Loading…
Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination
The pollination service provided by nocturnal flower visitors is disrupted near streetlamps, which leads to a reduced reproductive output of the plant that cannot be compensated for by day-time pollinators; in addition, the structure of combined nocturnal and diurnal pollination networks facilitates...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nature (London) 2017-08, Vol.548 (7666), p.206-209 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c720t-143e7cc816e7a6ca792fc7bac4b1cee3724c3bfcfac5c9755b40751a0250fa983 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c720t-143e7cc816e7a6ca792fc7bac4b1cee3724c3bfcfac5c9755b40751a0250fa983 |
container_end_page | 209 |
container_issue | 7666 |
container_start_page | 206 |
container_title | Nature (London) |
container_volume | 548 |
creator | Knop, Eva Zoller, Leana Ryser, Remo Gerpe, Christopher Hörler, Maurin Fontaine, Colin |
description | The pollination service provided by nocturnal flower visitors is disrupted near streetlamps, which leads to a reduced reproductive output of the plant that cannot be compensated for by day-time pollinators; in addition, the structure of combined nocturnal and diurnal pollination networks facilitates the spread of the consequences of disrupted night-time pollination to daytime pollinators.
Night lights put off pollinators
Pollinator numbers are declining worldwide. Alongside factors such as land use change and agricultural intensification, artificial light at night has been proposed to contribute to this loss. Eva Knop and colleagues put this theory to the test in a field experiment in Switzerland. They exposed ruderal meadows to artificial light at night and monitored nocturnal pollinator behaviour. Pollinator visits to plants fell by 62% in the illuminated plots, and fruit production by a focal plant fell by 13%. The findings suggest that artificial light at night, which is spreading at an estimated rate of 6% per year, poses yet another threat to global pollinator health.
Pollinators are declining worldwide
1
and this has raised concerns for a parallel decline in the essential pollination service they provide to both crops and wild plants
2
,
3
. Anthropogenic drivers linked to this decline include habitat changes, intensive agriculture, pesticides, invasive alien species, spread of pathogens and climate change
1
. Recently, the rapid global increase in artificial light at night
4
has been proposed to be a new threat to terrestrial ecosystems; the consequences of this increase for ecosystem function are mostly unknown
5
,
6
. Here we show that artificial light at night disrupts nocturnal pollination networks and has negative consequences for plant reproductive success. In artificially illuminated plant–pollinator communities, nocturnal visits to plants were reduced by 62% compared to dark areas. Notably, this resulted in an overall 13% reduction in fruit set of a focal plant even though the plant also received numerous visits by diurnal pollinators. Furthermore, by merging diurnal and nocturnal pollination sub-networks, we show that the structure of these combined networks tends to facilitate the spread of the negative consequences of disrupted nocturnal pollination to daytime pollinator communities. Our findings demonstrate that artificial light at night is a threat to pollination and that the negative effects of artificial light at night on nocturnal p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/nature23288 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03947729v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A500202722</galeid><sourcerecordid>A500202722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c720t-143e7cc816e7a6ca792fc7bac4b1cee3724c3bfcfac5c9755b40751a0250fa983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0ktv1DAQAGALgehSOHFHEVyoaIofSewcVxXQSish8ThbjjvJuvLaW9uh5d_jJaXsVpEPtsafx5rRIPSa4DOCmfjoVBoDUEaFeIIWpOJNWTWCP0ULjKkosWDNEXoR4zXGuCa8eo6OqOCCcYYXSCxDMr3RRtnCmmGdCpUKNx1ioQoHt0VaB8jR5Iutt9bk_4x3L9GzXtkIr-73Y_Tz86cf5xfl6uuXy_PlqtSc4lSSigHXWpAGuGq04i3tNe-UrjqiARinlWZdr3ula93yuu4qzGuiMK1xr1rBjtHJlHetrNwGs1Hht_TKyIvlSu5imLUV57T9RbJ9P9lt8DcjxCQ3JmqwVjnwY5SkpbloJpo203eP6LUfg8uV_FVt3TQt-a8GZUEa1_sUlN4llcs6dxdTTmlW5YwawEFQ1jvoTQ4f-LczXm_NjdxHZzMoryvYGD2b9eTgQTYJ7tKgxhjl5fdvh_bDZHXwMQboHzpLsNwNldwbqqzf3Pdq7DZw9WD_TVEGpxOI-coNEPaaOZPvD7ou0L0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1927956691</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination</title><source>Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><creator>Knop, Eva ; Zoller, Leana ; Ryser, Remo ; Gerpe, Christopher ; Hörler, Maurin ; Fontaine, Colin</creator><creatorcontrib>Knop, Eva ; Zoller, Leana ; Ryser, Remo ; Gerpe, Christopher ; Hörler, Maurin ; Fontaine, Colin</creatorcontrib><description>The pollination service provided by nocturnal flower visitors is disrupted near streetlamps, which leads to a reduced reproductive output of the plant that cannot be compensated for by day-time pollinators; in addition, the structure of combined nocturnal and diurnal pollination networks facilitates the spread of the consequences of disrupted night-time pollination to daytime pollinators.
