Loading…

The XXL Survey: XLV. Linking the ages of optically selected groups to their X-ray emission

Why are some galaxy groups pervaded by a hot X-ray emitting intracluster medium, whilst others have no detectable X-ray emission? Is the presence of hot gas a reliable indicator of dynamical maturity, and can some virialised groups contain little or none of it? What are the main differences between...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin) 2022-07, Vol.663, p.A2
Main Authors: Crossett, J. P., McGee, S. L., Ponman, T. J., Ramos-Ceja, M. E., Brown, M. J. I., Maughan, B. J., Robotham, A. S. G., Willis, J. P., Wood, C., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Brough, S., Driver, S. P., Holwerda, B. W., Hopkins, A. M., Loveday, J., Owers, M. S., Phillipps, S., Pierre, M., Pimbblet, K. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-9905319c46fd89ee131e3ce6417addaa82d77358ad01dacedcca65f1792b3bf13
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page A2
container_title Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)
container_volume 663
creator Crossett, J. P.
McGee, S. L.
Ponman, T. J.
Ramos-Ceja, M. E.
Brown, M. J. I.
Maughan, B. J.
Robotham, A. S. G.
Willis, J. P.
Wood, C.
Bland-Hawthorn, J.
Brough, S.
Driver, S. P.
Holwerda, B. W.
Hopkins, A. M.
Loveday, J.
Owers, M. S.
Phillipps, S.
Pierre, M.
Pimbblet, K. A.
description Why are some galaxy groups pervaded by a hot X-ray emitting intracluster medium, whilst others have no detectable X-ray emission? Is the presence of hot gas a reliable indicator of dynamical maturity, and can some virialised groups contain little or none of it? What are the main differences between samples of groups selected in the X-ray and optical bands? We address these questions by studying 232 optical spectroscopically selected groups from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey that overlap the XXL X-ray cluster survey. X-ray aperture flux measurements combined with GAMA group data provides the largest available sample of optical groups with detailed galaxy membership information and consistently measured X-ray fluxes and upper limits. A sample of 142 of these groups is divided into three subsets based on the relative strength of X-ray and optical emission, and we see a trend in galaxy properties between these subsets: X-ray overluminous groups contain a lower fraction of both blue and star forming galaxies compared with X-ray underluminous systems. X-ray overluminous groups also have a more dominant central galaxy, with a magnitude gap between first and second ranked galaxies on average 0.22 mag larger than in underluminous groups. Moreover, the central galaxy in overluminous groups lies closer to the luminosity-weighted centre of the group. We examine a number of other structural properties of our groups, such as axis ratio, velocity dispersion, and group crossing time, and find evidence of trends with X-ray emission in some of these properties despite the high stochastic noise arising from the limited number of group galaxies. We attribute the trends we see primarily to the evolutionary state of groups, with X-ray overluminous systems being more dynamically evolved than underluminous groups. The X-ray overluminous groups have had more time to develop a luminous intragroup medium, quench member galaxies, and build the mass of the central galaxy through mergers compared to underluminous groups. However, an interesting minority of X-ray underluminous groups have properties that suggest them to be dynamically mature. We find that the lack of hot gas in these systems cannot be accounted for by high star formation efficiency, suggesting that high gas entropy resulting from feedback is the likely cause of their weak X-ray emission.
