PROPRIÉTÉ FONCIÈRE ET AGRICULTURE D'ENTREPRISE

L'exploitation agricole se développe sur le modèle de l'entreprise industrielle. Cette tendance à la pure entreprise, locataire du sol ainsi que l'enseigne la théorie économique, rencontre cependant une limite. L'appropriation du sol finit par s'imposer. L'exploitation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revue d'économie politique 1985-07, Vol.95 (4), p.484-501
Main Author: BARTHÉLEMY, Denis
Format: Article
Language:fre
Subjects:
Life Sciences
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 501
container_issue 4
container_start_page 484
container_title Revue d'économie politique
container_volume 95
creator BARTHÉLEMY, Denis
description L'exploitation agricole se développe sur le modèle de l'entreprise industrielle. Cette tendance à la pure entreprise, locataire du sol ainsi que l'enseigne la théorie économique, rencontre cependant une limite. L'appropriation du sol finit par s'imposer. L'exploitation mixte, propriétaire et locataire, prévaut. La croissance agricole s'opère selon deux logiques opposées, celle de l'entreprise et celle de la propriété. L'économie politique ne retient que la première, alors que dans l'agriculture la seconde est dominante. Farming grows up on the industrial firm's pattern. This propensity to become a true enterprise, renting the land according to economic theory, encounts nevertheless limits. Farmer has finally to appropriate the soil. Composite farming, holding and renting the land, predominates. Agricultural growth becomes through the two opposite logics : of enterprise, of property. Political economy holds only the first, though the second, in agriculture, prevails.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02726105v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24698633</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24698633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h1159-d1e31005b931fd01618067932fb11dfc7f85244fa162e197327ec6eb3c88ac183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j91Kw0AQhRdRMFYfQQh4IV4Edmaym81liGkbCE2JyfWSX9pQTU1awTewz5UXM6Xi1XAOHx9nrpiBwIWFStE1Mzg5ZKEkfsvuhqHl3EYhwGCwTuJ1Eo6ndDyZ83jlh-NPEphBanqLJPSzKM2m-PocrNIkmMC34J7dNPluqB_-7oxl8yD1l1YUL0Lfi6wNgHCtCmoCzkXhEjQVBwmKS8clbAqAqimdRgm07SYHiTW4DqFTl7IuqFQqL0HRjL1cvJt8p_f99j3vv3WXb_XSi_S54-ignF78gol9urD7vvs81sNBt92x_5jmaUDXRhIozsbHC9UOh67_d6ItXSWJ6BfbR1Q4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1294235258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PROPRIÉTÉ FONCIÈRE ET AGRICULTURE D'ENTREPRISE</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>BARTHÉLEMY, Denis</creator><creatorcontrib>BARTHÉLEMY, Denis</creatorcontrib><description>L'exploitation agricole se développe sur le modèle de l'entreprise industrielle. Cette tendance à la pure entreprise, locataire du sol ainsi que l'enseigne la théorie économique, rencontre cependant une limite. L'appropriation du sol finit par s'imposer. L'exploitation mixte, propriétaire et locataire, prévaut. La croissance agricole s'opère selon deux logiques opposées, celle de l'entreprise et celle de la propriété. L'économie politique ne retient que la première, alors que dans l'agriculture la seconde est dominante. Farming grows up on the industrial firm's pattern. This propensity to become a true enterprise, renting the land according to economic theory, encounts nevertheless limits. Farmer has finally to appropriate the soil. Composite farming, holding and renting the land, predominates. Agricultural growth becomes through the two opposite logics : of enterprise, of property. Political economy holds only the first, though the second, in agriculture, prevails.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0373-2630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2105-2883</identifier><language>fre</language><publisher>Paris: sirey</publisher><subject>Life Sciences</subject><ispartof>Revue d'économie politique, 1985-07, Vol.95 (4), p.484-501</ispartof><rights>Editions Sirey — 1985</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24698633$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24698633$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02726105$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BARTHÉLEMY, Denis</creatorcontrib><title>PROPRIÉTÉ FONCIÈRE ET AGRICULTURE D'ENTREPRISE</title><title>Revue d'économie politique</title><description>L'exploitation agricole se développe sur le modèle de l'entreprise industrielle. Cette tendance à la pure entreprise, locataire du sol ainsi que l'enseigne la