Small-scale patches of detritus as habitat for invertebrates within a Zostera noltei meadow

• Published in: Marine environmental research 2021-10, Vol.171, p.105474-105474, Article 105474
• Main Authors: Costa, Valentina, Chemello, Renato, Iaciofano, Davide, Lo Brutto, Sabrina, Rossi, Francesca
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aquatic plants; Artificial substrata; Beach-cast; Biodiversity; Biodiversity and Ecology; Coastal lagoons; Colonization; Complexity; Crustaceans; Detritus; Environment and Society; Environmental Engineering; Environmental Sciences; Epifauna; Food; Food availability; Foods; Global Changes; Habitat structure; Habitats; Invertebrates; Lagoons; Leaf litter; Life Sciences; Macrofauna; Meadows; Mesograzers; Peracarids; Polychaetes; Sea grasses; Substrates; Systematics, Phylogenetics and taxonomy; Transitional system; Wrack; Zostera noltei
• ISSN: 0141-1136; 1879-0291
• DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2021.105474

Seagrass detritus can attract numerous invertebrates as it provides food and substrate within the meadow or in adjacent environments. Nonetheless, several factors could modify the invertebrate response to this habitat. In this study, we tested if epifaunal colonisation of Zostera noltei detritus was related to substrate availability rather than food and whether colonising assemblages were similar according to the meadow structural complexity. Litterbags filled with natural or artificial detritus were deployed within an eelgrass meadow in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon (Thau lagoon, France). Colonisation appeared to be driven by the presence of detritus, with similar assemblages in natural and artificial substrate, but with more individuals than the empty bags, used as controls. There were also no differences according to habitat complexity. These findings show that detritus, acting as a faunal magnet, plays an important role in maintaining biodiversity, as epifauna is a critical trophic link between primary producers and consumers. •The paper studies the colonisation of natural vs. artificial eelgrass detritus.•Macrofaunal assemblages colonising seagrass shoots are measured.•Empty litterbags are used to test for their attractiveness.•Macrofaunal assemblages of natural and artificial detritus show no differences.•Habitat structural complexity shows no effects on the colonisation of the detritus.