doi_str_mv 10.1051/0004-6361/202142057
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03644377v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_03644377v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-9905319c46fd89ee131e3ce6417addaa82d77358ad01dacedcca65f1792b3bf13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j0tLQzEQhYMoeK36B9x06yJ2JpPHzbIUtcIFF22hu5DmQSuVSqKF_nu9VO5qOMN3DnyMPSA8ISicAIDkmjROBAiUApS5YA1KEhyM1JesGYhrdlPrx18U2FLD7pfbNF6vu_HipxzT6ZZdZb-v6e7_jtjq5Xk5m_Pu_fVtNu14EETf3FpQhDZInWNrU0LCRCFpicbH6H0rojGkWh8Bow8phuC1ymis2NAmI43Y43l36_fuq-w-fTm5g9-5-bRz_Q9IS0nGHHuWzmwoh1pLykMBwfX6rpdzvZwb9OkX5ltJ9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The XXL Survey: XLV. Linking the ages of optically selected groups to their X-ray emission</title><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><creator>Crossett, J. P. ; McGee, S. L. ; Ponman, T. J. ; Ramos-Ceja, M. E. ; Brown, M. J. I. ; Maughan, B. J. ; Robotham, A. S. G. ; Willis, J. P. ; Wood, C. ; Bland-Hawthorn, J. ; Brough, S. ; Driver, S. P. ; Holwerda, B. W. ; Hopkins, A. M. ; Loveday, J. ; Owers, M. S. ; Phillipps, S. ; Pierre, M. ; Pimbblet, K. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crossett, J. P. ; McGee, S. L. ; Ponman, T. J. ; Ramos-Ceja, M. E. ; Brown, M. J. I. ; Maughan, B. J. ; Robotham, A. S. G. ; Willis, J. P. ; Wood, C. ; Bland-Hawthorn, J. ; Brough, S. ; Driver, S. P. ; Holwerda, B. W. ; Hopkins, A. M. ; Loveday, J. ; Owers, M. S. ; Phillipps, S. ; Pierre, M. ; Pimbblet, K. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Why are some galaxy groups pervaded by a hot X-ray emitting intracluster medium, whilst others have no detectable X-ray emission? Is the presence of hot gas a reliable indicator of dynamical maturity, and can some virialised groups contain little or none of it? What are the main differences between samples of groups selected in the X-ray and optical bands? We address these questions by studying 232 optical spectroscopically selected groups from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey that overlap the XXL X-ray cluster survey. X-ray aperture flux measurements combined with GAMA group data provides the largest available sample of optical groups with detailed galaxy membership information and consistently measured X-ray fluxes and upper limits. A sample of 142 of these groups is divided into three subsets based on the relative strength of X-ray and optical emission, and we see a trend in galaxy properties between these subsets: X-ray overluminous groups contain a lower fraction of both blue and star forming galaxies compared with X-ray underluminous systems. X-ray overluminous groups also have a more dominant central galaxy, with a magnitude gap between first and second ranked galaxies on average 0.22 mag larger than in underluminous groups. Moreover, the central galaxy in overluminous groups lies closer to the luminosity-weighted centre of the group. We examine a number of other structural properties of our groups, such as axis ratio, velocity dispersion, and group crossing time, and find evidence of trends with X-ray emission in some of these properties despite the high stochastic noise arising from the limited number of group galaxies. We attribute the trends we see primarily to the evolutionary state of groups, with X-ray overluminous systems being more dynamically evolved than underluminous groups. The X-ray overluminous groups have had more time to develop a luminous intragroup medium, quench member galaxies, and build the mass of the central galaxy through mergers compared to underluminous groups. However, an interesting minority of X-ray underluminous groups have properties that suggest them to be dynamically mature. We find that the lack of hot gas in these systems cannot be accounted for by high star formation efficiency, suggesting that high gas entropy resulting from feedback is the likely cause of their weak X-ray emission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-6361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142057</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>EDP Sciences</publisher><subject>Astrophysics ; Physics</subject><ispartof>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2022-07, Vol.663, p.A2</ispartof><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-9905319c46fd89ee131e3ce6417addaa82d77358ad01dacedcca65f1792b3bf13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6097-2747 ; 0000-0002-2879-1663 ; 0000-0002-9810-1664 ; 0000-0002-9117-3251 ; 0000-0003-3255-3139 ; 0000-0002-1207-9137 ; 0000-0003-0791-9098 ; 0000-0001-6601-2176 ; 0000-0002-9796-1363 ; 0000-0002-3963-3919 ; 0000-0001-5290-8940 ; 0000-0002-3169-0126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03644377$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crossett, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGee, S. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponman, T. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Ceja, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, M. J. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maughan, B. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robotham, A. S. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willis, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bland-Hawthorn, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brough, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driver, S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holwerda, B. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loveday, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owers, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillipps, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierre, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimbblet, K. A.</creatorcontrib><title>The XXL Survey: XLV. Linking the ages of optically selected groups to their X-ray emission</title><title>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</title><description>Why are some galaxy groups pervaded by a hot X-ray emitting intracluster medium, whilst others have no detectable X-ray emission? Is the presence of hot gas a reliable indicator of dynamical maturity, and can some virialised groups contain little or none of it? What are the main differences between samples of groups selected in the X-ray and optical bands? We address these questions by studying 232 optical spectroscopically selected groups from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey that overlap the XXL X-ray cluster survey. X-ray aperture flux measurements combined with GAMA group data provides the largest available sample of optical groups with detailed galaxy membership information and consistently measured X-ray fluxes and upper limits. A sample of 142 of these groups is divided into three subsets based on the relative strength of X-ray and optical emission, and we see a trend in galaxy properties between these subsets: X-ray overluminous groups contain a lower fraction of both blue and star forming galaxies compared with X-ray underluminous systems. X-ray overluminous groups also have a more dominant central galaxy, with a magnitude gap between first and second ranked galaxies on average 0.22 mag larger than in underluminous groups. Moreover, the central galaxy in overluminous groups lies closer to the luminosity-weighted centre of the group. We examine a number of other structural properties of our groups, such as axis ratio, velocity dispersion, and group crossing time, and find evidence of trends with X-ray emission in some of these properties despite the high stochastic noise arising from the limited number of group galaxies. We attribute the trends we see primarily to the evolutionary state of groups, with X-ray overluminous systems being more dynamically evolved than underluminous groups. The X-ray overluminous groups have had more time to develop a luminous intragroup medium, quench member galaxies, and build the mass of the central galaxy through mergers compared to underluminous groups. However, an interesting minority of X-ray underluminous groups have properties that suggest them to be dynamically mature. We find that the lack of hot gas in these systems cannot be accounted for by high star formation efficiency, suggesting that high gas entropy resulting from feedback is the likely cause of their weak X-ray emission.</description><subject>Astrophysics</subject><subject>Physics</subject><issn>0004-6361</issn><issn>1432-0746</issn><issn>1432-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j0tLQzEQhYMoeK36B9x06yJ2JpPHzbIUtcIFF22hu5DmQSuVSqKF_nu9VO5qOMN3DnyMPSA8ISicAIDkmjROBAiUApS5YA1KEhyM1JesGYhrdlPrx18U2FLD7pfbNF6vu_HipxzT6ZZdZb-v6e7_jtjq5Xk5m_Pu_fVtNu14EETf3FpQhDZInWNrU0LCRCFpicbH6H0rojGkWh8Bow8phuC1ymis2NAmI43Y43l36_fuq-w-fTm5g9-5-bRz_Q9IS0nGHHuWzmwoh1pLykMBwfX6rpdzvZwb9OkX5ltJ9A</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Crossett, J. P.</creator><creator>McGee, S. L.</creator><creator>Ponman, T. J.</creator><creator>Ramos-Ceja, M. E.</creator><creator>Brown, M. J. I.</creator><creator>Maughan, B. J.</creator><creator>Robotham, A. S. G.</creator><creator>Willis, J. P.</creator><creator>Wood, C.</creator><creator>Bland-Hawthorn, J.</creator><creator>Brough, S.</creator><creator>Driver, S. P.</creator><creator>Holwerda, B. W.</creator><creator>Hopkins, A. M.</creator><creator>Loveday, J.</creator><creator>Owers, M. S.</creator><creator>Phillipps, S.</creator><creator>Pierre, M.</creator><creator>Pimbblet, K. A.</creator><general>EDP Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6097-2747</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2879-1663</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9810-1664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9117-3251</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3255-3139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1207-9137</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0791-9098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6601-2176</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9796-1363</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3963-3919</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5290-8940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3169-0126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>The XXL Survey</title><author>Crossett, J. P. ; McGee, S. L. ; Ponman, T. J. ; Ramos-Ceja, M. E. ; Brown, M. J. I. ; Maughan, B. J. ; Robotham, A. S. G. ; Willis, J. P. ; Wood, C. ; Bland-Hawthorn, J. ; Brough, S. ; Driver, S. P. ; Holwerda, B. W. ; Hopkins, A. M. ; Loveday, J. ; Owers, M. S. ; Phillipps, S. ; Pierre, M. ; Pimbblet, K. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-9905319c46fd89ee131e3ce6417addaa82d77358ad01dacedcca65f1792b3bf13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Astrophysics</topic><topic>Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crossett, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGee, S. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponman, T. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Ceja, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, M. J. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maughan, B. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robotham, A. S. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willis, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bland-Hawthorn, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brough, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driver, S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holwerda, B. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loveday, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owers, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillipps, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierre, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimbblet, K. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crossett, J. P.</au><au>McGee, S. L.</au><au>Ponman, T. J.</au><au>Ramos-Ceja, M. E.</au><au>Brown, M. J. I.</au><au>Maughan, B. J.</au><au>Robotham, A. S. G.</au><au>Willis, J. P.</au><au>Wood, C.</au><au>Bland-Hawthorn, J.</au><au>Brough, S.</au><au>Driver, S. P.</au><au>Holwerda, B. W.</au><au>Hopkins, A. M.</au><au>Loveday, J.</au><au>Owers, M. S.</au><au>Phillipps, S.</au><au>Pierre, M.</au><au>Pimbblet, K. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The XXL Survey: XLV. Linking the ages of optically selected groups to their X-ray emission</atitle><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>663</volume><spage>A2</spage><pages>A2-</pages><issn>0004-6361</issn><eissn>1432-0746</eissn><eissn>1432-0756</eissn><abstract>Why are some galaxy groups pervaded by a hot X-ray emitting intracluster medium, whilst others have no detectable X-ray emission? Is the presence of hot gas a reliable indicator of dynamical maturity, and can some virialised groups contain little or none of it? What are the main differences between samples of groups selected in the X-ray and optical bands? We address these questions by studying 232 optical spectroscopically selected groups from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey that overlap the XXL X-ray cluster survey. X-ray aperture flux measurements combined with GAMA group data provides the largest available sample of optical groups with detailed galaxy membership information and consistently measured X-ray fluxes and upper limits. A sample of 142 of these groups is divided into three subsets based on the relative strength of X-ray and optical emission, and we see a trend in galaxy properties between these subsets: X-ray overluminous groups contain a lower fraction of both blue and star forming galaxies compared with X-ray underluminous systems. X-ray overluminous groups also have a more dominant central galaxy, with a magnitude gap between first and second ranked galaxies on average 0.22 mag larger than in underluminous groups. Moreover, the central galaxy in overluminous groups lies closer to the luminosity-weighted centre of the group. We examine a number of other structural properties of our groups, such as axis ratio, velocity dispersion, and group crossing time, and find evidence of trends with X-ray emission in some of these properties despite the high stochastic noise arising from the limited number of group galaxies. We attribute the trends we see primarily to the evolutionary state of groups, with X-ray overluminous systems being more dynamically evolved than underluminous groups. The X-ray overluminous groups have had more time to develop a luminous intragroup medium, quench member galaxies, and build the mass of the central galaxy through mergers compared to underluminous groups. However, an interesting minority of X-ray underluminous groups have properties that suggest them to be dynamically mature. We find that the lack of hot gas in these systems cannot be accounted for by high star formation efficiency, suggesting that high gas entropy resulting from feedback is the likely cause of their weak X-ray emission.</abstract><pub>EDP Sciences</pub><doi>10.1051/0004-6361/202142057</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6097-2747</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2879-1663</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9810-1664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9117-3251</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3255-3139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1207-9137</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0791-9098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6601-2176</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9796-1363</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3963-3919</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5290-8940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3169-0126</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-6361
ispartof Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2022-07, Vol.663, p.A2
issn 0004-6361
1432-0746
1432-0756
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03644377v1
source EZB Free E-Journals
subjects Astrophysics
Physics
title The XXL Survey: XLV. Linking the ages of optically selected groups to their X-ray emission
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T17%3A52%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20XXL%20Survey:%20XLV.%20Linking%20the%20ages%20of%20optically%20selected%20groups%20to%20their%20X-ray%20emission&rft.jtitle=Astronomy%20and%20astrophysics%20(Berlin)&rft.au=Crossett,%20J.%20P.&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=663&rft.spage=A2&rft.pages=A2-&rft.issn=0004-6361&rft.eissn=1432-0746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/0004-6361/202142057&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_03644377v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-9905319c46fd89ee131e3ce6417addaa82d77358ad01dacedcca65f1792b3bf13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true