Loading…
Comparison of airborne lidar, aerial photography, and field surveys to model the habitat suitability of a cryptic forest species - the hazel grouse
Light detection and ranging (lidar) is a useful tool for measuring three-dimensional habitat structure; hence, its use in habitat suitability models has been explored, both as a single resource and in combination with other remote-sensing techniques. Here, we evaluated the suitability of airborne li...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of remote sensing 2014-09, Vol.35 (17), p.6469-6489 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-24527b188064825e1e12341c923bf9412f9a043fd8938ff789132ad1fb02b8a43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-24527b188064825e1e12341c923bf9412f9a043fd8938ff789132ad1fb02b8a43 |
container_end_page | 6489 |
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 6469 |
container_title | International journal of remote sensing |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Bae, Soyeon Reineking, Bjoern Ewald, Michael Mueller, Joerg |
description | Light detection and ranging (lidar) is a useful tool for measuring three-dimensional habitat structure; hence, its use in habitat suitability models has been explored, both as a single resource and in combination with other remote-sensing techniques. Here, we evaluated the suitability of airborne lidar data in comparison with aerial photographs and field surveys for modelling the distribution of an endangered and cryptic forest species, the hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia). The study was conducted in the Bavarian Forest National Park of southeast Germany. Subsequently, a prediction map for conservation planning was generated for a large area, which encompassed the National Park. We examined the utility of lidar data for generating a hazel grouse distribution model by using machine learning (boosted regression trees), and then compared the results to variables derived from field surveys and aerial photographs, both separately and in combination. The cross-validated discrimination ability of the model was slightly higher when using lidar data (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), 0.79) compared to models using aerial photographs (AUC, 0.75) or field survey data (AUC, 0.78). The predictive performance consistently increased when combining the predictors from different sources, with an AUC of 0.86 being produced in the model combining all three data sources. The three data sources complemented one another, with each data source probably having an advantage at deriving one of three key aspects of the hazel grouse habitat, namely, vertically well-structured forest stands, horizontally mixed successional vegetation stages, and certain deciduous trees as food resources such as mountain ash (Sorbus aucuparia). In addition, the diverse lidar metrics might be applied to simultaneously characterize vertically and horizontally well-structured forest stands. We conclude that public available airborne lidar data are a viable source for creating habitat suitability maps for large areas and may have increased utility for detecting forest characteristics and valuable wildlife habitats. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01431161.2014.955145 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02601073v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835653268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-24527b188064825e1e12341c923bf9412f9a043fd8938ff789132ad1fb02b8a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiMEEkvLG3DwBQmkZuux48Q5oWpFKdJKXOBsTRK7MXLiYGeLwmvwwjhk2yPiNNbM98_88p9lb4DugUp6TaHgACXsWXrtayGgEM-yHfCyzEVN4Xm2W5F8ZV5mr2L8TiktK1Htst8HP0wYbPQj8YagDY0PoybOdhiuCOpg0ZGp97O_Dzj1S-qNHTFWu47EU3jQSySzJ4PvtCNzr0mPjZ1xTsNUGuvsvPzdTNqwTLNtifFBxzSfdGt1JPlZ9Svp74M_RX2ZvTDoon59rhfZt9uPXw93-fHLp8-Hm2PeClrNOSsEqxqQkpaFZEKDBsYLaGvGG1MXwEyNtOCmkzWXxlSyBs6wA9NQ1kgs-EX2ftvbo1NTsAOGRXm06u7mqNYeZSUFWvEHSOy7jZ2C_3FK_tVgY6udw1EnzwokF6XgrJT_gYKoKGOCJbTY0Db4GIM2TzaAqjVa9RitWqNVW7RJ9vZ8AWOLzgQcWxuftExKWSVx4j5snB3Tpw_40wfXqRkX58OjiP_z0h9Iybai</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1815702252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of airborne lidar, aerial photography, and field surveys to model the habitat suitability of a cryptic forest species - the hazel grouse</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Bae, Soyeon ; Reineking, Bjoern ; Ewald, Michael ; Mueller, Joerg</creator><creatorcontrib>Bae, Soyeon ; Reineking, Bjoern ; Ewald, Michael ; Mueller, Joerg</creatorcontrib><description>Light detection and ranging (lidar) is a useful tool for measuring three-dimensional habitat structure; hence, its use in habitat suitability models has been explored, both as a single resource and in combination with other remote-sensing techniques. Here, we evaluated the suitability of airborne lidar data in comparison with aerial photographs and field surveys for modelling the distribution of an endangered and cryptic forest species, the hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia). The study was conducted in the Bavarian Forest National Park of southeast Germany. Subsequently, a prediction map for conservation planning was generated for a large area, which encompassed the National Park. We examined the utility of lidar data for generating a hazel grouse distribution model by using machine learning (boosted regression trees), and then compared the results to variables derived from field surveys and aerial photographs, both separately and in combination. The cross-validated discrimination ability of the model was slightly higher when using lidar data (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), 0.79) compared to models using aerial photographs (AUC, 0.75) or field survey data (AUC, 0.78). The predictive performance consistently