Do implant-supported prostheses affect bioavailability of nutrients of complete and partially edentulous patients? A systematic review with meta-analysis

• Published in: Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Scotland), 2021-05, Vol.40 (5), p.3235-3249
• Main Authors: Bezerra, Adriana Pinto, Gama, Lorena Tavares, Pereira, Luciano José, van der Bilt, Andries, Peyron, Marie-Agnès, Rodrigues Garcia, Renata Cunha Matheus, Gonçalves, Thais Marques Simek Vega
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Dental implant; Food and Nutrition; Life Sciences; Mastication; Nutrition; Overdenture; Systematic review
• ISSN: 0261-5614; 1532-1983
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.02.018

Debate still exists about the impact of dental implant-supported prostheses on nutritional status of partially and complete edentulous patients. This review aims to answer the focused question: “Do complete and partial edentulous patients, using implant-supported prostheses, present better nutritional and masticatory functions when compared to those using conventional rehabilitations?”. A possible cause–effect relationship between masticatory improvements and nutritional gain was also evaluated. Literature search included 6 databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, LILACS, Scopus, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library - CENTRAL), grey literature (Google Scholar, Proquest Dissertations and Thesis and Open Grey databases) and manual search (last update June 2020), without language, publication time and follow-up restrictions. We included only studies evaluating both masticatory and nutritional outcomes. The PICO question comprised complete and partial edentulous patients (Population), submitted to implant-supported prostheses (Intervention), in comparison to conventional dental prosthetic rehabilitation, evaluating masticatory function and nutrition parameters (outcomes). Risk of bias was assessed by using Cochrane Collaboration's tool (randomized clinical trials), Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist (paired clinical trials), and Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument” (JBI - MAStARI) critical appraisal tools (cohort studies). All meta-analyses were conducted at 5% level of significance. This report followed the PRISMA guidelines. (Review registration PROSPERO - CRD42019135744). We identified 1199 articles while searching databases. Fourteen articles met eligibility criteria, including 817 prostheses installed in 660 patients (mean age = 66.8 years-old). Patients wearing implant overdentures (IOD) presented better masticatory function in comparison to conventional complete denture (CD) wearers (p