Loading…
Cluster counts: Calibration issue or new physics?
In recent years, the amplitude of matter fluctuations inferred from low-redshift probes has been found to be generally lower than the value derived from cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations in the ΛCDM model. This tension has been exemplified by Sunyaev-Zel’dovich and X-ray cluster counts...
Saved in:
Published in: | Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin) 2018-12, Vol.620, p.A78 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-af396d42593e2e86a19a2766a14278a2fdc898ca41e91e29b7ce1971541b9ad73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-af396d42593e2e86a19a2766a14278a2fdc898ca41e91e29b7ce1971541b9ad73 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | A78 |
container_title | Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin) |
container_volume | 620 |
creator | Sakr, Ziad Ilić, Stéphane Blanchard, Alain Bittar, Jamal Farah, Wehbeh |
description | In recent years, the amplitude of matter fluctuations inferred from low-redshift probes has been found to be generally lower than the value derived from cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations in the ΛCDM model. This tension has been exemplified by Sunyaev-Zel’dovich and X-ray cluster counts which, when using their Planck standard cluster mass calibration, yield a value of σ8, appreciably lower than estimations based on the latest Planck CMB measurements. In this work we examine whether non-minimal neutrino masses can alleviate this tension substantially. We used the cluster X-ray temperature distribution function derived from a flux-limited sample of local X-ray clusters, combined with Planck CMB measurements. These datasets were compared to ΛCDM predictions based on recent mass function, adapted to account for the effects of massive neutrinos. Treating the clusters mass calibration as a free parameter, we examined whether the data favours neutrino masses appreciably higher than the minimal 0.06 eV value. Using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, we found no significant correlation between the mass calibration of clusters and the sum of neutrino masses, meaning that massive neutrinos do not noticeably alleviate the above-mentioned Planck CMB–clusters tension. The addition of other datasets (baryon acoustic oscillations and Ly-α) reinforces those conclusions. As an alternative possible solution to the tension, we introduced a simple, phenomenological modification of gravity by letting the growth index γ vary as an additional free parameter. We find that the cluster mass calibration is robustly correlated with the γ parameter, insensitively to the presence of massive neutrinos or/and additional data used. We conclude that the standard Planck mass calibration of clusters, if consolidated, would represent evidence for new physics beyond ΛCDM with massive neutrinos. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1051/0004-6361/201833151 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01768168v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2161938807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-af396d42593e2e86a19a2766a14278a2fdc898ca41e91e29b7ce1971541b9ad73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKe_wJuCV17U5SRpPryRUTanFETw4zJkXcoyazuTVt2_t6XSq8M5PO_L4UHoEvAN4ARmGGMWc8phRjBISiGBIzQBRkmMBePHaDISp-gshF23kg6cIEjLNjTWR3ndVk24jVJTurU3jauryIXQ2qj2UWV_ov32EFwe7s7RSWHKYC_-5xS9Lhcv6SrOnu4f0nkW54zjJjYFVXzDSKKoJVZyA8oQwbvJiJCGFJtcKpkbBlaBJWotcgtKQMJgrcxG0Cm6Hnq3ptR77z6NP-jaOL2aZ7q_YRBcApff0LFXA7v39VdrQ6N3deur7j1NgIOiUuK-kQ5U7usQvC3GWsC696h7S7q3pEePXSoeUq7z9DtGjP_QXFCRaInfdSbeHp_pMtGK_gFoL3El</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161938807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cluster counts: Calibration issue or new physics?</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sakr, Ziad ; Ilić, Stéphane ; Blanchard, Alain ; Bittar, Jamal ; Farah, Wehbeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakr, Ziad ; Ilić, Stéphane ; Blanchard, Alain ; Bittar, Jamal ; Farah, Wehbeh</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, the amplitude of matter fluctuations inferred from low-redshift probes has been found to be generally lower than the value derived from cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations in the ΛCDM model. This tension has been exemplified by Sunyaev-Zel’dovich and X-ray cluster counts which, when using their Planck standard cluster mass calibration, yield a value of σ8, appreciably lower than estimations based on the latest Planck CMB measurements. In this work we examine whether non-minimal neutrino masses can alleviate this tension substantially. We used the cluster X-ray temperature distribution function derived from a flux-limited sample of local X-ray clusters, combined with Planck CMB measurements. These datasets were compared to ΛCDM predictions based on recent mass function, adapted to account for the effects of massive neutrinos. Treating the clusters mass calibration as a free parameter, we examined whether the data favours neutrino masses appreciably higher than the minimal 0.06 eV value. Using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, we found no significant correlation between the mass calibration of clusters and the sum of neutrino masses, meaning that massive neutrinos do not noticeably alleviate the above-mentioned Planck CMB–clusters tension. The addition of other datasets (baryon acoustic oscillations and Ly-α) reinforces those conclusions. As an alternative possible solution to the tension, we introduced a simple, phenomenological modification of gravity by letting the growth index γ vary as an additional free parameter. We find that the cluster mass calibration is robustly correlated with the γ parameter, insensitively to the presence of massive neutrinos or/and additional data used. We conclude that the standard Planck mass calibration of clusters, if consolidated, would represent evidence for new physics beyond ΛCDM with massive neutrinos.