Loading…

Using the Reliability Theory for Assessing the Decision Confidence Probability for Comparative Life Cycle Assessments

Comparative decision making process is widely used to identify which option (system, product, service, etc.) has smaller environmental footprints and for providing recommendations that help stakeholders take future decisions. However, the uncertainty problem complicates the comparison and the decisi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental science & technology 2016-03, Vol.50 (5), p.2272-2280
Main Authors: Wei, Wei, Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène, Faure, Thierry, Dumoulin, Nicolas, Roux, Philippe, Mathias, Jean-Denis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fd0b52aa9203857b4be21efd416b97b0a05181f0516f61e893ca271de3eb863e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fd0b52aa9203857b4be21efd416b97b0a05181f0516f61e893ca271de3eb863e3
container_end_page 2280
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2272
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 50
creator Wei, Wei
Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène
Faure, Thierry
Dumoulin, Nicolas
Roux, Philippe
Mathias, Jean-Denis
description Comparative decision making process is widely used to identify which option (system, product, service, etc.) has smaller environmental footprints and for providing recommendations that help stakeholders take future decisions. However, the uncertainty problem complicates the comparison and the decision making. Probability-based decision support in LCA is a way to help stakeholders in their decision-making process. It calculates the decision confidence probability which expresses the probability of a option to have a smaller environmental impact than the one of another option. Here we apply the reliability theory to approximate the decision confidence probability. We compare the traditional Monte Carlo method with a reliability method called FORM method. The Monte Carlo method needs high computational time to calculate the decision confidence probability. The FORM method enables us to approximate the decision confidence probability with fewer simulations than the Monte Carlo method by approximating the response surface. Moreover, the FORM method calculates the associated importance factors that correspond to a sensitivity analysis in relation to the probability. The importance factors allow stakeholders to determine which factors influence their decision. Our results clearly show that the reliability method provides additional useful information to stakeholders as well as it reduces the computational time.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.est.5b03683
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02602524v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3985113061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fd0b52aa9203857b4be21efd416b97b0a05181f0516f61e893ca271de3eb863e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc2L1DAYh4Mo7rh69iYBLyvS2eRNm6bHoX6sMKDILngLSfvWydI2Y9IuzH9vysyOIAgekkB4fk8-foS85mzNGfBr08Q1xmldWCakEk_IihfAskIV_ClZMcZFVgn544K8iPGeMQaCqefkAqTiRQn5isx30Y0_6bRD-h17Z6zr3XSgtzv04UA7H-gmRoxn6AM2Ljo_0tqPnWtxbJB-C94-BpdE7Ye9CWZyD0i3rkNaH5oeT6IBxym-JM8600d8dVovyd2nj7f1Tbb9-vlLvdlmJgc1ZV3LbAHGVMCEKkqbWwSOXZtzaavSMsMKrniXZtlJjqoSjYGStyjQKilQXJJ3R-_O9Hof3GDCQXvj9M1mq5c9BpJBAfkDT-zVkd0H_2tOn6oHFxvsezOin6PmZSmlrHKo_gOVVaUgjYS-_Qu993MY06MXoQDFASBR10eqCT7GgN35spzppWiditZL-lR0Srw5eWc7YHvmH5tNwPsjsCT_nPkP3W-No7LI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1773281222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using the Reliability Theory for Assessing the Decision Confidence Probability for Comparative Life Cycle Assessments</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Wei, Wei ; Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène ; Faure, Thierry ; Dumoulin, Nicolas ; Roux, Philippe ; Mathias, Jean-Denis</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei, Wei ; Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène ; Faure, Thierry ; Dumoulin, Nicolas ; Roux, Philippe ; Mathias, Jean-Denis</creatorcontrib><description>Comparative decision making process is widely used to identify which option (system, product, service, etc.) has smaller environmental footprints and for providing recommendations that help stakeholders take future decisions. However, the uncertainty problem complicates the comparison and the decision making. Probability-based decision support in LCA is a way to help stakeholders in their decision-making process. It calculates the decision confidence probability which expresses the probability of a option to have a smaller environmental impact than the one of another option. Here we apply the reliability theory to approximate the decision confidence probability. We compare the traditional Monte Carlo method with a reliability method called FORM method. The Monte Carlo method needs high computational time to calculate the decision confidence probability. The FORM method enables us to approximate the decision confidence probability with fewer simulations than the Monte Carlo method by approximating the response surface. Moreover, the FORM method calculates the associated importance factors that correspond to a sensitivity analysis in relation to the probability. The importance factors allow stakeholders to determine which factors influence their decision. Our results clearly show that the reliability method provides additional useful information to stakeholders as well as it reduces the computational time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03683</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26815724</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Decision Making ; Environment ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Sciences ; Life cycles ; Models, Theoretical ; Monte Carlo Method ; Probability ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Stochastic Processes ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2016-03, Vol.50 (5), p.2272-2280</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Mar 1, 2016</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fd0b52aa9203857b4be21efd416b97b0a05181f0516f61e893ca271de3eb863e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fd0b52aa9203857b4be21efd416b97b0a05181f0516f61e893ca271de3eb863e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6172-9079 ; 0000-0002-3803-7744 ; 0000-0003-0321-4189 ; 0000-0002-5083-0382 ; 0009-0009-9480-7684</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26815724$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02602524$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faure, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumoulin, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roux, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathias, Jean-Denis</creatorcontrib><title>Using the Reliability Theory for Assessing the Decision Confidence Probability for Comparative Life Cycle Assessments</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Comparative decision