Loading…

Insourcing versus outsourcing decision under environmental considerations and different contract arrangements

We investigate the insourcing versus outsourcing decision for a manufacturer, facing a price- and carbon emission-sensitive demand and an environmental regulation in the form of a carbon tax. We consider the carbon emissions generated during the production phase. In case of outsourcing, the transpor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of production economics 2022-11, Vol.253, p.108589, Article 108589
Main Authors: Kandil, Narjes, Hammami, Ramzi, Battaïa, Olga
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bf8077e3195508c6a1316eef94e8c99565b36a1ed42c684d6d4af007f8792f663
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bf8077e3195508c6a1316eef94e8c99565b36a1ed42c684d6d4af007f8792f663
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 108589
container_title International journal of production economics
container_volume 253
creator Kandil, Narjes
Hammami, Ramzi
Battaïa, Olga
description We investigate the insourcing versus outsourcing decision for a manufacturer, facing a price- and carbon emission-sensitive demand and an environmental regulation in the form of a carbon tax. We consider the carbon emissions generated during the production phase. In case of outsourcing, the transportation emissions are also considered, and we investigate the outcomes of revenue sharing and cost sharing contracts between the manufacturer and the supplier. We study the impacts of customers’ environmental awareness, carbon tax, price sensitivity, market potential, and supplier’s location on the insourcing vs. outsourcing decision, the environmental performance and the selling price. Our results show that a higher customers’ environmental awareness, a larger market potential and a longer distance between the supplier and the manufacturer favor insourcing over outsourcing, whereas a higher carbon tax and a higher price sensitivity favor outsourcing. •Insourcing versus outsourcing decision model under environmental considerations.•We investigate which contract is more beneficial under outsourcing.•Higher profit and lower emissions under cost sharing compared to revenue sharing.•Customers’ sensitivity to emission may have more impact on greenness than carbon tax.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108589
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03875737v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S092552732200175X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S092552732200175X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bf8077e3195508c6a1316eef94e8c99565b36a1ed42c684d6d4af007f8792f663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4GmvHrYmm90kC15KUVsoeNFzSJNJzdImJdkt-PZmWenR08A3_z8wH0KPBC8IJuy5W7juBIsKV1UGohHtFZoRwWnJG95eoxluq6ZsKk5v0V1KHcaYEyFm6LjxKQxRO78vzhDTkIow9BdkQLvkgi8GbyAW4M8uBn8E36tDoYNPLmPV50QqlDeFcdZCzOtx2Uel-0LFqPwexk66RzdWHRI8_M05-np7_Vyty-3H-2a13JaaMt6XOysw50BJ2zRYaKYIJQzAtjUI3bYNa3Y0QzB1pZmoDTO1svkjK3hbWcboHD1Nd7_VQZ6iO6r4I4Nycr3cypFhKrIYys8kZ6spq2NIKYK9FAiWo1zZyVGuHOXKSW4uvUwlyF-cHUSZtAOvwbgIupcmuP_qvwVwhaE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insourcing versus outsourcing decision under environmental considerations and different contract arrangements</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kandil, Narjes ; Hammami, Ramzi ; Battaïa, Olga</creator><creatorcontrib>Kandil, Narjes ; Hammami, Ramzi ; Battaïa, Olga</creatorcontrib><description>We investigate the insourcing versus outsourcing decision for a manufacturer, facing a price- and carbon emission-sensitive demand and an environmental regulation in the form of a carbon tax. We consider the carbon emissions generated during the production phase. In case of outsourcing, the transportation emissions are also considered, and we investigate the outcomes of revenue sharing and cost sharing contracts between the manufacturer and the supplier. We study the impacts of customers’ environmental awareness, carbon tax, price sensitivity, market potential, and supplier’s location on the insourcing vs. outsourcing decision, the environmental performance and the selling price. Our results show that a higher customers’ environmental awareness, a larger market potential and a longer distance between the supplier and the manufacturer favor insourcing over outsourcing, whereas a higher carbon tax and a higher price sensitivity favor outsourcing. •Insourcing versus outsourcing decision model under environmental considerations.•We investigate which contract is more beneficial under outsourcing.•Higher profit and lower emissions under cost sharing compared to revenue sharing.•Customers’ sensitivity to emission may have more impact on greenness than carbon tax.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-5273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7579</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108589</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Carbon emissions ; Cost sharing ; Environment and Society ; Environmental Sciences ; Insourcing ; Outsourcing ; Revenue sharing</subject><ispartof>International journal of production economics, 2022-11, Vol.253, p.108589, Article 108589</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bf8077e3195508c6a1316eef94e8c99565b36a1ed42c684d6d4af007f8792f663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bf8077e3195508c6a1316eef94e8c99565b36a1ed42c684d6d4af007f8792f663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5100-7371 ; 0000-0002-5367-7846</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://rennes-sb.hal.science/hal-03875737$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kandil, Narjes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammami, Ramzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battaïa, Olga</creatorcontrib><title>Insourcing versus outsourcing decision under environmental considerations and different contract arrangements</title><title>International journal of production economics</title><description>We investigate the insourcing versus outsourcing decision for a manufacturer, facing a price- and carbon emission-sensitive demand and an environmental regulation in the form of a carbon tax. We consider the carbon emissions generated during the production phase. In case of outsourcing, the transportation emissions are also considered, and we investigate the outcomes of revenue sharing and cost sharing contracts between the manufacturer and the supplier. We study the impacts of customers’ environmental awareness, carbon tax, price sensitivity, market potential, and supplier’s location on the insourcing vs. outsourcing decision, the environmental performance and the selling price. Our results show that a higher customers’ environmental awareness, a larger market potential and a longer distance between the supplier and the manufacturer favor insourcing over outsourcing, whereas a higher carbon tax and a higher price sensitivity favor outsourcing. •Insourcing versus outsourcing decision model under environmental considerations.