Night lights put off pollinators
Pollinator numbers are declining worldwide. Alongside factors such as land use change and agricultural intensification, artificial light at night has been proposed to contribute to this loss. Eva Knop and colleagues put this theory to the test in a field experiment in Switzerland. They exposed ruderal meadows to artificial light at night and monitored nocturnal pollinator behaviour. Pollinator visits to plants fell by 62% in the illuminated plots, and fruit production by a focal plant fell by 13%. The findings suggest that artificial light at night, which is spreading at an estimated rate of 6% per year, poses yet another threat to global pollinator health.
Pollinators are declining worldwide
1
and this has raised concerns for a parallel decline in the essential pollination service they provide to both crops and wild plants
2
,
3
. Anthropogenic drivers linked to this decline include habitat changes, intensive agriculture, pesticides, invasive alien species, spread of pathogens and climate change
1
. Recently, the rapid global increase in artificial light at night
4
has been proposed to be a new threat to terrestrial ecosystems; the consequences of this increase for ecosystem function are mostly unknown
5
,
6
. Here we show that artificial light at night disrupts nocturnal pollination networks and has negative consequences for plant reproductive success. In artificially illuminated plant–pollinator communities, nocturnal visits to plants were reduced by 62% compared to dark areas. Notably, this resulted in an overall 13% reduction in fruit set of a focal plant even though the plant also received numerous visits by diurnal pollinators. Furthermore, by merging diurnal and nocturnal pollination sub-networks, we show that the structure of these combined networks tends to facilitate the spread of the negative consequences of disrupted nocturnal pollination to daytime pollinator communities. Our findings demonstrate that artificial light at night is a threat to pollination and that the negative effects of artificial light at night on nocturnal pollination are predicted to propagate to the diurnal community, thereby aggravating the decline of the diurnal community. We provide perspectives on the functioning of plant–pollinator communities, showing that nocturnal pollinators are not redundant to diurnal communities and increasing our understanding of the human-induced decline in pollinators and their ecosystem service.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nature23288</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28783730</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/158/2165 ; 631/158/2463 ; 631/158/670 ; 631/158/853 ; Agriculture ; Agrochemicals ; Anthropogenic factors ; Breeding success ; Climate change ; Daytime ; Diurnal ; Ecological function ; Ecosystem services ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental Sciences ; Fruit set ; Habitat changes ; Human influences ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Intensive farming ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; letter ; Light ; Light sources ; Lighting ; multidisciplinary ; Night ; Nocturnal ; Pesticides ; Plant communities ; Pollination ; Pollinators ; Reproduction ; Science ; Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><ispartof>Nature (London), 2017-08, Vol.548 (7666), p.206-209</ispartof><rights>Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved. 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Aug 10, 2017</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c720t-143e7cc816e7a6ca792fc7bac4b1cee3724c3bfcfac5c9755b40751a0250fa983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c720t-143e7cc816e7a6ca792fc7bac4b1cee3724c3bfcfac5c9755b40751a0250fa983</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5367-5675</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28783730$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03947729$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knop, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoller, Leana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryser, Remo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerpe, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hörler, Maurin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, Colin</creatorcontrib><title>Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination</title><title>Nature (London)</title><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><description>The pollination service provided by nocturnal flower visitors is disrupted near streetlamps, which leads to a reduced reproductive output of the plant that cannot be compensated for by day-time pollinators; in addition, the structure of combined nocturnal and diurnal pollination networks facilitates the spread of the consequences of disrupted night-time pollination to daytime pollinators.