théorie économique, rencontre cependant une limite. L'appropriation du sol finit par s'imposer. L'exploitation mixte, propriétaire et locataire, prévaut. La croissance agricole s'opère selon deux logiques opposées, celle de l'entreprise et celle de la propriété. L'économie politique ne retient que la première, alors que dans l'agriculture la seconde est dominante. Farming grows up on the industrial firm's pattern. This propensity to become a true enterprise, renting the land according to economic theory, encounts nevertheless limits. Farmer has finally to appropriate the soil. Composite farming, holding and renting the land, predominates. Agricultural growth becomes through the two opposite logics : of enterprise, of property. Political economy holds only the first, though the second, in agriculture, prevails.</description><subject>Life Sciences</subject><issn>0373-2630</issn><issn>2105-2883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j91Kw0AQhRdRMFYfQQh4IV4Edmaym81liGkbCE2JyfWSX9pQTU1awTewz5UXM6Xi1XAOHx9nrpiBwIWFStE1Mzg5ZKEkfsvuhqHl3EYhwGCwTuJ1Eo6ndDyZ83jlh-NPEphBanqLJPSzKM2m-PocrNIkmMC34J7dNPluqB_-7oxl8yD1l1YUL0Lfi6wNgHCtCmoCzkXhEjQVBwmKS8clbAqAqimdRgm07SYHiTW4DqFTl7IuqFQqL0HRjL1cvJt8p_f99j3vv3WXb_XSi_S54-ignF78gol9urD7vvs81sNBt92x_5jmaUDXRhIozsbHC9UOh67_d6ItXSWJ6BfbR1Q4</recordid><startdate>19850701</startdate><enddate>19850701</enddate><creator>BARTHÉLEMY, Denis</creator><general>sirey</general><general>Sirey</general><general>Dalloz</general><scope>FBAQO</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850701</creationdate><title>PROPRIÉTÉ FONCIÈRE ET AGRICULTURE D'ENTREPRISE</title><author>BARTHÉLEMY, Denis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h1159-d1e31005b931fd01618067932fb11dfc7f85244fa162e197327ec6eb3c88ac183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Life Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BARTHÉLEMY, Denis</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 02</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Revue d'économie politique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BARTHÉLEMY, Denis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PROPRIÉTÉ FONCIÈRE ET AGRICULTURE D'ENTREPRISE</atitle><jtitle>Revue d'économie politique</jtitle><date>1985-07-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>484</spage><epage>501</epage><pages>484-501</pages><issn>0373-2630</issn><eissn>2105-2883</eissn><abstract>L'exploitation agricole se développe sur le modèle de l'entreprise industrielle. Cette tendance à la pure entreprise, locataire du sol ainsi que l'enseigne la théorie économique, rencontre cependant une limite. L'appropriation du sol finit par s'imposer. L'exploitation mixte, propriétaire et locataire, prévaut. La croissance agricole s'opère selon deux logiques opposées, celle de l'entreprise et celle de la propriété. L'économie politique ne retient que la première, alors que dans l'agriculture la seconde est dominante. Farming grows up on the industrial firm's pattern. This propensity to become a true enterprise, renting the land according to economic theory, encounts nevertheless limits. Farmer has finally to appropriate the soil. Composite farming, holding and renting the land, predominates. Agricultural growth becomes through the two opposite logics : of enterprise, of property. Political economy holds only the first, though the second, in agriculture, prevails.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>sirey</pub><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0373-2630
ispartof Revue d'économie politique, 1985-07, Vol.95 (4), p.484-501
issn 0373-2630
2105-2883
language fre
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02726105v1
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Life Sciences
title PROPRIÉTÉ FONCIÈRE ET AGRICULTURE D'ENTREPRISE
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T03%3A30%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PROPRI%C3%89T%C3%89%20FONCI%C3%88RE%20ET%20AGRICULTURE%20D'ENTREPRISE&rft.jtitle=Revue%20d'%C3%A9conomie%20politique&rft.au=BARTH%C3%89LEMY,%20Denis&rft.date=1985-07-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=484&rft.epage=501&rft.pages=484-501&rft.issn=0373-2630&rft.eissn=2105-2883&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E24698633%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h1159-d1e31005b931fd01618067932fb11dfc7f85244fa162e197327ec6eb3c88ac183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1294235258&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24698633&rfr_iscdi=true