Loading…
The contribution of private and public information in foraging by Australasian gannets
Predators that forage on foods with temporally and spatially patchy distributions may rely on private or public sources of information to enhance their chances of foraging success. Using GPS tracking, field observations, and videography, we examined potential sites and mechanisms of information acqu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Animal cognition 2014-07, Vol.17 (4), p.849-858 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-bf5466ab7e6c8d312c13b6fe37d8fcb16696a355c3ea4a97ab93857efe8630853 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-bf5466ab7e6c8d312c13b6fe37d8fcb16696a355c3ea4a97ab93857efe8630853 |
container_end_page | 858 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 849 |
container_title | Animal cognition |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E. Hauber, Mark E. Libby, Eric Amiot, Christophe Raubenheimer, David |
description | Predators that forage on foods with temporally and spatially patchy distributions may rely on private or public sources of information to enhance their chances of foraging success. Using GPS tracking, field observations, and videography, we examined potential sites and mechanisms of information acquisition in departures for foraging trips by colonially breeding Australasian gannets (
Morus serrator
). Analyses of the bill-fencing ceremony between mated pairs of breeding gannets did not detect correlations between parameters of this reciprocal behavior and foraging trips, as would have been predicted if gannets used this behavior as a source of private information. Instead, 60 % of the departing birds flew directly to join water rafts of other conspecific en route to the feeding grounds. The departure of solitary birds from the water rafts was synchronized (within 60 s) with the arrival of incoming foragers and also among departing birds. Furthermore, solitary departing birds from the rafts left in the same directional quadrant (90º slices) as the prior arriving (67 %) and also prior departing forager (79 %). When associated plunge dives of conspecific were visible from the colony, providing a public source of information, gannets more often departed from the water rafts in groups. Our study thus provides evidence for the use of water rafts, but not the nest site, as locations of information transfer, and also confirms the use of local enhancement as a strategy for foraging flights by Australasian gannets. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10071-013-0716-x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01931155v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1554952665</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-bf5466ab7e6c8d312c13b6fe37d8fcb16696a355c3ea4a97ab93857efe8630853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7jr6A7xIQBb00Jp0Pjo5Dou6woCX1WuoziSzWXqSMeledv-9aXscRRA8pCqVPFV5w4vQS0reUUK692WOtCGUNTXL5v4ROqeciUZzIR-f9lydoWel3BJCFNf0KTprOWOdJt05-nZ947BNccyhn8aQIk4eH3K4g9FhiFt8mPohWByiT3kPP4kQcS1gF-IO9w94PZUxwwAlQMQ7iNGN5Tl64mEo7sUxr9DXjx-uL6-azZdPny_Xm8YKpsem94JLCX3npFVbRltLWS-9Y91WedtTKbUEJoRlDjjoDnrNlOicd0oyogRbobfL3BsYTJW9h_xgEgRztd6Y-YxQzSgV4o5W9s3CHnL6Prkymn0o1g0DRJemYirFtWilFP-BMs0lb0lX0dd_obdpyrF-eqY6wRmta4XoQtmcSsnOn8RSYmYXzeJl1cvM7KW5rz2vjpOnfu-2p45f5lXg4ghAsTD4DNGG8ptTQiilZ65duFKv4s7lPyT-8_Uf7cq1Xw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1537543154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The contribution of private and public information in foraging by Australasian gannets</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E. ; Hauber, Mark E. ; Libby, Eric ; Amiot, Christophe ; Raubenheimer, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E. ; Hauber, Mark E. ; Libby, Eric ; Amiot, Christophe ; Raubenheimer, David</creatorcontrib><description>Predators that forage on foods with temporally and spatially patchy distributions may rely on private or public sources of information to enhance their chances of foraging success. Using GPS tracking, field observations, and videography, we examined potential sites and mechanisms of information acquisition in departures for foraging trips by colonially breeding Australasian gannets (
Morus serrator
). Analyses of the bill-fencing ceremony between mated pairs of breeding gannets did not detect correlations between parameters of this reciprocal behavior and foraging trips, as would have been predicted if gannets used this behavior as a source of private information. Instead, 60 % of the departing birds flew directly to join water rafts of other conspecific en route to the feeding grounds. The departure of solitary birds from the water rafts was synchronized (within 60 s) with the arrival of incoming foragers and also among departing birds. Furthermore, solitary departing birds from the rafts left in the same directional quadrant (90º slices) as the prior arriving (67 %) and also prior departing forager (79 %). When associated plunge dives of conspecific were visible from the colony, providing a public source of information, gannets more often departed from the water rafts in groups. Our study thus provides evidence for the use of water rafts, but not the nest site, as locations of information