Loading…
Effects of feed restriction and subsequent refeeding on energy utilization in growing pigs
An experiment was carried out to evaluate the metabolic utilization of energy in crossbred barrows during feed restriction and subsequent refeeding. Ten pigs, initially weighing 52 kg, were used in 5 blocks of 2 littermates each. A 7-d adaptation period (P1) was used in which pigs were offered feed...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of animal science 2006-12, Vol.84 (12), p.3329-3336 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2b2d41a1ec39182c568f72ee93d5210cd9ebb55ccd8373a163d95805f4da3bea3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2b2d41a1ec39182c568f72ee93d5210cd9ebb55ccd8373a163d95805f4da3bea3 |
container_end_page | 3336 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 3329 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Lovatto, P.A Sauvant, D Noblet, J Dubois, S Milgen, J. van |
description | An experiment was carried out to evaluate the metabolic utilization of energy in crossbred barrows during feed restriction and subsequent refeeding. Ten pigs, initially weighing 52 kg, were used in 5 blocks of 2 littermates each. A 7-d adaptation period (P1) was used in which pigs were offered feed at 2.60 MJ of ME·kg of BW⁻⁰.⁶⁰·d⁻¹. This adaptation period was followed by a 7-d period (P2), in which 1 pig of each block continued to receive feed at the same level of feeding, whereas for its littermate a 40% reduction in feed intake was imposed (i.e., 1.55 MJ of ME·kg of BW⁻⁰.⁶⁰·d⁻¹). During the subsequent 7-d period (P3), both pigs were offered feed at 2.60 MJ of ME·kg of BW⁻⁰.⁶⁰·d⁻¹. After P3, pigs were fasted for 1 d. Heat production (HP) was measured for all pigs during the last 3 d of P1 and on all days for P2 and P3. Heat production was measured using an open-circuit respiration chamber. Energy and N balances were determined for P1, P2, and P3. The HP was partitioned into HP due to physical activity, the short-term thermic effect of feeding, and resting HP. Feed restriction during P2 decreased (P < 0.01) total HP, resting HP, short-term thermic effect of feeding, and retained energy, whereas HP due to physical activity was not affected by feed restriction (P = 0.50). Likewise, fecal and urinary N loss, protein gain, lipid gain, and ADG were reduced during feed restriction (P < 0.01). There were no differences in components of HP and metabolic utilization of energy between the 2 groups during P1 and P3. Nevertheless, urinary N loss was decreased (P < 0.05) and ADG increased (P < 0.01) during P3 for pigs that were restricted in P2. Compensatory growth after a period of feed restriction does not seem to be related to a change in the metabolic utilization of energy for gain but more likely is due to gain in water and gut contents. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas.2006-048 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02661963v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1175077441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2b2d41a1ec39182c568f72ee93d5210cd9ebb55ccd8373a163d95805f4da3bea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0UGL1TAQB_AgivtcvXnWIqgIds1MmjQ9LsvqCg886F68hDRJu3n0NW-T1mX99Ka-4oKnQObHDDN_Ql4CPUOO9aedTmdIqShpJR-RDXDkJQPBHpMNpQillIAn5FlKO0oBecOfkhOoacMQ-Yb8vOw6Z6ZUhK7onLNFdGmK3kw-jIUebZHmNrnb2Y1TLi3Cj32Ra250sb8v5skP_rf-y_1Y9DHcLeDg-_ScPOn0kNyL9T0l158vf1xcldtvX75enG9LUzExldiirUCDM6wBiYYL2dXoXMMsR6DGNq5tOTfGSlYznTezDZeUd5XVrHWanZIPx743elCH6Pc63qugvbo636rlj6IQ0Aj2C7J9d7SHGPJSaVJ7n4wbBj26MCcl8rEqxniGb_6DuzDHMe-hEDKqK4EZfTwiE0NK-Tz_xgNVSzgqh6OWcFQOJ_NXa8-53Tv7gNc0Mni7Ap2MHrqoR-PTg5NYA5dNdu_XjX1_c-ejU2mvhyG3hWWirBSgYgwX-fooOx2U7mPudv0dKTAKAKwRFfsDwYitBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218127462</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of feed restriction and subsequent refeeding on energy utilization in growing pigs</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Lovatto, P.A ; Sauvant, D ; Noblet, J ; Dubois, S ; Milgen, J. van</creator><creatorcontrib>Lovatto, P.A ; Sauvant, D ; Noblet, J ; Dubois, S ; Milgen, J. van</creatorcontrib><description>An experiment was carried out to evaluate the metabolic utilization of energy in crossbred barrows during feed restriction and subsequent refeeding. Ten pigs, initially weighing 52 kg, were used in 5 blocks of 2 littermates each. A 7-d adaptation period (P1) was used in which pigs were offered feed at 2.60 MJ of ME·kg of BW⁻⁰.