Loading…

Combined intra- and extra-articular grafting for revision ACL reconstruction: A multicentre study by the French Arthroscopy Society (SFA)

A careful analysis of the reasons for ACL reconstruction failure is essential to selection of the optimal surgical revision technique designed to ensure good rotational stability and to minimise the risk of re-rupture. To evaluate anterolateral ligament (ALL) stabilisation during revision ACL recons...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research surgery & research, 2017-12, Vol.103 (8), p.S223-S229
Main Authors: Louis, M.-L., D’ingrado, P., Ehkirch, F.P., Bertiaux, S., Colombet, P., Sonnery-Cottet, B., Schlatterer, B., Pailhé, R., Panisset, J.C., Steltzlen, C., Lustig, S., Lutz, C., Dalmay, F., Imbert, P., Saragaglia, D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5c4df1d2f7197a01b6caa51c7e60e17f6561d780c0bc4b938feee90340b9b0a33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5c4df1d2f7197a01b6caa51c7e60e17f6561d780c0bc4b938feee90340b9b0a33
container_end_page S229
container_issue 8
container_start_page S223
container_title Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research
container_volume 103
creator Louis, M.-L.
D’ingrado, P.
Ehkirch, F.P.
Bertiaux, S.
Colombet, P.
Sonnery-Cottet, B.
Schlatterer, B.
Pailhé, R.
Panisset, J.C.
Steltzlen, C.
Lustig, S.
Lutz, C.
Dalmay, F.
Imbert, P.
Saragaglia, D.
description A careful analysis of the reasons for ACL reconstruction failure is essential to selection of the optimal surgical revision technique designed to ensure good rotational stability and to minimise the risk of re-rupture. To evaluate anterolateral ligament (ALL) stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction. ALL stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction provides good rotational stability without increasing the risk of complications. This multicentre study included 349 patients, 151 retrospectively and 198 prospectively. There were 283 males and 66 females. Inclusion criteria were an indication for revision ACL reconstruction surgery with combined intra-articular reconstruction and ALL stabilisation after failed autograft ACL reconstruction, and intact PCL. Exclusion criteria were primary ACL reconstruction and concomitant peripheral medial and/or lateral lesions. Each patient underwent a clinical and radiographic evaluation before and after revision surgery. Before revision surgery, the mean IKDC score was 56.5±15.5 and 96% of patients were IKDC C or D. Rates were 5.0% for early and 10.5% for late postoperative complications. Lachmann's test had a hard stop at last follow-up in 97% of patients. The pivot-shift test was positive in 1% of patients. The mean subjective IKDC score was 84.5±13.0 and 86.5% of patients were IKDC A or B. The proportions of patients with radiographic knee osteoarthritis at last follow-up was unchanged for the lateral tibio-femoral and patello-femoral compartments but increased by 9.7% to 21.2% for the medial tibio-femoral compartment. The re-rupture rate was 1.2% and the further surgical revision rate was 5.4%. Anterior laxity at last follow-up was consistent with previous studies of revision ACL reconstruction. However, rotational stability and the re-rupture risk were improved. ALL stabilisation is among the techniques that deserve consideration as part of the therapeutic options for revision ACL reconstruction. IV, retrospective and prospective cohort study.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02269878v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1877056817302384</els_id><sourcerecordid>1937759733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5c4df1d2f7197a01b6caa51c7e60e17f6561d780c0bc4b938feee90340b9b0a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1q3DAUhU1paX7aF-iiaJks7F7ZY0sq3ZghkwQGuki7FrJ8ndFgW1NJHuJH6FtXZpLQVVa6upzzwT0nSb5QyCjQ6ts-s8G7LAfKMuAZAHuXnFPOWAplxd__N58lF97vAaqKFvnH5CznnAvBy_Pk79oOjRmxJWYMTqVEjS3Bp2VULhg99cqRR6e6YMZH0llHHB6NN3Yk9XobP9qOPrhJh7j6TmoyTH20YYQh8WFqZ9LMJOyQbByOekdqF3bOem0PM3mw2mCYydXDpr7-lHzoVO_x8_N7mfze3Pxa36Xbn7f363qb6kJASEu9ajva5h2jgimgTaWVKqlmWAFS1lVlRVvGQUOjV40oeIeIAooVNKIBVRSXyfWJu1O9PDgzKDdLq4y8q7dy2UGeV4IzfqRRe3XSHpz9M6EPcjBeY9-rEe3kJRUFY6VgxYLNT1Idr_MOu1c2BbnUJfdyqUsudUngMtYVTV-f-VMzYPtqeeknCn6cBBgTORp00sfIRo2tidEH2VrzFv8f8hSnxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1937759733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined intra- and extra-articular grafting for revision ACL reconstruction: A multicentre study by the French Arthroscopy Society (SFA)</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Louis, M.-L. ; D’ingrado, P. ; Ehkirch, F.P. ; Bertiaux, S. ; Colombet, P. ; Sonnery-Cottet, B. ; Schlatterer, B. ; Pailhé, R. ; Panisset, J.C. ; Steltzlen, C. ; Lustig, S. ; Lutz, C. ; Dalmay, F. ; Imbert, P. ; Saragaglia, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Louis, M.