increased when combining the predictors from different sources, with an AUC of 0.86 being produced in the model combining all three data sources. The three data sources complemented one another, with each data source probably having an advantage at deriving one of three key aspects of the hazel grouse habitat, namely, vertically well-structured forest stands, horizontally mixed successional vegetation stages, and certain deciduous trees as food resources such as mountain ash (Sorbus aucuparia). In addition, the diverse lidar metrics might be applied to simultaneously characterize vertically and horizontally well-structured forest stands. We conclude that public available airborne lidar data are a viable source for creating habitat suitability maps for large areas and may have increased utility for detecting forest characteristics and valuable wildlife habitats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5901</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2014.955145</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJSEDK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Aerial surveys ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied geophysics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Data sources ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Environmental Sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects. Techniques ; Habitats ; Hazel ; Internal geophysics ; Lidar ; Mathematical models ; Teledetection and vegetation maps</subject><ispartof>International journal of remote sensing, 2014-09, Vol.35 (17), p.6469-6489</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor & Francis 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-24527b188064825e1e12341c923bf9412f9a043fd8938ff789132ad1fb02b8a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-24527b188064825e1e12341c923bf9412f9a043fd8938ff789132ad1fb02b8a43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5277-9181 ; 0000-0002-8027-5316</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28887080$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02601073$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bae, Soyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reineking, Bjoern</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewald, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Joerg</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of airborne lidar, aerial photography, and field surveys to model the habitat suitability of a cryptic forest species - the hazel grouse</title><title>International journal of remote sensing</title><description>Light detection and ranging (lidar) is a useful tool for measuring three-dimensional habitat structure; hence, its use in habitat suitability models has been explored, both as a single resource and in combination with other remote-sensing techniques. Here, we evaluated the suitability of airborne lidar data in comparison with aerial photographs and field surveys for modelling the distribution of an endangered and cryptic forest species, the hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia). The study was conducted in the Bavarian Forest National Park of southeast Germany. Subsequently, a prediction map for conservation planning was generated for a large area, which encompassed the National Park. We examined the utility of lidar data for generating a hazel grouse distribution model by using machine learning (boosted regression trees), and then compared the results to variables derived from field surveys and aerial photographs, both separately and in combination. The cross-validated discrimination ability of the model was slightly higher when using lidar data (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), 0.79) compared to models using aerial photographs (AUC, 0.75) or field survey data (AUC, 0.78). The predictive performance consistently increased when combining the predictors from different sources, with an AUC of 0.86 being produced in the model combining all three data sources. The three data sources complemented one another, with each data source probably having an advantage at deriving one of three key aspects of the hazel grouse habitat, namely, vertically well-structured forest stands, horizontally mixed successional vegetation stages, and certain deciduous trees as food resources such as mountain ash (Sorbus aucuparia). In addition, the diverse lidar metrics might be applied to simultaneously characterize vertically and horizontally well-structured forest stands. We conclude that public available airborne lidar data are a viable source for creating habitat suitability maps for large areas and may have increased utility for detecting forest characteristics and valuable wildlife habitats.</description><subject>Aerial surveys</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Data sources</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hazel</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Teledetection and vegetation maps</subject><issn>0143-1161</issn><issn>1366-5901</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiMEEkvLG3DwBQmkZuux48Q5oWpFKdJKXOBsTRK7MXLiYGeLwmvwwjhk2yPiNNbM98_88p9lb4DugUp6TaHgACXsWXrtayGgEM-yHfCyzEVN4Xm2W5F8ZV5mr2L8TiktK1Htst8HP0wYbPQj8YagDY0PoybOdhiuCOpg0ZGp97O_Dzj1S-qNHTFWu47EU3jQSySzJ4PvtCNzr0mPjZ1xTsNUGuvsvPzdTNqwTLNtifFBxzSfdGt1JPlZ9Svp74M_RX2ZvTDoon59rhfZt9uPXw93-fHLp8-Hm2PeClrNOSsEqxqQkpaFZEKDBsYLaGvGG1MXwEyNtOCmkzWXxlSyBs6wA9NQ1kgs-EX2ftvbo1NTsAOGRXm06u7mqNYeZSUFWvEHSOy7jZ2C_3FK_tVgY6udw1EnzwokF6XgrJT_gYKoKGOCJbTY0Db4GIM2TzaAqjVa9RitWqNVW7RJ9vZ8AWOLzgQcWxuftExKWSVx4j5snB3Tpw_40wfXqRkX58OjiP_z0h9Iybai</recordid><startdate>20140902</startdate><enddate>20140902</enddate><creator>Bae, Soyeon</creator><creator>Reineking, Bjoern</creator><creator>Ewald, Michael</creator><creator>Mueller, Joerg</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5277-9181</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8027-5316</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140902</creationdate><title>Comparison