Does phylogeographical structure relate to climatic niche divergence? A test using maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.)

• Published in: Global ecology and biogeography 2015-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1302-1313
• Main Authors: Serra-Varela, M. J., Grivet, D., Vincenot, L., Broennimann, O., Gonzalo-Jiménez, J., Zimmermann, N. E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bioclimatology; Biodiversity; Climate change; conservation; conservation biology; Ecology, environment; Evolution; genetics; infraspecies; Life Sciences; niche conservatism; Phylogenetics; Pinus; Pinus pinaster; Populations and Evolution; Principal components analysis; SDM; species distribution model
• ISSN: 1466-822X; 1466-8238; 1466-822X
• DOI: 10.1111/geb.12369

Aim: To disentangle the effects of environmental and geographical processes driving phylogenetic distances among clades of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). To assess the implications for conservation management of combining molecular information with species distribution models (SDMs; which predict species distribution based on known occurrence records and on environmental variables). Location: Western Mediterranean Basin and European Atlantic coast. Methods: We undertook two cluster analyses for eight genetically defined pine clades based on climatic niche and genetic similarities. We assessed niche similarity by means of a principal component analysis and Schoener's D metric. To calculate genetic similarity, we used the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean based on Nei's distance using 266 single nucleotide polymorphisms. We then assessed the contribution of environmental and geographical distances to phylogenetic distance by means of Mantel regression with variance partitioning. Finally, we compared the projection obtained from SDMs fitted from the species level (SDMsp) and composed from the eight clade-level models (SDMcm). Results: Genetically and environmentally defined clusters were identical. Environmental and geographical distances explained 12.6% of the phylogenetic distance variation and, overall, geographical and environmental overlap among clades was low. Large differences were detected between SDMsp and SDMcm (57.75% of disagreement in the areas predicted as suitable). Main conclusions: The genetic structure within the maritime pine subspecies complex is primarily a consequence of its demographic history, as seen by the high proportion of unexplained variation in phylogenetic distances. Nevertheless, our results highlight the contribution of local environmental adaptation in shaping the lower-order, phylogeographical distribution patterns and spatial genetic structure of maritime pine: (1) genetically and environmentally defined clusters are consistent, and (2) environment, rather than geography, explained a higher proportion of variation in phylogenetic distance. SDMs, key tools in conservation management, better characterize the fundamental niche of the species when they include molecular information.