Contribution of a better maxillofacial phenotype in Silver–Russell syndrome to define a better orthodontics and surgical management

• Published in: Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2019-04, Vol.120 (2), p.110-115
• Main Authors: Vo Quang, S., Galliani, E., Eche, S., Tomat, C., Fauroux, B., Picard, A., Kadlub, N.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Dentistry; Humans; Life Sciences; Malocclusion; Maxilla-facial phenotype; Orthodontics; Phenotype; Retrognatia; Retrospective Studies; Silver-Russell Syndrome
• ISSN: 2468-7855; 2468-7855
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2018.10.011

Maxillofacial phenotype for SRS is incompletely described in literature. The aim of this study was to describe a maxillofacial phenotype for SRS, to determine a better treatment. A retrospective study was conducted including 37 patients with SRS. 24-control patients had been included and appareled. The subjective clinical examination included analyzes of SRS defined criteria. Frontal and lateral photographs had been reviewed, according to Farkas analysis; dental photographs had been examined for the deep-bite and the crowding severity. Radiologic cephalometric analysis had been reviewed. Maxillofacial examination showed protruding forehead (55%), anteverted ears (55%) and low-set ears (16%), small triangular face (48%); retrognatia (29%) and micrognathia (13%). SSR patients presented a lower forehead transverse growth, forehead height, and higher sagittal and transverse mandibular growth than control patients. Deep-bite was present in 21 patients of patient, and crowding in 17 patients. Cephalometric analysis showed 18 patients with the skeletal class II. We did not note a correlation between sleep apnea and retrognatia, neither between genetic anomalies and craniofacial phenotype. In this study, we showed new SRS characteristics: small forehead, small mandible, skeletal class II and a dental phenotype, leading to a specific maxillofacial and orthopedic management.