Macrophage polarization in vitro and in vivo modified by contact with fragmented chitosan hydrogel

We have previously shown that implantation of a fragmented chitosan hydrogel suspension (chitosan‐FPHS) into a traumatic spinal cord lesion in adult rats led to significant axon regrowth and functional recovery, which was associated to a modulation of inflammation. Using an in vitro culture system,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A 2022-04, Vol.110 (4), p.773-787
Main Authors: Boxberg, Ysander, Soares, Sylvia, Giraudon, Camille, David, Laurent, Viallon, Maud, Montembault, Alexandra, Nothias, Fatiha
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acetylation
acetylation degree
Animals
Biocompatible Materials
Biomaterials
Biomedical materials
Bone marrow
bone marrow macrophages
cell culture
Chitosan
Chitosan - pharmacology
chitosan hydrogel
Hydrogels
Hydrogels - pharmacology
Implantation
Inflammation
Life Sciences
Macrophage Activation
Macrophages
Polarization
Rats
Recovery of function
Regrowth
Spinal cord
spinal cord injury
Surgical implants
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We have previously shown that implantation of a fragmented chitosan hydrogel suspension (chitosan‐FPHS) into a traumatic spinal cord lesion in adult rats led to significant axon regrowth and functional recovery, which was associated to a modulation of inflammation. Using an in vitro culture system, we show here that polarization of bone marrow‐derived macrophages is indeed modified by direct contact with chitosan‐FPHS. Reducing the degree of acetylation (DA) and raising the concentration of chitosan (Cp, from 1.5% to 3%), favors macrophage polarization toward anti‐inflammatory subtypes. These latter also migrate and adhere efficiently on low, but not high DA chitosan‐FPHS, both in vitro and in vivo, while inflammatory macrophages rarely invade a chitosan‐FPHS implant in vivo, no matter the DA. Our in vitro model setup should prove a valuable tool for screening diverse biomaterial formulations and combinations thereof for their inflammatory potential prior to implantation in vivo. Impact of the chitosan‐FPHS substrate on macrophage polarization markers. (a) preparation of Chitosan‐FPHS substrate; (b) macrophage polarization marker expression in relation to chitosan concentration (Cp) and acetylation degree (DA); (c) invasion of M1 (red) and M2 (green) macrophages into a spinal cord lesion site implanted with high or low DA chitosan‐FPHS.
ISSN:1549-3296
1552-4965
DOI:10.1002/jbm.a.37326