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-6361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: EDP Sciences</publisher><subject>Astrophysics ; Calibration ; Clusters ; Computer simulation ; cosmic background radiation ; Cosmic microwave background ; cosmological parameters ; Datasets ; Distribution functions ; galaxies: clusters: general ; large-scale structure of Universe ; Markov analysis ; Markov chains ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Neutrinos ; Physics ; Red shift ; Temperature distribution ; Tension ; Variation</subject><ispartof>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2018-12, Vol.620, p.A78</ispartof><rights>Copyright EDP Sciences Dec 2018</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-af396d42593e2e86a19a2766a14278a2fdc898ca41e91e29b7ce1971541b9ad73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-af396d42593e2e86a19a2766a14278a2fdc898ca41e91e29b7ce1971541b9ad73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8555-9003</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01768168$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakr, Ziad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilić, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bittar, Jamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farah, Wehbeh</creatorcontrib><title>Cluster counts: Calibration issue or new physics?</title><title>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</title><description>In recent years, the amplitude of matter fluctuations inferred from low-redshift probes has been found to be generally lower than the value derived from cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations in the ΛCDM model. This tension has been exemplified by Sunyaev-Zel’dovich and X-ray cluster counts which, when using their Planck standard cluster mass calibration, yield a value of σ8, appreciably lower than estimations based on the latest Planck CMB measurements. In this work we examine whether non-minimal neutrino masses can alleviate this tension substantially. We used the cluster X-ray temperature distribution function derived from a flux-limited sample of local X-ray clusters, combined with Planck CMB measurements. These datasets were compared to ΛCDM predictions based on recent mass function, adapted to account for the effects of massive neutrinos. Treating the clusters mass calibration as a free parameter, we examined whether the data favours neutrino masses appreciably higher than the minimal 0.06 eV value. Using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, we found no significant correlation between the mass calibration of clusters and the sum of neutrino masses, meaning that massive neutrinos do not noticeably alleviate the above-mentioned Planck CMB–clusters tension. The addition of other datasets (baryon acoustic oscillations and Ly-α) reinforces those conclusions. As an alternative possible solution to the tension, we introduced a simple, phenomenological modification of gravity by letting the growth index γ vary as an additional free parameter. We find that the cluster mass calibration is robustly correlated with the γ parameter, insensitively to the presence of massive neutrinos or/and additional data used. We conclude that the standard Planck mass calibration of clusters, if consolidated, would represent evidence for new physics beyond ΛCDM with massive neutrinos.</description><subject>Astrophysics</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Clusters</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>cosmic background radiation</subject><subject>Cosmic microwave background</subject><subject>cosmological parameters</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Distribution functions</subject><subject>galaxies: clusters: general</subject><subject>large-scale structure of Universe</subject><subject>Markov analysis</subject><subject>Markov chains</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Neutrinos</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Red shift</subject><subject>Temperature distribution</subject><subject>Tension</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>0004-6361</issn><issn>1432-0746</issn><issn>1432-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKe_wJuCV17U5SRpPryRUTanFETw4zJkXcoyazuTVt2_t6XSq8M5PO_L4UHoEvAN4ARmGGMWc8phRjBISiGBIzQBRkmMBePHaDISp-gshF23kg6cIEjLNjTWR3ndVk24jVJTurU3jauryIXQ2qj2UWV_ov32EFwe7s7RSWHKYC_-5xS9Lhcv6SrOnu4f0nkW54zjJjYFVXzDSKKoJVZyA8oQwbvJiJCGFJtcKpkbBlaBJWotcgtKQMJgrcxG0Cm6Hnq3ptR77z6NP-jaOL2aZ7q_YRBcApff0LFXA7v39VdrQ6N3deur7j1NgIOiUuK-kQ5U7usQvC3GWsC696h7S7q3pEePXSoeUq7z9DtGjP_QXFCRaInfdSbeHp_pMtGK_gFoL3El</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Sakr, Ziad</creator><creator>Ilić, Stéphane</creator><creator>Blanchard, Alain</creator><creator>Bittar, Jamal</creator><creator>Farah, Wehbeh</creator><general>EDP Sciences</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8555-9003</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Cluster counts: Calibration issue or new physics?</title><author>Sakr, Ziad ; Ilić, Stéphane ; Blanchard, Alain ; Bittar, Jamal ; Farah, Wehbeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-af396d42593e2e86a19a2766a14278a2fdc898ca41e91e29b7ce1971541b9ad73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Astrophysics</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Clusters</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>cosmic background radiation</topic><topic>Cosmic microwave background</topic><topic>cosmological parameters</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Distribution functions</topic><topic>galaxies: clusters: general</topic><topic>large-scale structure of Universe</topic><topic>Markov analysis</topic><topic>Markov chains</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Neutrinos</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Red shift</topic><topic>Temperature distribution</topic><topic>Tension</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakr, Ziad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilić, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bittar, Jamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farah, Wehbeh</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakr, Ziad</au><au>Ilić, Stéphane</au><au>Blanchard, Alain</au><au>Bittar, Jamal</au><au>Farah, Wehbeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cluster counts: Calibration issue or new physics?</atitle><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>620</volume><spage>A78</spage><pages>A78-</pages><issn>0004-6361</issn><eissn>1432-0746</eissn><eissn>1432-0756</eissn><abstract>In recent years, the amplitude of matter fluctuations inferred from low-redshift probes has been found to be generally lower than the value derived from cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations in the ΛCDM model. This tension has been exemplified by Sunyaev-Zel’dovich and X-ray cluster counts which, when using their Planck standard cluster mass calibration, yield a value of σ8, appreciably lower than estimations based on the latest Planck CMB measurements. In this work we examine whether non-minimal neutrino masses can alleviate this tension substantially. We used the cluster X-ray temperature distribution function derived from a flux-limited sample of local X-ray clusters, combined with Planck CMB measurements. These datasets were compared to ΛCDM predictions based on recent mass function, adapted to account for the effects of massive neutrinos. Treating the clusters mass calibration as a free parameter, we examined whether the data favours neutrino masses appreciably higher than the minimal 0.06 eV value. Using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, we found no significant correlation between the mass calibration of clusters and the sum of neutrino masses, meaning that massive neutrinos do not noticeably alleviate the above-mentioned Planck CMB–clusters tension. The addition of other datasets (baryon acoustic oscillations and Ly-α) reinforces those conclusions. As an alternative possible solution to the tension, we introduced a simple, phenomenological modification of gravity by letting the growth index γ vary as an additional free parameter. We find that the cluster mass calibration is robustly correlated with the γ parameter, insensitively to the presence of massive neutrinos or/and additional data used. We conclude that the standard Planck mass calibration of clusters, if consolidated, would represent evidence for new physics beyond ΛCDM with massive neutrinos.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>EDP Sciences</pub><doi>10.1051/0004-6361/201833151</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8555-9003</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-6361 |
ispartof | Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2018-12, Vol.620, p.A78 |
issn | 0004-6361 1432-0746 1432-0756 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01768168v1 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Astrophysics Calibration Clusters Computer simulation cosmic background radiation Cosmic microwave background cosmological parameters Datasets Distribution functions galaxies: clusters: general large-scale structure of Universe Markov analysis Markov chains Monte Carlo simulation Neutrinos Physics Red shift Temperature distribution Tension Variation |
title | Cluster counts: Calibration issue or new physics? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A54%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cluster%20counts:%20Calibration%20issue%20or%20new%20physics?&rft.jtitle=Astronomy%20and%20astrophysics%20(Berlin)&rft.au=Sakr,%20Ziad&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=620&rft.spage=A78&rft.pages=A78-&rft.issn=0004-6361&rft.eissn=1432-0746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/0004-6361/201833151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2161938807%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-af396d42593e2e86a19a2766a14278a2fdc898ca41e91e29b7ce1971541b9ad73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161938807&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |