRBcApff0LFXA7v39VdrQ6N3deur7j1NgIOiUuK-kQ5U7usQvC3GWsC696h7S7q3pEePXSoeUq7z9DtGjP_QXFCRaInfdSbeHp_pMtGK_gFoL3El</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Sakr, Ziad</creator><creator>Ilić, Stéphane</creator><creator>Blanchard, Alain</creator><creator>Bittar, Jamal</creator><creator>Farah, Wehbeh</creator><general>EDP Sciences</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8555-9003</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Cluster counts: Calibration issue or new physics?</title><author>Sakr, Ziad ; Ilić, Stéphane ; Blanchard, Alain ; Bittar, Jamal ; Farah, Wehbeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-af396d42593e2e86a19a2766a14278a2fdc898ca41e91e29b7ce1971541b9ad73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Astrophysics</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Clusters</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>cosmic background radiation</topic><topic>Cosmic microwave background</topic><topic>cosmological parameters</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Distribution functions</topic><topic>galaxies: clusters: general</topic><topic>large-scale structure of Universe</topic><topic>Markov analysis</topic><topic>Markov chains</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Neutrinos</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Red shift</topic><topic>Temperature distribution</topic><topic>Tension</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakr, Ziad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilić, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bittar, Jamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farah, Wehbeh</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakr, Ziad</au><au>Ilić, Stéphane</au><au>Blanchard, Alain</au><au>Bittar, Jamal</au><au>Farah, Wehbeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cluster counts: Calibration issue or new physics?</atitle><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>620</volume><spage>A78</spage><pages>A78-</pages><issn>0004-6361</issn><eissn>1432-0746</eissn><eissn>1432-0756</eissn><abstract>In recent years, the amplitude of matter fluctuations inferred from low-redshift probes has been found to be generally lower than the value derived from cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations in the ΛCDM model. This tension has been exemplified by Sunyaev-Zel’dovich and X-ray cluster counts which, when using their Planck standard cluster mass calibration, yield a value of σ8, appreciably lower than estimations based on the latest Planck CMB measurements. In this work we examine whether non-minimal neutrino masses can alleviate this tension substantially. We used the cluster X-ray temperature distribution function derived from a flux-limited sample of local X-ray clusters, combined with Planck CMB measurements. These datasets were compared to ΛCDM predictions based on recent mass function, adapted to account for the effects of massive neutrinos. Treating the clusters mass calibration as a free parameter, we examined whether the data favours neutrino masses appreciably higher than the minimal 0.06 eV value. Using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, we found no significant correlation between the mass calibration of clusters and the sum of neutrino masses, meaning that massive neutrinos do not noticeably alleviate the above-mentioned Planck CMB–clusters tension. The addition of other datasets (baryon acoustic oscillations and Ly-α) reinforces those conclusions. As an alternative possible solution to the tension, we introduced a simple, phenomenological modification of gravity by letting the growth index γ vary as an additional free parameter. We find that the cluster mass calibration is robustly correlated with the γ parameter, insensitively to the presence of massive neutrinos or/and additional data used. We conclude that the standard Planck mass calibration of clusters, if consolidated, would represent evidence for new physics beyond ΛCDM with massive neutrinos.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>EDP Sciences</pub><doi>10.1051/0004-6361/201833151</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8555-9003</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-6361
ispartof Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2018-12, Vol.620, p.A78
issn 0004-6361
1432-0746
1432-0756
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01768168v1
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Astrophysics
Calibration
Clusters
Computer simulation
cosmic background radiation
Cosmic microwave background
cosmological parameters
Datasets
Distribution functions
galaxies: clusters: general
large-scale structure of Universe
Markov analysis
Markov chains
Monte Carlo simulation
Neutrinos
Physics
Red shift
Temperature distribution
Tension
Variation
title Cluster counts: Calibration issue or new physics?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A54%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cluster%20counts:%20Calibration%20issue%20or%20new%20physics?&rft.jtitle=Astronomy%20and%20astrophysics%20(Berlin)&rft.au=Sakr,%20Ziad&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=620&rft.spage=A78&rft.pages=A78-&rft.issn=0004-6361&rft.eissn=1432-0746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/0004-6361/201833151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2161938807%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-af396d42593e2e86a19a2766a14278a2fdc898ca41e91e29b7ce1971541b9ad73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161938807&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true