Loading…

A mixed strain rate and energy based fatigue criterion for short fiber reinforced thermoplastics

•A large fatigue data base was produced to fully address orientation and loading ratio effects.•The evolution of a wide number of mechanical quantities was monitored.•A strain rate fatigue criteria is proposed for uniaxial and positive loading ratio fatigue tests.•This criteria is able to unify all...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of fatigue 2019-10, Vol.127, p.131-143
Main Authors: Raphael, I., Saintier, N., Rolland, H., Robert, G., Laiarinandrasana, L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•A large fatigue data base was produced to fully address orientation and loading ratio effects.•The evolution of a wide number of mechanical quantities was monitored.•A strain rate fatigue criteria is proposed for uniaxial and positive loading ratio fatigue tests.•This criteria is able to unify all the fatigue data with a single mechanical parameter.•In order to consider negative loading ratio tests an additional strain energy parameter is used.•The efficiency of the proposed criteria is unique considering the few number of parameters. Multiple parameters influence the durability of reinforced thermoplastics under fatigue loading. Having models unifying as many of these parameters, while providing an accurate estimation of the fatigue lifetime, is thus key. This investigation on the evolution of multiple mechanical parameters under cyclic loading, and based on a large experimental database (more than 200 uniaxial fatigue tests over a wide range of load ratios), two cyclic strain-rate based criteria are proposed. The second is more elaborated, introducing anelastic energy, to better account for mean stress effect and unify fatigue life predictions within scatter bands of factor two.
ISSN:0142-1123
1879-3452
DOI:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.06.003