Loading…
Insourcing versus outsourcing decision under environmental considerations and different contract arrangements
We investigate the insourcing versus outsourcing decision for a manufacturer, facing a price- and carbon emission-sensitive demand and an environmental regulation in the form of a carbon tax. We consider the carbon emissions generated during the production phase. In case of outsourcing, the transpor...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of production economics 2022-11, Vol.253, p.108589, Article 108589 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bf8077e3195508c6a1316eef94e8c99565b36a1ed42c684d6d4af007f8792f663 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bf8077e3195508c6a1316eef94e8c99565b36a1ed42c684d6d4af007f8792f663 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 108589 |
container_title | International journal of production economics |
container_volume | 253 |
creator | Kandil, Narjes Hammami, Ramzi Battaïa, Olga |
description | We investigate the insourcing versus outsourcing decision for a manufacturer, facing a price- and carbon emission-sensitive demand and an environmental regulation in the form of a carbon tax. We consider the carbon emissions generated during the production phase. In case of outsourcing, the transportation emissions are also considered, and we investigate the outcomes of revenue sharing and cost sharing contracts between the manufacturer and the supplier. We study the impacts of customers’ environmental awareness, carbon tax, price sensitivity, market potential, and supplier’s location on the insourcing vs. outsourcing decision, the environmental performance and the selling price. Our results show that a higher customers’ environmental awareness, a larger market potential and a longer distance between the supplier and the manufacturer favor insourcing over outsourcing, whereas a higher carbon tax and a higher price sensitivity favor outsourcing.
•Insourcing versus outsourcing decision model under environmental considerations.•We investigate which contract is more beneficial under outsourcing.•Higher profit and lower emissions under cost sharing compared to revenue sharing.•Customers’ sensitivity to emission may have more impact on greenness than carbon tax. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108589 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03875737v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S092552732200175X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S092552732200175X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bf8077e3195508c6a1316eef94e8c99565b36a1ed42c684d6d4af007f8792f663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4GmvHrYmm90kC15KUVsoeNFzSJNJzdImJdkt-PZmWenR08A3_z8wH0KPBC8IJuy5W7juBIsKV1UGohHtFZoRwWnJG95eoxluq6ZsKk5v0V1KHcaYEyFm6LjxKQxRO78vzhDTkIow9BdkQLvkgi8GbyAW4M8uBn8E36tDoYNPLmPV50QqlDeFcdZCzOtx2Uel-0LFqPwexk66RzdWHRI8_M05-np7_Vyty-3H-2a13JaaMt6XOysw50BJ2zRYaKYIJQzAtjUI3bYNa3Y0QzB1pZmoDTO1svkjK3hbWcboHD1Nd7_VQZ6iO6r4I4Nycr3cypFhKrIYys8kZ6spq2NIKYK9FAiWo1zZyVGuHOXKSW4uvUwlyF-cHUSZtAOvwbgIupcmuP_qvwVwhaE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insourcing versus outsourcing decision under environmental considerations and different contract arrangements</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kandil, Narjes ; Hammami, Ramzi ; Battaïa, Olga</creator><creatorcontrib>Kandil, Narjes ; Hammami, Ramzi ; Battaïa, Olga</creatorcontrib><description>We investigate the insourcing versus outsourcing decision for a manufacturer, facing a price- and carbon emission-sensitive demand and an environmental regulation in the form of a carbon tax. We consider the carbon emissions generated during the production phase. In case of outsourcing, the transportation emissions are also considered, and we investigate the outcomes of revenue sharing and cost sharing contracts between the manufacturer and the supplier. We study the impacts of customers’ environmental awareness, carbon tax, price sensitivity, market potential, and supplier’s location on the insourcing vs. outsourcing decision, the environmental performance and the selling price. Our results show that a higher customers’ environmental awareness, a larger market potential and a longer distance between the supplier and the manufacturer favor insourcing over outsourcing, whereas a higher carbon tax and a higher price sensitivity favor outsourcing.
•Insourcing versus outsourcing decision model under environmental considerations.•We investigate which contract is more beneficial under outsourcing.•Higher profit and lower emissions under cost sharing compared to revenue sharing.•Customers’ sensitivity to emission may have more impact on greenness than carbon tax.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-5273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7579</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108589</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Carbon emissions ; Cost sharing ; Environment and Society ; Environmental Sciences ; Insourcing ; Outsourcing ; Revenue sharing</subject><ispartof>International journal of production economics, 2022-11, Vol.253, p.108589, Article 108589</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bf8077e3195508c6a1316eef94e8c99565b36a1ed42c684d6d4af007f8792f663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bf8077e3195508c6a1316eef94e8c99565b36a1ed42c684d6d4af007f8792f663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5100-7371 ; 0000-0002-5367-7846</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://rennes-sb.hal.science/hal-03875737$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kandil, Narjes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammami, Ramzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battaïa, Olga</creatorcontrib><title>Insourcing versus outsourcing decision under environmental considerations and different contract arrangements</title><title>International journal of production economics</title><description>We investigate the insourcing versus outsourcing decision for a manufacturer, facing a price- and carbon emission-sensitive demand and an environmental regulation in the form of a carbon tax. We consider the carbon emissions generated during the production phase. In case of outsourcing, the transportation emissions are also considered, and we investigate the outcomes of revenue sharing and cost sharing contracts between the manufacturer and the supplier. We study the impacts of customers’ environmental awareness, carbon tax, price sensitivity, market potential, and supplier’s location on the insourcing vs. outsourcing decision, the environmental performance and the selling price. Our results show that a higher customers’ environmental awareness, a larger market potential and a longer distance between the supplier and the manufacturer favor insourcing over outsourcing, whereas a higher carbon tax and a higher price sensitivity favor outsourcing.