Night lights put off pollinators
Pollinator numbers are declining worldwide. Alongside factors such as land use change and agricultural intensification, artificial light at night has been proposed to contribute to this loss. Eva Knop and colleagues put this theory to the test in a field experiment in Switzerland. They exposed ruderal meadows to artificial light at night and monitored nocturnal pollinator behaviour. Pollinator visits to plants fell by 62% in the illuminated plots, and fruit production by a focal plant fell by 13%. The findings suggest that artificial light at night, which is spreading at an estimated rate of 6% per year, poses yet another threat to global pollinator health.
Pollinators are declining worldwide
1
and this has raised concerns for a parallel decline in the essential pollination service they provide to both crops and wild plants
2
,
3
. Anthropogenic drivers linked to this decline include habitat changes, intensive agriculture, pesticides, invasive alien species, spread of pathogens and climate change
1
. Recently, the rapid global increase in artificial light at night
4
has been proposed to be a new threat to terrestrial ecosystems; the consequences of this increase for ecosystem function are mostly unknown
5
,
6
. Here we show that artificial light at night disrupts nocturnal pollination networks and has negative consequences for plant reproductive success. In artificially illuminated plant–pollinator communities, nocturnal visits to plants were reduced by 62% compared to dark areas. Notably, this resulted in an overall 13% reduction in fruit set of a focal plant even though the plant also received numerous visits by diurnal pollinators. Furthermore, by merging diurnal and nocturnal pollination sub-networks, we show that the structure of these combined networks tends to facilitate the spread of the negative consequences of disrupted nocturnal pollination to daytime pollinator communities. Our findings demonstrate that artificial light at night is a threat to pollination and that the negative effects of artificial light at night on nocturnal pollination are predicted to propagate to the diurnal community, thereby aggravating the decline of the diurnal community. We provide perspectives on the functioning of plant–pollinator communities, showing that nocturnal pollinators are not redundant to diurnal communities and increasing our understanding of the human-induced decline in pollinators and their ecosystem service.</description><subject>631/158/2165</subject><subject>631/158/2463</subject><subject>631/158/670</subject><subject>631/158/853</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Daytime</subject><subject>Diurnal</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Fruit set</subject><subject>Habitat changes</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Intensive farming</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>letter</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Light sources</subject><subject>Lighting</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Night</subject><subject>Nocturnal</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><issn>0028-0836</issn><issn>1476-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0ktv1DAQAGALgehSOHFHEVyoaIofSewcVxXQSish8ThbjjvJuvLaW9uh5d_jJaXsVpEPtsafx5rRIPSa4DOCmfjoVBoDUEaFeIIWpOJNWTWCP0ULjKkosWDNEXoR4zXGuCa8eo6OqOCCcYYXSCxDMr3RRtnCmmGdCpUKNx1ioQoHt0VaB8jR5Iutt9bk_4x3L9GzXtkIr-73Y_Tz86cf5xfl6uuXy_PlqtSc4lSSigHXWpAGuGq04i3tNe-UrjqiARinlWZdr3ula93yuu4qzGuiMK1xr1rBjtHJlHetrNwGs1Hht_TKyIvlSu5imLUV57T9RbJ9P9lt8DcjxCQ3JmqwVjnwY5SkpbloJpo203eP6LUfg8uV_FVt3TQt-a8GZUEa1_sUlN4llcs6dxdTTmlW5YwawEFQ1jvoTQ4f-LczXm_NjdxHZzMoryvYGD2b9eTgQTYJ7tKgxhjl5fdvh_bDZHXwMQboHzpLsNwNldwbqqzf3Pdq7DZw9WD_TVEGpxOI-coNEPaaOZPvD7ou0L0</recordid><startdate>20170810</startdate><enddate>20170810</enddate><creator>Knop, Eva</creator><creator>Zoller, Leana</creator><creator>Ryser, Remo</creator><creator>Gerpe, Christopher</creator><creator>Hörler, Maurin</creator><creator>Fontaine, Colin</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5367-5675</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170810</creationdate><title>Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination</title><author>Knop, Eva ; Zoller, Leana ; Ryser, Remo ; Gerpe, Christopher ; Hörler, Maurin ; Fontaine, Colin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c720t-143e7cc816e7a6ca792fc7bac4b1cee3724c3bfcfac5c9755b40751a0250fa983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>631/158/2165</topic><topic>631/158/2463</topic><topic>631/158/670</topic><topic>631/158/853</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Daytime</topic><topic>Diurnal</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Fruit set</topic><topic>Habitat changes</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Intensive farming</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>letter</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Light sources</topic><topic>Lighting</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Night</topic><topic>Nocturnal</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knop, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoller, Leana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryser, Remo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerpe, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hörler, Maurin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, Colin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knop, Eva</au><au>Zoller, Leana</au><au>Ryser, Remo</au><au>Gerpe, Christopher</au><au>Hörler, Maurin</au><au>Fontaine, Colin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination</atitle><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle><stitle>Nature</stitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><date>2017-08-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>548</volume><issue>7666</issue><spage>206</spage><epage>209</epage><pages>206-209</pages><issn>0028-0836</issn><eissn>1476-4687</eissn><abstract>The pollination service provided by nocturnal flower visitors is disrupted near streetlamps, which leads to a reduced reproductive output of the plant that cannot be compensated for by day-time pollinators; in addition, the structure of combined nocturnal and diurnal pollination networks facilitates the spread of the consequences of disrupted night-time pollination to daytime pollinators.
