Loading…
Sensitivity uncertainty analysis and new neutron capture cross-sections for gadolinium odd-isotopes to support nuclear safety
•Nuclear technology needs better evaluation of gadolinium cross sections for safety and economics.•Experiments at n_TOF (CERN) facility obtained measures of gadolinium thermal capture cross sections.•Sensitivity analysis to gadolinium capture cross-sections for ZED-2 facility with MCNP6.1 code.•New...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of nuclear energy 2019-10, Vol.132, p.537-543 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Nuclear technology needs better evaluation of gadolinium cross sections for safety and economics.•Experiments at n_TOF (CERN) facility obtained measures of gadolinium thermal capture cross sections.•Sensitivity analysis to gadolinium capture cross-sections for ZED-2 facility with MCNP6.1 code.•New gadolinium capture cross-sections perform better in criticality experimental benchmarks.
This paper presents the results of a sensitivity and uncertainty (S&U) analysis on keff performed on a BWR fuel assembly (FA) poisoned with gadolinia, as well as of a criticality and sensitivity study of the ZED-2 research reactor, in whose moderator has been dissolved. The evidence collected from the ZED-2 analysis, the BWR FA S&U analysis, and from other criticality benchmarks indicates that improvements should be introduced in the 157Gd (n, γ) cross section evaluation, especially in the thermal and near-thermal ranges, and in its uncertainty. In 2016, to cope with this need, the n_TOF Collaboration conducted an experimental campaign to obtain new 157Gd and 155Gd cross section measurements. The preliminary information available from the analysis of the experimental data suggests that these new data have the potential to correct some of the discrepancies found between some experimental benchmarks and their simulation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0306-4549 1873-2100 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.06.025 |