Loading…

Increased adhesion of Enterococcus faecalis strains with bimodal electrophoretic mobility distributions

Initial adhesion is a determinant in the development of microbial biofilms. It is influenced, amongst others, by the surface hydrophobicity and the electrostatic characteristics of the substratum and adhering organisms. Enterococcus faecalis strains, grown in pure cultures, generally display subpopu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Colloids and surfaces, B, Biointerfaces B, Biointerfaces, 2008-07, Vol.64 (2), p.302-306
Main Authors: van Merode, Annet E.J., Duval, Jérôme F.L., van der Mei, Henny C., Busscher, Henk J., Krom, Bastiaan P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-7c0ca6e054eab75bde09fa732095ada2776a01300eaf7796b82887b1e9d56adc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-7c0ca6e054eab75bde09fa732095ada2776a01300eaf7796b82887b1e9d56adc3
container_end_page 306
container_issue 2
container_start_page 302
container_title Colloids and surfaces, B, Biointerfaces
container_volume 64
creator van Merode, Annet E.J.
Duval, Jérôme F.L.
van der Mei, Henny C.
Busscher, Henk J.
Krom, Bastiaan P.
description Initial adhesion is a determinant in the development of microbial biofilms. It is influenced, amongst others, by the surface hydrophobicity and the electrostatic characteristics of the substratum and adhering organisms. Enterococcus faecalis strains, grown in pure cultures, generally display subpopulations with different electrokinetic features, reflected in a bimodal electrophoretic mobility distribution. Here, the initial adhesion kinetics of five heterogeneous and five homogeneous E. faecalis strains were followed in a parallel-plate flow chamber. After 4 h of flow, heterogeneous strains adhered in significantly higher numbers than homogeneous strains (7.3 × 10 6 and 1.9 × 10 6 cm −2, respectively), but the initial deposition rates were not significantly influenced (740 and 600 cm −2 s −1, respectively). Apparently, initial deposition of bacteria is mainly governed by attractive Lifshitz–Van der Waals forces that overwhelm the electrostatic repulsion energy barrier, thus resulting in similar initial deposition rates for the various bacterial populations investigated. In contrast, during later stages of adhesion, bacteria in heterogeneous cultures likely experience a lower electrostatic repulsion from already adhering bacteria than bacteria in homogeneous cultures, thus allowing a closer proximity of the bacteria with respect to each other, which ultimately leads to increased adhesion after 4 h.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.02.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02059717v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0927776508000842</els_id><sourcerecordid>70782394</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-7c0ca6e054eab75bde09fa732095ada2776a01300eaf7796b82887b1e9d56adc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCX6h8QuKQMHY-nNyoqkIrrcQFztbEnrBeJfFiO0X99_VqF3rsyZL1zMw78zB2LaAUINov-9L4Ka5hHEoJ0JUgS4D6DduITlVFXbXqLdtAL1WhVNtcsMsY9wAga6HeswvRVU2noNmw3w-LCYSRLEe7o-j8wv3I75ZEwRtvzBr5iGRwcpHHFNAtkf91accHN3uLE6eJTAr-sPOBkjN89oObXHri1mXeDWvKPeMH9m7EKdLH83vFfn27-3l7X2x_fH-4vdkWpq5EKpQBgy1BUxMOqhksQT-iqiT0DVqUeRkEUQEQjkr17dDJrlODoN42LVpTXbHPp747nPQhuBnDk_bo9P3NVh__QELTK6EeRWY_ndhD8H9WiknPLhqaJlzIr1ErUJ2s-vpVMKeDnKPLYHsCTfAxBhr_RxCgj970Xv_zpo_echydveXC6_OEdZjJvpSdRWXg6wmgfLxHR0FH42gxZF3I99fWu9dmPAORaK7Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20902888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increased adhesion of Enterococcus faecalis strains with bimodal electrophoretic mobility distributions</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>van Merode, Annet E.J. ; Duval, Jérôme F.L. ; van der Mei, Henny C. ; Busscher, Henk J. ; Krom, Bastiaan P.</creator><creatorcontrib>van Merode, Annet E.J. ; Duval, Jérôme F.L. ; van der Mei, Henny C. ; Busscher, Henk J. ; Krom, Bastiaan P.</creatorcontrib><description>Initial adhesion is a determinant in the development of microbial biofilms. It is influenced, amongst others, by the surface hydrophobicity and the electrostatic characteristics of the substratum and adhering organisms. Enterococcus faecalis strains, grown in pure cultures, generally display subpopulations with different electrokinetic features, reflected in a bimodal electrophoretic mobility distribution. Here, the initial adhesion kinetics of five heterogeneous and five homogeneous E. faecalis strains were followed in a parallel-plate flow chamber. After 4 h of flow, heterogeneous strains adhered in significantly higher numbers than homogeneous strains (7.3 × 10 6 and 1.9 × 10 6 cm −2, respectively), but the initial deposition rates were not significantly influenced (740 and 600 cm −2 s −1, respectively). Apparently, initial deposition of bacteria is mainly governed by attractive Lifshitz–Van der Waals forces that overwhelm the electrostatic repulsion energy barrier, thus resulting in similar initial deposition rates for the various bacterial populations investigated. In contrast, during later stages of adhesion, bacteria in heterogeneous cultures likely experience a lower electrostatic repulsion from already adhering bacteria than bacteria in homogeneous cultures, thus allowing a closer proximity of the bacteria with respect to each other, which ultimately leads to increased adhesion after 4 h.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0927-7765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4367</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.02.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18358705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bacterial Adhesion - physiology ; Buffers ; Chemical Sciences ; Electrophoresis - methods ; Electrophoretic mobility ; Enterococcus faecalis ; Enterococcus faecalis - classification ; Enterococcus faecalis - genetics ; Enterococcus faecalis - growth &amp; development ; Enterococcus faecalis - isolation &amp; purification ; Enterococcus faecalis - physiology ; Environmental Sciences ; Glass - chemistry ; Heterogenic population ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Initial adhesion ; Phosphates - chemistry ; Physics ; Potassium Compounds - chemistry ; Substrate Specificity ; Surface Properties ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Colloids and surfaces, B, Biointerfaces, 2008-07, Vol.64 (2), p.302-306</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-7c0ca6e054eab75bde09fa732095ada2776a01300eaf7796b82887b1e9d56adc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-7c0ca6e054eab75bde09fa732095ada2776a01300eaf7796b82887b1e9d56adc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5458-3761</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18358705$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02059717$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Merode, Annet E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duval, Jérôme F.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Mei, Henny C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busscher, Henk J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krom, Bastiaan P.</creatorcontrib><title>Increased adhesion of Enterococcus faecalis strains with bimodal electrophoretic mobility distributions</title><title>Colloids and surfaces, B, Biointerfaces</title><addtitle>Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces</addtitle><description>Initial adhesion is a determinant in the development of microbial biofilms. It is influenced, amongst others, by the surface hydrophobicity and the electrostatic characteristics of the substratum and adhering organisms. Enterococcus faecalis strains, grown in pure cultures, generally display subpopulations with different electrokinetic features, reflected in a bimodal electrophoretic mobility distribution. Here, the initial adhesion kinetics of five heterogeneous and five homogeneous E. faecalis strains were followed in a parallel-plate flow chamber. After 4 h of flow, heterogeneous strains adhered in significantly higher numbers than homogeneous strains (7.3 × 10 6 and 1.9 × 10 6 cm −2, respectively), but the initial deposition rates were not significantly influenced (740 and 600 cm −2 s −1, respectively). Apparently, initial deposition of bacteria is mainly governed by attractive Lifshitz–Van der Waals forces that overwhelm the electrostatic repulsion energy barrier, thus resulting in similar initial deposition rates for the various bacterial populations investigated. In contrast, during later stages of adhesion, bacteria in heterogeneous cultures likely experience a lower electrostatic repulsion from already adhering bacteria than bacteria in homogeneous cultures, thus allowing a closer proximity of the bacteria with respect to each other, which ultimately leads to increased adhesion after 4 h.</description><subject>Bacterial Adhesion - physiology</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Chemical Sciences</subject><subject>Electrophoresis - methods</subject><subject>Electrophoretic mobility</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecalis</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecalis - classification</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecalis - genetics</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecalis - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecalis - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecalis - physiology</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Glass - chemistry</subject><subject>Heterogenic population</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Initial adhesion</subject><subject>Phosphates - chemistry</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Potassium Compounds - chemistry</subject><subject>Substrate Specificity</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0927-7765</issn><issn>1873-4367</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCX6h8QuKQMHY-nNyoqkIrrcQFztbEnrBeJfFiO0X99_VqF3rsyZL1zMw78zB2LaAUINov-9L4Ka5hHEoJ0JUgS4D6DduITlVFXbXqLdtAL1WhVNtcsMsY9wAga6HeswvRVU2noNmw3w-LCYSRLEe7o-j8wv3I75ZEwRtvzBr5iGRwcpHHFNAtkf91accHN3uLE6eJTAr-sPOBkjN89oObXHri1mXeDWvKPeMH9m7EKdLH83vFfn27-3l7X2x_fH-4vdkWpq5EKpQBgy1BUxMOqhksQT-iqiT0DVqUeRkEUQEQjkr17dDJrlODoN42LVpTXbHPp747nPQhuBnDk_bo9P3NVh__QELTK6EeRWY_ndhD8H9WiknPLhqaJlzIr1ErUJ2s-vpVMKeDnKPLYHsCTfAxBhr_RxCgj970Xv_zpo_echydveXC6_OEdZjJvpSdRWXg6wmgfLxHR0FH42gxZF3I99fWu9dmPAORaK7Y</recordid><startdate>20080715</startdate><enddate>20080715</enddate><creator>van Merode, Annet E.J.</creator><creator>Duval, Jérôme F.L.</creator><creator>van der Mei, Henny C.</creator><creator>Busscher, Henk J.</creator><creator>Krom, Bastiaan P.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5458-3761</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20080715</creationdate><title>Increased adhesion of Enterococcus faecalis strains with bimodal electrophoretic mobility distributions</title><author>van Merode, Annet E.J. ; Duval, Jérôme F.L. ; van der Mei, Henny C. ; Busscher, Henk J. ; Krom, Bastiaan P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-7c0ca6e054eab75bde09fa732095ada2776a01300eaf7796b82887b1e9d56adc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Bacterial Adhesion - physiology</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Chemical Sciences</topic><topic>Electrophoresis - methods</topic><topic>Electrophoretic mobility</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecalis</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecalis - classification</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecalis - genetics</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecalis - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecalis - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecalis - physiology</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Glass - chemistry</topic><topic>Heterogenic population</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Initial adhesion</topic><topic>Phosphates - chemistry</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Potassium Compounds - chemistry</topic><topic>Substrate Specificity</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Merode, Annet E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duval, Jérôme F.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Mei, Henny C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busscher, Henk J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krom, Bastiaan P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Colloids and surfaces, B, Biointerfaces</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Merode, Annet E.J.</au><au>Duval, Jérôme F.L.</au><au>van der Mei, Henny C.</au><au>Busscher, Henk J.</au><au>Krom, Bastiaan P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increased adhesion of Enterococcus faecalis strains with bimodal electrophoretic mobility distributions</atitle><jtitle>Colloids and surfaces, B, Biointerfaces</jtitle><addtitle>Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces</addtitle><date>2008-07-15</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>302</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>302-306</pages><issn>0927-7765</issn><eissn>1873-4367</eissn><abstract>Initial adhesion is a determinant in the development of microbial biofilms. It is influenced, amongst others, by the surface hydrophobicity and the electrostatic characteristics of the substratum and adhering organisms. Enterococcus faecalis strains, grown in pure cultures, generally display subpopulations with different electrokinetic features, reflected in a bimodal electrophoretic mobility distribution. Here, the initial adhesion kinetics of five heterogeneous and five homogeneous E. faecalis strains were followed in a parallel-plate flow chamber. After 4 h of flow, heterogeneous strains adhered in significantly higher numbers than homogeneous strains (7.3 × 10 6 and 1.9 × 10 6 cm −2, respectively), but the initial deposition rates were not significantly influenced (740 and 600 cm −2 s −1, respectively). Apparently, initial deposition of bacteria is mainly governed by attractive Lifshitz–Van der Waals forces that overwhelm the electrostatic repulsion energy barrier, thus resulting in similar initial deposition rates for the various bacterial populations investigated. In contrast, during later stages of adhesion, bacteria in heterogeneous cultures likely experience a lower electrostatic repulsion from already adhering bacteria than bacteria in homogeneous cultures, thus allowing a closer proximity of the bacteria with respect to each other, which ultimately leads to increased adhesion after 4 h.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>18358705</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.02.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5458-3761</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0927-7765
ispartof Colloids and surfaces, B, Biointerfaces, 2008-07, Vol.64 (2), p.302-306
issn 0927-7765
1873-4367
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02059717v1
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bacterial Adhesion - physiology
Buffers
Chemical Sciences
Electrophoresis - methods
Electrophoretic mobility
Enterococcus faecalis
Enterococcus faecalis - classification
Enterococcus faecalis - genetics
Enterococcus faecalis - growth & development
Enterococcus faecalis - isolation & purification
Enterococcus faecalis - physiology
Environmental Sciences
Glass - chemistry
Heterogenic population
Humans
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Initial adhesion
Phosphates - chemistry
Physics
Potassium Compounds - chemistry
Substrate Specificity
Surface Properties
Time Factors
title Increased adhesion of Enterococcus faecalis strains with bimodal electrophoretic mobility distributions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A08%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increased%20adhesion%20of%20Enterococcus%20faecalis%20strains%20with%20bimodal%20electrophoretic%20mobility%20distributions&rft.jtitle=Colloids%20and%20surfaces,%20B,%20Biointerfaces&rft.au=van%20Merode,%20Annet%20E.J.&rft.date=2008-07-15&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=302&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=302-306&rft.issn=0927-7765&rft.eissn=1873-4367&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.02.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E70782394%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-7c0ca6e054eab75bde09fa732095ada2776a01300eaf7796b82887b1e9d56adc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20902888&rft_id=info:pmid/18358705&rfr_iscdi=true