Night lights put off pollinators
Pollinator numbers are declining worldwide. Alongside factors such as land use change and agricultural intensification, artificial light at night has been proposed to contribute to this loss. Eva Knop and colleagues put this theory to the test in a field experiment in Switzerland. They exposed ruderal meadows to artificial light at night and monitored nocturnal pollinator behaviour. Pollinator visits to plants fell by 62% in the illuminated plots, and fruit production by a focal plant fell by 13%. The findings suggest that artificial light at night, which is spreading at an estimated rate of 6% per year, poses yet another threat to global pollinator health.
Pollinators are declining worldwide
1
and this has raised concerns for a parallel decline in the essential pollination service they provide to both crops and wild plants
2
,
3
. Anthropogenic drivers linked to this decline include habitat changes, intensive agriculture, pesticides, invasive alien species, spread of pathogens and climate change
1
. Recently, the rapid global increase in artificial light at night
4
has been proposed to be a new threat to terrestrial ecosystems; the consequences of this increase for ecosystem function are mostly unknown
5
,
6
. Here we show that artificial light at night disrupts nocturnal pollination networks and has negative consequences for plant reproductive success. In artificially illuminated plant–pollinator communities, nocturnal visits to plants were reduced by 62% compared to dark areas. Notably, this resulted in an overall 13% reduction in fruit set of a focal plant even though the plant also received numerous visits by diurnal pollinators. Furthermore, by merging diurnal and nocturnal pollination sub-networks, we show that the structure of these combined networks tends to facilitate the spread of the negative consequences of disrupted nocturnal pollination to daytime pollinator communities. Our findings demonstrate that artificial light at night is a threat to pollination and that the negative effects of artificial light at night on nocturnal pollination are predicted to propagate to the diurnal community, thereby aggravating the decline of the diurnal community. We provide perspectives on the functioning of plant–pollinator communities, showing that nocturnal pollinators are not redundant to diurnal communities and increasing our understanding of the human-induced decline in pollinators and their ecosystem service.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>28783730</pmid><doi>10.1038/nature23288</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5367-5675</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-0836 |
ispartof | Nature (London), 2017-08, Vol.548 (7666), p.206-209 |
issn | 0028-0836 1476-4687 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03947729v1 |
source | Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access |
subjects | 631/158/2165 631/158/2463 631/158/670 631/158/853 Agriculture Agrochemicals Anthropogenic factors Breeding success Climate change Daytime Diurnal Ecological function Ecosystem services Environmental aspects Environmental Sciences Fruit set Habitat changes Human influences Humanities and Social Sciences Intensive farming Introduced species Invasive species letter Light Light sources Lighting multidisciplinary Night Nocturnal Pesticides Plant communities Pollination Pollinators Reproduction Science Terrestrial ecosystems |
title | Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T08%3A01%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Artificial%20light%20at%20night%20as%20a%20new%20threat%20to%20pollination&rft.jtitle=Nature%20(London)&rft.au=Knop,%20Eva&rft.date=2017-08-10&rft.volume=548&rft.issue=7666&rft.spage=206&rft.epage=209&rft.pages=206-209&rft.issn=0028-0836&rft.eissn=1476-4687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nature23288&rft_dat=%3Cgale_hal_p%3EA500202722%3C/gale_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c720t-143e7cc816e7a6ca792fc7bac4b1cee3724c3bfcfac5c9755b40751a0250fa983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1927956691&rft_id=info:pmid/28783730&rft_galeid=A500202722&rfr_iscdi=true |