Loading…
Do functional groups of planktonic copepods differ in their ecological niches?
Aim: To assess the degree of overlap between the environmental niches of marine planktonic copepods and test if the distribution of copepod functional groups differs across environmental gradients. Location: The Mediterranean Sea. Methods: Functional groups were defined based on clustering of functi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of biogeography 2018-03, Vol.45 (3), p.604-616 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-cd623c7cb60b0d8ababb2bb2a9b624d64851cb599f8c34955c89251d6b26d1683 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-cd623c7cb60b0d8ababb2bb2a9b624d64851cb599f8c34955c89251d6b26d1683 |
container_end_page | 616 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 604 |
container_title | Journal of biogeography |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Benedetti, Fabio Vogt, Meike Righetti, Damiano Guilhaumon, François Ayata, Sakina-Dorothée |
description | Aim: To assess the degree of overlap between the environmental niches of marine planktonic copepods and test if the distribution of copepod functional groups differs across environmental gradients. Location: The Mediterranean Sea. Methods: Functional groups were defined based on clustering of functional traits in 106 marine copepod species using a multivariate ordination analysis. Functional traits included maximum body length, feeding mode, spawning strategy and trophic group. Simultaneously, the global distribution of the species was used to model their environmental niches with six environmental variables. For each of these predictors, four niche parameters were derived from the univariate response curve of each species to summarise their environmental preferences and ordinate the species in niche space through a PCA. Finally, the differences in the position in niche space of functional groups were tested with variance analysis. Results: We identified seven copepod functional groups with different distributions along the environmental gradients covered by our study. While carnivorous functional groups were affiliated with oligotrophic and tropical conditions, large and small current-feeding herbivores are associated with colder, more seasonally varying and productive conditions. Small cruising detritivores and other small current-feeding herbivores were not affiliated with specific conditions as their constituting species were scattered in niche space. Main conclusions: Since copepod functional groups occupy distinct ecological niches, ecosystem processes related to these groups are expected to vary across environmental gradients. Conditions favouring large current-feeding herbivores should allow for enhanced fluxes of energy and nutrients through Mediterranean Sea ecosystems, while such fluxes should be weakened where large carnivores and small passive ambush-feeding copepods dominate. Our study supports the development of trait-based Zooplankton functional groups in marine ecosystem models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jbi.13166 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01826722v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26626974</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26626974</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-cd623c7cb60b0d8ababb2bb2a9b624d64851cb599f8c34955c89251d6b26d1683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoWB8Lf4AQcOVi2jxmMslKfLdSdKPrkGQybeo4GZOp0n9varWuvFy4cPnOgXsuACcYDXGq0UK7IaaYsR0wwJQVGWFC7IIBoqjIECnRPjiIcYEQEgXNB-DxxsN62Zre-VY1cBb8sovQ17BrVPva-9YZaHxnO19FWLm6tgG6FvZz6wK0xjd-5kwSJm5u48UR2KtVE-3xzzwEL3e3z9fjbPp0P7m-nGaGcs4yUzFCTWk0QxpVXGmlNUmthGYkr1jOC2x0IUTNDc1FURguSIErpgmrMOP0EJxvfOeqkV1wbyqspFdOji-ncr1DmBNWEvKBE3u2Ybvg35c29nLhlyFdGyVBqOSC4Vz8OZrgYwy23tpiJNfRyhSt_I42saMN--kau_oflA9Xk1_F6UaxiL0PWwVhLP2nzOkXKiCC2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2007896149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do functional groups of planktonic copepods differ in their ecological niches?</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Benedetti, Fabio ; Vogt, Meike ; Righetti, Damiano ; Guilhaumon, François ; Ayata, Sakina-Dorothée</creator><creatorcontrib>Benedetti, Fabio ; Vogt, Meike ; Righetti, Damiano ; Guilhaumon, François ; Ayata, Sakina-Dorothée</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: To assess the degree of overlap between the environmental niches of marine planktonic copepods and test if the distribution of copepod functional groups differs across environmental gradients. Location: The Mediterranean Sea. Methods: Functional groups were defined based on clustering of functional traits in 106 marine copepod species using a multivariate ordination analysis. Functional traits included maximum body length, feeding mode, spawning strategy and trophic group. Simultaneously, the global distribution of the species was used to model their environmental niches with six environmental variables. For each of these predictors, four niche parameters were derived from the univariate response curve of each species to summarise their environmental preferences and ordinate the species in niche space through a PCA. Finally, the differences in the position in niche space of functional groups were tested with variance analysis. Results: We identified seven copepod functional groups with different distributions along the environmental gradients covered by our study. While carnivorous functional groups were affiliated with oligotrophic and tropical conditions, large and small current-feeding herbivores are associated with colder, more seasonally varying and productive conditions. Small cruising detritivores and other small current-feeding herbivores were not affiliated with specific conditions as their constituting species were scattered in niche space. Main conclusions: Since copepod functional groups occupy distinct ecological niches, ecosystem processes related