Loading…
Residential movements of top predators in Chile’s most isolated marine protected area: Implications for the conservation of the Galapagos shark, Carcharhinus galapagensis, and the yellowtail amberjack, Seriola lalandi
Marine protected areas (MPAs) are becoming a widely used tool for the conservation of biodiversity and for fishery management; however, most of these areas are designed without prior knowledge of the basic ecological aspects of the species that they are trying to protect. This study investigated the...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Aquatic conservation 2021-02, Vol.31 (2), p.340-355 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-d8719ed27410f46b9a5ae1e7f804a38b2ce51853499620afdd02c5ffeb0d574e3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-d8719ed27410f46b9a5ae1e7f804a38b2ce51853499620afdd02c5ffeb0d574e3 |
| container_end_page | 355 |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 340 |
| container_title | Aquatic conservation |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Morales, Naití A. Heidemeyer, Maike Bauer, Robert Hernández, Sebastian Acuña, Enzo Gennip, Simon Jan Friedlander, Alan M. Gaymer, Carlos F. |
| description | Marine protected areas (MPAs) are becoming a widely used tool for the conservation of biodiversity and for fishery management; however, most of these areas are designed without prior knowledge of the basic ecological aspects of the species that they are trying to protect.
This study investigated the movement of two top predators: the Galapagos shark, Carcharhinus galapagensis, and the yellowtail amberjack, Seriola lalandi, in and around the Motu Motiro Hiva Marine Park (MMHMP) using MiniPAT satellite tags to determine the effectiveness of this MPA for the protection of these species.
The Galapagos sharks (n = 4) spent most of their tag deployment periods inside the MMHMP. However, high intraspecific variability was observed in their movement dynamics. Daily individual maximum movements ranged from 17 to 58 km and the maximum distance from Salas y Gómez Island, the only emergent island within the MMHMP, ranged from 31 to 139 km.
The maximum linear distance travelled for a female juvenile Galapagos shark (152 cm total length) was 236 km, which is greater than the maximum distance previously documented for juveniles of this species ( |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/aqc.3472 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03411047v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2493017839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-d8719ed27410f46b9a5ae1e7f804a38b2ce51853499620afdd02c5ffeb0d574e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSMEEmVA4hEssQGpKXb-zW4UQVtpJFR-1tYd-6bx4MSp7Zlqdn2NPlt3PAnOBLFj5evj714f3ZMkbxm9YJRmH-FOXuRFnT1LzhjlPKV1WT6f6zJL64rlL5NX3u8opbxi1Vny9A29VjgGDYYM9oBDrD2xHQl2IpNDBcE6T_RI2l4b_P3w6CPnA9HeGgioyABOjxhZG1DOAjiET-R6mIyWELQdPemsI6FHIuMF3eGknj6J2iUYmODWeuJ7cL_OSQtOxqrX496T2-UVR6_9OYFRnXqOaIy9D6ANgWGLbgcyNn5Hp6MpYmLPqPTr5EUHxuObv-cq-fnl84_2Kt18vbxu15tU5jzPUtXUjKPK6oLRrqi2HEpAhnXX0ALyZptJLFlT5gXnVUahU4pmsuw63FJV1gXmq-TDMrcHIyan40KOwoIWV-uNmDWaF4zRoj6wyL5b2Liuuz36IHZ278ZoT2QFzymrm2hqlbxfKOms9w67f2MZFXPMIsYs5pgjmi7ofUzn-F9OrG_aE_8HcReuUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2493017839</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Residential movements of top predators in Chile’s most isolated marine protected area: Implications for the conservation of the Galapagos shark, Carcharhinus galapagensis, and the yellowtail amberjack, Seriola lalandi</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Morales, Naití A. ; Heidemeyer, Maike ; Bauer, Robert ; Hernández, Sebastian ; Acuña, Enzo ; Gennip, Simon Jan ; Friedlander, Alan M. ; Gaymer, Carlos F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Morales, Naití A. ; Heidemeyer, Maike ; Bauer, Robert ; Hernández, Sebastian ; Acuña, Enzo ; Gennip, Simon Jan ; Friedlander, Alan M. ; Gaymer, Carlos F.</creatorcontrib><description>Marine protected areas (MPAs) are becoming a widely used tool for the conservation of biodiversity and for fishery management; however, most of these areas are designed without prior knowledge of the basic ecological aspects of the species that they are trying to protect.
This study investigated the movement of two top predators: the Galapagos shark, Carcharhinus galapagensis, and the yellowtail amberjack, Seriola lalandi, in and around the Motu Motiro Hiva Marine Park (MMHMP) using MiniPAT satellite tags to determine the effectiveness of this MPA for the protection of these species.
The Galapagos sharks (n = 4) spent most of their tag deployment periods inside the MMHMP. However, high intraspecific variability was observed in their movement dynamics. Daily individual maximum movements ranged from 17 to 58 km and the maximum distance from Salas y Gómez Island, the only emergent island within the MMHMP, ranged from 31 to 139 km.
The maximum linear distance travelled for a female juvenile Galapagos shark (152 cm total length) was 236 km, which is greater than the maximum distance previously documented for juveniles of this species (<50 km).
For the yellowtail amberjack (n = 1), 91% of the satellite geolocations were within the MMHMP, with a maximum daily distance travelled of 6 km. The maximum distance travelled between points was 111 km and the maximum distance from Salas y Gómez Island was 62 km.
All archival tagged fish spent most of their time at depths of <50 m and never left the epipelagic zone. Daytime versus night‐time differences were pronounced in all individuals but showed high interindividual variability.
This study provides a baseline on the movement of these two top predators in the MMHMP and provides valuable insights for the creation of MPAs in the region and elsewhere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-7613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3472</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Biodiversity and Ecology ; Carcharhinus galapagensis ; Conservation ; Deployment ; Distance ; Environmental Sciences ; Epipelagic zone ; Euphotic zone ; Fish ; Fish conservation ; Fisheries ; Fisheries management ; Fishery management ; fishing pressure ; Global Changes ; Juveniles ; Marine fishes ; Marine parks ; Marine protected areas ; Motu Motiro Hiva Marine Park ; movement patterns ; MPA evaluation ; offshore islands ; Predators ; Protected areas ; Protected species ; Satellites ; Seriola lalandi ; Sharks ; Species ; top predators ; Variability ; Wildlife conservation ; Yellowtail</subject><ispartof>Aquatic conservation, 2021-02, Vol.31 (2), p.340-355</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-d8719ed27410f46b9a5ae1e7f804a38b2ce51853499620afdd02c5ffeb0d574e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-d8719ed27410f46b9a5ae1e7f804a38b2ce51853499620afdd02c5ffeb0d574e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3758-7090 ; 0000-0003-1348-2056 ; 0000-0003-4395-9505 ; 0000-0003-4224-8023 ; 0000-0003-4858-006X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-03411047$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morales, Naití A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidemeyer, Maike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acuña, Enzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gennip, Simon Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedlander, Alan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaymer, Carlos F.</creatorcontrib><title>Residential movements of top predators in Chile’s most isolated marine protected area: Implications for the conservation of the Galapagos shark, Carcharhinus galapagensis, and the yellowtail amberjack, Seriola lalandi</title><title>Aquatic conservation</title><description>Marine protected areas (MPAs) are becoming a widely used tool for the conservation of biodiversity and for fishery management; however, most of these areas are designed without prior knowledge of the basic ecological aspects of the species that they are trying to protect.
This study investigated the movement of two top predators: the Galapagos shark, Carcharhinus galapagensis, and the yellowtail amberjack, Seriola lalandi, in and around the Motu Motiro Hiva Marine Park (MMHMP) using MiniPAT satellite tags to determine the effectiveness of this MPA for the protection of these species.
The Galapagos sharks (n = 4) spent most of their tag deployment periods inside the MMHMP. However, high intraspecific variability was observed in their movement dynamics. Daily individual maximum movements ranged from 17 to 58 km and the maximum distance from Salas y Gómez Island, the only emergent island within the MMHMP, ranged from 31 to 139 km.
The maximum linear distance travelled for a female juvenile Galapagos shark (152 cm total length) was 236 km, which is greater than the maximum distance previously documented for juveniles of this species (<50 km).
For the yellowtail amberjack (n = 1), 91% of the satellite geolocations were within the MMHMP, with a maximum daily distance travelled of 6 km. The maximum distance travelled between points was 111 km and the maximum distance from Salas y Gómez Island was 62 km.
All archival tagged fish spent most of their time at depths of <50 m and never left the epipelagic zone. Daytime versus night‐time differences were pronounced in all individuals but showed high interindividual variability.
This study provides a baseline on the movement of these two top predators in the MMHMP and provides valuable insights for the creation of MPAs in the region and elsewhere.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Carcharhinus galapagensis</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Deployment</subject><subject>Distance</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Epipelagic zone</subject><subject>Euphotic zone</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish conservation</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Fishery management</subject><subject>fishing pressure</subject><subject>Global Changes</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Marine parks</subject><subject>Marine protected areas</subject><subject>Motu Motiro Hiva Marine Park</subject><subject>movement patterns</subject><subject>MPA evaluation</subject><subject>offshore islands</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Protected species</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Seriola lalandi</subject><subject>Sharks</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>top predators</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Yellowtail</subject><issn>1052-7613</issn><issn>1099-0755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSMEEmVA4hEssQGpKXb-zW4UQVtpJFR-1tYd-6bx4MSp7Zlqdn2NPlt3PAnOBLFj5evj714f3ZMkbxm9YJRmH-FOXuRFnT1LzhjlPKV1WT6f6zJL64rlL5NX3u8opbxi1Vny9A29VjgGDYYM9oBDrD2xHQl2IpNDBcE6T_RI2l4b_P3w6CPnA9HeGgioyABOjxhZG1DOAjiET-R6mIyWELQdPemsI6FHIuMF3eGknj6J2iUYmODWeuJ7cL_OSQtOxqrX496T2-UVR6_9OYFRnXqOaIy9D6ANgWGLbgcyNn5Hp6MpYmLPqPTr5EUHxuObv-cq-fnl84_2Kt18vbxu15tU5jzPUtXUjKPK6oLRrqi2HEpAhnXX0ALyZptJLFlT5gXnVUahU4pmsuw63FJV1gXmq-TDMrcHIyan40KOwoIWV-uNmDWaF4zRoj6wyL5b2Liuuz36IHZ278ZoT2QFzymrm2hqlbxfKOms9w67f2MZFXPMIsYs5pgjmi7ofUzn-F9OrG_aE_8HcReuUg</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Morales, Naití A.</creator><creator>Heidemeyer, Maike</creator><creator>Bauer, Robert</creator><creator>Hernández, Sebastian</creator><creator>Acuña, Enzo</creator><creator>Gennip, Simon Jan</creator><creator>Friedlander, Alan M.</creator><creator>Gaymer, Carlos F.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3758-7090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1348-2056</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4395-9505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4224-8023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4858-006X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Residential movements of top predators in Chile’s most isolated marine protected area: Implications for the conservation of the Galapagos shark, Carcharhinus galapagensis, and the yellowtail amberjack, Seriola lalandi</title><author>Morales, Naití A. ; Heidemeyer, Maike ; Bauer, Robert ; Hernández, Sebastian ; Acuña, Enzo ; Gennip, Simon Jan ; Friedlander, Alan M. ; Gaymer, Carlos F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-d8719ed27410f46b9a5ae1e7f804a38b2ce51853499620afdd02c5ffeb0d574e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Carcharhinus galapagensis</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Deployment</topic><topic>Distance</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Epipelagic zone</topic><topic>Euphotic zone</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish conservation</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Fishery management</topic><topic>fishing pressure</topic><topic>Global Changes</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Marine parks</topic><topic>Marine protected areas</topic><topic>Motu Motiro Hiva Marine Park</topic><topic>movement patterns</topic><topic>MPA evaluation</topic><topic>offshore islands</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Protected species</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Seriola lalandi</topic><topic>Sharks</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>top predators</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Yellowtail</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morales, Naití A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidemeyer, Maike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acuña, Enzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gennip, Simon Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedlander, Alan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaymer, Carlos F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morales, Naití A.</au><au>Heidemeyer, Maike</au><au>Bauer, Robert</au><au>Hernández, Sebastian</au><au>Acuña, Enzo</au><au>Gennip, Simon Jan</au><au>Friedlander, Alan M.</au><au>Gaymer, Carlos F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Residential movements of top predators in Chile’s most isolated marine protected area: Implications for the conservation of the Galapagos shark, Carcharhinus galapagensis, and the yellowtail amberjack, Seriola lalandi</atitle><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>340</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>340-355</pages><issn>1052-7613</issn><eissn>1099-0755</eissn><abstract>Marine protected areas (MPAs) are becoming a widely used tool for the conservation of biodiversity and for fishery management; however, most of these areas are designed without prior knowledge of the basic ecological aspects of the species that they are trying to protect.
This study investigated the movement of two top predators: the Galapagos shark, Carcharhinus galapagensis, and the yellowtail amberjack, Seriola lalandi, in and around the Motu Motiro Hiva Marine Park (MMHMP) using MiniPAT satellite tags to determine the effectiveness of this MPA for the protection of these species.
The Galapagos sharks (n = 4) spent most of their tag deployment periods inside the MMHMP. However, high intraspecific variability was observed in their movement dynamics. Daily individual maximum movements ranged from 17 to 58 km and the maximum distance from Salas y Gómez Island, the only emergent island within the MMHMP, ranged from 31 to 139 km.
The maximum linear distance travelled for a female juvenile Galapagos shark (152 cm total length) was 236 km, which is greater than the maximum distance previously documented for juveniles of this species (<50 km).
For the yellowtail amberjack (n = 1), 91% of the satellite geolocations were within the MMHMP, with a maximum daily distance travelled of 6 km. The maximum distance travelled between points was 111 km and the maximum distance from Salas y Gómez Island was 62 km.
All archival tagged fish spent most of their time at depths of <50 m and never left the epipelagic zone. Daytime versus night‐time differences were pronounced in all individuals but showed high interindividual variability.
This study provides a baseline on the movement of these two top predators in the MMHMP and provides valuable insights for the creation of MPAs in the region and elsewhere.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/aqc.3472</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3758-7090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1348-2056</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4395-9505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4224-8023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4858-006X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1052-7613 |
| ispartof | Aquatic conservation, 2021-02, Vol.31 (2), p.340-355 |
| issn | 1052-7613 1099-0755 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03411047v1 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
| subjects | Biodiversity Biodiversity and Ecology Carcharhinus galapagensis Conservation Deployment Distance Environmental Sciences Epipelagic zone Euphotic zone Fish Fish conservation Fisheries Fisheries management Fishery management fishing pressure Global Changes Juveniles Marine fishes Marine parks Marine protected areas Motu Motiro Hiva Marine Park movement patterns MPA evaluation offshore islands Predators Protected areas Protected species Satellites Seriola lalandi Sharks Species top predators Variability Wildlife conservation Yellowtail |
| title | Residential movements of top predators in Chile’s most isolated marine protected area: Implications for the conservation of the Galapagos shark, Carcharhinus galapagensis, and the yellowtail amberjack, Seriola lalandi |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A36%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Residential%20movements%20of%20top%20predators%20in%20Chile%E2%80%99s%20most%20isolated%20marine%20protected%20area:%20Implications%20for%20the%20conservation%20of%20the%20Galapagos%20shark,%20Carcharhinus%20galapagensis,%20and%20the%20yellowtail%20amberjack,%20Seriola%20lalandi&rft.jtitle=Aquatic%20conservation&rft.au=Morales,%20Nait%C3%AD%20A.&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=340&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=340-355&rft.issn=1052-7613&rft.eissn=1099-0755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aqc.3472&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2493017839%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-d8719ed27410f46b9a5ae1e7f804a38b2ce51853499620afdd02c5ffeb0d574e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2493017839&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |