Authoritarian clientelism: the case of the president’s ‘creatures’ in Cameroon

Within this article, we aim at exploring the topic of clientelism in Cameroon as a species of a wider phenomenon affecting Central and Western Francophone Africa. Our argument is that, in spite of the repeated efforts of reinforcing the local power structures, we have witnessed a process of centrali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta politica 2021-10, Vol.56 (4), p.639-657
Main Authors: Mişcoiu, Sergiu, Kakdeu, Louis-Marie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Authoritarianism
Centralization
Clientelism
Comparative Politics
European Politics
Former members
Francophones
Humanities and Social Sciences
Original Article
Patronage
Political Science
Political Science and International Relations
Political Science and International Studies
Presidents
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Within this article, we aim at exploring the topic of clientelism in Cameroon as a species of a wider phenomenon affecting Central and Western Francophone Africa. Our argument is that, in spite of the repeated efforts of reinforcing the local power structures, we have witnessed a process of centralisation of clientelism: the new networks are shaped around the ‘Creatures’, who are the President Paul Biya’s formal or informal appointees and play the role of nodal elements relying the rest of the chain to the central command. This happened on the expenses of the locally dispersed and more autonomous clientelistic groups that were either included in or smashed by the pyramidal Creatures’ structured. In order to test our assumption, we analysed a specific body of literature on the theorization of clientelism and on its African and Cameroonian specificity and organized four focus groups with the actual and former members of the clientelistic chains at different levels (central, regional and local). If our main presupposition proved to be generally correct, one of the sub-arguments was only partially validated through this empirical component of our research.
ISSN:0001-6810
1741-1416
DOI:10.1057/s41269-020-00188-y