Loading…

Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time

This work aims to compare biomass structure and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and an activated sludge process (ASP) treating the same domestic wastewater. The influence of the separation technique (membrane filtration or settling) and operation at high sludge-retention time (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water research (Oxford) 2006-07, Vol.40 (12), p.2405-2415
Main Authors: Massé, Anthony, Spérandio, Mathieu, Cabassud, Corinne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-13b51c1255b4537865e60e2c4596f3eac957cdaaef4cb68c03d955ee2a4fa32d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-13b51c1255b4537865e60e2c4596f3eac957cdaaef4cb68c03d955ee2a4fa32d3
container_end_page 2415
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2405
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 40
creator Massé, Anthony
Spérandio, Mathieu
Cabassud, Corinne
description This work aims to compare biomass structure and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and an activated sludge process (ASP) treating the same domestic wastewater. The influence of the separation technique (membrane filtration or settling) and operation at high sludge-retention time (SRT) were investigated. Over the entire range of SRT (10–110 days), the SMBR achieved very good organic removal efficiencies, ranging from 90.8±0.2% to 94.2±1.6% based on total COD (TCOD), whereas those of ASP were between 87.4±1.8% and 90.3±0.8%. The contribution of the membrane in the increase in performance was due to total suspended solid retention and also partly due to retention of proteins and polysaccharides of the sludge supernatant. No significant difference in excess sludge production was observed between the two processes operated at the same SRT, but sludge production in SMBR decreased from 0.31 to 0.13 g VSS g COD −1 as SRT increased from 9 to 110 days. The difference in sludge characteristics and performance was especially pronounced as SRT increased, resulting in deterioration of sludge settleability and effluent quality of the ASP (filamentous bacteria, increase of protein and polysaccharide release). Membrane filtration induced accumulation of soluble and colloidal proteins and polysaccharides which were progressively degraded in the supernatant as the SRT increased. At similar SRT, no significant difference was observed in the amount of extractable exocellular polymeric substances (bound EPS) from ASP and SMBR sludge. However as the SRT increased, the total specific amount of bound EPS in flocs decreased and the ratio proteins/polysaccharides also decreased. Concomitantly, laser diffraction analysis, microscopic observations, turbidity and DSVI measurement showed that the SRT increase induced significant modifications in sludge morphology in SMBR: decrease in floc size, densification of aggregates, and development of non-flocculating organisms.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.015
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02318002v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135406002375</els_id><sourcerecordid>29139688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-13b51c1255b4537865e60e2c4596f3eac957cdaaef4cb68c03d955ee2a4fa32d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks2O0zAUhSMEYsrAGyDwBiQWLf5PskEaVcAgVWIBs7ZunJvWVRIXOy3iQXhfbknF7JiVZfs7R_fnFMVLwVeCC_t-v_oJU8K8kpzbFdcrLsyjYiGqsl5KravHxYJzrZZCGX1VPMt5zzmXUtVPiythS1PbSi6K3-s4HCCFHEcWO5b7Y7tF5neQwE9I71PwmcHYsgOmLqYBRo9nElg-NgOmLbZswKFJMCJrQkxIwpj-SmBkdAknmAi6WB9S9JjJcmK7sN2xHPvQZpZwwnEKVMUUBnxePOmgz_jicl4Xd58-fl_fLjdfP39Z32yW3vJyotYaI7yQxjTaqLKyBi1H6TU11ykqpDalbwGw076xleeqrY1BlKA7ULJV18W72XcHvTukMED65SIEd3uzcec3LpWoaGwnQezbmaUOfhwxT24I2WPfU-PxmJ2srVCSBvwwKBQNv3oY5FLXQigC9Qz6FHNO2P2rVXB3DoPbuzkM7hwGx7WjMJDs1cX_vKn2XnTZPgFvLgBkD31HO_Qh33NlzSk9NXGvZ66D6GBLqXB33yT9ccEra7kl4sNMIG3rFDC57ANSVNqQ0E-ujeH_tf4BSGjfyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20249113</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Massé, Anthony ; Spérandio, Mathieu ; Cabassud, Corinne</creator><creatorcontrib>Massé, Anthony ; Spérandio, Mathieu ; Cabassud, Corinne</creatorcontrib><description>This work aims to compare biomass structure and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and an activated sludge process (ASP) treating the same domestic wastewater. The influence of the separation technique (membrane filtration or settling) and operation at high sludge-retention time (SRT) were investigated. Over the entire range of SRT (10–110 days), the SMBR achieved very good organic removal efficiencies, ranging from 90.8±0.2% to 94.2±1.6% based on total COD (TCOD), whereas those of ASP were between 87.4±1.8% and 90.3±0.8%. The contribution of the membrane in the increase in performance was due to total suspended solid retention and also partly due to retention of proteins and polysaccharides of the sludge supernatant. No significant difference in excess sludge production was observed between the two processes operated at the same SRT, but sludge production in SMBR decreased from 0.31 to 0.13 g VSS g COD −1 as SRT increased from 9 to 110 days. The difference in sludge characteristics and performance was especially pronounced as SRT increased, resulting in deterioration of sludge settleability and effluent quality of the ASP (filamentous bacteria, increase of protein and polysaccharide release). Membrane filtration induced accumulation of soluble and colloidal proteins and polysaccharides which were progressively degraded in the supernatant as the SRT increased. At similar SRT, no significant difference was observed in the amount of extractable exocellular polymeric substances (bound EPS) from ASP and SMBR sludge. However as the SRT increased, the total specific amount of bound EPS in flocs decreased and the ratio proteins/polysaccharides also decreased. Concomitantly, laser diffraction analysis, microscopic observations, turbidity and DSVI measurement showed that the SRT increase induced significant modifications in sludge morphology in SMBR: decrease in floc size, densification of aggregates, and development of non-flocculating organisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16759682</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>activated sludge ; analytical methods ; Applied sciences ; bacteria ; Biomass ; Bioreactors ; Chemical and Process Engineering ; chemical oxygen demand ; colloids ; Domestic wastewater ; duration ; Engineering Sciences ; Environmental Engineering ; Environmental Sciences ; equipment design ; equipment performance ; Exact sciences and technology ; extracellular matrix ; Extracellular polymeric substances ; Filtration ; Floc size ; flocculation ; High solids retention times ; humic substances ; lasers ; Membranes, Artificial ; Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge ; Pollution ; Polymers - chemistry ; polysaccharides ; proteins ; Sewage - chemistry ; Sewage - microbiology ; solids ; solubility ; Submerged membrane bioreactor ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Wastes ; wastewater treatment ; Water Purification - methods ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2006-07, Vol.40 (12), p.2405-2415</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-13b51c1255b4537865e60e2c4596f3eac957cdaaef4cb68c03d955ee2a4fa32d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-13b51c1255b4537865e60e2c4596f3eac957cdaaef4cb68c03d955ee2a4fa32d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0213-2141 ; 0000-0001-7554-8490</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17901359$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16759682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02318002$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Massé, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spérandio, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabassud, Corinne</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>This work aims to compare biomass structure and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and an activated sludge process (ASP) treating the same domestic wastewater. The influence of the separation technique (membrane filtration or settling) and operation at high sludge-retention time (SRT) were investigated. Over the entire range of SRT (10–110 days), the SMBR achieved very good organic removal efficiencies, ranging from 90.8±0.2% to 94.2±1.6% based on total COD (TCOD), whereas those of ASP were between 87.4±1.8% and 90.3±0.8%. The contribution of the membrane in the increase in performance was due to total suspended solid retention and also partly due to retention of proteins and polysaccharides of the sludge supernatant. No significant difference in excess sludge production was observed between the two processes operated at the same SRT, but sludge production in SMBR decreased from 0.31 to 0.13 g VSS g COD −1 as SRT increased from 9 to 110 days. The difference in sludge characteristics and performance was especially pronounced as SRT increased, resulting in deterioration of sludge settleability and effluent