Loading…
Adult sinonasal soft tissue sarcoma: Analysis of 48 cases from the French Sarcoma Group database
Objective The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of primary sinonasal adult sarcoma, identify histological subtypes, and analyze prognostic factors. Study Design Retrospective review. Method Forty‐eight adult sinonasal sarcomas included in the French Sarcoma Group database (Conticabase...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Laryngoscope 2015-03, Vol.125 (3), p.615-623 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of primary sinonasal adult sarcoma, identify histological subtypes, and analyze prognostic factors.
Study Design
Retrospective review.
Method
Forty‐eight adult sinonasal sarcomas included in the French Sarcoma Group database (Conticabase) were reviewed.
Results
The most frequent tumor types were alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (33.3%), embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (14,6%), unclassified sarcoma (14.6%), and leiomyosarcoma (12.5%). All round cell tumors were rhabdomyosarcomas. The 5‐year overall survival (OS), metastasis‐free survival (MFS), and local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS) rates were 62.3%, 73%, and 88.8%, respectively. Histotype was a prognostic factor for OS, MFS, and LRFS, with the worst prognosis associated with rhabdomyosarcomas, regardless of the subtype. The tumor grade influenced the OS and MFS. Surgery was a predictive factor for a complete response.
Conclusions
These results suggest that sinonasal tract should be considered as an unfavorable site for rhabdomyosarcoma. Moreover, surgery should always be considered in treatment.
Level of Evidence
N/A. Laryngoscope, 125:615–623, 2015 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
DOI: | 10.1002/lary.24910 |