transfer, and also confirms the use of local enhancement as a strategy for foraging flights by Australasian gannets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-9448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-9456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10071-013-0716-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24337907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal biology ; Animal cognition ; Animal ethology ; Animals ; Aves ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Birds - physiology ; Ecology, environment ; Ecosystems ; Feeding Behavior - psychology ; Female ; Food and Nutrition ; Forage ; Foraging behavior ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Geographic Information Systems ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Morus serrator ; Original Paper ; Populations and Evolution ; Predators ; Psychology Research ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Public information ; Social Behavior ; Symbiosis ; Vertebrate Zoology ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Animal cognition, 2014-07, Vol.17 (4), p.849-858</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-bf5466ab7e6c8d312c13b6fe37d8fcb16696a355c3ea4a97ab93857efe8630853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-bf5466ab7e6c8d312c13b6fe37d8fcb16696a355c3ea4a97ab93857efe8630853</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4788-0928</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28558897$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24337907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01931155$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauber, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libby, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amiot, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raubenheimer, David</creatorcontrib><title>The contribution of private and public information in foraging by Australasian gannets</title><title>Animal cognition</title><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><description>Predators that forage on foods with temporally and spatially patchy distributions may rely on private or public sources of information to enhance their chances of foraging success. Using GPS tracking, field observations, and videography, we examined potential sites and mechanisms of information acquisition in departures for foraging trips by colonially breeding Australasian gannets (
Morus serrator
). Analyses of the bill-fencing ceremony between mated pairs of breeding gannets did not detect correlations between parameters of this reciprocal behavior and foraging trips, as would have been predicted if gannets used this behavior as a source of private information. Instead, 60 % of the departing birds flew directly to join water rafts of other conspecific en route to the feeding grounds. The departure of solitary birds from the water rafts was synchronized (within 60 s) with the arrival of incoming foragers and also among departing birds. Furthermore, solitary departing birds from the rafts left in the same directional quadrant (90º slices) as the prior arriving (67 %) and also prior departing forager (79 %). When associated plunge dives of conspecific were visible from the colony, providing a public source of information, gannets more often departed from the water rafts in groups. Our study thus provides evidence for the use of water rafts, but not the nest site, as locations of information transfer, and also confirms the use of local enhancement as a strategy for foraging flights by Australasian gannets.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal biology</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>Ecology, environment</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food and Nutrition</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Geographic Information Systems</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Morus serrator</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Populations and Evolution</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Psychology Research</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Public information</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Vertebrate Zoology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1435-9448</issn><issn>1435-9456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7jr6A7xIQBb00Jp0Pjo5Dou6woCX1WuoziSzWXqSMeledv-9aXscRRA8pCqVPFV5w4vQS0reUUK692WOtCGUNTXL5v4ROqeciUZzIR-f9lydoWel3BJCFNf0KTprOWOdJt05-nZ947BNccyhn8aQIk4eH3K4g9FhiFt8mPohWByiT3kPP4kQcS1gF-IO9w94PZUxwwAlQMQ7iNGN5Tl64mEo7sUxr9DXjx-uL6-azZdPny_Xm8YKpsem94JLCX3npFVbRltLWS-9Y91WedtTKbUEJoRlDjjoDnrNlOicd0oyogRbobfL3BsYTJW9h_xgEgRztd6Y-YxQzSgV4o5W9s3CHnL6Prkymn0o1g0DRJemYirFtWilFP-BMs0lb0lX0dd_obdpyrF-eqY6wRmta4XoQtmcSsnOn8RSYmYXzeJl1cvM7KW5rz2vjpOnfu-2p45f5lXg4ghAsTD4DNGG8ptTQiilZ65duFKv4s7lPyT-8_Uf7cq1Xw</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E.</creator><creator>Hauber, Mark E.</creator><creator>Libby, Eric</creator><creator>Amiot, Christophe</creator><creator>Raubenheimer, David</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag (Germany)</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4788-0928</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>The contribution of private and public information in foraging by Australasian gannets</title><author>Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E. ; Hauber, Mark E. ; Libby, Eric ; Amiot, Christophe ; Raubenheimer, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-bf5466ab7e6c8d312c13b6fe37d8fcb16696a355c3ea4a97ab93857efe8630853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal biology</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>Ecology, environment</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food and Nutrition</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Geographic Information Systems</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Morus serrator</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Populations and Evolution</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Psychology Research</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Public information</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Vertebrate Zoology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauber, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libby, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amiot, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raubenheimer, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E.</au><au>Hauber, Mark E.</au><au>Libby, Eric</au><au>Amiot, Christophe</au><au>Raubenheimer, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The contribution of private and public information in foraging by Australasian gannets</atitle><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle><stitle>Anim Cogn</stitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>849</spage><epage>858</epage><pages>849-858</pages><issn>1435-9448</issn><eissn>1435-9456</eissn><abstract>Predators that forage on foods with temporally and spatially patchy distributions may rely on private or public sources of information to enhance their chances of foraging success. Using GPS tracking, field observations, and videography, we examined potential sites and mechanisms of information acquisition in departures for foraging trips by colonially breeding Australasian gannets (
Morus serrator
). Analyses of the bill-fencing ceremony between mated pairs of breeding gannets did not detect correlations between parameters of this reciprocal behavior and foraging trips, as would have been predicted if gannets used this behavior as a source of private information. Instead, 60 % of the departing birds flew directly to join water rafts of other conspecific en route to the feeding grounds. The departure of solitary birds from the water rafts was synchronized (within 60 s) with the arrival of incoming foragers and also among departing birds. Furthermore, solitary departing birds from the rafts left in the same directional quadrant (90º slices) as the prior arriving (67 %) and also prior departing forager (79 %). When associated plunge dives of conspecific were visible from the colony, providing a public source of information, gannets more often departed from the water rafts in groups. Our study thus provides evidence for the use of water rafts, but not the nest site, as locations of information transfer, and also confirms the use of local enhancement as a strategy for foraging flights by Australasian gannets.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>24337907</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10071-013-0716-x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4788-0928</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1435-9448 |
ispartof | Animal cognition, 2014-07, Vol.17 (4), p.849-858 |
issn | 1435-9448 1435-9456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01931155v1 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal biology Animal cognition Animal ethology Animals Aves Behavioral Sciences Biodiversity Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Birds Birds - physiology Ecology, environment Ecosystems Feeding Behavior - psychology Female Food and Nutrition Forage Foraging behavior Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Geographic Information Systems Life Sciences Male Morus serrator Original Paper Populations and Evolution Predators Psychology Research Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Public information Social Behavior Symbiosis Vertebrate Zoology Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution Zoology |
title | The contribution of private and public information in foraging by Australasian gannets |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A54%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20contribution%20of%20private%20and%20public%20information%20in%20foraging%20by%20Australasian%20gannets&rft.jtitle=Animal%20cognition&rft.au=Machovsky-Capuska,%20Gabriel%20E.&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=849&rft.epage=858&rft.pages=849-858&rft.issn=1435-9448&rft.eissn=1435-9456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10071-013-0716-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1554952665%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-bf5466ab7e6c8d312c13b6fe37d8fcb16696a355c3ea4a97ab93857efe8630853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1537543154&rft_id=info:pmid/24337907&rfr_iscdi=true |