Loading…

The contribution of private and public information in foraging by Australasian gannets

Predators that forage on foods with temporally and spatially patchy distributions may rely on private or public sources of information to enhance their chances of foraging success. Using GPS tracking, field observations, and videography, we examined potential sites and mechanisms of information acqu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal cognition 2014-07, Vol.17 (4), p.849-858
Main Authors: Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E., Hauber, Mark E., Libby, Eric, Amiot, Christophe, Raubenheimer, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-bf5466ab7e6c8d312c13b6fe37d8fcb16696a355c3ea4a97ab93857efe8630853
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-bf5466ab7e6c8d312c13b6fe37d8fcb16696a355c3ea4a97ab93857efe8630853
container_end_page 858
container_issue 4
container_start_page 849
container_title Animal cognition
container_volume 17
creator Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E.
Hauber, Mark E.
Libby, Eric
Amiot, Christophe
Raubenheimer, David
description Predators that forage on foods with temporally and spatially patchy distributions may rely on private or public sources of information to enhance their chances of foraging success. Using GPS tracking, field observations, and videography, we examined potential sites and mechanisms of information acquisition in departures for foraging trips by colonially breeding Australasian gannets ( Morus serrator ). Analyses of the bill-fencing ceremony between mated pairs of breeding gannets did not detect correlations between parameters of this reciprocal behavior and foraging trips, as would have been predicted if gannets used this behavior as a source of private information. Instead, 60 % of the departing birds flew directly to join water rafts of other conspecific en route to the feeding grounds. The departure of solitary birds from the water rafts was synchronized (within 60 s) with the arrival of incoming foragers and also among departing birds. Furthermore, solitary departing birds from the rafts left in the same directional quadrant (90º slices) as the prior arriving (67 %) and also prior departing forager (79 %). When associated plunge dives of conspecific were visible from the colony, providing a public source of information, gannets more often departed from the water rafts in groups. Our study thus provides evidence for the use of water rafts, but not the nest site, as locations of information transfer, and also confirms the use of local enhancement as a strategy for foraging flights by Australasian gannets.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10071-013-0716-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01931155v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1554952665</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-bf5466ab7e6c8d312c13b6fe37d8fcb16696a355c3ea4a97ab93857efe8630853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7jr6A7xIQBb00Jp0Pjo5Dou6woCX1WuoziSzWXqSMeledv-9aXscRRA8pCqVPFV5w4vQS0reUUK692WOtCGUNTXL5v4ROqeciUZzIR-f9lydoWel3BJCFNf0KTprOWOdJt05-nZ947BNccyhn8aQIk4eH3K4g9FhiFt8mPohWByiT3kPP4kQcS1gF-IO9w94PZUxwwAlQMQ7iNGN5Tl64mEo7sUxr9DXjx-uL6-azZdPny_Xm8YKpsem94JLCX3npFVbRltLWS-9Y91WedtTKbUEJoRlDjjoDnrNlOicd0oyogRbobfL3BsYTJW9h_xgEgRztd6Y-YxQzSgV4o5W9s3CHnL6Prkymn0o1g0DRJemYirFtWilFP-BMs0lb0lX0dd_obdpyrF-eqY6wRmta4XoQtmcSsnOn8RSYmYXzeJl1cvM7KW5rz2vjpOnfu-2p45f5lXg4ghAsTD4DNGG8ptTQiilZ65duFKv4s7lPyT-8_Uf7cq1Xw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1537543154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The contribution of private and public information in foraging by Australasian gannets</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E. ; Hauber, Mark E. ; Libby, Eric ; Amiot, Christophe ; Raubenheimer, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E. ; Hauber, Mark E. ; Libby, Eric ; Amiot, Christophe ; Raubenheimer, David</creatorcontrib><description>Predators that forage on foods with temporally and spatially patchy distributions may rely on private or public sources of information to enhance their chances of foraging success. Using GPS tracking, field observations, and videography, we examined potential sites and mechanisms of information acquisition in departures for foraging trips by colonially breeding Australasian gannets ( Morus serrator ). Analyses of the bill-fencing ceremony between mated pairs of breeding gannets did not detect correlations between parameters of this reciprocal behavior and foraging trips, as would have been predicted if gannets used this behavior as a source of private information. Instead, 60 % of the departing birds flew directly to join water rafts of other conspecific en route to the feeding grounds. The departure of solitary birds from the water rafts was synchronized (within 60 s) with the arrival of incoming foragers and also among departing birds. Furthermore, solitary departing birds from the rafts left in the same directional quadrant (90º slices) as the prior arriving (67 %) and also prior departing forager (79 %). When associated plunge dives of conspecific were visible from the colony, providing a public source of information, gannets more often departed from the water rafts in groups. Our study thus provides evidence