Loading…
Species-driven interpretation guidelines in case of a single-sampling strategy for blood culture
The purpose of this paper is to define guidelines to interpret positive blood cultures (BCs) to distinguish bloodstream infection (BSI) from contamination in BCs drawn with a single venipuncture. During a 2-year period, each positive BC set (comprising six bottles from a single venipuncture) was pro...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases 2011-12, Vol.30 (12), p.1537-1541 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2774dd9e5902cef0ab18ae28a8e9c203d208455eb80be3faa2716191a2a72dc43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2774dd9e5902cef0ab18ae28a8e9c203d208455eb80be3faa2716191a2a72dc43 |
container_end_page | 1541 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1537 |
container_title | European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Leyssene, D. Gardes, S. Vilquin, P. Flandrois, J.-P. Carret, G. Lamy, B. |
description | The purpose of this paper is to define guidelines to interpret positive blood cultures (BCs) to distinguish bloodstream infection (BSI) from contamination in BCs drawn with a single venipuncture. During a 2-year period, each positive BC set (comprising six bottles from a single venipuncture) was prospectively categorised by clinicians, bacteriologists and hospital epidemiologists as BSI or contamination. For each case, the number of positive bottles per set, results from Gram staining and microorganism identification were analysed in order to define interpretation guidelines. We analysed 940 positive BC sets. The BSI rate in monomicrobial BC sets was positively correlated with the number of positive bottles. The positive predictive value was 88% with one and 100% with ≥2 positive bottles for
Escherichia coli
; 100% for
Staphylococcus aureus
,
Pseudomonas
and
Candida
spp., regardless of the number of positive bottles; 3.5%, 61.1%, 78.9% and 100% for coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) with one, two, three and ≥4 positive bottles, respectively. Using a single-sampling strategy, interpretation guidelines for monomicrobial positive BCs are based on the number of positive bottles per set, results from Gram staining and microorganism identification: ≥4 positive bottles (≥2 with Gram-negative bacilli) always led to a diagnosis of BSI. The CoNS BSI rate positively correlates with the number of positive bottles. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10096-011-1257-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02297650v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>903146151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2774dd9e5902cef0ab18ae28a8e9c203d208455eb80be3faa2716191a2a72dc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10d9r1TAUB_Agirub_gG-SBBEfKjmV5vkcQzdhAs-qM_xND2tGb1NTdrB_ntz6XUDwZcEcj4nJ-FLyCvOPnDG9MdcVttUjPOKi1pX8gnZcSXrSkktn5Ids1JVVgt5Rs5zvmWlx2j9nJwJrqy1mu3Iz28z-oC56lK4w4mGacE0J1xgCXGiwxo6HMOEuVSoh4w09hRoDtMwYpXhMJfqQPOSYMHhnvYx0XaMsaN-HZc14QvyrIcx48vTfkF-fP70_eqm2n-9_nJ1ua98rdVSCa1V11msLRMeewYtN4DCgEHrBZOdYEbVNbaGtSh7AKF5wy0HAVp0XskL8n679xeMbk7hAOneRQju5nLvjmdMCKubmt3xYt9tdk7x94p5cYeQPY4jTBjX7CyTXDW8Pso3_8jbuKapfKQg0WjTGFsQ35BPMeeE_cN8ztwxKLcF5UpQ7hiUk6Xn9enitT1g99DxN5kC3p4AZA9jn2DyIT86pU0tjShObC6X0jRgenzh_6f_ATPRqkk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902678689</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Species-driven interpretation guidelines in case of a single-sampling strategy for blood culture</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Leyssene, D. ; Gardes, S. ; Vilquin, P. ; Flandrois, J.-P. ; Carret, G. ; Lamy, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Leyssene, D. ; Gardes, S. ; Vilquin, P. ; Flandrois, J.-P. ; Carret, G. ; Lamy, B.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this paper is to define guidelines to interpret positive blood cultures (BCs) to distinguish bloodstream infection (BSI) from contamination in BCs drawn with a single venipuncture. During a 2-year period, each positive BC set (comprising six bottles from a single venipuncture) was prospectively categorised by clinicians, bacteriologists and hospital epidemiologists as BSI or contamination. For each case, the number of positive bottles per set, results from Gram staining and microorganism identification were analysed in order to define interpretation guidelines. We analysed 940 positive BC sets. The BSI rate in monomicrobial BC sets was positively correlated with the number of positive bottles. The positive predictive value was 88% with one and 100% with ≥2 positive bottles for
Escherichia coli
; 100% for
Staphylococcus aureus
,
Pseudomonas
and
Candida
