Loading…

Protein S100B as a reliable tool for early prognostication after cardiac arrest

Early and reliable prognostication after cardiac arrest (CA) remains crucial. We hypothesized that protein-S100B (PS100B) could predict more accurately outcome in the early phase of CA compared with other current biomarkers. This prospective single-center study included 330 adult comatose non-trauma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Resuscitation 2020-11, Vol.156, p.251-259
Main Authors: Deye, Nicolas, Nguyen, Philippe, Vodovar, Nicolas, Sadoune, Malha, Collet, Corinne, Voicu, Sebastian, Malissin, Isabelle, Gayat, Etienne, Samuel, Jeanne-Lise, Delcayre, Claude, Launay, Jean-Marie, Cohen-Solal, Alain, Mégarbane, Bruno, Mebazaa, Alexandre
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Early and reliable prognostication after cardiac arrest (CA) remains crucial. We hypothesized that protein-S100B (PS100B) could predict more accurately outcome in the early phase of CA compared with other current biomarkers. This prospective single-center study included 330 adult comatose non-traumatic successfully resuscitated CA patients, treated with targeted temperature management but not extra-corporeal life support. Lactate, pH, creatinine, NSE, and PS100B were sampled in ICU early after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) corresponding to admission (Adm). Serial measurements were also performed at H24 and H48. PS100B was the sole biomarker blinded to physicians. The median delay between ROSC and first PS100B sampling was 220 min. At admission, all biomarkers were significantly associated with good outcome (CPC1–2; 109 patients) at 3-month follow-up (P ≤ 0.001, except for NSE: P = 0.03). PS100B-Adm showed the best AUC of ROC curves for outcome prediction at 3-month (AUC 0.83 [95%-CI: 0.78−0.88]), compared with other biomarkers (P 
ISSN:0300-9572
1873-1570
DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.08.010