Loading…
Global and Local Deadlock Freedom in BIP
We present a criterion for checking local and global deadlock freedom of finite state systems expressed in BIP: a component-based framework for constructing complex distributed systems. Our criterion is evaluated by model-checking a set of subsystems of the overall large system. If satisfied in smal...
Saved in:
Published in: | ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology 2018-01, Vol.26 (3), p.1-48 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-5bbef7c434421dd80f3991b78663f74e396c48fc805afd7a8d04ed620d48c3013 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-5bbef7c434421dd80f3991b78663f74e396c48fc805afd7a8d04ed620d48c3013 |
container_end_page | 48 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Attie, Paul C. Bensalem, Saddek Bozga, Marius Jaber, Mohamad Sifakis, Joseph Zaraket, Fadi A. |
description | We present a criterion for checking local and global deadlock freedom of finite state systems expressed in BIP: a component-based framework for constructing complex distributed systems. Our criterion is evaluated by model-checking a set of subsystems of the overall large system. If satisfied in small subsystems, it implies deadlock-freedom of the overall system. If not satisfied, then we re-evaluate over larger subsystems, which improves the accuracy of the check. When the subsystem being checked becomes the entire system, our criterion becomes complete for deadlock-freedom. Hence our criterion only fails to decide deadlock freedom because of computational limitations: state-space explosion sets in when the subsystems become too large. Our method thus combines the possibility of fast response together with theoretical completeness. Other criteria for deadlock freedom, in contrast, are incomplete in principle, and so may fail to decide deadlock freedom even if unlimited computational resources are available. Also, our criterion certifies freedom from local deadlock, in which a subsystem is deadlocked while the rest of the system executes. Other criteria only certify freedom from global deadlock. We present experimental results for dining philosophers and for a multi-token-based resource allocation system, which subsumes several data arbiters and schedulers, including Milner’s token-based scheduler. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1145/3152910 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01865301v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_01865301v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-5bbef7c434421dd80f3991b78663f74e396c48fc805afd7a8d04ed620d48c3013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLBDEQhIMouK7iX5ibehjtTieT5Liu7gMG9KDgLWTywNXZjcyI4L93hl08ddF8VRTF2CXCLaKQd4SSG4QjNkEpVanI8ONBgzAlEb6dsrO-_wBAAi4m7HrZ5sa1hduFos5-UA_RhTb7z2LRxRjyttjsivv18zk7Sa7t48XhTtnr4vFlvirrp-V6PqtLzw3_LmXTxKS8ICE4hqAhkTHYKF1VlJSIZCovdPIapEtBOR1AxFBxCEJ7GlpN2c0-99219qvbbF33a7Pb2NWstuMPUFdyIH9G9mrP-i73fRfTvwHBjmPYwxj0B33DTRM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global and Local Deadlock Freedom in BIP</title><source>Association for Computing Machinery:Jisc Collections:ACM OPEN Journals 2023-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Attie, Paul C. ; Bensalem, Saddek ; Bozga, Marius ; Jaber, Mohamad ; Sifakis, Joseph ; Zaraket, Fadi A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Attie, Paul C. ; Bensalem, Saddek ; Bozga, Marius ; Jaber, Mohamad ; Sifakis, Joseph ; Zaraket, Fadi A.</creatorcontrib><description>We present a criterion for checking local and global deadlock freedom of finite state systems expressed in BIP: a component-based framework for constructing complex distributed systems. Our criterion is evaluated by model-checking a set of subsystems of the overall large system. If satisfied in small subsystems, it implies deadlock-freedom of the overall system. If not satisfied, then we re-evaluate over larger subsystems, which improves the accuracy of the check. When the subsystem being checked becomes the entire system, our criterion becomes complete for deadlock-freedom. Hence our criterion only fails to decide deadlock freedom because of computational limitations: state-space explosion sets in when the subsystems become too large. Our method thus combines the possibility of fast response together with theoretical completeness. Other criteria for deadlock freedom, in contrast, are incomplete in principle, and so may fail to decide deadlock freedom even if unlimited computational resources are available. Also, our criterion certifies freedom from local deadlock, in which a subsystem is deadlocked while the rest of the system executes. Other criteria only certify freedom from global deadlock. We present experimental results for dining philosophers and for a multi-token-based resource allocation system, which subsumes several data arbiters and schedulers, including Milner’s token-based scheduler.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-331X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7392</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1145/3152910</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Association for Computing Machinery</publisher><subject>Computer Science ; Embedded Systems</subject><ispartof>ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology, 2018-01, Vol.26 (3), p.1-48</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-5bbef7c434421dd80f3991b78663f74e396c48fc805afd7a8d04ed620d48c3013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-5bbef7c434421dd80f3991b78663f74e396c48fc805afd7a8d04ed620d48c3013</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1989-0974 ; 0000-0002-5753-2126 ; 0000-0003-4412-5684</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01865301$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Attie, Paul C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensalem, Saddek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozga, Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaber, Mohamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sifakis, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaraket, Fadi A.