for the use of water rafts, but not the nest site, as locations of information transfer, and also confirms the use of local enhancement as a strategy for foraging flights by Australasian gannets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-9448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-9456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10071-013-0716-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24337907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal biology ; Animal cognition ; Animal ethology ; Animals ; Aves ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Birds - physiology ; Ecology, environment ; Ecosystems ; Feeding Behavior - psychology ; Female ; Food and Nutrition ; Forage ; Foraging behavior ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Geographic Information Systems ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Morus serrator ; Original Paper ; Populations and Evolution ; Predators ; Psychology Research ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Public information ; Social Behavior ; Symbiosis ; Vertebrate Zoology ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Animal cognition, 2014-07, Vol.17 (4), p.849-858</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-bf5466ab7e6c8d312c13b6fe37d8fcb16696a355c3ea4a97ab93857efe8630853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-bf5466ab7e6c8d312c13b6fe37d8fcb16696a355c3ea4a97ab93857efe8630853</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4788-0928</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28558897$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24337907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01931155$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauber, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libby, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amiot, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raubenheimer, David</creatorcontrib><title>The contribution of private and public information in foraging by Australasian gannets</title><title>Animal cognition</title><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><description>Predators that forage on foods with temporally and spatially patchy distributions may rely on private or public sources of information to enhance their chances of foraging success. Using GPS tracking, field observations, and videography, we examined potential sites and mechanisms of information acquisition in departures for foraging trips by colonially breeding Australasian gannets ( Morus serrator ). Analyses of the bill-fencing ceremony between mated pairs of breeding gannets did not detect correlations between parameters of this reciprocal behavior and foraging trips, as would have been predicted if gannets used this behavior as a source of private information. Instead, 60 % of the departing birds flew directly to join water rafts of other conspecific en route to the feeding grounds. The departure of solitary birds from the water rafts was synchronized (within 60 s) with the arrival of incoming foragers and also among departing birds. Furthermore, solitary departing birds from the rafts left in the same directional quadrant (90º slices) as the prior arriving (67 %) and also prior departing forager (79 %). When associated plunge dives of conspecific were visible from the colony, providing a public source of information, gannets more often departed from the water rafts in groups. Our study thus provides evidence for the use of water rafts, but not the nest site, as locations of information transfer, and also confirms the use of local enhancement as a strategy for foraging flights by Australasian gannets.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal biology</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>Ecology, environment</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food and Nutrition</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Geographic Information Systems</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Morus serrator</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Populations and Evolution</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Psychology Research</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Public information</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Vertebrate Zoology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1435-9448</issn><issn>1435-9456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7jr6A7xIQBb00Jp0Pjo5Dou6woCX1WuoziSzWXqSMeledv-9aXscRRA8pCqVPFV5w4vQS0reUUK692WOtCGUNTXL5v4ROqeciUZzIR-f9lydoWel3BJCFNf0KTprOWOdJt05-nZ947BNccyhn8aQIk4eH3K4g9FhiFt8mPohWByiT3kPP4kQcS1gF-IO9w94PZUxwwAlQMQ7iNGN5Tl64mEo7sUxr9DXjx-uL6-azZdPny_Xm8YKpsem94JLCX3npFVbRltLWS-9Y91WedtTKbUEJoRlDjjoDnrNlOicd0oyogRbobfL3BsYTJW9h_xgEgRztd6Y-YxQzSgV4o5W9s3CHnL6Prkymn0o1g0DRJemYirFtWilFP-BMs0lb0lX0dd_obdpyrF-eqY6wRmta4XoQtmcSsnOn8RSYmYXzeJl1cvM7KW5rz2vjpOnfu-2p45f5lXg4ghAsTD4DNGG8ptTQiilZ65duFKv4s7lPyT-8_Uf7cq1Xw</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E.</creator><creator>Hauber, Mark E.