From pattern to process: identifying predator–prey models from time‐series data

• Published in: Population ecology 2001-12, Vol.43 (3), p.229-243
• Main Authors: Jost, C., Arditi, R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Arthropod dynamics; Ecology, environment; Key words Functional response; Life Sciences; Model selection; Neurons and Cognition; Observation error; Plankton dynamics; Predator dependence; Process error; Protozoan dynamics; Psychology and behavior; Quantitative Methods; Symbiosis
• ISSN: 1438-3896; 1438-390X
• DOI: 10.1007/s10144-001-8187-3

Fitting nonlinear models to time‐series is a technique of increasing importance in population ecology. In this article, we apply it to assess the importance of predator dependence in the predation process by comparing two alternative models of equal complexity (one with and one without predator dependence) to predator–prey time‐series. Stochasticities in such data come from both observation error and process error. We consider how these errors must be taken into account in the fitting process, and we develop eight different model selection criteria. Applying these criteria to laboratory data on simple protozoan and arthropod predator–prey systems shows that little predator dependence is present, with one interesting exception. Field data are more ambiguous (either selection depends on the particular criterion or no significant differences can be detected), and we show that both models fit reasonably well. We conclude that, within our modeling framework, predator dependence is in general insignificant in simple systems in homogeneous environments. Relatively complex systems show significant predator dependence more often than simple ones but the data are also often inconclusive. The analysis of such systems should rely on several models to detect predictions that are sensitive to predator dependence and to direct further research if necessary.