Loading…
Combined intra- and extra-articular grafting for revision ACL reconstruction: A multicentre study by the French Arthroscopy Society (SFA)
A careful analysis of the reasons for ACL reconstruction failure is essential to selection of the optimal surgical revision technique designed to ensure good rotational stability and to minimise the risk of re-rupture. To evaluate anterolateral ligament (ALL) stabilisation during revision ACL recons...
Saved in:
Published in: | Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research surgery & research, 2017-12, Vol.103 (8), p.S223-S229 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5c4df1d2f7197a01b6caa51c7e60e17f6561d780c0bc4b938feee90340b9b0a33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5c4df1d2f7197a01b6caa51c7e60e17f6561d780c0bc4b938feee90340b9b0a33 |
container_end_page | S229 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | S223 |
container_title | Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Louis, M.-L. D’ingrado, P. Ehkirch, F.P. Bertiaux, S. Colombet, P. Sonnery-Cottet, B. Schlatterer, B. Pailhé, R. Panisset, J.C. Steltzlen, C. Lustig, S. Lutz, C. Dalmay, F. Imbert, P. Saragaglia, D. |
description | A careful analysis of the reasons for ACL reconstruction failure is essential to selection of the optimal surgical revision technique designed to ensure good rotational stability and to minimise the risk of re-rupture.
To evaluate anterolateral ligament (ALL) stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction.
ALL stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction provides good rotational stability without increasing the risk of complications.
This multicentre study included 349 patients, 151 retrospectively and 198 prospectively. There were 283 males and 66 females. Inclusion criteria were an indication for revision ACL reconstruction surgery with combined intra-articular reconstruction and ALL stabilisation after failed autograft ACL reconstruction, and intact PCL. Exclusion criteria were primary ACL reconstruction and concomitant peripheral medial and/or lateral lesions. Each patient underwent a clinical and radiographic evaluation before and after revision surgery. Before revision surgery, the mean IKDC score was 56.5±15.5 and 96% of patients were IKDC C or D.
Rates were 5.0% for early and 10.5% for late postoperative complications. Lachmann's test had a hard stop at last follow-up in 97% of patients. The pivot-shift test was positive in 1% of patients. The mean subjective IKDC score was 84.5±13.0 and 86.5% of patients were IKDC A or B. The proportions of patients with radiographic knee osteoarthritis at last follow-up was unchanged for the lateral tibio-femoral and patello-femoral compartments but increased by 9.7% to 21.2% for the medial tibio-femoral compartment. The re-rupture rate was 1.2% and the further surgical revision rate was 5.4%.
Anterior laxity at last follow-up was consistent with previous studies of revision ACL reconstruction. However, rotational stability and the re-rupture risk were improved. ALL stabilisation is among the techniques that deserve consideration as part of the therapeutic options for revision ACL reconstruction.
IV, retrospective and prospective cohort study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.007 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02269878v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1877056817302384</els_id><sourcerecordid>1937759733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5c4df1d2f7197a01b6caa51c7e60e17f6561d780c0bc4b938feee90340b9b0a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1q3DAUhU1paX7aF-iiaJks7F7ZY0sq3ZghkwQGuki7FrJ8ndFgW1NJHuJH6FtXZpLQVVa6upzzwT0nSb5QyCjQ6ts-s8G7LAfKMuAZAHuXnFPOWAplxd__N58lF97vAaqKFvnH5CznnAvBy_Pk79oOjRmxJWYMTqVEjS3Bp2VULhg99cqRR6e6YMZH0llHHB6NN3Yk9XobP9qOPrhJh7j6TmoyTH20YYQh8WFqZ9LMJOyQbByOekdqF3bOem0PM3mw2mCYydXDpr7-lHzoVO_x8_N7mfze3Pxa36Xbn7f363qb6kJASEu9ajva5h2jgimgTaWVKqlmWAFS1lVlRVvGQUOjV40oeIeIAooVNKIBVRSXyfWJu1O9PDgzKDdLq4y8q7dy2UGeV4IzfqRRe3XSHpz9M6EPcjBeY9-rEe3kJRUFY6VgxYLNT1Idr_MOu1c2BbnUJfdyqUsudUngMtYVTV-f-VMzYPtqeeknCn6cBBgTORp00sfIRo2tidEH2VrzFv8f8hSnxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1937759733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined intra- and extra-articular grafting for revision ACL reconstruction: A multicentre study by the French Arthroscopy Society (SFA)</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Louis, M.-L. ; D’ingrado, P. ; Ehkirch, F.P. ; Bertiaux, S. ; Colombet, P. ; Sonnery-Cottet, B. ; Schlatterer, B. ; Pailhé, R. ; Panisset, J.C. ; Steltzlen, C. ; Lustig, S. ; Lutz, C. ; Dalmay, F. ; Imbert, P. ; Saragaglia, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Louis, M.-L. ; D’ingrado, P. ; Ehkirch, F.P. ; Bertiaux, S. ; Colombet, P. ; Sonnery-Cottet, B. ; Schlatterer, B. ; Pailhé, R. ; Panisset, J.C. ; Steltzlen, C. ; Lustig, S. ; Lutz, C. ; Dalmay, F. ; Imbert, P. ; Saragaglia, D. ; the French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA) ; French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA)</creatorcontrib><description>A careful analysis of the reasons for ACL reconstruction failure is essential to selection of the optimal surgical revision technique designed to ensure good rotational stability and to minimise the risk of re-rupture.
To evaluate anterolateral ligament (ALL) stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction.
ALL stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction provides good rotational stability without increasing the risk of complications.
This multicentre study included 349 patients, 151 retrospectively and 198 prospectively. There were 283 males and 66 females. Inclusion criteria were an indication for revision ACL reconstruction surgery with combined intra-articular reconstruction and ALL stabilisation after failed autograft ACL reconstruction, and intact PCL. Exclusion criteria were primary ACL reconstruction and concomitant peripheral medial and/or lateral lesions. Each patient underwent a clinical and radiographic evaluation before and after revision surgery. Before revision surgery, the mean IKDC score was 56.5±15.5 and 96% of patients were IKDC C or D.
Rates were 5.0% for early and 10.5% for late postoperative complications. Lachmann's test had a hard stop at last follow-up in 97% of patients. The pivot-shift test was positive in 1% of patients. The mean subjective IKDC score was 84.5±13.0 and 86.5% of patients were IKDC A or B. The proportions of patients with radiographic knee osteoarthritis at last follow-up was unchanged for the lateral tibio-femoral and patello-femoral compartments but increased by 9.7% to 21.2% for the medial tibio-femoral compartment. The re-rupture rate was 1.2% and the further surgical revision rate was 5.4%.
Anterior laxity at last follow-up was consistent with previous studies of revision ACL reconstruction. However, rotational stability and the re-rupture risk were improved. ALL stabilisation is among the techniques that deserve consideration as part of the therapeutic options for revision ACL reconstruction.
IV, retrospective and prospective cohort study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28889985</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anterior cruciate ligament ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - complications ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - diagnostic imaging ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - adverse effects ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods ; Anterolateral ligament ; Arthroscopy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; France ; Hamstring Tendons - transplantation ; Humans ; Joint Instability - etiology ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint - physiopathology ; Lateral tenodesis ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging ; Patellar Ligament - transplantation ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Radiography ; Recurrence ; Reoperation - adverse effects ; Reoperation - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Revision ACL reconstruction ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research, 2017-12, Vol.103 (8), p.S223-S229</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5c4df1d2f7197a01b6caa51c7e60e17f6561d780c0bc4b938feee90340b9b0a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5c4df1d2f7197a01b6caa51c7e60e17f6561d780c0bc4b938feee90340b9b0a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28889985$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02269878$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Louis, M.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’ingrado, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehkirch, F.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertiaux, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombet, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnery-Cottet, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlatterer, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pailhé, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panisset, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steltzlen, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lustig, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalmay, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imbert, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saragaglia, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA)</creatorcontrib><title>Combined intra- and extra-articular grafting for revision ACL reconstruction: A multicentre study by the French Arthroscopy Society (SFA)</title><title>Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research</title><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><description>A careful analysis of the reasons for ACL reconstruction failure is essential to selection of the optimal surgical revision technique designed to ensure good rotational stability and to minimise the risk of re-rupture.
To evaluate anterolateral ligament (ALL) stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction.
ALL stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction provides good rotational stability without increasing the risk of complications.
This multicentre study included 349 patients, 151 retrospectively and 198 prospectively. There were 283 males and 66 females. Inclusion criteria were an indication for revision ACL reconstruction surgery with combined intra-articular reconstruction and ALL stabilisation after failed autograft ACL reconstruction, and intact PCL. Exclusion criteria were primary ACL reconstruction and concomitant peripheral medial and/or lateral lesions. Each patient underwent a clinical and radiographic evaluation before and after revision surgery. Before revision surgery, the mean IKDC score was 56.5±15.5 and 96% of patients were IKDC C or D.