⁶⁰·d⁻¹. This adaptation period was followed by a 7-d period (P2), in which 1 pig of each block continued to receive feed at the same level of feeding, whereas for its littermate a 40% reduction in feed intake was imposed (i.e., 1.55 MJ of ME·kg of BW⁻⁰.⁶⁰·d⁻¹). During the subsequent 7-d period (P3), both pigs were offered feed at 2.60 MJ of ME·kg of BW⁻⁰.⁶⁰·d⁻¹. After P3, pigs were fasted for 1 d. Heat production (HP) was measured for all pigs during the last 3 d of P1 and on all days for P2 and P3. Heat production was measured using an open-circuit respiration chamber. Energy and N balances were determined for P1, P2, and P3. The HP was partitioned into HP due to physical activity, the short-term thermic effect of feeding, and resting HP. Feed restriction during P2 decreased (P < 0.01) total HP, resting HP, short-term thermic effect of feeding, and retained energy, whereas HP due to physical activity was not affected by feed restriction (P = 0.50). Likewise, fecal and urinary N loss, protein gain, lipid gain, and ADG were reduced during feed restriction (P < 0.01). There were no differences in components of HP and metabolic utilization of energy between the 2 groups during P1 and P3. Nevertheless, urinary N loss was decreased (P < 0.05) and ADG increased (P < 0.01) during P3 for pigs that were restricted in P2. Compensatory growth after a period of feed restriction does not seem to be related to a change in the metabolic utilization of energy for gain but more likely is due to gain in water and gut contents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-048</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17093225</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: American Society of Animal Science</publisher><subject>Agricultural sciences ; Animal Feed ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animal production studies ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; compensatory growth ; Diet ; digesta ; energy metabolism ; Energy Metabolism - physiology ; feces ; Feed and pet food industries ; feed intake ; feed rations ; Food Deprivation - physiology ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; heat production ; Hogs ; Life Sciences ; lipid metabolism ; liveweight gain ; Male ; Metabolism ; nitrogen ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; nutrient retention ; physical activity ; protein metabolism ; refeeding ; restricted feeding ; swine ; Swine - growth & development ; Swine - metabolism ; swine feeding ; Terrestrial animal productions ; thermic effect of food ; urine ; Vertebrates ; water content ; Weaning ; Weight</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2006-12, Vol.84 (12), p.3329-3336</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Dec 2006</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2b2d41a1ec39182c568f72ee93d5210cd9ebb55ccd8373a163d95805f4da3bea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2b2d41a1ec39182c568f72ee93d5210cd9ebb55ccd8373a163d95805f4da3bea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6131-5255</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18271589$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17093225$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02661963$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lovatto, P.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauvant, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noblet, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milgen, J. van</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of feed restriction and subsequent refeeding on energy utilization in growing pigs</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>An experiment was carried out to evaluate the metabolic utilization of energy in crossbred barrows during feed restriction and subsequent refeeding. Ten pigs, initially weighing 52 kg, were used in 5 blocks of 2 littermates each. A 7-d adaptation period (P1) was used in which pigs were offered feed at 2.60 MJ of ME·kg of BW⁻⁰.⁶⁰·d⁻¹. This adaptation period was followed by a 7-d period (P2), in which 1 pig of each block continued to receive feed at the same level of feeding, whereas for its littermate a 40% reduction in feed intake was imposed (i.e., 1.55 MJ of ME·kg of BW⁻⁰.⁶⁰·d⁻¹). During the subsequent 7-d period (P3), both pigs were offered feed at 2.60 MJ of ME·kg of BW⁻⁰.⁶⁰·d⁻¹. After P3, pigs were fasted for 1 d. Heat production (HP) was measured for all pigs during the last 3 d of P1 and on all days for P2 and P3. Heat production was measured using an open-circuit respiration chamber. Energy and N balances were determined for P1, P2, and P3. The HP was partitioned into HP due to physical activity, the short-term thermic effect of feeding, and resting HP. Feed restriction during P2 decreased (P < 0.01) total HP, resting HP, short-term thermic effect of feeding, and retained energy, whereas HP due to physical activity was not affected by feed restriction (P = 0.50). Likewise, fecal and urinary N loss, protein gain, lipid gain, and ADG were reduced during feed restriction (P < 0.01). There were no differences in components of HP and metabolic utilization of energy between the 2 groups during P1 and P3. Nevertheless, urinary N loss was decreased (P < 0.05) and ADG increased (P < 0.01) during P3 for pigs that were restricted in P2. Compensatory growth after a period of feed restriction does not seem to be related to a change in the metabolic utilization of energy for gain but more likely is due to gain in water and gut contents.</description><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animal production studies</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>compensatory growth</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>digesta</subject><subject>energy metabolism</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism - physiology</subject><subject>feces</subject><subject>Feed and pet food industries</subject><subject>feed intake</subject><subject>feed rations</subject><subject>Food Deprivation - physiology</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>heat production</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>lipid metabolism</subject><subject>liveweight gain</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>nutrient retention</subject><subject>physical activity</subject><subject>protein metabolism</subject><subject>refeeding</subject><subject>restricted feeding</subject><subject>swine</subject><subject>Swine - growth & development</subject><subject>Swine - metabolism</subject><subject>swine feeding</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>thermic effect of food</subject><subject>urine</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>water content</subject><subject>Weaning</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0UGL1TAQB_AgivtcvXnWIqgIds1MmjQ9LsvqCg886F68hDRJu3n0NW-T1mX99Ka-4oKnQObHDDN_Ql4CPUOO9aedTmdIqShpJR-RDXDkJQPBHpMNpQillIAn5FlKO0oBecOfkhOoacMQ-Yb8vOw6Z6ZUhK7onLNFdGmK3kw-jIUebZHmNrnb2Y1TLi3Cj32Ra250sb8v5skP_rf-y_1Y9DHcLeDg-_ScPOn0kNyL9T0l158vf1xcldtvX75enG9LUzExldiirUCDM6wBiYYL2dXoXMMsR6DGNq5tOTfGSlYznTezDZeUd5XVrHWanZIPx743elCH6Pc63qugvbo636rlj6IQ0Aj2C7J9d7SHGPJSaVJ7n4wbBj26MCcl8rEqxniGb_6DuzDHMe-hEDKqK4EZfTwiE0NK-Tz_xgNVSzgqh6OWcFQOJ_NXa8-53Tv7gNc0Mni7Ap2MHrqoR-PTg5NYA5dNdu_XjX1_c-ejU2mvhyG3hWWirBSgYgwX-fooOx2U7mPudv0dKTAKAKwRFfsDwYitBA</recordid><startdate>20061201</startdate><enddate>20061201</enddate><creator>Lovatto, P.A</creator><creator>Sauvant, D</creator><creator>Noblet, J</creator><creator>Dubois, S</creator><creator>Milgen, J. van</creator><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6131-5255</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20061201</creationdate><title>Effects of feed restriction and subsequent refeeding on energy utilization in growing pigs</title><author>Lovatto, P.A ; Sauvant, D ; Noblet, J ; Dubois, S ; Milgen, J. van</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2b2d41a1ec39182c568f72ee93d5210cd9ebb55ccd8373a163d95805f4da3bea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animal production studies</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>compensatory growth</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>digesta</topic><topic>energy metabolism</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism - physiology</topic><topic>feces</topic><topic>Feed and pet food industries</topic><topic>feed intake</topic><topic>feed rations</topic><topic>Food Deprivation - physiology</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>heat production</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>lipid metabolism</topic><topic>liveweight gain</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>nutrient retention</topic><topic>physical activity</topic><topic>protein metabolism</topic><topic>refeeding</topic><topic>restricted feeding</topic><topic>swine</topic><topic>Swine - growth & development</topic><topic>Swine - metabolism</topic><topic>swine feeding</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>thermic effect of food</topic><topic>urine</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>water content</topic><topic>Weaning</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lovatto, P.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauvant, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noblet, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milgen, J. van</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Career and Technical Education</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lovatto, P.A</au><au>Sauvant, D</au><au>Noblet, J</au><au>Dubois, S</au><au>Milgen, J. van</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of feed restriction and subsequent refeeding on energy utilization in growing pigs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2006-12-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3329</spage><epage>3336</epage><pages>3329-3336</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>An experiment was carried out to evaluate the metabolic utilization of energy in crossbred barrows during feed restriction and subsequent refeeding. Ten pigs, initially weighing 52 kg, were used in 5 blocks of 2 littermates each. A 7-d adaptation period (P1) was used in which pigs were offered feed at 2.60 MJ of ME·kg of BW⁻⁰.⁶⁰·d⁻¹. This adaptation period was followed by a 7-d period (P2), in which 1 pig of each block continued to receive feed at the same level of feeding, whereas for its littermate a 40% reduction in feed intake was imposed (i.e., 1.55 MJ of ME·kg of BW⁻⁰.⁶⁰·d⁻¹). During the subsequent 7-d period (P3), both pigs were offered feed at 2.60 MJ of ME·kg of BW⁻⁰.⁶⁰·d⁻¹. After P3, pigs were fasted for 1 d. Heat production (HP) was measured for all pigs during the last 3 d of P1 and on all days for P2 and P3. Heat production was measured using an open-circuit respiration chamber. Energy and N balances were determined for P1, P2, and P3. The HP was partitioned into HP due to physical activity, the short-term thermic effect of feeding, and resting HP. Feed restriction during P2 decreased (P < 0.01) total HP, resting HP, short-term thermic effect of feeding, and retained energy, whereas HP due to physical activity was not affected by feed restriction (P = 0.50). Likewise, fecal and urinary N loss, protein gain, lipid gain, and ADG were reduced during feed restriction (P < 0.01). There were no differences in components of HP and metabolic utilization of energy between the 2 groups during P1 and P3. Nevertheless, urinary N loss was decreased (P < 0.05) and ADG increased (P < 0.01) during P3 for pigs that were restricted in P2. Compensatory growth after a period of feed restriction does not seem to be related to a change in the metabolic utilization of energy for gain but more likely is due to gain in water and gut contents.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>American Society of Animal Science</pub><pmid>17093225</pmid><doi>10.2527/jas.2006-048</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6131-5255</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2006-12, Vol.84 (12), p.3329-3336 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02661963v1 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Agricultural sciences Animal Feed Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena Animal production studies Animal productions Animals Biological and medical sciences compensatory growth Diet digesta energy metabolism Energy Metabolism - physiology feces Feed and pet food industries feed intake feed rations Food Deprivation - physiology Food industries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology heat production Hogs Life Sciences lipid metabolism liveweight gain Male Metabolism nitrogen Nitrogen - metabolism nutrient retention physical activity protein metabolism refeeding restricted feeding swine Swine - growth & development Swine - metabolism swine feeding Terrestrial animal productions thermic effect of food urine Vertebrates water content Weaning Weight |
title | Effects of feed restriction and subsequent refeeding on energy utilization in growing pigs |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T14%3A23%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20feed%20restriction%20and%20subsequent%20refeeding%20on%20energy%20utilization%20in%20growing%20pigs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Lovatto,%20P.A&rft.date=2006-12-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3329&rft.epage=3336&rft.pages=3329-3336&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas.2006-048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1175077441%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2b2d41a1ec39182c568f72ee93d5210cd9ebb55ccd8373a163d95805f4da3bea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218127462&rft_id=info:pmid/17093225&rfr_iscdi=true |