Loading…
Mycoplasma genitalium screening in a specialized French unit: A retrospective study
Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) infection accounts for 10–35% of non-gonococcal non-chlamydial (NGNC) urethritis. However, given that most people infected with MG do not develop symptoms and that antimicrobial resistance is increasing worldwide, there is no evidence of any benefits of screening asymptoma...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annales de dermatologie et de vénéréologie 2022-09, Vol.149 (3), p.165-168 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-893e1b3eedfc548151cf64d288b0097c2fefd3690813e3da206be9b0c19720693 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-893e1b3eedfc548151cf64d288b0097c2fefd3690813e3da206be9b0c19720693 |
container_end_page | 168 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 165 |
container_title | Annales de dermatologie et de vénéréologie |
container_volume | 149 |
creator | Herms, F. Poizeau, F. Anyfantakis, V. Bonhomme, P. Chaine-Sidibé, B. Louison, J.-B. Berçot, B. Bagot, M. Fouéré, S. |
description | Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) infection accounts for 10–35% of non-gonococcal non-chlamydial (NGNC) urethritis. However, given that most people infected with MG do not develop symptoms and that antimicrobial resistance is increasing worldwide, there is no evidence of any benefits of screening asymptomatic individuals. We conducted this study to describe MG screening practices and outcomes at a French Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) center in which MG testing was performed selectively and multiplex assays were not carried out [i.e., simultaneous screening for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and MG].
A retrospective, observational, single-center study was conducted at the STI unit of Saint-Louis Hospital in Paris. The records of all patients undergoing MG testing from January 1st, 2017, to December 31st, 2018, were reviewed. The primary aim of the study was to describe and evaluate the proportion of MG-positive (MG+) patients among those tested. Secondary objectives were determination of the prevalence of MG+ status among symptomatic patients, risk factors associated with MG infection, and therapeutic modalities and efficacy.
Two hundred and forty-nine patients underwent MG testing, 28 (11%) of whom were positive (MG+). The prevalence of MG+ status among symptomatic NGNC patients was 12%. HIV-positive (HIV+) status was significantly associated with MG+ status in univariate and multivariate analyses (Odds Ratio=7.3, 95% Confidence Interval 1.3-41.7; P=0.02). Twenty-three patients (85%) received antibiotics. Eighteen (67%) received azithromycin for 5 days, but 7 had clinical resistance. No quinolone resistance was reported.
Despite unavailability of multiplex testing at our facility, which led to targeted-only screening for MG, its relatively high local prevalence is in keeping with what is generally observed at similar facilities across the world, where use of multiplex tests enables systematic screening for MG alongside NG and CT. This reinforces the current recommendations in Europe, France and the US against systematic MG testing or treatment in asymptomatic patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.annder.2021.08.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03716698v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0151963821000879</els_id><sourcerecordid>2675603742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-893e1b3eedfc548151cf64d288b0097c2fefd3690813e3da206be9b0c19720693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtv1DAQgH0AtaXlHyDkIxw2jOPEa3NAWlX0IS3iAJwtx560XuWx2MlKy6_vrNL2yMn2zDcPf4x9EFAIEOrLrnDDEDAVJZSiAF0AVG_YBYharIyS-py9y3kHIEot6zN2LmtloNJwwX79OPpx37ncO_6AQ5xcF-eeZ5-QXsMDjwN3PO_RR8r8w8BvEg7-kc_EfuUbnnBK4yk_xQPyPM3heMXetq7L-P75vGR_br7_vr5bbX_e3l9vtisvjZpW2kgUjUQMra8rTbv6VlWh1LoBMGtfttgGSYtqIVEGV4Jq0DTghVnT3chL9nnp--g6u0-xd-loRxft3WZrTzGQa6GU0QdB7KeF3afx74x5sn3MHrvODTjO2ZZqXSviq5LQakE9fSwnbF97C7An3XZnF932pNuCtqSbyj4-T5ibHsNr0YtrAr4tAJKTQ6Ty7CO5xBAT6bNhjP-f8AQV95Qu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2675603742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mycoplasma genitalium screening in a specialized French unit: A retrospective study</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Herms, F. ; Poizeau, F. ; Anyfantakis, V. ; Bonhomme, P. ; Chaine-Sidibé, B. ; Louison, J.-B. ; Berçot, B. ; Bagot, M. ; Fouéré, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Herms, F. ; Poizeau, F. ; Anyfantakis, V. ; Bonhomme, P. ; Chaine-Sidibé, B. ; Louison, J.-B. ; Berçot, B. ; Bagot, M. ; Fouéré, S. ; Groupe infectiologie dermatologique et infections sexuellement transmissibles (GrIDIST) de la Société française de dermatologie (SFD)</creatorcontrib><description>Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) infection accounts for 10–35% of non-gonococcal non-chlamydial (NGNC) urethritis. However, given that most people infected with MG do not develop symptoms and that antimicrobial resistance is increasing worldwide, there is no evidence of any benefits of screening asymptomatic individuals. We conducted this study to describe MG screening practices and outcomes at a French Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) center in which MG testing was performed selectively and multiplex assays were not carried out [i.e., simultaneous screening for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and MG].
A retrospective, observational, single-center study was conducted at the STI unit of Saint-Louis Hospital in Paris. The records of all patients undergoing MG testing from January 1st, 2017, to December 31st, 2018, were reviewed. The primary aim of the study was to describe and evaluate the proportion of MG-positive (MG+) patients among those tested. Secondary objectives were determination of the prevalence of MG+ status among symptomatic patients, risk factors associated with MG infection, and therapeutic modalities and efficacy.
Two hundred and forty-nine patients underwent MG testing, 28 (11%) of whom were positive (MG+). The prevalence of MG+ status among symptomatic NGNC patients was 12%. HIV-positive (HIV+) status was significantly associated with MG+ status in univariate and multivariate analyses (Odds Ratio=7.3, 95% Confidence Interval 1.3-41.7; P=0.02). Twenty-three patients (85%) received antibiotics. Eighteen (67%) received azithromycin for 5 days, but 7 had clinical resistance. No quinolone resistance was reported.
Despite unavailability of multiplex testing at our facility, which led to targeted-only screening for MG, its relatively high local prevalence is in keeping with what is generally observed at similar facilities across the world, where use of multiplex tests enables systematic screening for MG alongside NG and CT. This reinforces the current recommendations in Europe, France and the US against systematic MG testing or treatment in asymptomatic patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0151-9638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2021.08.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35690480</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Chlamydia trachomatis ; Drug resistance ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Mycoplasma genitalium ; Mycoplasma Infections - diagnosis ; Mycoplasma Infections - drug therapy ; Mycoplasma Infections - epidemiology ; Neisseria gonorrhoeae ; Prevalence ; Retrospective Studies ; Sexual health ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - complications ; Urethritis ; Urethritis - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Annales de dermatologie et de vénéréologie, 2022-09, Vol.149 (3), p.165-168</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-893e1b3eedfc548151cf64d288b0097c2fefd3690813e3da206be9b0c19720693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-893e1b3eedfc548151cf64d288b0097c2fefd3690813e3da206be9b0c19720693</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1603-3635 ; 0000-0002-0754-361X ; 0000-0002-1631-5192</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35690480$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03716698$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herms, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poizeau, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anyfantakis, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonhomme, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaine-Sidibé, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louison, J.-B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berçot, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagot, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fouéré, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groupe infectiologie dermatologique et infections sexuellement transmissibles (GrIDIST) de la Société française de dermatologie (SFD)</creatorcontrib><title>Mycoplasma genitalium screening in a specialized French unit: A retrospective study</title><title>Annales de dermatologie et de vénéréologie</title><addtitle>Ann Dermatol Venereol</addtitle><description>Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) infection accounts for 10–35% of non-gonococcal non-chlamydial (NGNC) urethritis. However, given that most people infected with MG do not develop symptoms and that antimicrobial resistance is increasing worldwide, there is no evidence of any benefits of screening asymptomatic individuals. We conducted this study to describe MG screening practices and outcomes at a French Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) center in which MG testing was performed selectively and multiplex assays were not carried out [i.e., simultaneous screening for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and MG].
A retrospective, observational, single-center study was conducted at the STI unit of Saint-Louis Hospital in Paris. The records of all patients undergoing MG testing from January 1st, 2017, to December 31st, 2018, were reviewed. The primary aim of the study was to describe and evaluate the proportion of MG-positive (MG+) patients among those tested. Secondary objectives were determination of the prevalence of MG+ status among symptomatic patients, risk factors associated with MG infection, and therapeutic modalities and efficacy.
Two hundred and forty-nine patients underwent MG testing, 28 (11%) of whom were positive (MG+). The prevalence of MG+ status among symptomatic NGNC patients was 12%. HIV-positive (HIV+) status was significantly associated with MG+ status in univariate and multivariate analyses (Odds Ratio=7.3, 95% Confidence Interval 1.3-41.7; P=0.02). Twenty-three patients (85%) received antibiotics. Eighteen (67%) received azithromycin for 5 days, but 7 had clinical resistance. No quinolone resistance was reported.
Despite unavailability of multiplex testing at our facility, which led to targeted-only screening for MG, its relatively high local prevalence is in keeping with what is generally observed at similar facilities across the world, where use of multiplex tests enables systematic screening for MG alongside NG and CT. This reinforces the current recommendations in Europe, France and the US against systematic MG testing or treatment in asymptomatic patients.</description><subject>Chlamydia trachomatis</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mycoplasma genitalium</subject><subject>Mycoplasma Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Mycoplasma Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Mycoplasma Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sexual health</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Urethritis</subject><subject>Urethritis - diagnosis</subject><issn>0151-9638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtv1DAQgH0AtaXlHyDkIxw2jOPEa3NAWlX0IS3iAJwtx560XuWx2MlKy6_vrNL2yMn2zDcPf4x9EFAIEOrLrnDDEDAVJZSiAF0AVG_YBYharIyS-py9y3kHIEot6zN2LmtloNJwwX79OPpx37ncO_6AQ5xcF-eeZ5-QXsMDjwN3PO_RR8r8w8BvEg7-kc_EfuUbnnBK4yk_xQPyPM3heMXetq7L-P75vGR_br7_vr5bbX_e3l9vtisvjZpW2kgUjUQMra8rTbv6VlWh1LoBMGtfttgGSYtqIVEGV4Jq0DTghVnT3chL9nnp--g6u0-xd-loRxft3WZrTzGQa6GU0QdB7KeF3afx74x5sn3MHrvODTjO2ZZqXSviq5LQakE9fSwnbF97C7An3XZnF932pNuCtqSbyj4-T5ibHsNr0YtrAr4tAJKTQ6Ty7CO5xBAT6bNhjP-f8AQV95Qu</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Herms, F.</creator><creator>Poizeau, F.</creator><creator>Anyfantakis, V.</creator><creator>Bonhomme, P.</creator><creator>Chaine-Sidibé, B.</creator><creator>Louison, J.-B.</creator><creator>Berçot, B.</creator><creator>Bagot, M.</creator><creator>Fouéré, S.</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><general>Elsevier Masson</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1603-3635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0754-361X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1631-5192</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Mycoplasma genitalium screening in a specialized French unit: A retrospective study</title><author>Herms, F. ; Poizeau, F. ; Anyfantakis, V. ; Bonhomme, P. ; Chaine-Sidibé, B. ; Louison, J.-B. ; Berçot, B. ; Bagot, M. ; Fouéré, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-893e1b3eedfc548151cf64d288b0097c2fefd3690813e3da206be9b0c19720693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Chlamydia trachomatis</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mycoplasma genitalium</topic><topic>Mycoplasma Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Mycoplasma Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Mycoplasma Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sexual health</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Urethritis</topic><topic>Urethritis - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herms, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poizeau, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anyfantakis, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonhomme, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaine-Sidibé, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louison, J.-B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berçot, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagot, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fouéré, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groupe infectiologie dermatologique et infections sexuellement transmissibles (GrIDIST) de la Société française de dermatologie (SFD)</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Annales de dermatologie et de vénéréologie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herms, F.</au><au>Poizeau, F.</au><au>Anyfantakis, V.</au><au>Bonhomme, P.</au><au>Chaine-Sidibé, B.</au><au>Louison, J.-B.</au><au>Berçot, B.</au><au>Bagot, M.</au><au>Fouéré, S.</au><aucorp>Groupe infectiologie dermatologique et infections sexuellement transmissibles (GrIDIST) de la Société française de dermatologie (SFD)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mycoplasma genitalium screening in a specialized French unit: A retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>Annales de dermatologie et de vénéréologie</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Dermatol Venereol</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>165-168</pages><issn>0151-9638</issn><abstract>Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) infection accounts for 10–35% of non-gonococcal non-chlamydial (NGNC) urethritis. However, given that most people infected with MG do not develop symptoms and that antimicrobial resistance is increasing worldwide, there is no evidence of any benefits of screening asymptomatic individuals. We conducted this study to describe MG screening practices and outcomes at a French Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) center in which MG testing was performed selectively and multiplex assays were not carried out [i.e., simultaneous screening for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and MG].
A retrospective, observational, single-center study was conducted at the STI unit of Saint-Louis Hospital in Paris. The records of all patients undergoing MG testing from January 1st, 2017, to December 31st, 2018, were reviewed. The primary aim of the study was to describe and evaluate the proportion of MG-positive (MG+) patients among those tested. Secondary objectives were determination of the prevalence of MG+ status among symptomatic patients, risk factors associated with MG infection, and therapeutic modalities and efficacy.
Two hundred and forty-nine patients underwent MG testing, 28 (11%) of whom were positive (MG+). The prevalence of MG+ status among symptomatic NGNC patients was 12%. HIV-positive (HIV+) status was significantly associated with MG+ status in univariate and multivariate analyses (Odds Ratio=7.3, 95% Confidence Interval 1.3-41.7; P=0.02). Twenty-three patients (85%) received antibiotics. Eighteen (67%) received azithromycin for 5 days, but 7 had clinical resistance. No quinolone resistance was reported.
Despite unavailability of multiplex testing at our facility, which led to targeted-only screening for MG, its relatively high local prevalence is in keeping with what is generally observed at similar facilities across the world, where use of multiplex tests enables systematic screening for MG alongside NG and CT. This reinforces the current recommendations in Europe, France and the US against systematic MG testing or treatment in asymptomatic patients.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>35690480</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.annder.2021.08.004</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1603-3635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0754-361X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1631-5192</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0151-9638 |
ispartof | Annales de dermatologie et de vénéréologie, 2022-09, Vol.149 (3), p.165-168 |
issn | 0151-9638 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03716698v1 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Chlamydia trachomatis Drug resistance Humans Life Sciences Mycoplasma genitalium Mycoplasma Infections - diagnosis Mycoplasma Infections - drug therapy Mycoplasma Infections - epidemiology Neisseria gonorrhoeae Prevalence Retrospective Studies Sexual health Sexually Transmitted Diseases - complications Urethritis Urethritis - diagnosis |
title | Mycoplasma genitalium screening in a specialized French unit: A retrospective study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A47%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mycoplasma%20genitalium%20screening%20in%20a%20specialized%20French%20unit:%20A%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Annales%20de%20dermatologie%20et%20de%20v%C3%A9n%C3%A9r%C3%A9ologie&rft.au=Herms,%20F.&rft.aucorp=Groupe%20infectiologie%20dermatologique%20et%20infections%20sexuellement%20transmissibles%20(GrIDIST)%20de%20la%20Soci%C3%A9t%C3%A9%20fran%C3%A7aise%20de%20dermatologie%20(SFD)&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=165-168&rft.issn=0151-9638&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.annder.2021.08.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2675603742%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-893e1b3eedfc548151cf64d288b0097c2fefd3690813e3da206be9b0c19720693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2675603742&rft_id=info:pmid/35690480&rfr_iscdi=true |