spp., regardless of the number of positive bottles; 3.5%, 61.1%, 78.9% and 100% for coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) with one, two, three and ≥4 positive bottles, respectively. Using a single-sampling strategy, interpretation guidelines for monomicrobial positive BCs are based on the number of positive bottles per set, results from Gram staining and microorganism identification: ≥4 positive bottles (≥2 with Gram-negative bacilli) always led to a diagnosis of BSI. The CoNS BSI rate positively correlates with the number of positive bottles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0934-9723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-4373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10096-011-1257-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21499970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Bacteremia - diagnosis ; Bacteremia - microbiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Blood ; Blood - microbiology ; E coli ; Fungemia - diagnosis ; Fungemia - microbiology ; Humans ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Internal Medicine ; Life Sciences ; Medical Microbiology ; Medical sciences ; Microbiological Techniques - methods ; Microorganisms ; Phlebotomy ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 2011-12, Vol.30 (12), p.1537-1541</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2774dd9e5902cef0ab18ae28a8e9c203d208455eb80be3faa2716191a2a72dc43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2774dd9e5902cef0ab18ae28a8e9c203d208455eb80be3faa2716191a2a72dc43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4953-9125</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24785382$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21499970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://univ-lyon1.hal.science/hal-02297650$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leyssene, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardes, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilquin, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flandrois, J.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carret, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamy, B.</creatorcontrib><title>Species-driven interpretation guidelines in case of a single-sampling strategy for blood culture</title><title>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><description>The purpose of this paper is to define guidelines to interpret positive blood cultures (BCs) to distinguish bloodstream infection (BSI) from contamination in BCs drawn with a single venipuncture. During a 2-year period, each positive BC set (comprising six bottles from a single venipuncture) was prospectively categorised by clinicians, bacteriologists and hospital epidemiologists as BSI or contamination. For each case, the number of positive bottles per set, results from Gram staining and microorganism identification were analysed in order to define interpretation guidelines. We analysed 940 positive BC sets. The BSI rate in monomicrobial BC sets was positively correlated with the number of positive bottles. The positive predictive value was 88% with one and 100% with ≥2 positive bottles for
Escherichia coli
; 100% for
Staphylococcus aureus
,
Pseudomonas
and
Candida
spp., regardless of the number of positive bottles; 3.5%, 61.1%, 78.9% and 100% for coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) with one, two, three and ≥4 positive bottles, respectively. Using a single-sampling strategy, interpretation guidelines for monomicrobial positive BCs are based on the number of positive bottles per set, results from Gram staining and microorganism identification: ≥4 positive bottles (≥2 with Gram-negative bacilli) always led to a diagnosis of BSI. The CoNS BSI rate positively correlates with the number of positive bottles.</description><subject>Bacteremia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Bacteremia - microbiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood - microbiology</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Fungemia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fungemia - microbiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbiological Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Phlebotomy</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>0934-9723</issn><issn>1435-4373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10d9r1TAUB_Agirub_gG-SBBEfKjmV5vkcQzdhAs-qM_xND2tGb1NTdrB_ntz6XUDwZcEcj4nJ-FLyCvOPnDG9MdcVttUjPOKi1pX8gnZcSXrSkktn5Ids1JVVgt5Rs5zvmWlx2j9nJwJrqy1mu3Iz28z-oC56lK4w4mGacE0J1xgCXGiwxo6HMOEuVSoh4w09hRoDtMwYpXhMJfqQPOSYMHhnvYx0XaMsaN-HZc14QvyrIcx48vTfkF-fP70_eqm2n-9_nJ1ua98rdVSCa1V11msLRMeewYtN4DCgEHrBZOdYEbVNbaGtSh7AKF5wy0HAVp0XskL8n679xeMbk7hAOneRQju5nLvjmdMCKubmt3xYt9tdk7x94p5cYeQPY4jTBjX7CyTXDW8Pso3_8jbuKapfKQg0WjTGFsQ35BPMeeE_cN8ztwxKLcF5UpQ7hiUk6Xn9enitT1g99DxN5kC3p4AZA9jn2DyIT86pU0tjShObC6X0jRgenzh_6f_ATPRqkk</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Leyssene, D.</creator><creator>Gardes, S.</creator><creator>Vilquin, P.</creator><creator>Flandrois, J.-P.</creator><creator>Carret, G.</creator><creator>Lamy, B.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4953-9125</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Species-driven interpretation guidelines in case of a single-sampling strategy for blood culture</title><author>Leyssene, D. ; Gardes, S. ; Vilquin, P. ; Flandrois, J.-P. ; Carret, G. ; Lamy, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2774dd9e5902cef0ab18ae28a8e9c203d208455eb80be3faa2716191a2a72dc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bacteremia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Bacteremia - microbiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood - microbiology</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Fungemia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fungemia - microbiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbiological Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Phlebotomy</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leyssene, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardes, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilquin, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flandrois, J.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carret, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamy, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leyssene, D.</au><au>Gardes, S.</au><au>Vilquin, P.</au><au>Flandrois, J.-P.</au><au>Carret, G.</au><au>Lamy, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Species-driven interpretation guidelines in case of a single-sampling strategy for blood culture</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1537</spage><epage>1541</epage><pages>1537-1541</pages><issn>0934-9723</issn><eissn>1435-4373</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this paper is to define guidelines to interpret positive blood cultures (BCs) to distinguish bloodstream infection (BSI) from contamination in BCs drawn with a single venipuncture. During a 2-year period, each positive BC set (comprising six bottles from a single venipuncture) was prospectively categorised by clinicians, bacteriologists and hospital epidemiologists as BSI or contamination. For each case, the number of positive bottles per set, results from Gram staining and microorganism identification were analysed in order to define interpretation guidelines. We analysed 940 positive BC sets. The BSI rate in monomicrobial BC sets was positively correlated with the number of positive bottles. The positive predictive value was 88% with one and 100% with ≥2 positive bottles for
Escherichia coli
; 100% for
Staphylococcus aureus
,
Pseudomonas
and
Candida
spp., regardless of the number of positive bottles; 3.5%, 61.1%, 78.9% and 100% for coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) with one, two, three and ≥4 positive bottles, respectively. Using a single-sampling strategy, interpretation guidelines for monomicrobial positive BCs are based on the number of positive bottles per set, results from Gram staining and microorganism identification: ≥4 positive bottles (≥2 with Gram-negative bacilli) always led to a diagnosis of BSI. The CoNS BSI rate positively correlates with the number of positive bottles.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21499970</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10096-011-1257-3</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4953-9125</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0934-9723 |
ispartof | European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 2011-12, Vol.30 (12), p.1537-1541 |
issn | 0934-9723 1435-4373 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02297650v1 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Bacteremia - diagnosis Bacteremia - microbiology Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Blood Blood - microbiology E coli Fungemia - diagnosis Fungemia - microbiology Humans Infections Infectious diseases Internal Medicine Life Sciences Medical Microbiology Medical sciences Microbiological Techniques - methods Microorganisms Phlebotomy Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies |
title | Species-driven interpretation guidelines in case of a single-sampling strategy for blood culture |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A10%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Species-driven%20interpretation%20guidelines%20in%20case%20of%20a%20single-sampling%20strategy%20for%20blood%20culture&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology%20&%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Leyssene,%20D.&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1537&rft.epage=1541&rft.pages=1537-1541&rft.issn=0934-9723&rft.eissn=1435-4373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10096-011-1257-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E903146151%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2774dd9e5902cef0ab18ae28a8e9c203d208455eb80be3faa2716191a2a72dc43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902678689&rft_id=info:pmid/21499970&rfr_iscdi=true |