Rates were 5.0% for early and 10.5% for late postoperative complications. Lachmann's test had a hard stop at last follow-up in 97% of patients. The pivot-shift test was positive in 1% of patients. The mean subjective IKDC score was 84.5±13.0 and 86.5% of patients were IKDC A or B. The proportions of patients with radiographic knee osteoarthritis at last follow-up was unchanged for the lateral tibio-femoral and patello-femoral compartments but increased by 9.7% to 21.2% for the medial tibio-femoral compartment. The re-rupture rate was 1.2% and the further surgical revision rate was 5.4%.
Anterior laxity at last follow-up was consistent with previous studies of revision ACL reconstruction. However, rotational stability and the re-rupture risk were improved. ALL stabilisation is among the techniques that deserve consideration as part of the therapeutic options for revision ACL reconstruction.
IV, retrospective and prospective cohort study.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anterior cruciate ligament</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - complications</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods</subject><subject>Anterolateral ligament</subject><subject>Arthroscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Hamstring Tendons - transplantation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Instability - etiology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Lateral tenodesis</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Patellar Ligament - transplantation</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Reoperation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Reoperation - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Revision ACL reconstruction</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1877-0568</issn><issn>1877-0568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1q3DAUhU1paX7aF-iiaJks7F7ZY0sq3ZghkwQGuki7FrJ8ndFgW1NJHuJH6FtXZpLQVVa6upzzwT0nSb5QyCjQ6ts-s8G7LAfKMuAZAHuXnFPOWAplxd__N58lF97vAaqKFvnH5CznnAvBy_Pk79oOjRmxJWYMTqVEjS3Bp2VULhg99cqRR6e6YMZH0llHHB6NN3Yk9XobP9qOPrhJh7j6TmoyTH20YYQh8WFqZ9LMJOyQbByOekdqF3bOem0PM3mw2mCYydXDpr7-lHzoVO_x8_N7mfze3Pxa36Xbn7f363qb6kJASEu9ajva5h2jgimgTaWVKqlmWAFS1lVlRVvGQUOjV40oeIeIAooVNKIBVRSXyfWJu1O9PDgzKDdLq4y8q7dy2UGeV4IzfqRRe3XSHpz9M6EPcjBeY9-rEe3kJRUFY6VgxYLNT1Idr_MOu1c2BbnUJfdyqUsudUngMtYVTV-f-VMzYPtqeeknCn6cBBgTORp00sfIRo2tidEH2VrzFv8f8hSnxw</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Louis, M.-L.</creator><creator>D’ingrado, P.</creator><creator>Ehkirch, F.P.</creator><creator>Bertiaux, S.</creator><creator>Colombet, P.</creator><creator>Sonnery-Cottet, B.</creator><creator>Schlatterer, B.</creator><creator>Pailhé, R.</creator><creator>Panisset, J.C.</creator><creator>Steltzlen, C.</creator><creator>Lustig, S.</creator><creator>Lutz, C.</creator><creator>Dalmay, F.</creator><creator>Imbert, P.</creator><creator>Saragaglia, D.</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Combined intra- and extra-articular grafting for revision ACL reconstruction: A multicentre study by the French Arthroscopy Society (SFA)</title><author>Louis, M.-L. ; D’ingrado, P. ; Ehkirch, F.P. ; Bertiaux, S. ; Colombet, P. ; Sonnery-Cottet, B. ; Schlatterer, B. ; Pailhé, R. ; Panisset, J.C. ; Steltzlen, C. ; Lustig, S. ; Lutz, C. ; Dalmay, F. ; Imbert, P. ; Saragaglia, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5c4df1d2f7197a01b6caa51c7e60e17f6561d780c0bc4b938feee90340b9b0a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anterior cruciate ligament</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - complications</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods</topic><topic>Anterolateral ligament</topic><topic>Arthroscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Hamstring Tendons - transplantation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Instability - etiology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Lateral tenodesis</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Patellar Ligament - transplantation</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Reoperation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Reoperation - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Revision ACL reconstruction</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Louis, M.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’ingrado, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehkirch, F.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertiaux, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombet, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnery-Cottet, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlatterer, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pailhé, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panisset, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steltzlen, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lustig, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalmay, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imbert, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saragaglia, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA)</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Louis, M.-L.</au><au>D’ingrado, P.</au><au>Ehkirch, F.P.</au><au>Bertiaux, S.</au><au>Colombet, P.</au><au>Sonnery-Cottet, B.</au><au>Schlatterer, B.</au><au>Pailhé, R.</au><au>Panisset, J.C.</au><au>Steltzlen, C.</au><au>Lustig, S.</au><au>Lutz, C.</au><au>Dalmay, F.</au><au>Imbert, P.</au><au>Saragaglia, D.</au><aucorp>the French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA)</aucorp><aucorp>French Arthroscopy Society (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie, SFA)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined intra- and extra-articular grafting for revision ACL reconstruction: A multicentre study by the French Arthroscopy Society (SFA)</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research</jtitle><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>S223</spage><epage>S229</epage><pages>S223-S229</pages><issn>1877-0568</issn><eissn>1877-0568</eissn><abstract>A careful analysis of the reasons for ACL reconstruction failure is essential to selection of the optimal surgical revision technique designed to ensure good rotational stability and to minimise the risk of re-rupture.