of airborne lidar, aerial photography, and field surveys to model the habitat suitability of a cryptic forest species - the hazel grouse</title><author>Bae, Soyeon ; Reineking, Bjoern ; Ewald, Michael ; Mueller, Joerg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-24527b188064825e1e12341c923bf9412f9a043fd8938ff789132ad1fb02b8a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aerial surveys</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Data sources</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hazel</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Teledetection and vegetation maps</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bae, Soyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reineking, Bjoern</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewald, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Joerg</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>International journal of remote sensing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bae, Soyeon</au><au>Reineking, Bjoern</au><au>Ewald, Michael</au><au>Mueller, Joerg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of airborne lidar, aerial photography, and field surveys to model the habitat suitability of a cryptic forest species - the hazel grouse</atitle><jtitle>International journal of remote sensing</jtitle><date>2014-09-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>6469</spage><epage>6489</epage><pages>6469-6489</pages><issn>0143-1161</issn><eissn>1366-5901</eissn><coden>IJSEDK</coden><abstract>Light detection and ranging (lidar) is a useful tool for measuring three-dimensional habitat structure; hence, its use in habitat suitability models has been explored, both as a single resource and in combination with other remote-sensing techniques. Here, we evaluated the suitability of airborne lidar data in comparison with aerial photographs and field surveys for modelling the distribution of an endangered and cryptic forest species, the hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia). The study was conducted in the Bavarian Forest National Park of southeast Germany. Subsequently, a prediction map for conservation planning was generated for a large area, which encompassed the National Park. We examined the utility of lidar data for generating a hazel grouse distribution model by using machine learning (boosted regression trees), and then compared the results to variables derived from field surveys and aerial photographs, both separately and in combination. The cross-validated discrimination ability of the model was slightly higher when using lidar data (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), 0.79) compared to models using aerial photographs (AUC, 0.75) or field survey data (AUC, 0.78). The predictive performance consistently increased when combining the predictors from different sources, with an AUC of 0.86 being produced in the model combining all three data sources. The three data sources complemented one another, with each data source probably having an advantage at deriving one of three key aspects of the hazel grouse habitat, namely, vertically well-structured forest stands, horizontally mixed successional vegetation stages, and certain deciduous trees as food resources such as mountain ash (Sorbus aucuparia). In addition, the diverse lidar metrics might be applied to simultaneously characterize vertically and horizontally well-structured forest stands. We conclude that public available airborne lidar data are a viable source for creating habitat suitability maps for large areas and may have increased utility for detecting forest characteristics and valuable wildlife habitats.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/01431161.2014.955145</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5277-9181</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8027-5316</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-1161 |
ispartof | International journal of remote sensing, 2014-09, Vol.35 (17), p.6469-6489 |
issn | 0143-1161 1366-5901 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02601073v1 |
source | Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection |
subjects | Aerial surveys Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied geophysics Biological and medical sciences Data sources Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Environmental Sciences Exact sciences and technology Forests Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects. Techniques Habitats Hazel Internal geophysics Lidar Mathematical models Teledetection and vegetation maps |
title | Comparison of airborne lidar, aerial photography, and field surveys to model the habitat suitability of a cryptic forest species - the hazel grouse |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A57%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20airborne%20lidar,%20aerial%20photography,%20and%20field%20surveys%20to%20model%20the%20habitat%20suitability%20of%20a%20cryptic%20forest%20species%20-%20the%20hazel%20grouse&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20remote%20sensing&rft.au=Bae,%20Soyeon&rft.date=2014-09-02&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=6469&rft.epage=6489&rft.pages=6469-6489&rft.issn=0143-1161&rft.eissn=1366-5901&rft.coden=IJSEDK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01431161.2014.955145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1835653268%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-24527b188064825e1e12341c923bf9412f9a043fd8938ff789132ad1fb02b8a43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1815702252&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |