Loading…

Pancreatico‐jejunostomy decreases post‐operative pancreatic fistula incidence and severity after central pancreatectomy

Backgrounds Central pancreatectomy (CP) is an alternative to pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy in benign tumours of pancreatic isthmus management. It is known for a high post‐operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate. The purpose of this study was to compare POPF incidence between pan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ANZ journal of surgery 2018-01, Vol.88 (1-2), p.77-81
Main Authors: Borel, Frédéric, Ouaissi, Mehdi, Merdrignac, Aude, Venara, Aurelien, De Franco, Valéria, Sulpice, Laurent, Hamy, Antoine, Regenet, Nicolas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-bdf7a9bcbbc5665fb7758a7bf252cc829bb8705170002ddb87232db04df848923
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-bdf7a9bcbbc5665fb7758a7bf252cc829bb8705170002ddb87232db04df848923
container_end_page 81
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 77
container_title ANZ journal of surgery
container_volume 88
creator Borel, Frédéric
Ouaissi, Mehdi
Merdrignac, Aude
Venara, Aurelien
De Franco, Valéria
Sulpice, Laurent
Hamy, Antoine
Regenet, Nicolas
description Backgrounds Central pancreatectomy (CP) is an alternative to pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy in benign tumours of pancreatic isthmus management. It is known for a high post‐operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate. The purpose of this study was to compare POPF incidence between pancreatico‐jejunostomy (PJ) and pancreatico‐gastrostomy (PG). Methods Fifty‐eight patients (mean age 53.9 ± 1.9 years) who underwent a CP in four French University Hospitals from 1988 to 2011 were analysed. The distal pancreatic remnant was either anastomosed to the stomach (44.8%, n = 25) or to a Roux‐en‐Y jejunal loop (55.2%, n = 35) with routine external drainage allowing a systematic search for POPF. POPF severity was classified according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) and Clavien‐Dindo classifications. Results The groups were similar on sex ratio, mean age, ASA score, pancreas texture, operative time and operative blood loss. Mean follow‐up was 36.2 ± 3.9 months. POPF were significantly more frequent after PG (76.9 versus 37.5%, P = 0.003). PG was associated with significantly higher grade of POPF both when graded with ISGPF classification (P = 0.012) and Clavien‐Dindo classification (P = 0.044). There was no significant difference in post‐operative bleeding (0.918) and delayed gastric emptying (0.877) between the two groups. Hospital length of stay was increased after PG (23.6 ± 3.5 days versus 16.5 ± 1.9 days, P = 0.071). There was no significant difference in incidence of long‐term exocrine (3.8 versus 19.2%, P = 0.134) and endocrine (7.7 versus 9.4%, P = 0.575) pancreatic insufficiencies. Conclusion PG was associated with a significantly higher POPF incidence and severity in CP. We recommend performing PJ especially in older patients to improve CP outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ans.14049
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02648795v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1993249877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-bdf7a9bcbbc5665fb7758a7bf252cc829bb8705170002ddb87232db04df848923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9qFDEUxgex2Fq98AUk4I1ebJtkJpPkcinWCksrqNchf85gltlkTGa2LN74CH1Gn8SMu64gNDdJzvmd70v4quoVwRekrEsd8gVpcCOfVGekadiCEsmfHs6kqevT6nnOa4xJ20r2rDqlQmCJZXtW_fikg02gR2_jr58Pa1hPIeYxbnbIwdzIkNFQKqUZB0gF3AIajkOo83mceo18sN5BsIB0cCjDFpIfd0h3IyRkIYxJ98c5sLPDi-qk032Gl4f9vPp6_f7L1c1idffh49VytbC14HJhXMe1NNYYy9qWdYZzJjQ3HWXUWkGlMYJjRjjGmDpXLrSmzuDGdaIRktbn1bu97jfdqyH5jU47FbVXN8uVmmuYtk1xYltS2Ld7dkjx-wR5VBufLfS9DhCnrIikkmBes1n2zX_oOk4plJ8USta0kYLzf-Y2xZwTdMcXEKzm9FRJT_1Jr7CvD4qT2YA7kn_jKsDlHrj3PeweV1LL2897yd_5t6eh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993249877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pancreatico‐jejunostomy decreases post‐operative pancreatic fistula incidence and severity after central pancreatectomy</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Borel, Frédéric ; Ouaissi, Mehdi ; Merdrignac, Aude ; Venara, Aurelien ; De Franco, Valéria ; Sulpice, Laurent ; Hamy, Antoine ; Regenet, Nicolas</creator><creatorcontrib>Borel, Frédéric ; Ouaissi, Mehdi ; Merdrignac, Aude ; Venara, Aurelien ; De Franco, Valéria ; Sulpice, Laurent ; Hamy, Antoine ; Regenet, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><description>Backgrounds Central pancreatectomy (CP) is an alternative to pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy in benign tumours of pancreatic isthmus management. It is known for a high post‐operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate. The purpose of this study was to compare POPF incidence between pancreatico‐jejunostomy (PJ) and pancreatico‐gastrostomy (PG). Methods Fifty‐eight patients (mean age 53.9 ± 1.9 years) who underwent a CP in four French University Hospitals from 1988 to 2011 were analysed. The distal pancreatic remnant was either anastomosed to the stomach (44.8%, n = 25) or to a Roux‐en‐Y jejunal loop (55.2%, n = 35) with routine external drainage allowing a systematic search for POPF. POPF severity was classified according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) and Clavien‐Dindo classifications. Results The groups were similar on sex ratio, mean age, ASA score, pancreas texture, operative time and operative blood loss. Mean follow‐up was 36.2 ± 3.9 months. POPF were significantly more frequent after PG (76.9 versus 37.5%, P = 0.003). PG was associated with significantly higher grade of POPF both when graded with ISGPF classification (P = 0.012) and Clavien‐Dindo classification (P = 0.044). There was no significant difference in post‐operative bleeding (0.918) and delayed gastric emptying (0.877) between the two groups. Hospital length of stay was increased after PG (23.6 ± 3.5 days versus 16.5 ± 1.9 days, P = 0.071). There was no significant difference in incidence of long‐term exocrine (3.8 versus 19.2%, P = 0.134) and endocrine (7.7 versus 9.4%, P = 0.575) pancreatic insufficiencies. Conclusion PG was associated with a significantly higher POPF incidence and severity in CP. We recommend performing PJ especially in older patients to improve CP outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1445-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ans.14049</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28809096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Bleeding ; central pancreatectomy ; Classification ; Fistula ; Fistulae ; Gastric emptying ; Incidence ; Life Sciences ; Ostomy ; Pancreas ; Pancreatectomy ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy ; pancreatico‐enteric anastomosis ; pancreatico‐gastrostomy ; pancreatico‐jejunostomy ; Patients ; post‐operative pancreatic fistula ; Quality ; Sex ratio ; Stomach ; Surgical outcomes ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>ANZ journal of surgery, 2018-01, Vol.88 (1-2), p.77-81</ispartof><rights>2017 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><rights>2017 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.</rights><rights>2018 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-bdf7a9bcbbc5665fb7758a7bf252cc829bb8705170002ddb87232db04df848923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-bdf7a9bcbbc5665fb7758a7bf252cc829bb8705170002ddb87232db04df848923</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2370-4778 ; 0000-0002-8817-1685 ; 0000-0003-1539-4797</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,4010,27904,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28809096$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://univ-angers.hal.science/hal-02648795$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borel, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouaissi, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merdrignac, Aude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venara, Aurelien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Franco, Valéria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulpice, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamy, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regenet, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><title>Pancreatico‐jejunostomy decreases post‐operative pancreatic fistula incidence and severity after central pancreatectomy</title><title>ANZ journal of surgery</title><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><description>Backgrounds Central pancreatectomy (CP) is an alternative to pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy in benign tumours of pancreatic isthmus management. It is known for a high post‐operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate. The purpose of this study was to compare POPF incidence between pancreatico‐jejunostomy (PJ) and pancreatico‐gastrostomy (PG). Methods Fifty‐eight patients (mean age 53.9 ± 1.9 years) who underwent a CP in four French University Hospitals from 1988 to 2011 were analysed. The distal pancreatic remnant was either anastomosed to the stomach (44.8%, n = 25) or to a Roux‐en‐Y jejunal loop (55.2%, n = 35) with routine external drainage allowing a systematic search for POPF. POPF severity was classified according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) and Clavien‐Dindo classifications. Results The groups were similar on sex ratio, mean age, ASA score, pancreas texture, operative time and operative blood loss. Mean follow‐up was 36.2 ± 3.9 months. POPF were significantly more frequent after PG (76.9 versus 37.5%, P = 0.003). PG was associated with significantly higher grade of POPF both when graded with ISGPF classification (P = 0.012) and Clavien‐Dindo classification (P = 0.044). There was no significant difference in post‐operative bleeding (0.918) and delayed gastric emptying (0.877) between the two groups. Hospital length of stay was increased after PG (23.6 ± 3.5 days versus 16.5 ± 1.9 days, P = 0.071). There was no significant difference in incidence of long‐term exocrine (3.8 versus 19.2%, P = 0.134) and endocrine (7.7 versus 9.4%, P = 0.575) pancreatic insufficiencies. Conclusion PG was associated with a significantly higher POPF incidence and severity in CP. We recommend performing PJ especially in older patients to improve CP outcomes.</description><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>central pancreatectomy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Fistula</subject><subject>Fistulae</subject><subject>Gastric emptying</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>Pancreatectomy</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy</subject><subject>pancreatico‐enteric anastomosis</subject><subject>pancreatico‐gastrostomy</subject><subject>pancreatico‐jejunostomy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>post‐operative pancreatic fistula</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Sex ratio</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1445-1433</issn><issn>1445-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd9qFDEUxgex2Fq98AUk4I1ebJtkJpPkcinWCksrqNchf85gltlkTGa2LN74CH1Gn8SMu64gNDdJzvmd70v4quoVwRekrEsd8gVpcCOfVGekadiCEsmfHs6kqevT6nnOa4xJ20r2rDqlQmCJZXtW_fikg02gR2_jr58Pa1hPIeYxbnbIwdzIkNFQKqUZB0gF3AIajkOo83mceo18sN5BsIB0cCjDFpIfd0h3IyRkIYxJ98c5sLPDi-qk032Gl4f9vPp6_f7L1c1idffh49VytbC14HJhXMe1NNYYy9qWdYZzJjQ3HWXUWkGlMYJjRjjGmDpXLrSmzuDGdaIRktbn1bu97jfdqyH5jU47FbVXN8uVmmuYtk1xYltS2Ld7dkjx-wR5VBufLfS9DhCnrIikkmBes1n2zX_oOk4plJ8USta0kYLzf-Y2xZwTdMcXEKzm9FRJT_1Jr7CvD4qT2YA7kn_jKsDlHrj3PeweV1LL2897yd_5t6eh</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Borel, Frédéric</creator><creator>Ouaissi, Mehdi</creator><creator>Merdrignac, Aude</creator><creator>Venara, Aurelien</creator><creator>De Franco, Valéria</creator><creator>Sulpice, Laurent</creator><creator>Hamy, Antoine</creator><creator>Regenet, Nicolas</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2370-4778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8817-1685</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1539-4797</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Pancreatico‐jejunostomy decreases post‐operative pancreatic fistula incidence and severity after central pancreatectomy</title><author>Borel, Frédéric ; Ouaissi, Mehdi ; Merdrignac, Aude ; Venara, Aurelien ; De Franco, Valéria ; Sulpice, Laurent ; Hamy, Antoine ; Regenet, Nicolas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-bdf7a9bcbbc5665fb7758a7bf252cc829bb8705170002ddb87232db04df848923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>central pancreatectomy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Fistula</topic><topic>Fistulae</topic><topic>Gastric emptying</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>Pancreatectomy</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy</topic><topic>pancreatico‐enteric anastomosis</topic><topic>pancreatico‐gastrostomy</topic><topic>pancreatico‐jejunostomy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>post‐operative pancreatic fistula</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Sex ratio</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borel, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouaissi, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merdrignac, Aude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venara, Aurelien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Franco, Valéria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulpice, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamy, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regenet, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borel, Frédéric</au><au>Ouaissi, Mehdi</au><au>Merdrignac, Aude</au><au>Venara, Aurelien</au><au>De Franco, Valéria</au><au>Sulpice, Laurent</au><au>Hamy, Antoine</au><au>Regenet, Nicolas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pancreatico‐jejunostomy decreases post‐operative pancreatic fistula incidence and severity after central pancreatectomy</atitle><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>77-81</pages><issn>1445-1433</issn><eissn>1445-2197</eissn><abstract>Backgrounds Central pancreatectomy (CP) is an alternative to pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy in benign tumours of pancreatic isthmus management. It is known for a high post‐operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate. The purpose of this study was to compare POPF incidence between pancreatico‐jejunostomy (PJ) and pancreatico‐gastrostomy (PG). Methods Fifty‐eight patients (mean age 53.9 ± 1.9 years) who underwent a CP in four French University Hospitals from 1988 to 2011 were analysed. The distal pancreatic remnant was either anastomosed to the stomach (44.8%, n = 25) or to a Roux‐en‐Y jejunal loop (55.2%, n = 35) with routine external drainage allowing a systematic search for POPF. POPF severity was classified according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) and Clavien‐Dindo classifications. Results The groups were similar on sex ratio, mean age, ASA score, pancreas texture, operative time and operative blood loss. Mean follow‐up was 36.2 ± 3.9 months. POPF were significantly more frequent after PG (76.9 versus 37.5%, P = 0.003). PG was associated with significantly higher grade of POPF both when graded with ISGPF classification (P = 0.012) and Clavien‐Dindo classification (P = 0.044). There was no significant difference in post‐operative bleeding (0.918) and delayed gastric emptying (0.877) between the two groups. Hospital length of stay was increased after PG (23.6 ± 3.5 days versus 16.5 ± 1.9 days, P = 0.071). There was no significant difference in incidence of long‐term exocrine (3.8 versus 19.2%, P = 0.134) and endocrine (7.7 versus 9.4%, P = 0.575) pancreatic insufficiencies. Conclusion PG was associated with a significantly higher POPF incidence and severity in CP. We recommend performing PJ especially in older patients to improve CP outcomes.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>28809096</pmid><doi>10.1111/ans.14049</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2370-4778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8817-1685</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1539-4797</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1445-1433
ispartof ANZ journal of surgery, 2018-01, Vol.88 (1-2), p.77-81
issn 1445-1433
1445-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02648795v1
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Bleeding
central pancreatectomy
Classification
Fistula
Fistulae
Gastric emptying
Incidence
Life Sciences
Ostomy
Pancreas
Pancreatectomy
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
pancreatico‐enteric anastomosis
pancreatico‐gastrostomy
pancreatico‐jejunostomy
Patients
post‐operative pancreatic fistula
Quality
Sex ratio
Stomach
Surgical outcomes
Tumors
title Pancreatico‐jejunostomy decreases post‐operative pancreatic fistula incidence and severity after central pancreatectomy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T01%3A13%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pancreatico%E2%80%90jejunostomy%20decreases%20post%E2%80%90operative%20pancreatic%20fistula%20incidence%20and%20severity%20after%20central%20pancreatectomy&rft.jtitle=ANZ%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Borel,%20Fr%C3%A9d%C3%A9ric&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=77-81&rft.issn=1445-1433&rft.eissn=1445-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ans.14049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1993249877%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3879-bdf7a9bcbbc5665fb7758a7bf252cc829bb8705170002ddb87232db04df848923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993249877&rft_id=info:pmid/28809096&rfr_iscdi=true