To evaluate anterolateral ligament (ALL) stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction.
ALL stabilisation during revision ACL reconstruction provides good rotational stability without increasing the risk of complications.
This multicentre study included 349 patients, 151 retrospectively and 198 prospectively. There were 283 males and 66 females. Inclusion criteria were an indication for revision ACL reconstruction surgery with combined intra-articular reconstruction and ALL stabilisation after failed autograft ACL reconstruction, and intact PCL. Exclusion criteria were primary ACL reconstruction and concomitant peripheral medial and/or lateral lesions. Each patient underwent a clinical and radiographic evaluation before and after revision surgery. Before revision surgery, the mean IKDC score was 56.5±15.5 and 96% of patients were IKDC C or D.
Rates were 5.0% for early and 10.5% for late postoperative complications. Lachmann's test had a hard stop at last follow-up in 97% of patients. The pivot-shift test was positive in 1% of patients. The mean subjective IKDC score was 84.5±13.0 and 86.5% of patients were IKDC A or B. The proportions of patients with radiographic knee osteoarthritis at last follow-up was unchanged for the lateral tibio-femoral and patello-femoral compartments but increased by 9.7% to 21.2% for the medial tibio-femoral compartment. The re-rupture rate was 1.2% and the further surgical revision rate was 5.4%.
Anterior laxity at last follow-up was consistent with previous studies of revision ACL reconstruction. However, rotational stability and the re-rupture risk were improved. ALL stabilisation is among the techniques that deserve consideration as part of the therapeutic options for revision ACL reconstruction.
IV, retrospective and prospective cohort study.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>28889985</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.007</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1877-0568 |
ispartof | Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research, 2017-12, Vol.103 (8), p.S223-S229 |
issn | 1877-0568 1877-0568 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02269878v1 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Anterior cruciate ligament Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - complications Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - diagnostic imaging Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - adverse effects Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods Anterolateral ligament Arthroscopy Female Follow-Up Studies France Hamstring Tendons - transplantation Humans Joint Instability - etiology Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging Knee Joint - physiopathology Lateral tenodesis Life Sciences Male Middle Aged Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging Patellar Ligament - transplantation Postoperative Complications - etiology Prospective Studies Radiography Recurrence Reoperation - adverse effects Reoperation - methods Retrospective Studies Revision ACL reconstruction Young Adult |
title | Combined intra- and extra-articular grafting for revision ACL reconstruction: A multicentre study by the French Arthroscopy Society (SFA) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A33%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20intra-%20and%20extra-articular%20grafting%20for%20revision%20ACL%20reconstruction:%20A%20multicentre%20study%20by%20the%20French%20Arthroscopy%20Society%20(SFA)&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedics%20&%20traumatology,%20surgery%20&%20research&rft.au=Louis,%20M.-L.&rft.aucorp=the%20French%20Arthroscopy%20Society%20(Soci%C3%A9t%C3%A9%20Francophone%20d%E2%80%99Arthroscopie,%20SFA)&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=S223&rft.epage=S229&rft.pages=S223-S229&rft.issn=1877-0568&rft.eissn=1877-0568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1937759733%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-5c4df1d2f7197a01b6caa51c7e60e17f6561d780c0bc4b938feee90340b9b0a33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1937759733&rft_id=info:pmid/28889985&rfr_iscdi=true |