quality of the ASP (filamentous bacteria, increase of protein and polysaccharide release). Membrane filtration induced accumulation of soluble and colloidal proteins and polysaccharides which were progressively degraded in the supernatant as the SRT increased. At similar SRT, no significant difference was observed in the amount of extractable exocellular polymeric substances (bound EPS) from ASP and SMBR sludge. However as the SRT increased, the total specific amount of bound EPS in flocs decreased and the ratio proteins/polysaccharides also decreased. Concomitantly, laser diffraction analysis, microscopic observations, turbidity and DSVI measurement showed that the SRT increase induced significant modifications in sludge morphology in SMBR: decrease in floc size, densification of aggregates, and development of non-flocculating organisms.</description><subject>activated sludge</subject><subject>analytical methods</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>bacteria</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Chemical and Process Engineering</subject><subject>chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>colloids</subject><subject>Domestic wastewater</subject><subject>duration</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>equipment design</subject><subject>equipment performance</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>extracellular matrix</subject><subject>Extracellular polymeric substances</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Floc size</subject><subject>flocculation</subject><subject>High solids retention times</subject><subject>humic substances</subject><subject>lasers</subject><subject>Membranes, Artificial</subject><subject>Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Polymers - chemistry</subject><subject>polysaccharides</subject><subject>proteins</subject><subject>Sewage - chemistry</subject><subject>Sewage - microbiology</subject><subject>solids</subject><subject>solubility</subject><subject>Submerged membrane bioreactor</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><subject>wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFks2O0zAUhSMEYsrAGyDwBiQWLf5PskEaVcAgVWIBs7ZunJvWVRIXOy3iQXhfbknF7JiVZfs7R_fnFMVLwVeCC_t-v_oJU8K8kpzbFdcrLsyjYiGqsl5KravHxYJzrZZCGX1VPMt5zzmXUtVPiythS1PbSi6K3-s4HCCFHEcWO5b7Y7tF5neQwE9I71PwmcHYsgOmLqYBRo9nElg-NgOmLbZswKFJMCJrQkxIwpj-SmBkdAknmAi6WB9S9JjJcmK7sN2xHPvQZpZwwnEKVMUUBnxePOmgz_jicl4Xd58-fl_fLjdfP39Z32yW3vJyotYaI7yQxjTaqLKyBi1H6TU11ykqpDalbwGw076xleeqrY1BlKA7ULJV18W72XcHvTukMED65SIEd3uzcec3LpWoaGwnQezbmaUOfhwxT24I2WPfU-PxmJ2srVCSBvwwKBQNv3oY5FLXQigC9Qz6FHNO2P2rVXB3DoPbuzkM7hwGx7WjMJDs1cX_vKn2XnTZPgFvLgBkD31HO_Qh33NlzSk9NXGvZ66D6GBLqXB33yT9ccEra7kl4sNMIG3rFDC57ANSVNqQ0E-ujeH_tf4BSGjfyQ</recordid><startdate>20060701</startdate><enddate>20060701</enddate><creator>Massé, Anthony</creator><creator>Spérandio, Mathieu</creator><creator>Cabassud, Corinne</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>IWA Publishing/Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-2141</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7554-8490</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20060701</creationdate><title>Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time</title><author>Massé, Anthony ; Spérandio, Mathieu ; Cabassud, Corinne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-13b51c1255b4537865e60e2c4596f3eac957cdaaef4cb68c03d955ee2a4fa32d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>activated sludge</topic><topic>analytical methods</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>bacteria</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Chemical and Process Engineering</topic><topic>chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>colloids</topic><topic>Domestic wastewater</topic><topic>duration</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>equipment design</topic><topic>equipment performance</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>extracellular matrix</topic><topic>Extracellular polymeric substances</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Floc size</topic><topic>flocculation</topic><topic>High solids retention times</topic><topic>humic substances</topic><topic>lasers</topic><topic>Membranes, Artificial</topic><topic>Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Polymers - chemistry</topic><topic>polysaccharides</topic><topic>proteins</topic><topic>Sewage - chemistry</topic><topic>Sewage - microbiology</topic><topic>solids</topic><topic>solubility</topic><topic>Submerged membrane bioreactor</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><topic>wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Massé, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spérandio, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabassud, Corinne</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Massé, Anthony</au><au>Spérandio, Mathieu</au><au>Cabassud, Corinne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2006-07-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2405</spage><epage>2415</epage><pages>2405-2415</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>This work aims to compare biomass structure and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and an activated sludge process (ASP) treating the same domestic wastewater. The influence of the separation technique (membrane filtration or settling) and operation at high sludge-retention time (SRT) were investigated. Over the entire range of SRT (10–110 days), the SMBR achieved very good organic removal efficiencies, ranging from 90.8±0.2% to 94.2±1.6% based on total COD (TCOD), whereas those of ASP were between 87.4±1.8% and 90.3±0.8%. The contribution of the membrane in the increase in performance was due to total suspended solid retention and also partly due to retention of proteins and polysaccharides of the sludge supernatant. No significant difference in excess sludge production was observed between the two processes operated at the same SRT, but sludge production in SMBR decreased from 0.31 to 0.13 g VSS g COD −1 as SRT increased from 9 to 110 days. The difference in sludge characteristics and performance was especially pronounced as SRT increased, resulting in deterioration of sludge settleability and effluent quality of the ASP (filamentous bacteria, increase of protein and polysaccharide release). Membrane filtration induced accumulation of soluble and colloidal proteins and polysaccharides which were progressively degraded in the supernatant as the SRT increased. At similar SRT, no significant difference was observed in the amount of extractable exocellular polymeric substances (bound EPS) from ASP and SMBR sludge. However as the SRT increased, the total specific amount of bound EPS in flocs decreased and the ratio proteins/polysaccharides also decreased. Concomitantly, laser diffraction analysis, microscopic observations, turbidity and DSVI measurement showed that the SRT increase induced significant modifications in sludge morphology in SMBR: decrease in floc size, densification of aggregates, and development of non-flocculating organisms.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16759682</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.015</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-2141</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7554-8490</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2006-07, Vol.40 (12), p.2405-2415
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02318002v1
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects activated sludge
analytical methods
Applied sciences
bacteria
Biomass
Bioreactors
Chemical and Process Engineering
chemical oxygen demand
colloids
Domestic wastewater
duration
Engineering Sciences
Environmental Engineering
Environmental Sciences
equipment design
equipment performance
Exact sciences and technology
extracellular matrix
Extracellular polymeric substances
Filtration
Floc size
flocculation
High solids retention times
humic substances
lasers
Membranes, Artificial
Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge
Pollution
Polymers - chemistry
polysaccharides
proteins
Sewage - chemistry
Sewage - microbiology
solids
solubility
Submerged membrane bioreactor
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
Wastes
wastewater treatment
Water Purification - methods
Water treatment and pollution
title Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A59%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20sludge%20characteristics%20and%20performance%20of%20a%20submerged%20membrane%20bioreactor%20and%20an%20activated%20sludge%20process%20at%20high%20solids%20retention%20time&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Mass%C3%A9,%20Anthony&rft.date=2006-07-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2405&rft.epage=2415&rft.pages=2405-2415&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E29139688%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-13b51c1255b4537865e60e2c4596f3eac957cdaaef4cb68c03d955ee2a4fa32d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20249113&rft_id=info:pmid/16759682&rfr_iscdi=true