making process is widely used to identify which option (system, product, service, etc.) has smaller environmental footprints and for providing recommendations that help stakeholders take future decisions. However, the uncertainty problem complicates the comparison and the decision making. Probability-based decision support in LCA is a way to help stakeholders in their decision-making process. It calculates the decision confidence probability which expresses the probability of a option to have a smaller environmental impact than the one of another option. Here we apply the reliability theory to approximate the decision confidence probability. We compare the traditional Monte Carlo method with a reliability method called FORM method. The Monte Carlo method needs high computational time to calculate the decision confidence probability. The FORM method enables us to approximate the decision confidence probability with fewer simulations than the Monte Carlo method by approximating the response surface. Moreover, the FORM method calculates the associated importance factors that correspond to a sensitivity analysis in relation to the probability. The importance factors allow stakeholders to determine which factors influence their decision. Our results clearly show that the reliability method provides additional useful information to stakeholders as well as it reduces the computational time.</description><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Stochastic Processes</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc2L1DAYh4Mo7rh69iYBLyvS2eRNm6bHoX6sMKDILngLSfvWydI2Y9IuzH9vysyOIAgekkB4fk8-foS85mzNGfBr08Q1xmldWCakEk_IihfAskIV_ClZMcZFVgn544K8iPGeMQaCqefkAqTiRQn5isx30Y0_6bRD-h17Z6zr3XSgtzv04UA7H-gmRoxn6AM2Ljo_0tqPnWtxbJB-C94-BpdE7Ye9CWZyD0i3rkNaH5oeT6IBxym-JM8600d8dVovyd2nj7f1Tbb9-vlLvdlmJgc1ZV3LbAHGVMCEKkqbWwSOXZtzaavSMsMKrniXZtlJjqoSjYGStyjQKilQXJJ3R-_O9Hof3GDCQXvj9M1mq5c9BpJBAfkDT-zVkd0H_2tOn6oHFxvsezOin6PmZSmlrHKo_gOVVaUgjYS-_Qu993MY06MXoQDFASBR10eqCT7GgN35spzppWiditZL-lR0Srw5eWc7YHvmH5tNwPsjsCT_nPkP3W-No7LI</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Wei, Wei</creator><creator>Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène</creator><creator>Faure, Thierry</creator><creator>Dumoulin, Nicolas</creator><creator>Roux, Philippe</creator><creator>Mathias, Jean-Denis</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6172-9079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3803-7744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0321-4189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5083-0382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9480-7684</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Using the Reliability Theory for Assessing the Decision Confidence Probability for Comparative Life Cycle Assessments</title><author>Wei, Wei ; Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène ; Faure, Thierry ; Dumoulin, Nicolas ; Roux, Philippe ; Mathias, Jean-Denis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fd0b52aa9203857b4be21efd416b97b0a05181f0516f61e893ca271de3eb863e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Stochastic Processes</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faure, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumoulin, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roux, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathias, Jean-Denis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, Wei</au><au>Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrène</au><au>Faure, Thierry</au><au>Dumoulin, Nicolas</au><au>Roux, Philippe</au><au>Mathias, Jean-Denis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using the Reliability Theory for Assessing the Decision Confidence Probability for Comparative Life Cycle Assessments</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2272</spage><epage>2280</epage><pages>2272-2280</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Comparative decision making process is widely used to identify which option (system, product, service, etc.) has smaller environmental footprints and for providing recommendations that help stakeholders take future decisions. However, the uncertainty problem complicates the comparison and the decision making. Probability-based decision support in LCA is a way to help stakeholders in their decision-making process. It calculates the decision confidence probability which expresses the probability of a option to have a smaller environmental impact than the one of another option. Here we apply the reliability theory to approximate the decision confidence probability. We compare the traditional Monte Carlo method with a reliability method called FORM method. The Monte Carlo method needs high computational time to calculate the decision confidence probability. The FORM method enables us to approximate the decision confidence probability with fewer simulations than the Monte Carlo method by approximating the response surface. Moreover, the FORM method calculates the associated importance factors that correspond to a sensitivity analysis in relation to the probability. The importance factors allow stakeholders to determine which factors influence their decision. Our results clearly show that the reliability method provides additional useful information to stakeholders as well as it reduces the computational time.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>26815724</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.5b03683</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6172-9079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3803-7744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0321-4189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5083-0382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9480-7684</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2016-03, Vol.50 (5), p.2272-2280
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02602524v1
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects Decision Making
Environment
Environmental impact
Environmental Sciences
Life cycles
Models, Theoretical
Monte Carlo Method
Probability
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Stochastic Processes
Uncertainty
title Using the Reliability Theory for Assessing the Decision Confidence Probability for Comparative Life Cycle Assessments
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A31%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20the%20Reliability%20Theory%20for%20Assessing%20the%20Decision%20Confidence%20Probability%20for%20Comparative%20Life%20Cycle%20Assessments&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Wei,%20Wei&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2272&rft.epage=2280&rft.pages=2272-2280&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.5b03683&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3985113061%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fd0b52aa9203857b4be21efd416b97b0a05181f0516f61e893ca271de3eb863e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1773281222&rft_id=info:pmid/26815724&rfr_iscdi=true