Loading…

Understanding the governance of sustainability pathways: Hydraulic megaprojects, social-ecological traps, and politicized networks of action situations

To enable robust and just sustainability pathways, we need to understand how social-ecological systems (SES) respond to different governance configurations, considering their historical, institutional, political and power conditions. We advance a robust methodological tool for the integrated analysi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability science 2023
Main Authors: Méndez, Pablo, Clement, Floriane, Salvador, Guillermo Palau, Díaz-Delgado, Ricardo, Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Sustainability science
container_volume
creator Méndez, Pablo
Clement, Floriane
Salvador, Guillermo Palau
Díaz-Delgado, Ricardo
Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio
description To enable robust and just sustainability pathways, we need to understand how social-ecological systems (SES) respond to different governance configurations, considering their historical, institutional, political and power conditions. We advance a robust methodological tool for the integrated analysis of those conditions, focusing on SES traps and building on an existing case study: the Doñana region (Guadalquivir estuary, SW Spain), an estuary-delta SES. Doñana is characterized by institutional rigidity for water resources and wetland conservation governance and, more generally, by a SES rigidity trap. Here, we focus on a relatively recent hydraulic megaproject involving deep dredging in the Guadalquivir estuary, finally canceled due to its broad negative socioeconomic and environmental repercussions. Our methodological development consists of a novel combination of the politicized version of the Institutional Analysis and Development (pIAD) framework and the Networks of Action Situations (NAS) approach. Our analysis reveals a governance configuration characterized by strategic interactions among key actors posing no new large socioeconomic or environmental risks in the short term. This pattern is however vulnerable due to an underlying coordination failure and sub-optimal equilibrium situation, which emerge from a pattern of uncooperative behavior that cannot be explained without considering discourse inertia and power dynamics. Deep dredging could have led to a sudden fall of governance into a below sub-optimal equilibrium and regime shift toward a lock-in trap posing high sunk and trajectory-shifting costs. Currently, the game is on for achieving a shift to a high ‘blue equilibrium’ and launching a robust sustainability pathway through collective action.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11625-022-01258-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03365127v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_03365127v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03365127v13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjbtOxDAURC0EEsvjB6jcImGwHfKADiFWKSihji6ON7mL1458nV2FH-F3SSRETzWjOaMZxq6UvFVSlnekVKFzIbUWUum8EvKIrVRVaHEv8_L4zxf5KTsj2kpZ6PKhWrHvd9_aSAl8i77jqbe8C3sbPXhjedhwGmeIHj7QYZr4AKk_wESPvJ7aCKNDw3e2gyGGrTWJbjgFg-CENcGFDg04niIMM5gv-BDmFTT4ZVvubTqE-EnLC5iEwXPCNMLi6IKdbMCRvfzVc3a9fnl7rkUPrhki7iBOTQBs6qfXZslklhW50uVeZf_p_gAmVGXZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding the governance of sustainability pathways: Hydraulic megaprojects, social-ecological traps, and politicized networks of action situations</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Méndez, Pablo ; Clement, Floriane ; Salvador, Guillermo Palau ; Díaz-Delgado, Ricardo ; Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio</creator><creatorcontrib>Méndez, Pablo ; Clement, Floriane ; Salvador, Guillermo Palau ; Díaz-Delgado, Ricardo ; Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio</creatorcontrib><description>To enable robust and just sustainability pathways, we need to understand how social-ecological systems (SES) respond to different governance configurations, considering their historical, institutional, political and power conditions. We advance a robust methodological tool for the integrated analysis of those conditions, focusing on SES traps and building on an existing case study: the Doñana region (Guadalquivir estuary, SW Spain), an estuary-delta SES. Doñana is characterized by institutional rigidity for water resources and wetland conservation governance and, more generally, by a SES rigidity trap. Here, we focus on a relatively recent hydraulic megaproject involving deep dredging in the Guadalquivir estuary, finally canceled due to its broad negative socioeconomic and environmental repercussions. Our methodological development consists of a novel combination of the politicized version of the Institutional Analysis and Development (pIAD) framework and the Networks of Action Situations (NAS) approach. Our analysis reveals a governance configuration characterized by strategic interactions among key actors posing no new large socioeconomic or environmental risks in the short term. This pattern is however vulnerable due to an underlying coordination failure and sub-optimal equilibrium situation, which emerge from a pattern of uncooperative behavior that cannot be explained without considering discourse inertia and power dynamics. Deep dredging could have led to a sudden fall of governance into a below sub-optimal equilibrium and regime shift toward a lock-in trap posing high sunk and trajectory-shifting costs. Currently, the game is on for achieving a shift to a high ‘blue equilibrium’ and launching a robust sustainability pathway through collective action.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1862-4065</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1862-4057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11625-022-01258-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springer Verlag (Germany)</publisher><subject>Environmental studies ; Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Sustainability science, 2023</ispartof><rights>Attribution</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-1825-6496 ; 0000-0003-4195-222X ; 0000-0003-4195-222X ; 0000-0003-1825-6496</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,4012,27910,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03365127$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Méndez, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clement, Floriane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador, Guillermo Palau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz-Delgado, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding the governance of sustainability pathways: Hydraulic megaprojects, social-ecological traps, and politicized networks of action situations</title><title>Sustainability science</title><description>To enable robust and just sustainability pathways, we need to understand how social-ecological systems (SES) respond to different governance configurations, considering their historical, institutional, political and power conditions. We advance a robust methodological tool for the integrated