Loading…
Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time
This work aims to compare biomass structure and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and an activated sludge process (ASP) treating the same domestic wastewater. The influence of the separation technique (membrane filtration or settling) and operation at high sludge-retention time (...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water research (Oxford) 2006-07, Vol.40 (12), p.2405-2415 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-13b51c1255b4537865e60e2c4596f3eac957cdaaef4cb68c03d955ee2a4fa32d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-13b51c1255b4537865e60e2c4596f3eac957cdaaef4cb68c03d955ee2a4fa32d3 |
container_end_page | 2415 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2405 |
container_title | Water research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Massé, Anthony Spérandio, Mathieu Cabassud, Corinne |
description | This work aims to compare biomass structure and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and an activated sludge process (ASP) treating the same domestic wastewater. The influence of the separation technique (membrane filtration or settling) and operation at high sludge-retention time (SRT) were investigated. Over the entire range of SRT (10–110 days), the SMBR achieved very good organic removal efficiencies, ranging from 90.8±0.2% to 94.2±1.6% based on total COD (TCOD), whereas those of ASP were between 87.4±1.8% and 90.3±0.8%. The contribution of the membrane in the increase in performance was due to total suspended solid retention and also partly due to retention of proteins and polysaccharides of the sludge supernatant. No significant difference in excess sludge production was observed between the two processes operated at the same SRT, but sludge production in SMBR decreased from 0.31 to 0.13
g
VSS
g
COD
−1 as SRT increased from 9 to 110 days. The difference in sludge characteristics and performance was especially pronounced as SRT increased, resulting in deterioration of sludge settleability and effluent quality of the ASP (filamentous bacteria, increase of protein and polysaccharide release).
Membrane filtration induced accumulation of soluble and colloidal proteins and polysaccharides which were progressively degraded in the supernatant as the SRT increased. At similar SRT, no significant difference was observed in the amount of extractable exocellular polymeric substances (bound EPS) from ASP and SMBR sludge. However as the SRT increased, the total specific amount of bound EPS in flocs decreased and the ratio proteins/polysaccharides also decreased. Concomitantly, laser diffraction analysis, microscopic observations, turbidity and DSVI measurement showed that the SRT increase induced significant modifications in sludge morphology in SMBR: decrease in floc size, densification of aggregates, and development of non-flocculating organisms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.015 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02318002v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135406002375</els_id><sourcerecordid>29139688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-13b51c1255b4537865e60e2c4596f3eac957cdaaef4cb68c03d955ee2a4fa32d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks2O0zAUhSMEYsrAGyDwBiQWLf5PskEaVcAgVWIBs7ZunJvWVRIXOy3iQXhfbknF7JiVZfs7R_fnFMVLwVeCC_t-v_oJU8K8kpzbFdcrLsyjYiGqsl5KravHxYJzrZZCGX1VPMt5zzmXUtVPiythS1PbSi6K3-s4HCCFHEcWO5b7Y7tF5neQwE9I71PwmcHYsgOmLqYBRo9nElg-NgOmLbZswKFJMCJrQkxIwpj-SmBkdAknmAi6WB9S9JjJcmK7sN2xHPvQZpZwwnEKVMUUBnxePOmgz_jicl4Xd58-fl_fLjdfP39Z32yW3vJyotYaI7yQxjTaqLKyBi1H6TU11ykqpDalbwGw076xleeqrY1BlKA7ULJV18W72XcHvTukMED65SIEd3uzcec3LpWoaGwnQezbmaUOfhwxT24I2WPfU-PxmJ2srVCSBvwwKBQNv3oY5FLXQigC9Qz6FHNO2P2rVXB3DoPbuzkM7hwGx7WjMJDs1cX_vKn2XnTZPgFvLgBkD31HO_Qh33NlzSk9NXGvZ66D6GBLqXB33yT9ccEra7kl4sNMIG3rFDC57ANSVNqQ0E-ujeH_tf4BSGjfyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20249113</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Massé, Anthony ; Spérandio, Mathieu ; Cabassud, Corinne</creator><creatorcontrib>Massé, Anthony ; Spérandio, Mathieu ; Cabassud, Corinne</creatorcontrib><description>This work aims to compare biomass structure and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and an activated sludge process (ASP) treating the same domestic wastewater. The influence of the separation technique (membrane filtration or settling) and operation at high sludge-retention time (SRT) were investigated. Over the entire range of SRT (10–110 days), the SMBR achieved very good organic removal efficiencies, ranging from 90.8±0.2% to 94.2±1.6% based on total COD (TCOD), whereas those of ASP were between 87.4±1.8% and 90.3±0.8%. The contribution of the membrane in the increase in performance was due to total suspended solid retention and also partly due to retention of proteins and polysaccharides of the sludge supernatant. No significant difference in excess sludge production was observed between the two processes operated at the same SRT, but sludge production in SMBR decreased from 0.31 to 0.13
g
VSS
g
COD
−1 as SRT increased from 9 to 110 days. The difference in sludge characteristics and performance was especially pronounced as SRT increased, resulting in deterioration of sludge settleability and effluent quality of the ASP (filamentous bacteria, increase of protein and polysaccharide release).
