Loading…
Using the Reliability Theory for Assessing the Decision Confidence Probability for Comparative Life Cycle Assessments
Comparative decision making process is widely used to identify which option (system, product, service, etc.) has smaller environmental footprints and for providing recommendations that help stakeholders take future decisions. However, the uncertainty problem complicates the comparison and the decisi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental science & technology 2016-03, Vol.50 (5), p.2272-2280 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fd0b52aa9203857b4be21efd416b97b0a05181f0516f61e893ca271de3eb863e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fd0b52aa9203857b4be21efd416b97b0a05181f0516f61e893ca271de3eb863e3 |
container_end_page | 2280 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2272 |
container_title | Environmental science & technology |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Wei, Wei Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène Faure, Thierry Dumoulin, Nicolas Roux, Philippe Mathias, Jean-Denis |
description | Comparative decision making process is widely used to identify which option (system, product, service, etc.) has smaller environmental footprints and for providing recommendations that help stakeholders take future decisions. However, the uncertainty problem complicates the comparison and the decision making. Probability-based decision support in LCA is a way to help stakeholders in their decision-making process. It calculates the decision confidence probability which expresses the probability of a option to have a smaller environmental impact than the one of another option. Here we apply the reliability theory to approximate the decision confidence probability. We compare the traditional Monte Carlo method with a reliability method called FORM method. The Monte Carlo method needs high computational time to calculate the decision confidence probability. The FORM method enables us to approximate the decision confidence probability with fewer simulations than the Monte Carlo method by approximating the response surface. Moreover, the FORM method calculates the associated importance factors that correspond to a sensitivity analysis in relation to the probability. The importance factors allow stakeholders to determine which factors influence their decision. Our results clearly show that the reliability method provides additional useful information to stakeholders as well as it reduces the computational time. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acs.est.5b03683 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02602524v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3985113061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fd0b52aa9203857b4be21efd416b97b0a05181f0516f61e893ca271de3eb863e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc2L1DAYh4Mo7rh69iYBLyvS2eRNm6bHoX6sMKDILngLSfvWydI2Y9IuzH9vysyOIAgekkB4fk8-foS85mzNGfBr08Q1xmldWCakEk_IihfAskIV_ClZMcZFVgn544K8iPGeMQaCqefkAqTiRQn5isx30Y0_6bRD-h17Z6zr3XSgtzv04UA7H-gmRoxn6AM2Ljo_0tqPnWtxbJB-C94-BpdE7Ye9CWZyD0i3rkNaH5oeT6IBxym-JM8600d8dVovyd2nj7f1Tbb9-vlLvdlmJgc1ZV3LbAHGVMCEKkqbWwSOXZtzaavSMsMKrniXZtlJjqoSjYGStyjQKilQXJJ3R-_O9Hof3GDCQXvj9M1mq5c9BpJBAfkDT-zVkd0H_2tOn6oHFxvsezOin6PmZSmlrHKo_gOVVaUgjYS-_Qu993MY06MXoQDFASBR10eqCT7GgN35spzppWiditZL-lR0Srw5eWc7YHvmH5tNwPsjsCT_nPkP3W-No7LI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1773281222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using the Reliability Theory for Assessing the Decision Confidence Probability for Comparative Life Cycle Assessments</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Wei, Wei ; Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène ; Faure, Thierry ; Dumoulin, Nicolas ; Roux, Philippe ; Mathias, Jean-Denis</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei, Wei ; Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène ; Faure, Thierry ; Dumoulin, Nicolas ; Roux, Philippe ; Mathias, Jean-Denis</creatorcontrib><description>Comparative decision making process is widely used to identify which option (system, product, service, etc.) has smaller environmental footprints and for providing recommendations that help stakeholders take future decisions. However, the uncertainty problem complicates the comparison and the decision making. Probability-based decision support in LCA is a way to help stakeholders in their decision-making process. It calculates the decision confidence probability which expresses the probability of a option to have a smaller environmental impact than the one of another option. Here we apply the reliability theory to approximate the decision confidence probability. We compare the traditional Monte Carlo method with a reliability method called FORM method. The Monte Carlo method needs high computational time to calculate the decision confidence probability. The FORM method enables us to approximate the decision confidence probability with fewer simulations than the Monte Carlo method by approximating the response surface. Moreover, the FORM method calculates the associated importance factors that correspond to a sensitivity analysis in relation to the probability. The importance factors allow stakeholders to determine which factors influence their decision. Our results clearly show that the reliability method provides additional useful information to stakeholders as well as it reduces the computational time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03683</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26815724</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Decision Making ; Environment ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Sciences ; Life cycles ; Models, Theoretical ; Monte Carlo Method ; Probability ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Stochastic Processes ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & technology, 2016-03, Vol.50 (5), p.2272-2280</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Mar 1, 2016</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fd0b52aa9203857b4be21efd416b97b0a05181f0516f61e893ca271de3eb863e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fd0b52aa9203857b4be21efd416b97b0a05181f0516f61e893ca271de3eb863e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6172-9079 ; 0000-0002-3803-7744 ; 0000-0003-0321-4189 ; 0000-0002-5083-0382 ; 0009-0009-9480-7684</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26815724$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02602524$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faure, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumoulin, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roux, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathias, Jean-Denis</creatorcontrib><title>Using the Reliability Theory for Assessing the Decision Confidence Probability for Comparative Life Cycle Assessments</title><title>Environmental science & technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Comparative decision making process is widely used to identify which option (system, product, service, etc.) has smaller environmental footprints and for providing recommendations that help stakeholders take future decisions. However, the uncertainty problem complicates the comparison and the decision making. Probability-based decision support in LCA is a way to help stakeholders in their decision-making process. It calculates the decision confidence probability which expresses the probability of a option to have a smaller environmental impact than the one of another option. Here we apply the reliability theory to approximate the decision confidence probability. We compare the traditional Monte Carlo method with a reliability method called FORM method. The Monte Carlo method needs high computational time to calculate the decision confidence probability. The FORM method enables us to approximate the decision confidence probability with fewer simulations than the Monte Carlo method by approximating the response surface. Moreover, the FORM method calculates the associated importance factors that correspond to a sensitivity analysis in relation to the probability. The importance factors allow stakeholders to determine which factors influence their decision. Our results clearly show that the reliability method provides additional useful information to stakeholders as well as it reduces the computational time.</description><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Stochastic Processes</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc2L1DAYh4Mo7rh69iYBLyvS2eRNm6bHoX6sMKDILngLSfvWydI2Y9IuzH9vysyOIAgekkB4fk8-foS85mzNGfBr08Q1xmldWCakEk_IihfAskIV_ClZMcZFVgn544K8iPGeMQaCqefkAqTiRQn5isx30Y0_6bRD-h17Z6zr3XSgtzv04UA7H-gmRoxn6AM2Ljo_0tqPnWtxbJB-C94-BpdE7Ye9CWZyD0i3rkNaH5oeT6IBxym-JM8600d8dVovyd2nj7f1Tbb9-vlLvdlmJgc1ZV3LbAHGVMCEKkqbWwSOXZtzaavSMsMKrniXZtlJjqoSjYGStyjQKilQXJJ3R-_O9Hof3GDCQXvj9M1mq5c9BpJBAfkDT-zVkd0H_2tOn6oHFxvsezOin6PmZSmlrHKo_gOVVaUgjYS-_Qu993MY06MXoQDFASBR10eqCT7GgN35spzppWiditZL-lR0Srw5eWc7YHvmH5tNwPsjsCT_nPkP3W-No7LI</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Wei, Wei</creator><creator>Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène</creator><creator>Faure, Thierry</creator><creator>Dumoulin, Nicolas</creator><creator>Roux, Philippe</creator><creator>Mathias, Jean-Denis</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6172-9079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3803-7744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0321-4189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5083-0382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9480-7684</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Using the Reliability Theory for Assessing the Decision Confidence Probability for Comparative Life Cycle Assessments</title><author>Wei, Wei ; Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène ; Faure, Thierry ; Dumoulin, Nicolas ; Roux, Philippe ; Mathias, Jean-Denis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fd0b52aa9203857b4be21efd416b97b0a05181f0516f61e893ca271de3eb863e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Stochastic Processes</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faure, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumoulin, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roux, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathias, Jean-Denis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, Wei</au><au>Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène</au><au>Faure, Thierry</au><au>Dumoulin, Nicolas</au><au>Roux, Philippe</au><au>Mathias, Jean-Denis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using the Reliability Theory for Assessing the Decision Confidence Probability for Comparative Life Cycle Assessments</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2272</spage><epage>2280</epage><pages>2272-2280</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Comparative decision making process is widely used to identify which option (system, product, service, etc.) has smaller environmental footprints and for providing recommendations that help stakeholders take future decisions. However, the uncertainty problem complicates the comparison and the decision making. Probability-based decision support in LCA is a way to help stakeholders in their decision-making process. It calculates the decision confidence probability which expresses the probability of a option to have a smaller environmental impact than the one of another option. Here we apply the reliability theory to approximate the decision confidence probability. We compare the traditional Monte Carlo method with a reliability method called FORM method. The Monte Carlo method needs high computational time to calculate the decision confidence probability. The FORM method enables us to approximate the decision confidence probability with fewer simulations than the Monte Carlo method by approximating the response surface. Moreover, the FORM method calculates the associated importance factors that correspond to a sensitivity analysis in relation to the probability. The importance factors allow stakeholders to determine which factors influence their decision. Our results clearly show that the reliability method provides additional useful information to stakeholders as well as it reduces the computational time.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>26815724</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.5b03683</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6172-9079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3803-7744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0321-4189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5083-0382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9480-7684</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-936X |
ispartof | Environmental science & technology, 2016-03, Vol.50 (5), p.2272-2280 |
issn | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02602524v1 |
source | American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list) |
subjects | Decision Making Environment Environmental impact Environmental Sciences Life cycles Models, Theoretical Monte Carlo Method Probability Reliability Reproducibility of Results Stochastic Processes Uncertainty |
title | Using the Reliability Theory for Assessing the Decision Confidence Probability for Comparative Life Cycle Assessments |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A31%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20the%20Reliability%20Theory%20for%20Assessing%20the%20Decision%20Confidence%20Probability%20for%20Comparative%20Life%20Cycle%20Assessments&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Wei,%20Wei&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2272&rft.epage=2280&rft.pages=2272-2280&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.5b03683&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3985113061%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fd0b52aa9203857b4be21efd416b97b0a05181f0516f61e893ca271de3eb863e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1773281222&rft_id=info:pmid/26815724&rfr_iscdi=true |