Loading…

Hidden Gem or Fool’s Gold: Can passive ESG ETFs outperform the benchmarks?

Using a unique and extensive dataset of 121 socially responsible investing (SRI) equity exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from January 2010 to December 2020, this study examines how passive SRI ETFs perform compared with their non-SRI benchmarks composed of S&P500 ETFs. Over the full sample period, o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International review of financial analysis 2023-03, Vol.86, p.102540, Article 102540
Main Authors: Dumitrescu, Ariadna, Järvinen, Jesse, Zakriya, Mohammed
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-967a1e792b519a28ef91d5729c887f11db5f959d518a3d393a35785e9d583eee3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-967a1e792b519a28ef91d5729c887f11db5f959d518a3d393a35785e9d583eee3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102540
container_title International review of financial analysis
container_volume 86
creator Dumitrescu, Ariadna
Järvinen, Jesse
Zakriya, Mohammed
description Using a unique and extensive dataset of 121 socially responsible investing (SRI) equity exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from January 2010 to December 2020, this study examines how passive SRI ETFs perform compared with their non-SRI benchmarks composed of S&P500 ETFs. Over the full sample period, our results show that an equally weighted SRI ETF portfolio underperforms its benchmark portfolio. Notably, we do not find significant differences in the two portfolios’ performance in the second half of our sample period. However, in the last two years, the SRI ETF portfolio significantly outperforms the benchmark. For the SRI investment strategies, we show that positive screening (or inclusion) rather than negative screening (or exclusion) can beat the benchmark portfolio. In particular, environmental inclusion screen provides significantly higher abnormal returns. Finally, we find that SRI ETFs’ performance can be explained by increasing industry competition and declining market concentration. •Between 2010 and 2020, an equally weighted SRI ETF portfolio underperforms its benchmark portfolio.•However, in the last two years, SRI ETF portfolio significantly outperforms the benchmark.•Only positive screening (or inclusion), and particularly environmental inclusion screens, beat the market and provide significantly higher abnormal returns.•Increasing industry competition and declining market concentration explains SRI ETFs’ performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102540
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04136303v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S105752192300056X</els_id><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_04136303v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-967a1e792b519a28ef91d5729c887f11db5f959d518a3d393a35785e9d583eee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4CpbF1Pz00wmIoiUdioMuLCuQzq5Q1OnTUnGgjtfw9fzScww4tLVvRzOdy_nIHRNyYQSmt9uJy40ZsII40lgYkpO0IgWkmcFkeo07UTITDCqztFFjFtCiBC5HKFq6ayFPS5hh33AC-_b78-viEvf2js8M3t8MDG6I-D5S4nnq0XE_r07QGh82OFuA3gN-3qzM-EtPlyis8a0Ea5-5xi9Luar2TKrnsun2WOV1UzJLlO5NBSkYmtBlWEFNIpaIZmqi0I2lNq1aJRQVtDCcMsVN1zIQkBSCg4AfIxuhrsb0-pDcOn7h_bG6eVjpXuNTCnPOeFHmrxs8NbBxxig-QMo0X13eqv77nTfnR66S9D9AEFKcXQQdKxdygnWBag7bb37D_8B9fZ11w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hidden Gem or Fool’s Gold: Can passive ESG ETFs outperform the benchmarks?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dumitrescu, Ariadna ; Järvinen, Jesse ; Zakriya, Mohammed</creator><creatorcontrib>Dumitrescu, Ariadna ; Järvinen, Jesse ; Zakriya, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><description>Using a unique and extensive dataset of 121 socially responsible investing (SRI) equity exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from January 2010 to December 2020, this study examines how passive SRI ETFs perform compared with their non-SRI benchmarks composed of S&amp;P500 ETFs. Over the full sample period, our results show that an equally weighted SRI ETF portfolio underperforms its benchmark portfolio. Notably, we do not find significant differences in the two portfolios’ performance in the second half of our sample period. However, in the last two years, the SRI ETF portfolio significantly outperforms the benchmark. For the SRI investment strategies, we show that positive screening (or inclusion) rather than negative screening (or exclusion) can beat the benchmark portfolio. In particular, environmental inclusion screen provides significantly higher abnormal returns. Finally, we find that SRI ETFs’ performance can be explained by increasing industry competition and declining market concentration. •Between 2010 and 2020, an equally weighted SRI ETF portfolio underperforms its benchmark portfolio.•However, in the last two years, SRI ETF portfolio significantly outperforms the benchmark.•Only positive screening (or inclusion), and particularly environmental inclusion screens, beat the market and provide significantly higher abnormal returns.•Increasing industry competition and declining market concentration explains SRI ETFs’ performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-5219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-8079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102540</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Business administration ; ESG ; ETFs ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Socially responsible investments ; SRI ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>International review of financial analysis, 2023-03, Vol.86, p.102540, Article 102540</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-967a1e792b519a28ef91d5729c887f11db5f959d518a3d393a35785e9d583eee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-967a1e792b519a28ef91d5729c887f11db5f959d518a3d393a35785e9d583eee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2319-2642 ; 0000-0001-7343-7113 ; 0000-0002-2692-731X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04136303$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dumitrescu, Ariadna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Järvinen, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakriya, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><title>Hidden Gem or Fool’s Gold: Can passive ESG ETFs outperform the benchmarks?