</creator><creator>Libby, Eric</creator><creator>Amiot, Christophe</creator><creator>Raubenheimer, David</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag (Germany)</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4788-0928</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>The contribution of private and public information in foraging by Australasian gannets</title><author>Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E. ; Hauber, Mark E. ; Libby, Eric ; Amiot, Christophe ; Raubenheimer, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-bf5466ab7e6c8d312c13b6fe37d8fcb16696a355c3ea4a97ab93857efe8630853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal biology</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>Ecology, environment</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food and Nutrition</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Geographic Information Systems</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Morus serrator</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Populations and Evolution</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Psychology Research</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Public information</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Vertebrate Zoology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauber, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libby, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amiot, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raubenheimer, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Machovsky-Capuska, Gabriel E.</au><au>Hauber, Mark E.</au><au>Libby, Eric</au><au>Amiot, Christophe</au><au>Raubenheimer, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The contribution of private and public information in foraging by Australasian gannets</atitle><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle><stitle>Anim Cogn</stitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>849</spage><epage>858</epage><pages>849-858</pages><issn>1435-9448</issn><eissn>1435-9456</eissn><abstract>Predators that forage on foods with temporally and spatially patchy distributions may rely on private or public sources of information to enhance their chances of foraging success. Using GPS tracking, field observations, and videography, we examined potential sites and mechanisms of information acquisition in departures for foraging trips by colonially breeding Australasian gannets ( Morus serrator ). Analyses of the bill-fencing ceremony between mated pairs of breeding gannets did not detect correlations between parameters of this reciprocal behavior and foraging trips, as would have been predicted if gannets used this behavior as a source of private information. Instead, 60 % of the departing birds flew directly to join water rafts of other conspecific en route to the feeding grounds. The departure of solitary birds from the water rafts was synchronized (within 60 s) with the arrival of incoming foragers and also among departing birds. Furthermore, solitary departing birds from the rafts left in the same directional quadrant (90º slices) as the prior arriving (67 %) and also prior departing forager (79 %). When associated plunge dives of conspecific were visible from the colony, providing a public source of information, gannets more often departed from the water rafts in groups. Our study thus provides evidence for the use of water rafts, but not the nest site, as locations of information transfer, and also confirms the use of local enhancement as a strategy for foraging flights by Australasian gannets.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>24337907</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10071-013-0716-x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4788-0928</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1435-9448
ispartof Animal cognition, 2014-07, Vol.17 (4), p.849-858
issn 1435-9448
1435-9456
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01931155v1
source Springer Nature
subjects Animal behavior
Animal biology
Animal cognition
Animal ethology
Animals
Aves
Behavioral Sciences
Biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Birds
Birds - physiology
Ecology, environment
Ecosystems
Feeding Behavior - psychology
Female
Food and Nutrition
Forage
Foraging behavior
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Geographic Information Systems
Life Sciences
Male
Morus serrator
Original Paper
Populations and Evolution
Predators
Psychology Research
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Public information
Social Behavior
Symbiosis
Vertebrate Zoology
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
Zoology
title The contribution of private and public information in foraging by Australasian gannets
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A54%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20contribution%20of%20private%20and%20public%20information%20in%20foraging%20by%20Australasian%20gannets&rft.jtitle=Animal%20cognition&rft.au=Machovsky-Capuska,%20Gabriel%20E.&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=849&rft.epage=858&rft.pages=849-858&rft.issn=1435-9448&rft.eissn=1435-9456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10071-013-0716-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1554952665%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-bf5466ab7e6c8d312c13b6fe37d8fcb16696a355c3ea4a97ab93857efe8630853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1537543154&rft_id=info:pmid/24337907&rfr_iscdi=true