The role of roles: Physical cooperation between humans and robots

Since the strict separation of working spaces of humans and robots has experienced a softening due to recent robotics research achievements, close interaction of humans and robots comes rapidly into reach. In this context, physical human–robot interaction raises a number of questions regarding a des...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The International journal of robotics research 2012-11, Vol.31 (13), p.1656-1674
Main Authors: Mörtl, Alexander, Lawitzky, Martin, Kucukyilmaz, Ayse, Sezgin, Metin, Basdogan, Cagatay, Hirche, Sandra
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Allocations
Computer Science
Dynamics
Feedback
Human
Human-Computer Interaction
Information
Robotics
Robots
Strategy
Tasks
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Since the strict separation of working spaces of humans and robots has experienced a softening due to recent robotics research achievements, close interaction of humans and robots comes rapidly into reach. In this context, physical human–robot interaction raises a number of questions regarding a desired intuitive robot behavior. The continuous bilateral information and energy exchange requires an appropriate continuous robot feedback. Investigating a cooperative manipulation task, the desired behavior is a combination of an urge to fulfill the task, a smooth instant reactive behavior to human force inputs and an assignment of the task effort to the cooperating agents. In this paper, a formal analysis of human–robot cooperative load transport is presented. Three different possibilities for the assignment of task effort are proposed. Two proposed dynamic role exchange mechanisms adjust the robot’s urge to complete the task based on the human feedback. For comparison, a static role allocation strategy not relying on the human agreement feedback is investigated as well. All three role allocation mechanisms are evaluated in a user study that involves large-scale kinesthetic interaction and full-body human motion. Results show tradeoffs between subjective and objective performance measures stating a clear objective advantage of the proposed dynamic role allocation scheme.
ISSN:0278-3649
1741-3176
DOI:10.1177/0278364912455366