Loading…

Current clinical practice in antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: results from a survey in five European countries

Abstract Objectives To determine clinical practice variation and identify knowledge gaps in antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB). Methods A web-based survey with questions addressing antibiotic treatment of SAB was distributed through the ESGAP network among infectious dis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2022-09, Vol.77 (10), p.2827-2834
Main Authors: Buis, D T P, Prins, J M, Betica-Radic, L, de Boer, M G J, Ekkelenkamp, M, Kofteridis, D, Peiffer-Smadja, N, Schouten, J, Spernovasilis, N, Tattevin, P, ten Oever, J, Sigaloff, K C E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-aa7fce5d0964676bbea3874299f9ff3896f53aa414264c201e5b2a434c973e653
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-aa7fce5d0964676bbea3874299f9ff3896f53aa414264c201e5b2a434c973e653
container_end_page 2834
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2827
container_title Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
container_volume 77
creator Buis, D T P
Prins, J M
Betica-Radic, L
de Boer, M G J
Ekkelenkamp, M
Kofteridis, D
Peiffer-Smadja, N
Schouten, J
Spernovasilis, N
Tattevin, P
ten Oever, J
Sigaloff, K C E
description Abstract Objectives To determine clinical practice variation and identify knowledge gaps in antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB). Methods A web-based survey with questions addressing antibiotic treatment of SAB was distributed through the ESGAP network among infectious disease specialists, clinical microbiologists and internists in Croatia, France, Greece, the Netherlands and the UK between July 2021 and November 2021. Results A total number of 1687 respondents opened the survey link, of whom 677 (40%) answered at least one question. For MSSA and MRSA bacteraemia, 98% and 94% preferred initial monotherapy, respectively. In patients with SAB and non-removable infected prosthetic material, between 80% and 90% would use rifampicin as part of the treatment. For bone and joint infections, 65%–77% of respondents would consider oral step-down therapy, but for endovascular infections only 12%–32% would. Respondents recommended widely varying treatment durations for SAB with different foci of infection. Overall, 48% stated they used 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (18F-FDG-PET/CT) to guide antibiotic treatment duration. Persistent bacteraemia was the only risk factor for complicated SAB that would prompt a majority to extend treatment from 2 to 4–6 weeks. Conclusions This survey in five European countries shows considerable clinical practice variation between and within countries in the antibiotic management of SAB, in particular regarding oral step-down therapy, choice of oral antibiotic agents, treatment duration and use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Physicians use varying criteria for treatment decisions, as evidence from clinical trials is often lacking. These areas of practice variation could be used to prioritize future studies for further improvement of SAB care.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jac/dkac237
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03777270v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jac/dkac237</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2693781613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-aa7fce5d0964676bbea3874299f9ff3896f53aa414264c201e5b2a434c973e653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQQC0EotvCiTvyCYFQWjtO7JhbtWpppZV6AM7WxDtWXZI4-GOl_Qf8bLLapceeRjN68y6PkA-cXXKmxdUT2Kvtb7C1UK_IijeSVTXT_DVZMcHaSjWtOCPnKT0xxmQru7fkTLSd1KoVK_J3XWLEKVM7-MlbGOgcwWZvkfqJwpR978Oy0hwR8nggg6M_MsyP-yHYYG1JFErEZfTLI0bA0cM3GjGVISfqYhgp0FTiDvcHp_M7pDclhhlhojaUKUeP6R1542BI-P40L8iv25uf67tq8_D9fn29qazQPFcAyllst0zLRirZ9wiiU02ttdPOiU5L1wqAhje1bGzNOLZ9DY1orFYCZSsuyJej9xEGM0c_QtybAN7cXW_M4caEUqpWbMcX9vORnWP4UzBlM_pkcRhgwlCSqaUWquOSiwX9ekRtDClFdM9uzswhk1kymVOmhf54Epd-xO0z-7_LAnw6AqHML5r-ASSgnco</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2693781613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current clinical practice in antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: results from a survey in five European countries</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Buis, D T P ; Prins, J M ; Betica-Radic, L ; de Boer, M G J ; Ekkelenkamp, M ; Kofteridis, D ; Peiffer-Smadja, N ; Schouten, J ; Spernovasilis, N ; Tattevin, P ; ten Oever, J ; Sigaloff, K C E</creator><creatorcontrib>Buis, D T P ; Prins, J M ; Betica-Radic, L ; de Boer, M G J ; Ekkelenkamp, M ; Kofteridis, D ; Peiffer-Smadja, N ; Schouten, J ; Spernovasilis, N ; Tattevin, P ; ten Oever, J ; Sigaloff, K C E</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives To determine clinical practice variation and identify knowledge gaps in antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB). Methods A web-based survey with questions addressing antibiotic treatment of SAB was distributed through the ESGAP network among infectious disease specialists, clinical microbiologists and internists in Croatia, France, Greece, the Netherlands and the UK between July 2021 and November 2021. Results A total number of 1687 respondents opened the survey link, of whom 677 (40%) answered at least one question. For MSSA and MRSA bacteraemia, 98% and 94% preferred initial monotherapy, respectively. In patients with SAB and non-removable infected prosthetic material, between 80% and 90% would use rifampicin as part of the treatment. For bone and joint infections, 65%–77% of respondents would consider oral step-down therapy, but for endovascular infections only 12%–32% would. Respondents recommended widely varying treatment durations for SAB with different foci of infection. Overall, 48% stated they used 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (18F-FDG-PET/CT) to guide antibiotic treatment duration. Persistent bacteraemia was the only risk factor for complicated SAB that would prompt a majority to extend treatment from 2 to 4–6 weeks. Conclusions This