-L. ; D’ingrado, P. ; Ehkirch, F.P. ; Bertiaux, S. ; Colombet, P. ; Sonnery-Cottet, B. ; Schlatterer, B. ; Pailhé, R. ; Panisset, J.C. ; Steltzlen, C. ; Lustig, S. ; Lutz, C. ; Dalmay, F. ; Imbert, P. ; Saragaglia, D. ; the French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA) ; French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA)</creatorcontrib><description>A careful analysis of the reasons for ACL reconstruction failure is essential to selection of the optimal surgical revision technique designed to ensure good rotational stability and to minimise the risk of re-rupture. To evaluate anterolateral ligament (ALL) stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction. ALL stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction provides good rotational stability without increasing the risk of complications. This multicentre study included 349 patients, 151 retrospectively and 198 prospectively. There were 283 males and 66 females. Inclusion criteria were an indication for revision ACL reconstruction surgery with combined intra-articular reconstruction and ALL stabilisation after failed autograft ACL reconstruction, and intact PCL. Exclusion criteria were primary ACL reconstruction and concomitant peripheral medial and/or lateral lesions. Each patient underwent a clinical and radiographic evaluation before and after revision surgery. Before revision surgery, the mean IKDC score was 56.5±15.5 and 96% of patients were IKDC C or D. Rates were 5.0% for early and 10.5% for late postoperative complications. Lachmann's test had a hard stop at last follow-up in 97% of patients. The pivot-shift test was positive in 1% of patients. The mean subjective IKDC score was 84.5±13.0 and 86.5% of patients were IKDC A or B. The proportions of patients with radiographic knee osteoarthritis at last follow-up was unchanged for the lateral tibio-femoral and patello-femoral compartments but increased by 9.7% to 21.2% for the medial tibio-femoral compartment. The re-rupture rate was 1.2% and the further surgical revision rate was 5.4%. Anterior laxity at last follow-up was consistent with previous studies of revision ACL reconstruction. However, rotational stability and the re-rupture risk were improved. ALL stabilisation is among the techniques that deserve consideration as part of the therapeutic options for revision ACL reconstruction. IV, retrospective and prospective cohort study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28889985</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anterior cruciate ligament ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - complications ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - diagnostic imaging ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - adverse effects ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods ; Anterolateral ligament ; Arthroscopy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; France ; Hamstring Tendons - transplantation ; Humans ; Joint Instability - etiology ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint - physiopathology ; Lateral tenodesis ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging ; Patellar Ligament - transplantation ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Radiography ; Recurrence ; Reoperation - adverse effects ; Reoperation - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Revision ACL reconstruction ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research, 2017-12, Vol.103 (8), p.S223-S229</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5c4df1d2f7197a01b6caa51c7e60e17f6561d780c0bc4b938feee90340b9b0a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5c4df1d2f7197a01b6caa51c7e60e17f6561d780c0bc4b938feee90340b9b0a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28889985$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02269878$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Louis, M.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’ingrado, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehkirch, F.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertiaux, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombet, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnery-Cottet, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlatterer, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pailhé, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panisset, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steltzlen, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lustig, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalmay, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imbert, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saragaglia, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA)</creatorcontrib><title>Combined intra- and extra-articular grafting for revision ACL reconstruction: A multicentre study by the French Arthroscopy Society (SFA)</title><title>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</title><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><description>A careful analysis of the reasons for ACL reconstruction failure is essential to selection of the optimal surgical revision technique designed to ensure good rotational stability and to minimise the risk of re-rupture. To evaluate anterolateral ligament (ALL) stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction. ALL stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction provides good rotational stability without increasing the risk of complications. This multicentre study included 349 patients, 151 retrospectively and 198 prospectively. There were 283 males and 66 females. Inclusion criteria were an indication for revision ACL reconstruction surgery with combined intra-articular reconstruction and ALL stabilisation after failed autograft ACL reconstruction, and intact PCL. Exclusion criteria were primary ACL