Loading…
Ecological economics and scientific controversies. Lessons from some recent policy making in the EEC
Contrasting the very limited scientific evidence on the forest dieback issue with the sudden adoption of policies on air pollution decided in the FRG (1983–1984) and extended to the European Community (1985), we propose an interpretative framework for the real internalization process at work in what...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecological economics 1992, Vol.6 (3), p.211-233 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517o-6313318b9f2f171acbb427ccb2310345249e6d17a34cdd54c5ce6342ce1e8dc63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517o-6313318b9f2f171acbb427ccb2310345249e6d17a34cdd54c5ce6342ce1e8dc63 |
container_end_page | 233 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 211 |
container_title | Ecological economics |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Hourcade, Jean-Charles Salles, Jean-Michel Théry, Daniel |
description | Contrasting the very limited scientific evidence on the forest dieback issue with the sudden adoption of policies on air pollution decided in the FRG (1983–1984) and extended to the European Community (1985), we propose an interpretative framework for the real
internalization process at work in what was tantamount to a social crisis for public opinion, the media and political actors. We conclude that open scientific controversies on some environmental issues (effects, causes, solutions) pave the way for some actors to use the issue for their own techno-industrial strategies quite alien to ecological constraints. In cases of very high uncertainties on impacts, it becomes impossible to apply conventional social cost-benefit analysis (SCBA) as an optimizing tool. We propose to develop economic analysis as a negotiation language and to give pride of place to the value of learning time and to the crucial role of technological pluralism as a condition for flexibility in the future. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0921-8009(92)90026-O |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02961810v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>092180099290026O</els_id><sourcerecordid>16499367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517o-6313318b9f2f171acbb427ccb2310345249e6d17a34cdd54c5ce6342ce1e8dc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkGL2zAQhU1poem2_6AHQaF0D95qJEW2LoUlpN2FQC7tWSjj8UZb23IlJ5B_v8q65NBDV_AQDN8bNPNUFB-B3wAH_ZUbAWXNuflixLXhXOhy-6pYQF3JUgPXr4vFBXlbvEvpkXOutZGLollj6MKDR9cxwjCE3mNibmhYQk_D5FuPLNenGI4Uk6d0wzaUUhgSa2PoWQo9sUiYWTaGzuOJ9e63Hx6YH9i0J7Zer94Xb1rXJfrw974qfn1f_1zdlZvtj_vV7abEJVSh1BKkhHpnWtFCBQ53OyUqxJ2QwKVaCmVIN1A5qbBplgqXSFoqgQRUN6jlVXE99927zo7R9y6ebHDe3t1u7LnGhdFQAz9CZj_P7BjDnwOlyfY-IXWdGygckpWVUjUI_iIIWhkjdfUyqPIYtZYZ_PQP-BgOccibsSByTtKoWmVKzRTGkFKk9jIRcHuO3Z4ztedMrRH2OXa7zbb72RZpJLx4KJ-cdK4crXQ665QFJjtlXpB0MmvMEgBWSGn3U597fZt7UQ7t6Cna50-B1Pic-GSb4P__mCdxkssS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292139484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecological economics and scientific controversies. Lessons from some recent policy making in the EEC</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Backfile Package - Environmental Science (Legacy) [YES]</source><source>Backfile Package - Economics, Econometrics and Finance (Legacy) [YET]</source><creator>Hourcade, Jean-Charles ; Salles, Jean-Michel ; Théry, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Hourcade, Jean-Charles ; Salles, Jean-Michel ; Théry, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Contrasting the very limited scientific evidence on the forest dieback issue with the sudden adoption of policies on air pollution decided in the FRG (1983–1984) and extended to the European Community (1985), we propose an interpretative framework for the real
internalization process at work in what was tantamount to a social crisis for public opinion, the media and political actors. We conclude that open scientific controversies on some environmental issues (effects, causes, solutions) pave the way for some actors to use the issue for their own techno-industrial strategies quite alien to ecological constraints. In cases of very high uncertainties on impacts, it becomes impossible to apply conventional social cost-benefit analysis (SCBA) as an optimizing tool. We propose to develop economic analysis as a negotiation language and to give pride of place to the value of learning time and to the crucial role of technological pluralism as a condition for flexibility in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-8009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0921-8009(92)90026-O</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Economics and Finance ; Environmental policy ; Environmental studies ; European Communities ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Policy making ; Pollution control</subject><ispartof>Ecological economics, 1992, Vol.6 (3), p.211-233</ispartof><rights>1992</rights><rights>Public Domain</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517o-6313318b9f2f171acbb427ccb2310345249e6d17a34cdd54c5ce6342ce1e8dc63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517o-6313318b9f2f171acbb427ccb2310345249e6d17a34cdd54c5ce6342ce1e8dc63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5030-2195</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/092180099290026O$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3447,3469,4010,27900,27901,27902,33201,45968,45969</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeecolec/v_3a6_3ay_3a1992_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a211-233.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02961810$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hourcade, Jean-Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salles, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Théry, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Ecological economics and scientific controversies. Lessons from some recent policy making in the EEC</title><title>Ecological economics</title><description>Contrasting the very limited scientific evidence on the forest dieback issue with the sudden adoption of policies on air pollution decided in the FRG (1983–1984) and extended to the European Community (1985), we propose an interpretative framework for the real
internalization process at work in what was tantamount to a social crisis for public opinion, the media and political actors. We conclude that open scientific controversies on some environmental issues (effects, causes, solutions) pave the way for some actors to use the issue for their own techno-industrial strategies quite alien to ecological constraints. In cases of very high uncertainties on impacts, it becomes impossible to apply conventional social cost-benefit analysis (SCBA) as an optimizing tool. We propose to develop economic analysis as a negotiation language and to give pride of place to the value of learning time and to the crucial role of technological pluralism as a condition for flexibility in the future.</description><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental studies</subject><subject>European Communities</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><issn>0921-8009</issn><issn>1873-6106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkGL2zAQhU1poem2_6AHQaF0D95qJEW2LoUlpN2FQC7tWSjj8UZb23IlJ5B_v8q65NBDV_AQDN8bNPNUFB-B3wAH_ZUbAWXNuflixLXhXOhy-6pYQF3JUgPXr4vFBXlbvEvpkXOutZGLollj6MKDR9cxwjCE3mNibmhYQk_D5FuPLNenGI4Uk6d0wzaUUhgSa2PoWQo9sUiYWTaGzuOJ9e63Hx6YH9i0J7Zer94Xb1rXJfrw974qfn1f_1zdlZvtj_vV7abEJVSh1BKkhHpnWtFCBQ53OyUqxJ2QwKVaCmVIN1A5qbBplgqXSFoqgQRUN6jlVXE99927zo7R9y6ebHDe3t1u7LnGhdFQAz9CZj_P7BjDnwOlyfY-IXWdGygckpWVUjUI_iIIWhkjdfUyqPIYtZYZ_PQP-BgOccibsSByTtKoWmVKzRTGkFKk9jIRcHuO3Z4ztedMrRH2OXa7zbb72RZpJLx4KJ-cdK4crXQ665QFJjtlXpB0MmvMEgBWSGn3U597fZt7UQ7t6Cna50-B1Pic-GSb4P__mCdxkssS</recordid><startdate>1992</startdate><enddate>1992</enddate><creator>Hourcade, Jean-Charles</creator><creator>Salles, Jean-Michel</creator><creator>Théry, Daniel</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5030-2195</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>1992</creationdate><title>Ecological economics and scientific controversies. Lessons from some recent policy making in the EEC</title><author>Hourcade, Jean-Charles ; Salles, Jean-Michel ; Théry, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517o-6313318b9f2f171acbb427ccb2310345249e6d17a34cdd54c5ce6342ce1e8dc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental studies</topic><topic>European Communities</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hourcade, Jean-Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salles, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Théry, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hourcade, Jean-Charles</au><au>Salles, Jean-Michel</au><au>Théry, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecological economics and scientific controversies. Lessons from some recent policy making in the EEC</atitle><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle><date>1992</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>211-233</pages><issn>0921-8009</issn><eissn>1873-6106</eissn><abstract>Contrasting the very limited scientific evidence on the forest dieback issue with the sudden adoption of policies on air pollution decided in the FRG (1983–1984) and extended to the European Community (1985), we propose an interpretative framework for the real
internalization process at work in what was tantamount to a social crisis for public opinion, the media and political actors. We conclude that open scientific controversies on some environmental issues (effects, causes, solutions) pave the way for some actors to use the issue for their own techno-industrial strategies quite alien to ecological constraints. In cases of very high uncertainties on impacts, it becomes impossible to apply conventional social cost-benefit analysis (SCBA) as an optimizing tool. We propose to develop economic analysis as a negotiation language and to give pride of place to the value of learning time and to the crucial role of technological pluralism as a condition for flexibility in the future.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam, The Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0921-8009(92)90026-O</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5030-2195</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-8009 |
ispartof | Ecological economics, 1992, Vol.6 (3), p.211-233 |
issn | 0921-8009 1873-6106 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02961810v1 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Backfile Package - Environmental Science (Legacy) [YES]; Backfile Package - Economics, Econometrics and Finance (Legacy) [YET] |
subjects | Economics and Finance Environmental policy Environmental studies European Communities Humanities and Social Sciences Policy making Pollution control |
title | Ecological economics and scientific controversies. Lessons from some recent policy making in the EEC |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecological%20economics%20and%20scientific%20controversies.%20Lessons%20from%20some%20recent%20policy%20making%20in%20the%20EEC&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20economics&rft.au=Hourcade,%20Jean-Charles&rft.date=1992&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=211-233&rft.issn=0921-8009&rft.eissn=1873-6106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0921-8009(92)90026-O&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E16499367%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517o-6313318b9f2f171acbb427ccb2310345249e6d17a34cdd54c5ce6342ce1e8dc63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292139484&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |