Beta diversity of diatom species and ecological guilds: Response to environmental and spatial mechanisms along the stream watercourse

• Published in: Freshwater biology 2018-01, Vol.63 (1), p.62-73
• Main Authors: Jamoneau, Aurélien, Passy, Sophia I., Soininen, Janne, Leboucher, Thibault, Tison‐Rosebery, Juliette
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biodiversity; Components; Diatoms; Dispersal; Downstream; Downstream effects; Ecological monitoring; Ecological research; Environmental conditions; Environmental effects; Environmental factors; environmental filtering; Environmental Sciences; Environmental testing; Filtration; Frameworks; Guilds; mass effects; metacommunities; Mineral nutrients; Nutrient enrichment; Plankton; Rivers; Species; species assemblages; Species diversity; Upstream
• ISSN: 0046-5070; 1365-2427
• DOI: 10.1111/fwb.12980

Understanding the mechanisms that drive beta diversity (i.e. β‐diversity), an important aspect of regional biodiversity, remains a priority for ecological research. β‐diversity and its components can provide insights into the processes generating regional biodiversity patterns. We tested whether environmental filtering or dispersal related processes predominated along the stream watercourse by analysing the responses of taxonomic and functional diatom β‐diversity to environmental and spatial factors. We examined the variation in total β‐diversity and its components (turnover and nestedness) in benthic diatom species and ecological guilds (motile, planktonic, low‐ and high profile) with respect to watercourse position (up‐, mid‐ and downstream) in 2,182 sites throughout France. We tested the effects of pure environmental and pure spatial factors on β‐diversity with partial Mantel tests. Environmental factors included eight physicochemical variables, while geographical distances between sites were used as spatial factors. We also correlated α and γ‐diversity, and the degree of nestedness (NODF metric) with environmental variables. Total β‐diversity and its turnover component displayed higher values upstream than mid‐ and downstream. The nestedness component exhibited low values, even when NODF values increased from up‐ to downstream. Pure environmental factors were highly significant for explaining total β‐diversity and turnover regardless of watercourse position, but pure spatial factors were mostly significant mid‐ and downstream, with geographical distance being positively correlated with β‐diversity. Across sites, nutrient enrichment decreased turnover but increased the degree of nestedness. Motile and low profile diatoms comprised the most abundant guilds, but their β‐diversity patterns varied in an opposite way. The lowest guild β‐diversity was observed upstream for low profile species, and downstream for motile species. In conclusion, environmental filtering seemed to play a major role in structuring metacommunities irrespective of site watercourse position. Filtering promoted strong turnover patterns, especially in disconnected upstream sites. The greater role of spatial factors mid‐ and downstream was consistent with mass effects rather than neutral processes because these sites had lower total β‐diversity than upstream sites. Motile species were most strongly affected by mass effects processes, whereas low profile species were primarily influenced