Validity and internal consistency of the French version of the revised Skin Management Needs Assessment Checklist in people with spinal cord injury

Study design Cross-sectional psychometrics study. Objectives To determine the construct validity and internal consistency of the revised Skin Management Needs Assessment Checklist (revised SMnac). Setting Six spinal cord rehabilitation centers. Methods One-hundred and thirty-two community-dwelling i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Spinal cord 2018-11, Vol.56 (11), p.1069-1075
Main Authors: Gélis, Anthony, Dupeyron, Arnaud, Daures, Jean Pierre, Goossens, David, Gault, Dominique, Pedelucq, Jean Paul, Enjalbert, Michel, Maupas, Eric, Kennedy, Paul, Fattal, Charles
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
692/499
692/617/375/1824
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anatomy
Anxiety
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Checklist
Consistency
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Human Physiology
Humans
Injuries
Life Sciences
Male
Management
Mental depression
Middle Aged
Needs analysis
Needs Assessment
Neurochemistry
Neuropsychology
Neurosciences
Pain
Psychometrics
Rehabilitation
Reproducibility of Results
Self-Management
Skin
Skin Diseases - diagnosis
Skin Diseases - prevention & control
Skin Diseases - psychology
Skin Diseases - rehabilitation
Spinal cord injuries
Spinal Cord Injuries - complications
Spinal Cord Injuries - diagnosis
Spinal Cord Injuries - psychology
Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation
Validation studies
Validity
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Study design Cross-sectional psychometrics study. Objectives To determine the construct validity and internal consistency of the revised Skin Management Needs Assessment Checklist (revised SMnac). Setting Six spinal cord rehabilitation centers. Methods One-hundred and thirty-two community-dwelling individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) were included. Construct validity was assessed by a Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between the revised SMnac and several questionnaires: Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Ways of Coping Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Braden scale; or clinical variables: educational level, presence of a pressure ulcer (PU), history of multiple PUs, time since injury, and pain. Results The study evidenced construct validity with a fair to moderate correlation coefficient between the revised SMnac and Rosenberg scale ( r s  = 0.25; p  = 0.03), active coping ( r s  = 0.29; p  = 0.001), HADS ( r s  = -0.43; p  
ISSN:1362-4393
1476-5624
1362-4393
DOI:10.1038/s41393-018-0156-1