Microbial Community Structure and Dynamics in the Largest Natural French Lake (Lake Bourget)

• Published in: Microbial ecology 2006-07, Vol.52 (1), p.72-89
• Main Authors: Comte, J., Jacquet, S., Viboud, S., Fontvieille, D., Millery, A., Paolini, G., Domaizon, I.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algae; Animals; Bacteria; Bacteria - classification; Bacteria - isolation & purification; Bacterial Physiological Phenomena; Bacteriology; Biodiversity; Biological and medical sciences; Biomass; Chlorophyll - analysis; Chlorophylls; Colony Count, Microbial; Community structure; Cryptomonas; Cryptophyta; Dinobryon; Ecology, environment; Ecosystem; Epilimnion; Eukaryota - classification; Eukaryota - isolation & purification; Eukaryota - physiology; Food webs; France; Fresh water; Fresh Water - microbiology; Fresh Water - parasitology; Freshwater; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Grazing; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Lakes; Lentic systems; Life Sciences; Microbiology; Miscellaneous; Phytoplankton; Plankton; Predation; Predators; Spring; Summer; Surface water; Taxa
• ISSN: 0095-3628; 1432-184X
• DOI: 10.1007/s00248-004-0230-4

We investigated the dynamics and diversity of heterotrophic bacteria, autotrophic and heterotrophic flagellates, and ciliates from March to July 2002 in the surface waters (0-50 m) of Lake Bourget. The heterotrophic bacteria consisted mainly of "small" cocci, but filaments (>2 μm), commonly considered to be grazing-resistant forms under increased nanoflagellate grazing, were also detected. These elongated cells mainly belonged to the Cytophaga-Flavobacterium (CF) cluster, and were most abundant during spring and early summer, when mixotrophic or heterotrophic flagellates were the main bacterial predators. The CF group strongly dominated fluorescent in situ hybridization-detected cells from March to June, whereas clear changes were observed in early summer when Beta-proteobacteria and Alpha-proteobacteria increased concomitantly with maximal protist grazing pressures. The analysis of protist community structure revealed that the flagellates consisted mainly of cryptomonad forms. The dynamics of Cryptomonas sp. and Dinobryon sp. suggested the potential importance of mixotrophs as consumers of bacteria. This point was verified by an experimental approach based on fluorescent microbeads to assess the potential grazing impact of all protist taxa in the epilimnion. From the results, three distinct periods in the functioning of the epilimnetic microbial loop were identified. In early spring, mixotrophic and heterotrophic flagellates constituted the main bacterivores, and were regulated by the availability of their resources mainly during April (phase 1). Once the "clear water phase" was established, the predation pressure of metazooplankton represented a strong top-down force on all microbial compartments. During this period only mixotrophic flagellates occasionally exerted a significant bacterivory pressure (phase 2). Finally, the early summer was characterized by the highest protozoan grazing impact and by a rapid shift in the carbon pathway transfer, with a fast change-over of the main predators contribution, i.e., mixotrophic, heterotrophic flagellates and ciliates in bacterial mortality. The high abundance of ciliates during this period was consistent with the high densities of resources (heterotrophic nanoflagellates, algae, bacteria) in deep layers containing the most chlorophyll. Bacteria, as ciliates, responded clearly to increasing phytoplankton abundance, and although bacterial grazing impact could vary largely, bacterial abundance seemed to be primari