Current Views on Hydrodynamic Models of Nonideal Flow Anaerobic Reactors

A critical review of the different hydrodynamic mathematical models available for nonideal flow configurations of both low-rate and high-rate anaerobic reactors is presented, including upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors, anaerobic fluidized bed reactors, anaerobic biofilters, wet and dry diges...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Critical reviews in environmental science and technology 2015-10, Vol.45 (20), p.2175-2207
Main Authors: Liotta, Flavia, Chatellier, Patrice, Esposito, Giovanni, Fabbricino, Massimiliano, Van hullebusch, Eric D., Lens, Piet N. L., Pirozzi, Francesco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
anaerobic processes
biofilter
Computational fluid dynamics
Dispersions
dry anaerobic digestion
Fluid Dynamics
Fluid flow
fluidized bed
Fluidized bed reactors
General overviews
Hydrodynamics
mathematical modeling
Mathematical models
Physics
Reactors
Sludge
Tanks
UASB
Water treatment plants
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-f2ee698d354afa261aa084897e2b45175e890032a3158d81a72276ca2a55e7e53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-f2ee698d354afa261aa084897e2b45175e890032a3158d81a72276ca2a55e7e53
container_end_page 2207
container_issue 20
container_start_page 2175
container_title Critical reviews in environmental science and technology
container_volume 45
creator Liotta, Flavia
Chatellier, Patrice
Esposito, Giovanni
Fabbricino, Massimiliano
Van hullebusch, Eric D.
Lens, Piet N. L.
Pirozzi, Francesco
description A critical review of the different hydrodynamic mathematical models available for nonideal flow configurations of both low-rate and high-rate anaerobic reactors is presented, including upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors, anaerobic fluidized bed reactors, anaerobic biofilters, wet and dry digesters. The review highlights the role of mathematical modeling on design and operational optimization of organic waste and wastewater treatment plants. For each reactor configuration the following approaches, proposed by various authors, are presented and compared: (a) plug flow model, (b) tank in series model, (c) dispersion model, and (d) computational fluid dynamic model. The review gives a general overview on mathematical modeling of anaerobic nonideal plug-flow reactors and compares different models indicating the advantages and disadvantages to apply them for different reactor type.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10643389.2015.1010426
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01791029v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1709165721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-f2ee698d354afa261aa084897e2b45175e890032a3158d81a72276ca2a55e7e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9r3DAQxU1oIGnSjxAw9NIenGj0x5JuXZamW9gkENJcxcQeUwetlEreLvvtK7NpDz2UHoYZHr95zPCq6gLYJTDDroC1UghjLzkDVSRgkrdH1SkoqZtWCf2mzIVpZuikepvzM2PAS51Wq-U2JQpT_TjSLtcx1Kt9n2K_D7gZu_om9uSLPNS3MYw9oa-vfdzVi4CU4lMh7gm7KaZ8Xh0P6DO9e-1n1bfrzw_LVbO--_J1uVg3nRRmagZO1FrTCyVxQN4CIjPSWE38SSrQioxlTHAUoExvADXnuu2Qo1KkSYmz6uPB9zt695LGDaa9izi61WLtZo2BtsC4_QmF_XBgX1L8saU8uc2YO_IeA8VtdqAFY1pqy_8DZRZapfns-v4v9DluUyhPO2it5oYrOVPqQHUp5pxo-HMsMDfH5n7H5ubY3GtsZe_TYW8MQ0wb3MXkezfh3sc0JAzdmJ34t8UvT3Oahg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697282541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current Views on Hydrodynamic Models of Nonideal Flow Anaerobic Reactors</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Liotta, Flavia ; Chatellier, Patrice ; Esposito, Giovanni ; Fabbricino, Massimiliano ; Van hullebusch, Eric D. ; Lens, Piet N. L. ; Pirozzi, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Liotta, Flavia ; Chatellier, Patrice ; Esposito, Giovanni ; Fabbricino, Massimiliano ; Van hullebusch, Eric D. ; Lens, Piet N. L. ; Pirozzi, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>A critical review of the different hydrodynamic mathematical models available for nonideal flow configurations of both low-rate and high-rate anaerobic reactors is presented, including upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors, anaerobic fluidized bed reactors, anaerobic biofilters, wet and dry digesters. The review highlights the role of mathematical modeling on design and operational optimization of organic waste and wastewater treatment plants. For each reactor configuration the following approaches, proposed by various authors, are presented and compared: (a) plug flow model, (b) tank in series model, (c) dispersion model, and (d) computational fluid dynamic model. The review gives a general overview on mathematical modeling of anaerobic nonideal plug-flow reactors and compares different models indicating the advantages and disadvantages to apply them for different reactor type.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-3389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-6537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10643389.2015.1010426</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRETEK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boca Raton: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>anaerobic processes ; biofilter ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Dispersions ; dry anaerobic digestion ; Fluid Dynamics ; Fluid flow ; fluidized bed ; Fluidized bed reactors ; General overviews ; Hydrodynamics ; mathematical modeling ; Mathematical models ; Physics ; Reactors ; Sludge ; Tanks ; UASB ; Water treatment plants</subject><ispartof>Critical reviews in environmental science and technology, 2015-10, Vol.45 (20), p.2175-2207</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2015</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-f2ee698d354afa261aa084897e2b45175e890032a3158d81a72276ca2a55e7e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-f2ee698d354afa261aa084897e2b45175e890032a3158d81a72276ca2a55e7e53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8418-3809</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01791029$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liotta, Flavia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatellier, Patrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esposito, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabbricino, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van hullebusch, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lens, Piet N. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirozzi, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>Current Views on Hydrodynamic Models of Nonideal Flow Anaerobic Reactors</title><title>Critical reviews in environmental science and technology</title><description>A critical review of the different hydrodynamic mathematical models available for nonideal flow configurations of both low-rate and high-rate anaerobic reactors is presented, including upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors, anaerobic fluidized bed reactors, anaerobic biofilters, wet and dry digesters. The review highlights the role of mathematical modeling on design and operational optimization of organic waste and wastewater treatment plants. For each reactor configuration the following approaches, proposed by various authors, are presented and compared: (a) plug flow model, (b) tank in series model, (c) dispersion model, and (d) computational fluid dynamic model. The review gives a general overview on mathematical modeling of anaerobic nonideal plug-flow reactors and compares different models indicating the advantages and disadvantages to apply them for different reactor type.</description><subject>anaerobic processes</subject><subject>biofilter</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Dispersions</subject><subject>dry anaerobic digestion</subject><subject>Fluid Dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>fluidized bed</subject><subject>Fluidized bed reactors</subject><subject>General overviews</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>mathematical modeling</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Tanks</subject><subject>UASB</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><issn>1064-3389</issn><issn>1547-6537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9r3DAQxU1oIGnSjxAw9NIenGj0x5JuXZamW9gkENJcxcQeUwetlEreLvvtK7NpDz2UHoYZHr95zPCq6gLYJTDDroC1UghjLzkDVSRgkrdH1SkoqZtWCf2mzIVpZuikepvzM2PAS51Wq-U2JQpT_TjSLtcx1Kt9n2K_D7gZu_om9uSLPNS3MYw9oa-vfdzVi4CU4lMh7gm7KaZ8Xh0P6DO9e-1n1bfrzw_LVbO--_J1uVg3nRRmagZO1FrTCyVxQN4CIjPSWE38SSrQioxlTHAUoExvADXnuu2Qo1KkSYmz6uPB9zt695LGDaa9izi61WLtZo2BtsC4_QmF_XBgX1L8saU8uc2YO_IeA8VtdqAFY1pqy_8DZRZapfns-v4v9DluUyhPO2it5oYrOVPqQHUp5pxo-HMsMDfH5n7H5ubY3GtsZe_TYW8MQ0wb3MXkezfh3sc0JAzdmJ34t8UvT3Oahg</recordid><startdate>20151018</startdate><enddate>20151018</enddate><creator>Liotta, Flavia</creator><creator>Chatellier, Patrice</creator><creator>Esposito, Giovanni</creator><creator>Fabbricino, Massimiliano</creator><creator>Van hullebusch, Eric D.</creator><creator>Lens, Piet N. L.</creator><creator>Pirozzi, Francesco</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8418-3809</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151018</creationdate><title>Current Views on Hydrodynamic Models of Nonideal Flow Anaerobic Reactors</title><author>Liotta, Flavia ; Chatellier, Patrice ; Esposito, Giovanni ; Fabbricino, Massimiliano ; Van hullebusch, Eric D. ; Lens, Piet N. L. ; Pirozzi, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-f2ee698d354afa261aa084897e2b45175e890032a3158d81a72276ca2a55e7e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>anaerobic processes</topic><topic>biofilter</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Dispersions</topic><topic>dry anaerobic digestion</topic><topic>Fluid Dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>fluidized bed</topic><topic>Fluidized bed reactors</topic><topic>General overviews</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>mathematical modeling</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Tanks</topic><topic>UASB</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liotta, Flavia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatellier, Patrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esposito, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabbricino, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van hullebusch, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lens, Piet N. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirozzi, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Critical reviews in environmental science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liotta, Flavia</au><au>Chatellier, Patrice</au><au>Esposito, Giovanni</au><au>Fabbricino, Massimiliano</au><au>Van hullebusch, Eric D.</au><au>Lens, Piet N. L.</au><au>Pirozzi, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current Views on Hydrodynamic Models of Nonideal Flow Anaerobic Reactors</atitle><jtitle>Critical reviews in environmental science and technology</jtitle><date>2015-10-18</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>2175</spage><epage>2207</epage><pages>2175-2207</pages><issn>1064-3389</issn><eissn>1547-6537</eissn><coden>CRETEK</coden><abstract>A critical review of the different hydrodynamic mathematical models available for nonideal flow configurations of both low-rate and high-rate anaerobic reactors is presented, including upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors, anaerobic fluidized bed reactors, anaerobic biofilters, wet and dry digesters. The review highlights the role of mathematical modeling on design and operational optimization of organic waste and wastewater treatment plants. For each reactor configuration the following approaches, proposed by various authors, are presented and compared: (a) plug flow model, (b) tank in series model, (c) dispersion model, and (d) computational fluid dynamic model. The review gives a general overview on mathematical modeling of anaerobic nonideal plug-flow reactors and compares different models indicating the advantages and disadvantages to apply them for different reactor type.</abstract><cop>Boca Raton</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/10643389.2015.1010426</doi><tpages>33</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8418-3809</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-3389
ispartof Critical reviews in environmental science and technology, 2015-10, Vol.45 (20), p.2175-2207
issn 1064-3389
1547-6537
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01791029v1
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects anaerobic processes
biofilter
Computational fluid dynamics
Dispersions
dry anaerobic digestion
Fluid Dynamics
Fluid flow
fluidized bed
Fluidized bed reactors
General overviews
Hydrodynamics
mathematical modeling
Mathematical models
Physics
Reactors
Sludge
Tanks
UASB
Water treatment plants
title Current Views on Hydrodynamic Models of Nonideal Flow Anaerobic Reactors
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T07%3A17%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20Views%20on%20Hydrodynamic%20Models%20of%20Nonideal%20Flow%20Anaerobic%20Reactors&rft.jtitle=Critical%20reviews%20in%20environmental%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Liotta,%20Flavia&rft.date=2015-10-18&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=2175&rft.epage=2207&rft.pages=2175-2207&rft.issn=1064-3389&rft.eissn=1547-6537&rft.coden=CRETEK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10643389.2015.1010426&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1709165721%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-f2ee698d354afa261aa084897e2b45175e890032a3158d81a72276ca2a55e7e53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697282541&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true