analysis of those conditions, focusing on SES traps and building on an existing case study: the Doñana region (Guadalquivir estuary, SW Spain), an estuary-delta SES. Doñana is characterized by institutional rigidity for water resources and wetland conservation governance and, more generally, by a SES rigidity trap. Here, we focus on a relatively recent hydraulic megaproject involving deep dredging in the Guadalquivir estuary, finally canceled due to its broad negative socioeconomic and environmental repercussions. Our methodological development consists of a novel combination of the politicized version of the Institutional Analysis and Development (pIAD) framework and the Networks of Action Situations (NAS) approach. Our analysis reveals a governance configuration characterized by strategic interactions among key actors posing no new large socioeconomic or environmental risks in the short term. This pattern is however vulnerable due to an underlying coordination failure and sub-optimal equilibrium situation, which emerge from a pattern of uncooperative behavior that cannot be explained without considering discourse inertia and power dynamics. Deep dredging could have led to a sudden fall of governance into a below sub-optimal equilibrium and regime shift toward a lock-in trap posing high sunk and trajectory-shifting costs. Currently, the game is on for achieving a shift to a high ‘blue equilibrium’ and launching a robust sustainability pathway through collective action.</description><subject>Environmental studies</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><issn>1862-4065</issn><issn>1862-4057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjbtOxDAURC0EEsvjB6jcImGwHfKADiFWKSihji6ON7mL1458nV2FH-F3SSRETzWjOaMZxq6UvFVSlnekVKFzIbUWUum8EvKIrVRVaHEv8_L4zxf5KTsj2kpZ6PKhWrHvd9_aSAl8i77jqbe8C3sbPXhjedhwGmeIHj7QYZr4AKk_wESPvJ7aCKNDw3e2gyGGrTWJbjgFg-CENcGFDg04niIMM5gv-BDmFTT4ZVvubTqE-EnLC5iEwXPCNMLi6IKdbMCRvfzVc3a9fnl7rkUPrhki7iBOTQBs6qfXZslklhW50uVeZf_p_gAmVGXZ</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Méndez, Pablo</creator><creator>Clement, Floriane</creator><creator>Salvador, Guillermo Palau</creator><creator>Díaz-Delgado, Ricardo</creator><creator>Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio</creator><general>Springer Verlag (Germany)</general><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-6496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-222X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-222X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-6496</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Understanding the governance of sustainability pathways: Hydraulic megaprojects, social-ecological traps, and politicized networks of action situations</title><author>Méndez, Pablo ; Clement, Floriane ; Salvador, Guillermo Palau ; Díaz-Delgado, Ricardo ; Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03365127v13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Environmental studies</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Méndez, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clement, Floriane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador, Guillermo Palau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz-Delgado, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio</creatorcontrib><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Sustainability science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Méndez, Pablo</au><au>Clement, Floriane</au><au>Salvador, Guillermo Palau</au><au>Díaz-Delgado, Ricardo</au><au>Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding the governance of sustainability pathways: Hydraulic megaprojects, social-ecological traps, and politicized networks of action situations</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability science</jtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><issn>1862-4065</issn><eissn>1862-4057</eissn><abstract>To enable robust and just sustainability pathways, we need to understand how social-ecological systems (SES) respond to different governance configurations, considering their historical, institutional, political and power conditions. We advance a robust methodological tool for the integrated analysis of those conditions, focusing on SES traps and building on an existing case study: the Doñana region (Guadalquivir estuary, SW Spain), an estuary-delta SES. Doñana is characterized by institutional rigidity for water resources and wetland conservation governance and, more generally, by a SES rigidity trap. Here, we focus on a relatively recent hydraulic megaproject involving deep dredging in the Guadalquivir estuary, finally canceled due to its broad negative socioeconomic and environmental repercussions. Our methodological development consists of a novel combination of the politicized version of the Institutional Analysis and Development (pIAD) framework and the Networks of Action Situations (NAS) approach. Our analysis reveals a governance configuration characterized by strategic interactions among key actors posing no new large socioeconomic or environmental risks in the short term. This pattern is however vulnerable due to an underlying coordination failure and sub-optimal equilibrium situation, which emerge from a pattern of uncooperative behavior that cannot be explained without considering discourse inertia and power dynamics. Deep dredging could have led to a sudden fall of governance into a below sub-optimal equilibrium and regime shift toward a lock-in trap posing high sunk and trajectory-shifting costs. Currently, the game is on for achieving a shift to a high ‘blue equilibrium’ and launching a robust sustainability pathway through collective action.</abstract><pub>Springer Verlag (Germany)</pub><doi>10.1007/s11625-022-01258-0</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-6496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-222X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-222X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-6496</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1862-4065
ispartof Sustainability science, 2023
issn 1862-4065
1862-4057
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03365127v1
source ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature
subjects Environmental studies
Humanities and Social Sciences
title Understanding the governance of sustainability pathways: Hydraulic megaprojects, social-ecological traps, and politicized networks of action situations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A07%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20the%20governance%20of%20sustainability%20pathways:%20Hydraulic%20megaprojects,%20social-ecological%20traps,%20and%20politicized%20networks%20of%20action%20situations&rft.jtitle=Sustainability%20science&rft.au=M%C3%A9ndez,%20Pablo&rft.date=2023&rft.issn=1862-4065&rft.eissn=1862-4057&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11625-022-01258-0&rft_dat=%3Chal%3Eoai_HAL_hal_03365127v1%3C/hal%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03365127v13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true