•We investigate which contract is more beneficial under outsourcing.•Higher profit and lower emissions under cost sharing compared to revenue sharing.•Customers’ sensitivity to emission may have more impact on greenness than carbon tax.</description><subject>Carbon emissions</subject><subject>Cost sharing</subject><subject>Environment and Society</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Insourcing</subject><subject>Outsourcing</subject><subject>Revenue sharing</subject><issn>0925-5273</issn><issn>1873-7579</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4GmvHrYmm90kC15KUVsoeNFzSJNJzdImJdkt-PZmWenR08A3_z8wH0KPBC8IJuy5W7juBIsKV1UGohHtFZoRwWnJG95eoxluq6ZsKk5v0V1KHcaYEyFm6LjxKQxRO78vzhDTkIow9BdkQLvkgi8GbyAW4M8uBn8E36tDoYNPLmPV50QqlDeFcdZCzOtx2Uel-0LFqPwexk66RzdWHRI8_M05-np7_Vyty-3H-2a13JaaMt6XOysw50BJ2zRYaKYIJQzAtjUI3bYNa3Y0QzB1pZmoDTO1svkjK3hbWcboHD1Nd7_VQZ6iO6r4I4Nycr3cypFhKrIYys8kZ6spq2NIKYK9FAiWo1zZyVGuHOXKSW4uvUwlyF-cHUSZtAOvwbgIupcmuP_qvwVwhaE</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Kandil, Narjes</creator><creator>Hammami, Ramzi</creator><creator>Battaïa, Olga</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-7371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5367-7846</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Insourcing versus outsourcing decision under environmental considerations and different contract arrangements</title><author>Kandil, Narjes ; Hammami, Ramzi ; Battaïa, Olga</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bf8077e3195508c6a1316eef94e8c99565b36a1ed42c684d6d4af007f8792f663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Carbon emissions</topic><topic>Cost sharing</topic><topic>Environment and Society</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Insourcing</topic><topic>Outsourcing</topic><topic>Revenue sharing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kandil, Narjes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammami, Ramzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battaïa, Olga</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>International journal of production economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kandil, Narjes</au><au>Hammami, Ramzi</au><au>Battaïa, Olga</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insourcing versus outsourcing decision under environmental considerations and different contract arrangements</atitle><jtitle>International journal of production economics</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>253</volume><spage>108589</spage><pages>108589-</pages><artnum>108589</artnum><issn>0925-5273</issn><eissn>1873-7579</eissn><abstract>We investigate the insourcing versus outsourcing decision for a manufacturer, facing a price- and carbon emission-sensitive demand and an environmental regulation in the form of a carbon tax. We consider the carbon emissions generated during the production phase. In case of outsourcing, the transportation emissions are also considered, and we investigate the outcomes of revenue sharing and cost sharing contracts between the manufacturer and the supplier. We study the impacts of customers’ environmental awareness, carbon tax, price sensitivity, market potential, and supplier’s location on the insourcing vs. outsourcing decision, the environmental performance and the selling price. Our results show that a higher customers’ environmental awareness, a larger market potential and a longer distance between the supplier and the manufacturer favor insourcing over outsourcing, whereas a higher carbon tax and a higher price sensitivity favor outsourcing. •Insourcing versus outsourcing decision model under environmental considerations.•We investigate which contract is more beneficial under outsourcing.•Higher profit and lower emissions under cost sharing compared to revenue sharing.•Customers’ sensitivity to emission may have more impact on greenness than carbon tax.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108589</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-7371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5367-7846</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-5273
ispartof International journal of production economics, 2022-11, Vol.253, p.108589, Article 108589
issn 0925-5273
1873-7579
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03875737v1
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Carbon emissions
Cost sharing
Environment and Society
Environmental Sciences
Insourcing
Outsourcing
Revenue sharing
title Insourcing versus outsourcing decision under environmental considerations and different contract arrangements
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A33%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insourcing%20versus%20outsourcing%20decision%20under%20environmental%20considerations%20and%20different%20contract%20arrangements&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20production%20economics&rft.au=Kandil,%20Narjes&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=253&rft.spage=108589&rft.pages=108589-&rft.artnum=108589&rft.issn=0925-5273&rft.eissn=1873-7579&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108589&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_hal_p%3ES092552732200175X%3C/elsevier_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-bf8077e3195508c6a1316eef94e8c99565b36a1ed42c684d6d4af007f8792f663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true