to these groups are expected to vary across environmental gradients. Conditions favouring large current-feeding herbivores should allow for enhanced fluxes of energy and nutrients through Mediterranean Sea ecosystems, while such fluxes should be weakened where large carnivores and small passive ambush-feeding copepods dominate. Our study supports the development of trait-based Zooplankton functional groups in marine ecosystem models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley & Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology ; Body length ; Carnivores ; Clustering ; Copepoda ; copepods ; Detritivores ; Earth Sciences ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecological niches ; Ecosystem models ; Environment models ; Environmental gradient ; environmental niche ; Environmental Sciences ; Feeding ; Feeding behavior ; Fluxes ; Functional groups ; Herbivores ; Marine ecosystems ; Morphology and diversity ; Niches ; Nutrients ; Oceanography ; Ordination ; Sciences of the Universe ; Spawning ; Species ; trait biogeography ; Variance analysis ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Journal of biogeography, 2018-03, Vol.45 (3), p.604-616</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-cd623c7cb60b0d8ababb2bb2a9b624d64851cb599f8c34955c89251d6b26d1683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-cd623c7cb60b0d8ababb2bb2a9b624d64851cb599f8c34955c89251d6b26d1683</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4707-8932 ; 0000-0002-7554-3646 ; 0000-0003-3226-9779</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26626974$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26626974$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01826722$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benedetti, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogt, Meike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Righetti, Damiano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guilhaumon, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayata, Sakina-Dorothée</creatorcontrib><title>Do functional groups of planktonic copepods differ in their ecological niches?</title><title>Journal of biogeography</title><description>Aim: To assess the degree of overlap between the environmental niches of marine planktonic copepods and test if the distribution of copepod functional groups differs across environmental gradients. Location: The Mediterranean Sea. Methods: Functional groups were defined based on clustering of functional traits in 106 marine copepod species using a multivariate ordination analysis. Functional traits included maximum body length, feeding mode, spawning strategy and trophic group. Simultaneously, the global distribution of the species was used to model their environmental niches with six environmental variables. For each of these predictors, four niche parameters were derived from the univariate response curve of each species to summarise their environmental preferences and ordinate the species in niche space through a PCA. Finally, the differences in the position in niche space of functional groups were tested with variance analysis. Results: We identified seven copepod functional groups with different distributions along the environmental gradients covered by our study. While carnivorous functional groups were affiliated with oligotrophic and tropical conditions, large and small current-feeding herbivores are associated with colder, more seasonally varying and productive conditions. Small cruising detritivores and other small current-feeding herbivores were not affiliated with specific conditions as their constituting species were scattered in niche space. Main conclusions: Since copepod functional groups occupy distinct ecological niches, ecosystem processes related to these groups are expected to vary across environmental gradients. Conditions favouring large current-feeding herbivores should allow for enhanced fluxes of energy and nutrients through Mediterranean Sea ecosystems, while such fluxes should be weakened where large carnivores and small passive ambush-feeding copepods dominate. Our study supports the development of trait-based Zooplankton functional groups in marine ecosystem models.</description><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Body length</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Copepoda</subject><subject>copepods</subject><subject>Detritivores</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecological niches</subject><subject>Ecosystem models</subject><subject>Environment models</subject><subject>Environmental gradient</subject><subject>environmental niche</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Functional groups</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Morphology and diversity</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Ordination</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Spawning</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>trait biogeography</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>0305-0270</issn><issn>1365-2699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoWB8Lf4AQcOVi2jxmMslKfLdSdKPrkGQybeo4GZOp0n9varWuvFy4cPnOgXsuACcYDXGq0UK7IaaYsR0wwJQVGWFC7IIBoqjIECnRPjiIcYEQEgXNB-DxxsN62Zre-VY1cBb8sovQ17BrVPva-9YZaHxnO19FWLm6tgG6FvZz6wK0xjd-5kwSJm5u48UR2KtVE-3xzzwEL3e3z9fjbPp0P7m-nGaGcs4yUzFCTWk0QxpVXGmlNUmthGYkr1jOC2x0IUTNDc1FURguSIErpgmrMOP0EJxvfOeqkV1wbyqspFdOji-ncr1DmBNWEvKBE3u2Ybvg35c29nLhlyFdGyVBqOSC4Vz8OZrgYwy23tpiJNfRyhSt_I42saMN--kau_oflA9Xk1_F6UaxiL0PWwVhLP2nzOkXKiCC2w</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Benedetti, Fabio</creator><creator>Vogt, Meike</creator><creator>Righetti, Damiano</creator><creator>Guilhaumon, François</creator><creator>Ayata, Sakina-Dorothée</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4707-8932</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7554-3646</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3226-9779</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Do functional groups of planktonic copepods differ in their ecological niches?</title><author>Benedetti, Fabio ; Vogt, Meike ; Righetti, Damiano ; Guilhaumon, François ; Ayata, Sakina-Dorothée</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-cd623c7cb60b0d8ababb2bb2a9b624d64851cb599f8c34955c89251d6b26d1683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Body length</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Copepoda</topic><topic>copepods</topic><topic>Detritivores</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecological niches</topic><topic>Ecosystem models</topic><topic>Environment models</topic><topic>Environmental gradient</topic><topic>environmental niche</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Functional groups</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Morphology and diversity</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Ordination</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Spawning</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>trait biogeography</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benedetti, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogt, Meike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Righetti, Damiano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guilhaumon, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayata, Sakina-Dorothée</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of biogeography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benedetti, Fabio</au><au>Vogt, Meike</au><au>Righetti, Damiano</au><au>Guilhaumon, François</au><au>Ayata, Sakina-Dorothée</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do functional groups of planktonic copepods differ in their ecological niches?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biogeography</jtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>604</spage><epage>616</epage><pages>604-616</pages><issn>0305-0270</issn><eissn>1365-2699</eissn><abstract>Aim: To assess the degree of overlap between the environmental niches of marine planktonic copepods and test if the distribution of copepod functional groups differs across environmental gradients. Location: The Mediterranean Sea. Methods: Functional groups were defined based on clustering of functional traits in 106 marine copepod species using a multivariate ordination analysis. Functional traits included maximum body length, feeding mode, spawning strategy and trophic group. Simultaneously, the global distribution of the species was used to model their environmental niches with six environmental variables. For each of these predictors, four niche parameters were derived from the univariate response curve of each species to summarise their environmental preferences and ordinate the species in niche space through a PCA. Finally, the differences in the position in niche space of functional groups were tested with variance analysis. Results: We identified seven copepod functional groups with different distributions along the environmental gradients covered by our study. While carnivorous functional groups were affiliated with oligotrophic and tropical conditions, large and small current-feeding herbivores are associated with colder, more seasonally varying and productive conditions. Small cruising detritivores and other small current-feeding herbivores were not affiliated with specific conditions as their constituting species were scattered in niche space. Main conclusions: Since copepod functional groups occupy distinct ecological niches, ecosystem processes related to these groups are expected to vary across environmental gradients. Conditions favouring large current-feeding herbivores should allow for enhanced fluxes of energy and nutrients through Mediterranean Sea ecosystems, while such fluxes should be weakened where large carnivores and small passive ambush-feeding copepods dominate. Our study supports the development of trait-based Zooplankton functional groups in marine ecosystem models.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jbi.13166</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4707-8932</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7554-3646</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3226-9779</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-0270 |
ispartof | Journal of biogeography, 2018-03, Vol.45 (3), p.604-616 |
issn | 0305-0270 1365-2699 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01826722v1 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Biodiversity and Ecology Body length Carnivores Clustering Copepoda copepods Detritivores Earth Sciences Ecological monitoring Ecological niches Ecosystem models Environment models Environmental gradient environmental niche Environmental Sciences Feeding Feeding behavior Fluxes Functional groups Herbivores Marine ecosystems Morphology and diversity Niches Nutrients Oceanography Ordination Sciences of the Universe Spawning Species trait biogeography Variance analysis Zooplankton |
title | Do functional groups of planktonic copepods differ in their ecological niches? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T21%3A18%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20functional%20groups%20of%20planktonic%20copepods%20differ%20in%20their%20ecological%20niches?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biogeography&rft.au=Benedetti,%20Fabio&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=604&rft.epage=616&rft.pages=604-616&rft.issn=0305-0270&rft.eissn=1365-2699&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jbi.13166&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E26626974%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-cd623c7cb60b0d8ababb2bb2a9b624d64851cb599f8c34955c89251d6b26d1683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2007896149&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26626974&rfr_iscdi=true |