reconstruction and concomitant peripheral medial and/or lateral lesions. Each patient underwent a clinical and radiographic evaluation before and after revision surgery. Before revision surgery, the mean IKDC score was 56.5±15.5 and 96% of patients were IKDC C or D. Rates were 5.0% for early and 10.5% for late postoperative complications. Lachmann's test had a hard stop at last follow-up in 97% of patients. The pivot-shift test was positive in 1% of patients. The mean subjective IKDC score was 84.5±13.0 and 86.5% of patients were IKDC A or B. The proportions of patients with radiographic knee osteoarthritis at last follow-up was unchanged for the lateral tibio-femoral and patello-femoral compartments but increased by 9.7% to 21.2% for the medial tibio-femoral compartment. The re-rupture rate was 1.2% and the further surgical revision rate was 5.4%. Anterior laxity at last follow-up was consistent with previous studies of revision ACL reconstruction. However, rotational stability and the re-rupture risk were improved. ALL stabilisation is among the techniques that deserve consideration as part of the therapeutic options for revision ACL reconstruction. IV, retrospective and prospective cohort study.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anterior cruciate ligament</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - complications</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods</subject><subject>Anterolateral ligament</subject><subject>Arthroscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Hamstring Tendons - transplantation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Instability - etiology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Lateral tenodesis</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Patellar Ligament - transplantation</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Reoperation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Reoperation - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Revision ACL reconstruction</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1877-0568</issn><issn>1877-0568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1q3DAUhU1paX7aF-iiaJks7F7ZY0sq3ZghkwQGuki7FrJ8ndFgW1NJHuJH6FtXZpLQVVa6upzzwT0nSb5QyCjQ6ts-s8G7LAfKMuAZAHuXnFPOWAplxd__N58lF97vAaqKFvnH5CznnAvBy_Pk79oOjRmxJWYMTqVEjS3Bp2VULhg99cqRR6e6YMZH0llHHB6NN3Yk9XobP9qOPrhJh7j6TmoyTH20YYQh8WFqZ9LMJOyQbByOekdqF3bOem0PM3mw2mCYydXDpr7-lHzoVO_x8_N7mfze3Pxa36Xbn7f363qb6kJASEu9ajva5h2jgimgTaWVKqlmWAFS1lVlRVvGQUOjV40oeIeIAooVNKIBVRSXyfWJu1O9PDgzKDdLq4y8q7dy2UGeV4IzfqRRe3XSHpz9M6EPcjBeY9-rEe3kJRUFY6VgxYLNT1Idr_MOu1c2BbnUJfdyqUsudUngMtYVTV-f-VMzYPtqeeknCn6cBBgTORp00sfIRo2tidEH2VrzFv8f8hSnxw</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Louis, M.-L.</creator><creator>D’ingrado, P.</creator><creator>Ehkirch, F.P.</creator><creator>Bertiaux, S.</creator><creator>Colombet, P.</creator><creator>Sonnery-Cottet, B.</creator><creator>Schlatterer, B.</creator><creator>Pailhé, R.</creator><creator>Panisset, J.C.</creator><creator>Steltzlen, C.</creator><creator>Lustig, S.</creator><creator>Lutz, C.</creator><creator>Dalmay, F.</creator><creator>Imbert, P.</creator><creator>Saragaglia, D.</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Combined intra- and extra-articular grafting for revision ACL reconstruction: A multicentre study by the French Arthroscopy Society (SFA)</title><author>Louis, M.-L. ; D’ingrado, P. ; Ehkirch, F.P. ; Bertiaux, S. ; Colombet, P. ; Sonnery-Cottet, B. ; Schlatterer, B. ; Pailhé, R. ; Panisset, J.C. ; Steltzlen, C. ; Lustig, S. ; Lutz, C. ; Dalmay, F. ; Imbert, P. ; Saragaglia, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5c4df1d2f7197a01b6caa51c7e60e17f6561d780c0bc4b938feee90340b9b0a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anterior cruciate ligament</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - complications</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods</topic><topic>Anterolateral ligament</topic><topic>Arthroscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Hamstring Tendons - transplantation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Instability - etiology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Lateral tenodesis</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Patellar Ligament - transplantation</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Reoperation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Reoperation - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Revision ACL reconstruction</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Louis, M.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’ingrado, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehkirch, F.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertiaux, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombet, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnery-Cottet, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlatterer, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pailhé, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panisset, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steltzlen, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lustig, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalmay, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imbert, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saragaglia, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA)</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Louis, M.-L.</au><au>D’ingrado, P.</au><au>Ehkirch, F.P.</au><au>Bertiaux, S.</au><au>Colombet, P.</au><au>Sonnery-Cottet, B.</au><au>Schlatterer, B.</au><au>Pailhé, R.</au><au>Panisset, J.C.</au><au>Steltzlen, C.</au><au>Lustig, S.</au><au>Lutz, C.</au><au>Dalmay, F.</au><au>Imbert, P.</au><au>Saragaglia, D.</au><aucorp>the French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA)</aucorp><aucorp>French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined intra- and extra-articular grafting for revision ACL reconstruction: A multicentre study by the French Arthroscopy Society (SFA)</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</jtitle><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>S223</spage><epage>S229</epage><pages>S223-S229</pages><issn>1877-0568</issn><eissn>1877-0568</eissn><abstract>A careful analysis of the reasons for ACL reconstruction failure is essential to selection of the optimal surgical revision technique designed to ensure good rotational stability and to minimise the risk of re-rupture. To evaluate anterolateral ligament (ALL) stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction. ALL stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction provides good rotational stability without increasing the risk of complications. This multicentre study included 349 patients, 151 retrospectively and 198 prospectively. There were 283 males and 66 females. Inclusion criteria were an indication for revision ACL reconstruction surgery with combined intra-articular reconstruction and ALL stabilisation after failed autograft ACL reconstruction, and intact PCL. Exclusion criteria were primary ACL reconstruction and concomitant peripheral medial and/or lateral lesions. Each patient underwent a clinical and radiographic evaluation before and after revision surgery. Before revision surgery, the mean IKDC score was 56.5±15.5 and 96% of patients were IKDC C or D. Rates were 5.0% for early and 10.5% for late postoperative complications. Lachmann's test had a hard stop at last follow-up in 97% of patients. The pivot-shift test was positive in 1% of patients. The mean subjective IKDC score was 84.5±13.0 and 86.5% of patients were IKDC A or B. The proportions of patients with radiographic knee osteoarthritis at last follow-up was unchanged for the lateral tibio-femoral and patello-femoral compartments but increased by 9.7% to 21.2% for the medial tibio-femoral compartment. The re-rupture rate was 1.2% and the further surgical revision rate was 5.4%. Anterior laxity at last follow-up was consistent with previous studies of revision ACL reconstruction. However, rotational stability and the re-rupture risk were improved. ALL stabilisation is among the techniques that deserve consideration as part of the therapeutic options for revision ACL reconstruction. IV, retrospective and prospective cohort study.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>28889985</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.007</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1877-0568
ispartof Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research, 2017-12, Vol.103 (8), p.S223-S229
issn 1877-0568
1877-0568
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02269878v1
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anterior cruciate ligament
Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging
Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - complications
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - diagnostic imaging
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - adverse effects
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods
Anterolateral ligament
Arthroscopy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
France
Hamstring Tendons - transplantation
Humans
Joint Instability - etiology
Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging
Knee Joint - physiopathology
Lateral tenodesis
Life Sciences
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging
Patellar Ligament - transplantation
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Prospective Studies
Radiography
Recurrence
Reoperation - adverse effects
Reoperation - methods
Retrospective Studies
Revision ACL reconstruction
Young Adult
title Combined intra- and extra-articular grafting for revision ACL reconstruction: A multicentre study by the French Arthroscopy Society (SFA)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A33%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20intra-%20and%20extra-articular%20grafting%20for%20revision%20ACL%20reconstruction:%20A%20multicentre%20study%20by%20the%20French%20Arthroscopy%20Society%20(SFA)&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedics%20&%20traumatology,%20surgery%20&%20research&rft.au=Louis,%20M.-L.&rft.aucorp=the%20French%20Arthroscopy%20Society%20(Soci%C3%A9t%C3%A9%20Francophone%20d%E2%80%99Arthroscopie,%20SFA)&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=S223&rft.epage=S229&rft.pages=S223-S229&rft.issn=1877-0568&rft.eissn=1877-0568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1937759733%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5c4df1d2f7197a01b6caa51c7e60e17f6561d780c0bc4b938feee90340b9b0a33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1937759733&rft_id=info:pmid/28889985&rfr_iscdi=true