</title><title>International review of financial analysis</title><description>Using a unique and extensive dataset of 121 socially responsible investing (SRI) equity exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from January 2010 to December 2020, this study examines how passive SRI ETFs perform compared with their non-SRI benchmarks composed of S&amp;P500 ETFs. Over the full sample period, our results show that an equally weighted SRI ETF portfolio underperforms its benchmark portfolio. Notably, we do not find significant differences in the two portfolios’ performance in the second half of our sample period. However, in the last two years, the SRI ETF portfolio significantly outperforms the benchmark. For the SRI investment strategies, we show that positive screening (or inclusion) rather than negative screening (or exclusion) can beat the benchmark portfolio. In particular, environmental inclusion screen provides significantly higher abnormal returns. Finally, we find that SRI ETFs’ performance can be explained by increasing industry competition and declining market concentration. •Between 2010 and 2020, an equally weighted SRI ETF portfolio underperforms its benchmark portfolio.•However, in the last two years, SRI ETF portfolio significantly outperforms the benchmark.•Only positive screening (or inclusion), and particularly environmental inclusion screens, beat the market and provide significantly higher abnormal returns.•Increasing industry competition and declining market concentration explains SRI ETFs’ performance.</description><subject>Business administration</subject><subject>ESG</subject><subject>ETFs</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Socially responsible investments</subject><subject>SRI</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>1057-5219</issn><issn>1873-8079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4CpbF1Pz00wmIoiUdioMuLCuQzq5Q1OnTUnGgjtfw9fzScww4tLVvRzOdy_nIHRNyYQSmt9uJy40ZsII40lgYkpO0IgWkmcFkeo07UTITDCqztFFjFtCiBC5HKFq6ayFPS5hh33AC-_b78-viEvf2js8M3t8MDG6I-D5S4nnq0XE_r07QGh82OFuA3gN-3qzM-EtPlyis8a0Ea5-5xi9Luar2TKrnsun2WOV1UzJLlO5NBSkYmtBlWEFNIpaIZmqi0I2lNq1aJRQVtDCcMsVN1zIQkBSCg4AfIxuhrsb0-pDcOn7h_bG6eVjpXuNTCnPOeFHmrxs8NbBxxig-QMo0X13eqv77nTfnR66S9D9AEFKcXQQdKxdygnWBag7bb37D_8B9fZ11w</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Dumitrescu, Ariadna</creator><creator>Järvinen, Jesse</creator><creator>Zakriya, Mohammed</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2319-2642</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7343-7113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2692-731X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Hidden Gem or Fool’s Gold: Can passive ESG ETFs outperform the benchmarks?</title><author>Dumitrescu, Ariadna ; Järvinen, Jesse ; Zakriya, Mohammed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-967a1e792b519a28ef91d5729c887f11db5f959d518a3d393a35785e9d583eee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Business administration</topic><topic>ESG</topic><topic>ETFs</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Socially responsible investments</topic><topic>SRI</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dumitrescu, Ariadna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Järvinen, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakriya, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>International review of financial analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dumitrescu, Ariadna</au><au>Järvinen, Jesse</au><au>Zakriya, Mohammed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hidden Gem or Fool’s Gold: Can passive ESG ETFs outperform the benchmarks?</atitle><jtitle>International review of financial analysis</jtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>86</volume><spage>102540</spage><pages>102540-</pages><artnum>102540</artnum><issn>1057-5219</issn><eissn>1873-8079</eissn><abstract>Using a unique and extensive dataset of 121 socially responsible investing (SRI) equity exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from January 2010 to December 2020, this study examines how passive SRI ETFs perform compared with their non-SRI benchmarks composed of S&amp;P500 ETFs. Over the full sample period, our results show that an equally weighted SRI ETF portfolio underperforms its benchmark portfolio. Notably, we do not find significant differences in the two portfolios’ performance in the second half of our sample period. However, in the last two years, the SRI ETF portfolio significantly outperforms the benchmark. For the SRI investment strategies, we show that positive screening (or inclusion) rather than negative screening (or exclusion) can beat the benchmark portfolio. In particular, environmental inclusion screen provides significantly higher abnormal returns. Finally, we find that SRI ETFs’ performance can be explained by increasing industry competition and declining market concentration. •Between 2010 and 2020, an equally weighted SRI ETF portfolio underperforms its benchmark portfolio.•However, in the last two years, SRI ETF portfolio significantly outperforms the benchmark.•Only positive screening (or inclusion), and particularly environmental inclusion screens, beat the market and provide significantly higher abnormal returns.•Increasing industry competition and declining market concentration explains SRI ETFs’ performance.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102540</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2319-2642</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7343-7113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2692-731X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-5219
ispartof International review of financial analysis, 2023-03, Vol.86, p.102540, Article 102540
issn 1057-5219
1873-8079
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04136303v1
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Business administration
ESG
ETFs
Humanities and Social Sciences
Socially responsible investments
SRI
Sustainability
title Hidden Gem or Fool’s Gold: Can passive ESG ETFs outperform the benchmarks?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T02%3A40%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hidden%20Gem%20or%20Fool%E2%80%99s%20Gold:%20Can%20passive%20ESG%20ETFs%20outperform%20the%20benchmarks?&rft.jtitle=International%20review%20of%20financial%20analysis&rft.au=Dumitrescu,%20Ariadna&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=86&rft.spage=102540&rft.pages=102540-&rft.artnum=102540&rft.issn=1057-5219&rft.eissn=1873-8079&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102540&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_04136303v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-967a1e792b519a28ef91d5729c887f11db5f959d518a3d393a35785e9d583eee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true