survey in five European countries shows considerable clinical practice variation between and within countries in the antibiotic management of SAB, in particular regarding oral step-down therapy, choice of oral antibiotic agents, treatment duration and use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Physicians use varying criteria for treatment decisions, as evidence from clinical trials is often lacking. These areas of practice variation could be used to prioritize future studies for further improvement of SAB care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac237</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35869753</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Bacteremia - complications ; Bacteremia - drug therapy ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Microbiology and Parasitology ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography ; Rifampin - therapeutic use ; Staphylococcal Infections - complications ; Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2022-09, Vol.77 (10), p.2827-2834</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-aa7fce5d0964676bbea3874299f9ff3896f53aa414264c201e5b2a434c973e653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-aa7fce5d0964676bbea3874299f9ff3896f53aa414264c201e5b2a434c973e653</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2397-0125 ; 0000-0003-3617-5411</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35869753$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03777270$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buis, D T P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prins, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betica-Radic, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Boer, M G J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekkelenkamp, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kofteridis, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peiffer-Smadja, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schouten, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spernovasilis, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tattevin, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Oever, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigaloff, K C E</creatorcontrib><title>Current clinical practice in antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: results from a survey in five European countries</title><title>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</title><addtitle>J Antimicrob Chemother</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives To determine clinical practice variation and identify knowledge gaps in antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB). Methods A web-based survey with questions addressing antibiotic treatment of SAB was distributed through the ESGAP network among infectious disease specialists, clinical microbiologists and internists in Croatia, France, Greece, the Netherlands and the UK between July 2021 and November 2021. Results A total number of 1687 respondents opened the survey link, of whom 677 (40%) answered at least one question. For MSSA and MRSA bacteraemia, 98% and 94% preferred initial monotherapy, respectively. In patients with SAB and non-removable infected prosthetic material, between 80% and 90% would use rifampicin as part of the treatment. For bone and joint infections, 65%–77% of respondents would consider oral step-down therapy, but for endovascular infections only 12%–32% would. Respondents recommended widely varying treatment durations for SAB with different foci of infection. Overall, 48% stated they used 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (18F-FDG-PET/CT) to guide antibiotic treatment duration. Persistent bacteraemia was the only risk factor for complicated SAB that would prompt a majority to extend treatment from 2 to 4–6 weeks. Conclusions This survey in five European countries shows considerable clinical practice variation between and within countries in the antibiotic management of SAB, in particular regarding oral step-down therapy, choice of oral antibiotic agents, treatment duration and use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Physicians use varying criteria for treatment decisions, as evidence from clinical trials is often lacking. These areas of practice variation could be used to prioritize future studies for further improvement of SAB care.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bacteremia - complications</subject><subject>Bacteremia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microbiology and Parasitology</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Rifampin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - complications</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0305-7453</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQQC0EotvCiTvyCYFQWjtO7JhbtWpppZV6AM7WxDtWXZI4-GOl_Qf8bLLapceeRjN68y6PkA-cXXKmxdUT2Kvtb7C1UK_IijeSVTXT_DVZMcHaSjWtOCPnKT0xxmQru7fkTLSd1KoVK_J3XWLEKVM7-MlbGOgcwWZvkfqJwpR978Oy0hwR8nggg6M_MsyP-yHYYG1JFErEZfTLI0bA0cM3GjGVISfqYhgp0FTiDvcHp_M7pDclhhlhojaUKUeP6R1542BI-P40L8iv25uf67tq8_D9fn29qazQPFcAyllst0zLRirZ9wiiU02ttdPOiU5L1wqAhje1bGzNOLZ9DY1orFYCZSsuyJej9xEGM0c_QtybAN7cXW_M4caEUqpWbMcX9vORnWP4UzBlM_pkcRhgwlCSqaUWquOSiwX9ekRtDClFdM9uzswhk1kymVOmhf54Epd-xO0z-7_LAnw6AqHML5r-ASSgnco</recordid><startdate>20220930</startdate><enddate>20220930</enddate><creator>Buis, D T P</creator><creator>Prins, J M</creator><creator>Betica-Radic, L</creator><creator>de Boer, M G J</creator><creator>Ekkelenkamp, M</creator><creator>Kofteridis, D</creator><creator>Peiffer-Smadja, N</creator><creator>Schouten, J</creator><creator>Spernovasilis, N</creator><creator>Tattevin, P</creator><creator>ten Oever, J</creator><creator>Sigaloff, K C E</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford University Press (OUP)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2397-0125</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3617-5411</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220930</creationdate><title>Current clinical practice in antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: results from a survey in five European countries</title><author>Buis, D T P ; Prins, J M ; Betica-Radic, L ; de Boer, M G J ; Ekkelenkamp, M ; Kofteridis, D ; Peiffer-Smadja, N ; Schouten, J ; Spernovasilis, N ; Tattevin, P ; ten Oever, J ; Sigaloff, K C E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-aa7fce5d0964676bbea3874299f9ff3896f53aa414264c201e5b2a434c973e653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bacteremia - complications</topic><topic>Bacteremia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microbiology and Parasitology</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Rifampin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - complications</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buis, D T P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prins, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betica-Radic, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Boer, M G J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekkelenkamp, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kofteridis, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peiffer-Smadja, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schouten, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spernovasilis, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tattevin, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Oever, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigaloff, K C E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buis, D T P</au><au>Prins, J M</au><au>Betica-Radic, L</au><au>de Boer, M G J</au><au>Ekkelenkamp, M</au><au>Kofteridis, D</au><au>Peiffer-Smadja, N</au><au>Schouten, J</au><au>Spernovasilis, N</au><au>Tattevin, P</au><au>ten Oever, J</au><au>Sigaloff, K C E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current clinical practice in antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: results from a survey in five European countries</atitle><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Antimicrob Chemother</addtitle><date>2022-09-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2827</spage><epage>2834</epage><pages>2827-2834</pages><issn>0305-7453</issn><eissn>1460-2091</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives To determine clinical practice variation and identify knowledge gaps in antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB). Methods A web-based survey with questions addressing antibiotic treatment of SAB was distributed through the ESGAP network among infectious disease specialists, clinical microbiologists and internists in Croatia, France, Greece, the Netherlands and the UK between July 2021 and November 2021. Results A total number of 1687 respondents opened the survey link, of whom 677 (40%) answered at least one question. For MSSA and MRSA bacteraemia, 98% and 94% preferred initial monotherapy, respectively. In patients with SAB and non-removable infected prosthetic material, between 80% and 90% would use rifampicin as part of the treatment. For bone and joint infections, 65%–77% of respondents would consider oral step-down therapy, but for endovascular infections only 12%–32% would. Respondents recommended widely varying treatment durations for SAB with different foci of infection. Overall, 48% stated they used 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (18F-FDG-PET/CT) to guide antibiotic treatment duration. Persistent bacteraemia was the only risk factor for complicated SAB that would prompt a majority to extend treatment from 2 to 4–6 weeks. Conclusions This survey in five European countries shows considerable clinical practice variation between and within countries in the antibiotic management of SAB, in particular regarding oral step-down therapy, choice of oral antibiotic agents, treatment duration and use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Physicians use varying criteria for treatment decisions, as evidence from clinical trials is often lacking. These areas of practice variation could be used to prioritize future studies for further improvement of SAB care.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>35869753</pmid><doi>10.1093/jac/dkac237</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2397-0125</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3617-5411</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-7453
ispartof Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2022-09, Vol.77 (10), p.2827-2834
issn 0305-7453
1460-2091
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03777270v1
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Bacteremia - complications
Bacteremia - drug therapy
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - therapeutic use
Humans
Life Sciences
Microbiology and Parasitology
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Rifampin - therapeutic use
Staphylococcal Infections - complications
Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy
Staphylococcus aureus
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Current clinical practice in antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: results from a survey in five European countries
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A56%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20clinical%20practice%20in%20antibiotic%20treatment%20of%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20bacteraemia:%20results%20from%20a%20survey%20in%20five%20European%20countries&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20chemotherapy&rft.au=Buis,%20D%20T%20P&rft.date=2022-09-30&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2827&rft.epage=2834&rft.pages=2827-2834&rft.issn=0305-7453&rft.eissn=1460-2091&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jac/dkac237&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2693781613%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-aa7fce5d0964676bbea3874299f9ff3896f53aa414264c201e5b2a434c973e653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2693781613&rft_id=info:pmid/35869753&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jac/dkac237&rfr_iscdi=true