•Insourcing versus outsourcing decision model under environmental considerations.•We investigate which contract is more beneficial under outsourcing.•Higher profit and lower emissions under cost sharing compared to revenue sharing.•Customers’ sensitivity to emission may have more impact on greenness than carbon tax.</description><subject>Carbon emissions</subject><subject>Cost sharing</subject><subject>Environment and Society</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Insourcing</subject><subject>Outsourcing</subject><subject>Revenue sharing</subject><issn>0925-5273</issn><issn>1873-7579</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4GmvHrYmm90kC15KUVsoeNFzSJNJzdImJdkt-PZmWenR08A3_z8wH0KPBC8IJuy5W7juBIsKV1UGohHtFZoRwWnJG95eoxluq6ZsKk5v0V1KHcaYEyFm6LjxKQxRO78vzhDTkIow9BdkQLvkgi8GbyAW4M8uBn8E36tDoYNPLmPV50QqlDeFcdZCzOtx2Uel-0LFqPwexk66RzdWHRI8_M05-np7_Vyty-3H-2a13JaaMt6XOysw50BJ2zRYaKYIJQzAtjUI3bYNa3Y0QzB1pZmoDTO1svkjK3hbWcboHD1Nd7_VQZ6iO6r4I4Nycr3cypFhKrIYys8kZ6spq2NIKYK9FAiWo1zZyVGuHOXKSW4uvUwlyF-cHUSZtAOvwbgIupcmuP_qvwVwhaE</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Kandil, Narjes</creator><creator>Hammami, Ramzi</creator><creator>Battaïa, Olga</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-7371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5367-7846</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Insourcing versus outsourcing decision under environmental considerations and different contract arrangements</title><author>Kandil, Narjes ; Hammami, Ramzi ; Battaïa, Olga</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bf8077e3195508c6a1316eef94e8c99565b36a1ed42c684d6d4af007f8792f663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Carbon emissions</topic><topic>Cost sharing</topic><topic>Environment and Society</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Insourcing</topic><topic>Outsourcing</topic><topic>Revenue sharing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kandil, Narjes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammami, Ramzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battaïa, Olga</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>International journal of production economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kandil, Narjes</au><au>Hammami, Ramzi</au><au>Battaïa, Olga</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insourcing versus outsourcing decision under environmental considerations and different contract arrangements</atitle><jtitle>International journal of production economics</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>253</volume><spage>108589</spage><pages>108589-</pages><artnum>108589</artnum><issn>0925-5273</issn><eissn>1873-7579</eissn><abstract>We investigate the insourcing versus outsourcing decision for a manufacturer, facing a price- and carbon emission-sensitive demand and an environmental regulation in the form of a carbon tax. We consider the carbon emissions generated during the production phase. In case of outsourcing, the transportation emissions are also considered, and we investigate the outcomes of revenue sharing and cost sharing contracts between the manufacturer and the supplier. We study the impacts of customers’ environmental awareness, carbon tax, price sensitivity, market potential, and supplier’s location on the insourcing vs. outsourcing decision, the environmental performance and the selling price. Our results show that a higher customers’ environmental awareness, a larger market potential and a longer distance between the supplier and the manufacturer favor insourcing over outsourcing, whereas a higher carbon tax and a higher price sensitivity favor outsourcing.
•Insourcing versus outsourcing decision model under environmental considerations.•We investigate which contract is more beneficial under outsourcing.•Higher profit and lower emissions under cost sharing compared to revenue sharing.•Customers’ sensitivity to emission may have more impact on greenness than carbon tax.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108589</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-7371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5367-7846</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0925-5273 |
ispartof | International journal of production economics, 2022-11, Vol.253, p.108589, Article 108589 |
issn | 0925-5273 1873-7579 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03875737v1 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Carbon emissions Cost sharing Environment and Society Environmental Sciences Insourcing Outsourcing Revenue sharing |
title | Insourcing versus outsourcing decision under environmental considerations and different contract arrangements |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A33%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insourcing%20versus%20outsourcing%20decision%20under%20environmental%20considerations%20and%20different%20contract%20arrangements&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20production%20economics&rft.au=Kandil,%20Narjes&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=253&rft.spage=108589&rft.pages=108589-&rft.artnum=108589&rft.issn=0925-5273&rft.eissn=1873-7579&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108589&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_hal_p%3ES092552732200175X%3C/elsevier_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bf8077e3195508c6a1316eef94e8c99565b36a1ed42c684d6d4af007f8792f663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |