Loading…

A proliferation inducing ligand (APRIL) promotes IL-10 production and regulatory functions of human B cells

Abstract B cells may have a negative regulatory role, mainly mediated by interleukin 10 (IL-10). We recently showed that regulatory B-cell functions are impaired in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and that mice transgenic for a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) are protected against coll...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of autoimmunity 2016-09, Vol.73, p.64-72
Main Authors: Hua, Charlotte, Audo, Rachel, Yeremenko, Nataliya, Baeten, Dominique, Hahne, Michael, Combe, Bernard, Morel, Jacques, Daïen, Claire
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract B cells may have a negative regulatory role, mainly mediated by interleukin 10 (IL-10). We recently showed that regulatory B-cell functions are impaired in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and that mice transgenic for a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) are protected against collagen-induced arthritis. We aimed to explore the effect of APRIL on human B-cell IL-10 production, in healthy subjects and in patients with RA. The IL-10 production of B-cell was greater with APRIL than with BLyS or control medium, in a dose dependent manner. TACI expression was greater in IL-10 producing B cells (B10) than non-IL-10–producing B cells whereas BAFF-R expression was lower. TNF-α and IFN-γ secretion of T-cells were decreased by APRIL-stimulated B cells. APRIL stimulated STAT3 and STAT3 inhibition decreased B10 cells. APRIL also promoted B10 cells in RA patients. In conclusion, APRIL but not BLyS promotes IL-10 production by CpG-activated B cells and enhances the regulatory role of B cells on T cells. B10 cells in RA patients are responsive to APRIL, which suggests a possible therapeutic application of APRIL to expand B10 cells. This could also explain the difference of clinical efficacy observed between belimumab and atacicept in RA.
ISSN:0896-8411
1095-9157
DOI:10.1016/j.jaut.2016.06.002