Greenspace exposure and cancer incidence: A 27-year follow-up of the French GAZEL cohort

• Published in: The Science of the total environment 2021-09, Vol.787, p.147553-147553, Article 147553
• Main Authors: Zare Sakhvidi, Mohammad Javad, Yang, Jun, Siemiatycki, Jack, Dadvand, Payam, de Hoogh, Kees, Vienneau, Danielle, Goldberg, Marcel, Zins, Marie, Lequy, Emeline, Jacquemin, Bénédicte
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cancer; Cancer incidence; Environment and Society; Environmental health; Environmental Sciences; Greenspace; Life Sciences; Longitudinal study; Santé publique et épidémiologie
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147553

Greenspace exposure has been suggested to be associated with a range of health outcomes. The available evidence on the association of this exposure with cancer is still very scarce and inconsistent. We aimed to study the association between greenspace exposure and all-site and site-specific (prostate, breast, colorectal, bladder, lung, and malignant melanoma of skin) cancer incidence in the GAZEL cohort. This study was based on over 27 years of follow-up (1989–2016) of 19,408 participants across France. We assessed the residential greenspace exposure within several buffers as well as residential proximity to green spaces (agricultural, urban, and forests) in each follow-up. We used time-dependent Cox models, controlling for time-varying personal and area-level variables, with different lags between exposure and outcome. Additional analysis was conducted according to the urban-rural residence of the participants' over follow-up. Over the 294,645 person-years of follow-up, we registered 4075 incident cases of cancer. We found an increase in the risk for all-sites cancer with an inter-quartile range increase of Normalized Difference in Vegetation Index across different buffers (hazard ratio (HR) of 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.14 for the 100 m buffer). We found a positive association of all-sites cancer with proximity to agricultural lands (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.05), and forests (HR:1.04; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.07), but not with urban green spaces. The cancer site-specific analyses suggested a protective role of greenspace for breast, lung, and colorectal cancers (e.g. breast cancer HR at 100 m buffer: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.99). Non-significant associations were observed for prostate, bladder, and skin cancer. Stratified analyses based on urban, semi-urban, and rural classification did not suggest any differential pattern. We identified an increased risk of all-site cancer with increased greenspace and proximity to agricultural lands and forests; whereas potential protective role of greenspace for breast cancer. [Display omitted] •Evidences on the association between greenspace exposure and cancer is inconsistent.•The association depends on the cancer site and greenspace type.•Greenspace seems to have a protective role for the breast cancer.•Greenness was linked to increased risk of all-site cancers.