Membrane filtration induced accumulation of soluble and colloidal proteins and polysaccharides which were progressively degraded in the supernatant as the SRT increased. At similar SRT, no significant difference was observed in the amount of extractable exocellular polymeric substances (bound EPS) from ASP and SMBR sludge. However as the SRT increased, the total specific amount of bound EPS in flocs decreased and the ratio proteins/polysaccharides also decreased. Concomitantly, laser diffraction analysis, microscopic observations, turbidity and DSVI measurement showed that the SRT increase induced significant modifications in sludge morphology in SMBR: decrease in floc size, densification of aggregates, and development of non-flocculating organisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16759682</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>activated sludge ; analytical methods ; Applied sciences ; bacteria ; Biomass ; Bioreactors ; Chemical and Process Engineering ; chemical oxygen demand ; colloids ; Domestic wastewater ; duration ; Engineering Sciences ; Environmental Engineering ; Environmental Sciences ; equipment design ; equipment performance ; Exact sciences and technology ; extracellular matrix ; Extracellular polymeric substances ; Filtration ; Floc size ; flocculation ; High solids retention times ; humic substances ; lasers ; Membranes, Artificial ; Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge ; Pollution ; Polymers - chemistry ; polysaccharides ; proteins ; Sewage - chemistry ; Sewage - microbiology ; solids ; solubility ; Submerged membrane bioreactor ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Wastes ; wastewater treatment ; Water Purification - methods ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2006-07, Vol.40 (12), p.2405-2415</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-13b51c1255b4537865e60e2c4596f3eac957cdaaef4cb68c03d955ee2a4fa32d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-13b51c1255b4537865e60e2c4596f3eac957cdaaef4cb68c03d955ee2a4fa32d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0213-2141 ; 0000-0001-7554-8490</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17901359$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16759682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02318002$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Massé, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spérandio, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabassud, Corinne</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>This work aims to compare biomass structure and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and an activated sludge process (ASP) treating the same domestic wastewater. The influence of the separation technique (membrane filtration or settling) and operation at high sludge-retention time (SRT) were investigated. Over the entire range of SRT (10–110 days), the SMBR achieved very good organic removal efficiencies, ranging from 90.8±0.2% to 94.2±1.6% based on total COD (TCOD), whereas those of ASP were between 87.4±1.8% and 90.3±0.8%. The contribution of the membrane in the increase in performance was due to total suspended solid retention and also partly due to retention of proteins and polysaccharides of the sludge supernatant. No significant difference in excess sludge production was observed between the two processes operated at the same SRT, but sludge production in SMBR decreased from 0.31 to 0.13
g
VSS
g
COD
−1 as SRT increased from 9 to 110 days. The difference in sludge characteristics and performance was especially pronounced as SRT increased, resulting in deterioration of sludge settleability and effluent quality of the ASP (filamentous bacteria, increase of protein and polysaccharide release).
Membrane filtration induced accumulation of soluble and colloidal proteins and polysaccharides which were progressively degraded in the supernatant as the SRT increased. At similar SRT, no significant difference was observed in the amount of extractable exocellular polymeric substances (bound EPS) from ASP and SMBR sludge. However as the SRT increased, the total specific amount of bound EPS in flocs decreased and the ratio proteins/polysaccharides also decreased. Concomitantly, laser diffraction analysis, microscopic observations, turbidity and DSVI measurement showed that the SRT increase induced significant modifications in sludge morphology in SMBR: decrease in floc size, densification of aggregates, and development of non-flocculating organisms.</description><subject>activated sludge</subject><subject>analytical methods</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>bacteria</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Chemical and Process Engineering</subject><subject>chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>colloids</subject><subject>Domestic wastewater</subject><subject>duration</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>equipment design</subject><subject>equipment performance</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>extracellular matrix</subject><subject>Extracellular polymeric substances</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Floc size</subject><subject>flocculation</subject><subject>High solids retention times</subject><subject>humic substances</subject><subject>lasers</subject><subject>Membranes, Artificial</subject><subject>Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Polymers - chemistry</subject><subject>polysaccharides</subject><subject>proteins</subject><subject>Sewage - chemistry</subject><subject>Sewage - microbiology</subject><subject>solids</subject><subject>solubility</subject><subject>Submerged membrane bioreactor</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><subject>wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFks2O0zAUhSMEYsrAGyDwBiQWLf5PskEaVcAgVWIBs7ZunJvWVRIXOy3iQXhfbknF7JiVZfs7R_fnFMVLwVeCC_t-v_oJU8K8kpzbFdcrLsyjYiGqsl5KravHxYJzrZZCGX1VPMt5zzmXUtVPiythS1PbSi6K3-s4HCCFHEcWO5b7Y7tF5neQwE9I71PwmcHYsgOmLqYBRo9nElg-NgOmLbZswKFJMCJrQkxIwpj-SmBkdAknmAi6WB9S9JjJcmK7sN2xHPvQZpZwwnEKVMUUBnxePOmgz_jicl4Xd58-fl_fLjdfP39Z32yW3vJyotYaI7yQxjTaqLKyBi1H6TU11ykqpDalbwGw076xleeqrY1BlKA7ULJV18W72XcHvTukMED65SIEd3uzcec3LpWoaGwnQezbmaUOfhwxT24I2WPfU-PxmJ2srVCSBvwwKBQNv3oY5FLXQigC9Qz6FHNO2P2rVXB3DoPbuzkM7hwGx7WjMJDs1cX_vKn2XnTZPgFvLgBkD31HO_Qh33NlzSk9NXGvZ66D6GBLqXB33yT9ccEra7kl4sNMIG3rFDC57ANSVNqQ0E-ujeH_tf4BSGjfyQ</recordid><startdate>20060701</startdate><enddate>20060701</enddate><creator>Massé, Anthony</creator><creator>Spérandio, Mathieu</creator><creator>Cabassud, Corinne</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>IWA Publishing/Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-2141</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7554-8490</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20060701</creationdate><title>Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time</title><author>Massé, Anthony ; Spérandio, Mathieu ; Cabassud, Corinne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-13b51c1255b4537865e60e2c4596f3eac957cdaaef4cb68c03d955ee2a4fa32d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>activated sludge</topic><topic>analytical methods</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>bacteria</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Chemical and Process Engineering</topic><topic>chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>colloids</topic><topic>Domestic wastewater</topic><topic>duration</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>equipment design</topic><topic>equipment performance</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>extracellular matrix</topic><topic>Extracellular polymeric substances</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Floc size</topic><topic>flocculation</topic><topic>High solids retention times</topic><topic>humic substances</topic><topic>lasers</topic><topic>Membranes, Artificial</topic><topic>Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Polymers - chemistry</topic><topic>polysaccharides</topic><topic>proteins</topic><topic>Sewage - chemistry</topic><topic>Sewage - microbiology</topic><topic>solids</topic><topic>solubility</topic><topic>Submerged membrane bioreactor</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><topic>wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Massé, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spérandio, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabassud, Corinne</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Massé, Anthony</au><au>Spérandio, Mathieu</au><au>Cabassud, Corinne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2006-07-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2405</spage><epage>2415</epage><pages>2405-2415</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>This work aims to compare biomass structure and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and an activated sludge process (ASP) treating the same domestic wastewater. The influence of the separation technique (membrane filtration or settling) and operation at high sludge-retention time (SRT) were investigated. Over the entire range of SRT (10–110 days), the SMBR achieved very good organic removal efficiencies, ranging from 90.8±0.2% to 94.2±1.6% based on total COD (TCOD), whereas those of ASP were between 87.4±1.8% and 90.3±0.8%. The contribution of the membrane in the increase in performance was due to total suspended solid retention and also partly due to retention of proteins and polysaccharides of the sludge supernatant. No significant difference in excess sludge production was observed between the two processes operated at the same SRT, but sludge production in SMBR decreased from 0.31 to 0.13
g
VSS
g
COD
−1 as SRT increased from 9 to 110 days. The difference in sludge characteristics and performance was especially pronounced as SRT increased, resulting in deterioration of sludge settleability and effluent quality of the ASP (filamentous bacteria, increase of protein and polysaccharide release).
Membrane filtration induced accumulation of soluble and colloidal proteins and polysaccharides which were progressively degraded in the supernatant as the SRT increased. At similar SRT, no significant difference was observed in the amount of extractable exocellular polymeric substances (bound EPS) from ASP and SMBR sludge. However as the SRT increased, the total specific amount of bound EPS in flocs decreased and the ratio proteins/polysaccharides also decreased. Concomitantly, laser diffraction analysis, microscopic observations, turbidity and DSVI measurement showed that the SRT increase induced significant modifications in sludge morphology in SMBR: decrease in floc size, densification of aggregates, and development of non-flocculating organisms.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16759682</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.015</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-2141</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7554-8490</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1354 |
ispartof | Water research (Oxford), 2006-07, Vol.40 (12), p.2405-2415 |
issn | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02318002v1 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | activated sludge analytical methods Applied sciences bacteria Biomass Bioreactors Chemical and Process Engineering chemical oxygen demand colloids Domestic wastewater duration Engineering Sciences Environmental Engineering Environmental Sciences equipment design equipment performance Exact sciences and technology extracellular matrix Extracellular polymeric substances Filtration Floc size flocculation High solids retention times humic substances lasers Membranes, Artificial Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge Pollution Polymers - chemistry polysaccharides proteins Sewage - chemistry Sewage - microbiology solids solubility Submerged membrane bioreactor Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods Wastes wastewater treatment Water Purification - methods Water treatment and pollution |
title | Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A59%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20sludge%20characteristics%20and%20performance%20of%20a%20submerged%20membrane%20bioreactor%20and%20an%20activated%20sludge%20process%20at%20high%20solids%20retention%20time&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Mass%C3%A9,%20Anthony&rft.date=2006-07-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2405&rft.epage=2415&rft.pages=2405-2415&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E29139688%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-13b51c1255b4537865e60e2c4596f3eac957cdaaef4cb68c03d955ee2a4fa32d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20249113&rft_id=info:pmid/16759682&rfr_iscdi=true |