</creatorcontrib><title>Global and Local Deadlock Freedom in BIP</title><title>ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology</title><description>We present a criterion for checking local and global deadlock freedom of finite state systems expressed in BIP: a component-based framework for constructing complex distributed systems. Our criterion is evaluated by model-checking a set of subsystems of the overall large system. If satisfied in small subsystems, it implies deadlock-freedom of the overall system. If not satisfied, then we re-evaluate over larger subsystems, which improves the accuracy of the check. When the subsystem being checked becomes the entire system, our criterion becomes complete for deadlock-freedom. Hence our criterion only fails to decide deadlock freedom because of computational limitations: state-space explosion sets in when the subsystems become too large. Our method thus combines the possibility of fast response together with theoretical completeness. Other criteria for deadlock freedom, in contrast, are incomplete in principle, and so may fail to decide deadlock freedom even if unlimited computational resources are available. Also, our criterion certifies freedom from local deadlock, in which a subsystem is deadlocked while the rest of the system executes. Other criteria only certify freedom from global deadlock. We present experimental results for dining philosophers and for a multi-token-based resource allocation system, which subsumes several data arbiters and schedulers, including Milner’s token-based scheduler.</description><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Embedded Systems</subject><issn>1049-331X</issn><issn>1557-7392</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtLBDEQhIMouK7iX5ibehjtTieT5Liu7gMG9KDgLWTywNXZjcyI4L93hl08ddF8VRTF2CXCLaKQd4SSG4QjNkEpVanI8ONBgzAlEb6dsrO-_wBAAi4m7HrZ5sa1hduFos5-UA_RhTb7z2LRxRjyttjsivv18zk7Sa7t48XhTtnr4vFlvirrp-V6PqtLzw3_LmXTxKS8ICE4hqAhkTHYKF1VlJSIZCovdPIapEtBOR1AxFBxCEJ7GlpN2c0-99219qvbbF33a7Pb2NWstuMPUFdyIH9G9mrP-i73fRfTvwHBjmPYwxj0B33DTRM</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Attie, Paul C.</creator><creator>Bensalem, Saddek</creator><creator>Bozga, Marius</creator><creator>Jaber, Mohamad</creator><creator>Sifakis, Joseph</creator><creator>Zaraket, Fadi A.</creator><general>Association for Computing Machinery</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1989-0974</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5753-2126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4412-5684</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Global and Local Deadlock Freedom in BIP</title><author>Attie, Paul C. ; Bensalem, Saddek ; Bozga, Marius ; Jaber, Mohamad ; Sifakis, Joseph ; Zaraket, Fadi A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-5bbef7c434421dd80f3991b78663f74e396c48fc805afd7a8d04ed620d48c3013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Embedded Systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Attie, Paul C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensalem, Saddek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozga, Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaber, Mohamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sifakis, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaraket, Fadi A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Attie, Paul C.</au><au>Bensalem, Saddek</au><au>Bozga, Marius</au><au>Jaber, Mohamad</au><au>Sifakis, Joseph</au><au>Zaraket, Fadi A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global and Local Deadlock Freedom in BIP</atitle><jtitle>ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>1-48</pages><issn>1049-331X</issn><eissn>1557-7392</eissn><abstract>We present a criterion for checking local and global deadlock freedom of finite state systems expressed in BIP: a component-based framework for constructing complex distributed systems. Our criterion is evaluated by model-checking a set of subsystems of the overall large system. If satisfied in small subsystems, it implies deadlock-freedom of the overall system. If not satisfied, then we re-evaluate over larger subsystems, which improves the accuracy of the check. When the subsystem being checked becomes the entire system, our criterion becomes complete for deadlock-freedom. Hence our criterion only fails to decide deadlock freedom because of computational limitations: state-space explosion sets in when the subsystems become too large. Our method thus combines the possibility of fast response together with theoretical completeness. Other criteria for deadlock freedom, in contrast, are incomplete in principle, and so may fail to decide deadlock freedom even if unlimited computational resources are available. Also, our criterion certifies freedom from local deadlock, in which a subsystem is deadlocked while the rest of the system executes. Other criteria only certify freedom from global deadlock. We present experimental results for dining philosophers and for a multi-token-based resource allocation system, which subsumes several data arbiters and schedulers, including Milner’s token-based scheduler.</abstract><pub>Association for Computing Machinery</pub><doi>10.1145/3152910</doi><tpages>48</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1989-0974</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5753-2126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4412-5684</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-331X |
ispartof | ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology, 2018-01, Vol.26 (3), p.1-48 |
issn | 1049-331X 1557-7392 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01865301v1 |
source | Association for Computing Machinery:Jisc Collections:ACM OPEN Journals 2023-2025 (reading list) |
subjects | Computer Science Embedded Systems |
title | Global and Local Deadlock Freedom in BIP |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A40%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20and%20Local%20Deadlock%20Freedom%20in%20BIP&rft.jtitle=ACM%20transactions%20on%20software%20engineering%20and%20methodology&rft.au=Attie,%20Paul%20C.&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=1-48&rft.issn=1049-331X&rft.eissn=1557-7392&rft_id=info:doi/10.1145/3152910&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_01865301v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-5bbef7c434421dd80f3991b78663f74e396c48fc805afd7a8d04ed620d48c3013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |