Loading…

Knowledge coproduction to improve assessments of nature's contributions to people

Sustainability science needs new approaches to produce, share, and use knowledge because there are major barriers to translating research into policy and practice. Multiple actors hold relevant knowledge for sustainability including indigenous and local people who have developed over generations kno...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Conservation biology 2023-12, Vol.37 (6), p.e14182-n/a
Main Authors: Vallet, Améline, Locatelli, Bruno, Valdivia‐Díaz, Merelyn, Quispe Conde, Yésica, Matencio García, Gerardina, Ramos Criales, Alejandrina, Valverde Huamanñahui, Francisca, Ramos Criales, Santusa, Makowski, David, Lavorel, Sandra
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3862-f83609d5b3080dd2ccab0c686a2e65ad9de634b45dfa3c8feb14e4c86dd494073
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 6
container_start_page e14182
container_title Conservation biology
container_volume 37
creator Vallet, Améline
Locatelli, Bruno
Valdivia‐Díaz, Merelyn
Quispe Conde, Yésica
Matencio García, Gerardina
Ramos Criales, Alejandrina
Valverde Huamanñahui, Francisca
Ramos Criales, Santusa
Makowski, David
Lavorel, Sandra
description Sustainability science needs new approaches to produce, share, and use knowledge because there are major barriers to translating research into policy and practice. Multiple actors hold relevant knowledge for sustainability including indigenous and local people who have developed over generations knowledge, methods, and practices that biodiversity and ecosystem assessments need to capture. Despite efforts to mainstream knowledge coproduction, less than 3% of the literature on nature's contributions to people (NCP) integrates indigenous and local knowledge (ILK). Approaches and tools to better integrate scientific and ILK knowledge systems in NCP assessments are urgently needed. To fill this gap, we conducted interviews with ILK experts from Abancay and Tamburco, Peru, and convened focus groups and workshops during which participatory mapping, a serious game, a Bayesian belief network based on ILK were introduced. We inventoried 60 medicinal plants used to treat different illnesses, and analyzed the spatial distribution of the 7 plants that contribute the most to a good quality of life, and delineated their nonmedicinal uses. Based on the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services conceptual framework, we defined dimensions of a good quality of life according to indigenous and local worldviews. Medicinal plants contributed strongly to health and household security, among other contributions. Climate change and overexploitation were the main perceived threats to medicinal plants, despite the existence of formal and customary institutions to regulate trade. Our approach was flexible enough to integrate diverse forms of knowledge, as well as qualitative and quantitative information from, for example, the Bayesian belief network. Coproducción de conocimiento para mejorar la evaluación de las contribuciones de la naturaleza para las personas Resumen La ciencia de la sostenibilidad necesita nuevos enfoques para producir, compartir y utilizar los conocimientos, ya que existen grandes obstáculos para trasladar la investigación a la política y la práctica. Varios actores poseen conocimientos relevantes para la sostenibilidad, incluidos los pueblos originarios y locales que han desarrollado conocimientos, métodos y prácticas a lo largo de generaciones, que deben reflejarse en las evaluaciones de la biodiversidad y los ecosistemas. A pesar de los esfuerzos por integrar la coproducción de conocimientos,
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cobi.14182
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04298913v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2899315414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3862-f83609d5b3080dd2ccab0c686a2e65ad9de634b45dfa3c8feb14e4c86dd494073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1LwzAYB_AgipsvFz-AFDz4AtW8tUuOc6gTB0PQc0iTp1ppm9m0G357U6sePJhLyMMvfxL-CB0RfEnCujIuKy4JJ4JuoTFJKIvJhMltNMZCiFgISUdoz_s3jLFMCN9FIzYJUyz5GD0-1G5Tgn2ByLhV42xn2sLVUeuiogrnNUTae_C-grr1kcujWrddA6c--Lptiqzrve8vrMCtSjhAO7kuPRx-7_vo-fbmaTaPF8u7-9l0ERsmUhrngqVY2iRjWGBrqTE6wyYVqaaQJtpKCynjGU9srpkROWSEAzcitZZLjidsH50Pua-6VKumqHTzoZwu1Hy6UP0McyqFJGxNgj0bbPjRewe-VVXhDZSlrsF1XlEhWCJoMunpyR_65rqmDj8JSkpGEk54UBeDMo3zvoH89wUEq74U1ZeivkoJ-Pg7sssqsL_0p4UAyAA2RQkf_0Sp2fL6fgj9BM4ulvU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2899315414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge coproduction to improve assessments of nature's contributions to people</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Vallet, Améline ; Locatelli, Bruno ; Valdivia‐Díaz, Merelyn ; Quispe Conde, Yésica ; Matencio García, Gerardina ; Ramos Criales, Alejandrina ; Valverde Huamanñahui, Francisca ; Ramos Criales, Santusa ; Makowski, David ; Lavorel, Sandra</creator><creatorcontrib>Vallet, Améline ; Locatelli, Bruno ; Valdivia‐Díaz, Merelyn ; Quispe Conde, Yésica ; Matencio García, Gerardina ; Ramos Criales, Alejandrina ; Valverde Huamanñahui, Francisca ; Ramos Criales, Santusa ; Makowski, David ; Lavorel, Sandra</creatorcontrib><description>Sustainability science needs new approaches to produce, share, and use knowledge because there are major barriers to translating research into policy and practice. Multiple actors hold relevant knowledge for sustainability including indigenous and local people who have developed over generations knowledge, methods, and practices that biodiversity and ecosystem assessments need to capture. Despite efforts to mainstream knowledge coproduction, less than 3% of the literature on nature's contributions to people (NCP) integrates indigenous and local knowledge (ILK). Approaches and tools to better integrate scientific and ILK knowledge systems in NCP assessments are urgently needed. To fill this gap, we conducted interviews with ILK experts from Abancay and Tamburco, Peru, and convened focus groups and workshops during which participatory mapping, a serious game, a Bayesian belief network based on ILK were introduced. We inventoried 60 medicinal plants used to treat different illnesses, and analyzed the spatial distribution of the 7 plants that contribute the most to a good quality of life, and delineated their nonmedicinal uses. Based on the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services conceptual framework, we defined dimensions of a good quality of life according to indigenous and local worldviews. Medicinal plants contributed strongly to health and household security, among other contributions. Climate change and overexploitation were the main perceived threats to medicinal plants, despite the existence of formal and customary institutions to regulate trade. Our approach was flexible enough to integrate diverse forms of knowledge, as well as qualitative and quantitative information from, for example, the Bayesian belief network. Coproducción de conocimiento para mejorar la evaluación de las contribuciones de la naturaleza para las personas Resumen La ciencia de la sostenibilidad necesita nuevos enfoques para producir, compartir y utilizar los conocimientos, ya que existen grandes obstáculos para trasladar la investigación a la política y la práctica. Varios actores poseen conocimientos relevantes para la sostenibilidad, incluidos los pueblos originarios y locales que han desarrollado conocimientos, métodos y prácticas a lo largo de generaciones, que deben reflejarse en las evaluaciones de la biodiversidad y los ecosistemas. A pesar de los esfuerzos por integrar la coproducción de conocimientos, &lt;3% de la bibliografía sobre las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas (CNP) integra los conocimientos autóctonos y locales (CAL). Se necesitan urgentemente enfoques y herramientas para integrar mejor los sistemas de conocimiento científico y los conocimientos autóctonos y locales en las evaluaciones de los CNP. Para llenar este vacío, realizamos entrevistas con expertos en CAL de Abancay y Tamburco, Perú, y convocamos grupos focales y talleres durante los cuales se introdujeron el mapeo participativo, un juego serio y una red de creencia bayesiana basada en CAL. Inventariamos 60 plantas medicinales utilizadas para tratar diferentes enfermedades y analizamos la distribución espacial de las siete especies de plantas que más contribuyen a una buena calidad de vida y delineamos sus usos no medicinales. A partir del marco conceptual de la Plataforma Intergubernamental Científico‐Normativa sobre Diversidad Biológica y Servicios de los Ecosistemas, definimos las dimensiones de una buena calidad de vida según las cosmovisiones autóctonas y locales. Las plantas medicinales contribuían en gran medida a la salud y a la seguridad de los hogares, entre otras aportaciones. El cambio climático y la sobreexplotación fueron las principales amenazas percibidas para las plantas medicinales a pesar de la existencia de instituciones tradicionales que regulan el mercado. Nuestra estrategia fue lo suficientemente flexible para integrar el conocimiento diverso, así como la información cualitativa y cuantitativa, como por ejemplo la red de creencia bayesiana. 通过知识共创改进自然对人类贡献的评估 【摘要】可持续科学需要新的方法来生产、分享和利用知识, 这是因为将研究成果转化为政策和实践仍存在重大阻碍。该过程的各方参与者都拥有与可持续相关的知识, 包括土著人和当地人, 他们经过数代人的努力已经形成了生物多样性和生态系统评估所需的知识、方法和实践。然而, 即便人们已在努力将知识共创纳入主流, 但在关于自然对人类贡献的文献中, 仅有不到3%的文献整合了土著和地方知识 (Indigenous and local knowledge, ILK) 。因此, 目前急需建立在自然对人类贡献评估中更好地整合科学知识体系与 ILK 知识体系的方法和工具。为了填补这一空白, 本研究对秘鲁阿班凯和坦布尔科的 ILK 专家进行了访谈, 组织了焦点小组会议和研讨会, 介绍了参与式地图绘制、严肃游戏和基于 ILK 的贝叶斯信念网络。我们整理了 60 种用于治疗不同疾病的药用植物, 分析了对提高生活质量贡献最大的7种植物的空间分布, 并界定了它们的非药用用途。根据生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学政策平台的概念框架, 我们按照土著和地方世界观定义了优质生活的各个层面。我们发现, 药用植物除其他贡献外, 还对健康和家庭安全做出了巨大贡献。人们认为气候变化和过度开发是药用植物面临的主要威胁, 尽管已存在正式和惯例的贸易监管体系。我们的方法非常灵活, 可以整合各种形式的知识, 以及来自贝叶斯信念网络等定性和定量的信息。【翻译:胡怡思;审校:聂永刚】</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14182</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37889094</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian belief networks ; Bayesian theory ; Belief networks ; bienestar ; Biodiversity ; Climate change ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem assessment ; Ecosystem services ; Environment and Society ; Environmental Sciences ; ethnopharmacology ; etnofarmacología ; Herbal medicine ; Humans ; ILK protein ; investigación participativa ; investigación transdisciplinaria ; Knowledge ; Life Sciences ; mapeo de distribución botánica ; medicina tradicional ; Medicinal plants ; Overexploitation ; participatory research ; Pharmaceutical sciences ; Pharmacology ; plant distribution mapping ; Plants ; Plants, Medicinal ; Policy research ; Probability theory ; Quality of Life ; red de creencia bayesiana ; servicios ambientales ; Spatial distribution ; Sustainability ; Sustainability science ; Traditional medicine ; transdisciplinary research ; well‐being ; 传统医学 ; 参与式研究 ; 植物分布 ; 民族药物学 ; 生态系统服务 ; 福祉 ; 贝叶斯信念网络 ; 跨学科研究</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2023-12, Vol.37 (6), p.e14182-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3862-f83609d5b3080dd2ccab0c686a2e65ad9de634b45dfa3c8feb14e4c86dd494073</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2731-0098 ; 0000-0003-2983-1644 ; 0000-0001-6385-3703 ; 0000-0002-9592-4657 ; 0000-0002-7300-2811</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37889094$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04298913$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vallet, Améline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Locatelli, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdivia‐Díaz, Merelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quispe Conde, Yésica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matencio García, Gerardina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos Criales, Alejandrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valverde Huamanñahui, Francisca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos Criales, Santusa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makowski, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavorel, Sandra</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge coproduction to improve assessments of nature's contributions to people</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><description>Sustainability science needs new approaches to produce, share, and use knowledge because there are major barriers to translating research into policy and practice. Multiple actors hold relevant knowledge for sustainability including indigenous and local people who have developed over generations knowledge, methods, and practices that biodiversity and ecosystem assessments need to capture. Despite efforts to mainstream knowledge coproduction, less than 3% of the literature on nature's contributions to people (NCP) integrates indigenous and local knowledge (ILK). Approaches and tools to better integrate scientific and ILK knowledge systems in NCP assessments are urgently needed. To fill this gap, we conducted interviews with ILK experts from Abancay and Tamburco, Peru, and convened focus groups and workshops during which participatory mapping, a serious game, a Bayesian belief network based on ILK were introduced. We inventoried 60 medicinal plants used to treat different illnesses, and analyzed the spatial distribution of the 7 plants that contribute the most to a good quality of life, and delineated their nonmedicinal uses. Based on the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services conceptual framework, we defined dimensions of a good quality of life according to indigenous and local worldviews. Medicinal plants contributed strongly to health and household security, among other contributions. Climate change and overexploitation were the main perceived threats to medicinal plants, despite the existence of formal and customary institutions to regulate trade. Our approach was flexible enough to integrate diverse forms of knowledge, as well as qualitative and quantitative information from, for example, the Bayesian belief network. Coproducción de conocimiento para mejorar la evaluación de las contribuciones de la naturaleza para las personas Resumen La ciencia de la sostenibilidad necesita nuevos enfoques para producir, compartir y utilizar los conocimientos, ya que existen grandes obstáculos para trasladar la investigación a la política y la práctica. Varios actores poseen conocimientos relevantes para la sostenibilidad, incluidos los pueblos originarios y locales que han desarrollado conocimientos, métodos y prácticas a lo largo de generaciones, que deben reflejarse en las evaluaciones de la biodiversidad y los ecosistemas. A pesar de los esfuerzos por integrar la coproducción de conocimientos, &lt;3% de la bibliografía sobre las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas (CNP) integra los conocimientos autóctonos y locales (CAL). Se necesitan urgentemente enfoques y herramientas para integrar mejor los sistemas de conocimiento científico y los conocimientos autóctonos y locales en las evaluaciones de los CNP. Para llenar este vacío, realizamos entrevistas con expertos en CAL de Abancay y Tamburco, Perú, y convocamos grupos focales y talleres durante los cuales se introdujeron el mapeo participativo, un juego serio y una red de creencia bayesiana basada en CAL. Inventariamos 60 plantas medicinales utilizadas para tratar diferentes enfermedades y analizamos la distribución espacial de las siete especies de plantas que más contribuyen a una buena calidad de vida y delineamos sus usos no medicinales. A partir del marco conceptual de la Plataforma Intergubernamental Científico‐Normativa sobre Diversidad Biológica y Servicios de los Ecosistemas, definimos las dimensiones de una buena calidad de vida según las cosmovisiones autóctonas y locales. Las plantas medicinales contribuían en gran medida a la salud y a la seguridad de los hogares, entre otras aportaciones. El cambio climático y la sobreexplotación fueron las principales amenazas percibidas para las plantas medicinales a pesar de la existencia de instituciones tradicionales que regulan el mercado. Nuestra estrategia fue lo suficientemente flexible para integrar el conocimiento diverso, así como la información cualitativa y cuantitativa, como por ejemplo la red de creencia bayesiana. 通过知识共创改进自然对人类贡献的评估 【摘要】可持续科学需要新的方法来生产、分享和利用知识, 这是因为将研究成果转化为政策和实践仍存在重大阻碍。该过程的各方参与者都拥有与可持续相关的知识, 包括土著人和当地人, 他们经过数代人的努力已经形成了生物多样性和生态系统评估所需的知识、方法和实践。然而, 即便人们已在努力将知识共创纳入主流, 但在关于自然对人类贡献的文献中, 仅有不到3%的文献整合了土著和地方知识 (Indigenous and local knowledge, ILK) 。因此, 目前急需建立在自然对人类贡献评估中更好地整合科学知识体系与 ILK 知识体系的方法和工具。为了填补这一空白, 本研究对秘鲁阿班凯和坦布尔科的 ILK 专家进行了访谈, 组织了焦点小组会议和研讨会, 介绍了参与式地图绘制、严肃游戏和基于 ILK 的贝叶斯信念网络。我们整理了 60 种用于治疗不同疾病的药用植物, 分析了对提高生活质量贡献最大的7种植物的空间分布, 并界定了它们的非药用用途。根据生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学政策平台的概念框架, 我们按照土著和地方世界观定义了优质生活的各个层面。我们发现, 药用植物除其他贡献外, 还对健康和家庭安全做出了巨大贡献。人们认为气候变化和过度开发是药用植物面临的主要威胁, 尽管已存在正式和惯例的贸易监管体系。我们的方法非常灵活, 可以整合各种形式的知识, 以及来自贝叶斯信念网络等定性和定量的信息。【翻译:胡怡思;审校:聂永刚】</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian belief networks</subject><subject>Bayesian theory</subject><subject>Belief networks</subject><subject>bienestar</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem assessment</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Environment and Society</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>ethnopharmacology</subject><subject>etnofarmacología</subject><subject>Herbal medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ILK protein</subject><subject>investigación participativa</subject><subject>investigación transdisciplinaria</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>mapeo de distribución botánica</subject><subject>medicina tradicional</subject><subject>Medicinal plants</subject><subject>Overexploitation</subject><subject>participatory research</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>plant distribution mapping</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants, Medicinal</subject><subject>Policy research</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>red de creencia bayesiana</subject><subject>servicios ambientales</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainability science</subject><subject>Traditional medicine</subject><subject>transdisciplinary research</subject><subject>well‐being</subject><subject>传统医学</subject><subject>参与式研究</subject><subject>植物分布</subject><subject>民族药物学</subject><subject>生态系统服务</subject><subject>福祉</subject><subject>贝叶斯信念网络</subject><subject>跨学科研究</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1LwzAYB_AgipsvFz-AFDz4AtW8tUuOc6gTB0PQc0iTp1ppm9m0G357U6sePJhLyMMvfxL-CB0RfEnCujIuKy4JJ4JuoTFJKIvJhMltNMZCiFgISUdoz_s3jLFMCN9FIzYJUyz5GD0-1G5Tgn2ByLhV42xn2sLVUeuiogrnNUTae_C-grr1kcujWrddA6c--Lptiqzrve8vrMCtSjhAO7kuPRx-7_vo-fbmaTaPF8u7-9l0ERsmUhrngqVY2iRjWGBrqTE6wyYVqaaQJtpKCynjGU9srpkROWSEAzcitZZLjidsH50Pua-6VKumqHTzoZwu1Hy6UP0McyqFJGxNgj0bbPjRewe-VVXhDZSlrsF1XlEhWCJoMunpyR_65rqmDj8JSkpGEk54UBeDMo3zvoH89wUEq74U1ZeivkoJ-Pg7sssqsL_0p4UAyAA2RQkf_0Sp2fL6fgj9BM4ulvU</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Vallet, Améline</creator><creator>Locatelli, Bruno</creator><creator>Valdivia‐Díaz, Merelyn</creator><creator>Quispe Conde, Yésica</creator><creator>Matencio García, Gerardina</creator><creator>Ramos Criales, Alejandrina</creator><creator>Valverde Huamanñahui, Francisca</creator><creator>Ramos Criales, Santusa</creator><creator>Makowski, David</creator><creator>Lavorel, Sandra</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2731-0098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2983-1644</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6385-3703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9592-4657</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7300-2811</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Knowledge coproduction to improve assessments of nature's contributions to people</title><author>Vallet, Améline ; Locatelli, Bruno ; Valdivia‐Díaz, Merelyn ; Quispe Conde, Yésica ; Matencio García, Gerardina ; Ramos Criales, Alejandrina ; Valverde Huamanñahui, Francisca ; Ramos Criales, Santusa ; Makowski, David ; Lavorel, Sandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3862-f83609d5b3080dd2ccab0c686a2e65ad9de634b45dfa3c8feb14e4c86dd494073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian belief networks</topic><topic>Bayesian theory</topic><topic>Belief networks</topic><topic>bienestar</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem assessment</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Environment and Society</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>ethnopharmacology</topic><topic>etnofarmacología</topic><topic>Herbal medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ILK protein</topic><topic>investigación participativa</topic><topic>investigación transdisciplinaria</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>mapeo de distribución botánica</topic><topic>medicina tradicional</topic><topic>Medicinal plants</topic><topic>Overexploitation</topic><topic>participatory research</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>plant distribution mapping</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants, Medicinal</topic><topic>Policy research</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>red de creencia bayesiana</topic><topic>servicios ambientales</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainability science</topic><topic>Traditional medicine</topic><topic>transdisciplinary research</topic><topic>well‐being</topic><topic>传统医学</topic><topic>参与式研究</topic><topic>植物分布</topic><topic>民族药物学</topic><topic>生态系统服务</topic><topic>福祉</topic><topic>贝叶斯信念网络</topic><topic>跨学科研究</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vallet, Améline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Locatelli, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdivia‐Díaz, Merelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quispe Conde, Yésica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matencio García, Gerardina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos Criales, Alejandrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valverde Huamanñahui, Francisca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos Criales, Santusa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makowski, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavorel, Sandra</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vallet, Améline</au><au>Locatelli, Bruno</au><au>Valdivia‐Díaz, Merelyn</au><au>Quispe Conde, Yésica</au><au>Matencio García, Gerardina</au><au>Ramos Criales, Alejandrina</au><au>Valverde Huamanñahui, Francisca</au><au>Ramos Criales, Santusa</au><au>Makowski, David</au><au>Lavorel, Sandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowledge coproduction to improve assessments of nature's contributions to people</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e14182</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14182-n/a</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><abstract>Sustainability science needs new approaches to produce, share, and use knowledge because there are major barriers to translating research into policy and practice. Multiple actors hold relevant knowledge for sustainability including indigenous and local people who have developed over generations knowledge, methods, and practices that biodiversity and ecosystem assessments need to capture. Despite efforts to mainstream knowledge coproduction, less than 3% of the literature on nature's contributions to people (NCP) integrates indigenous and local knowledge (ILK). Approaches and tools to better integrate scientific and ILK knowledge systems in NCP assessments are urgently needed. To fill this gap, we conducted interviews with ILK experts from Abancay and Tamburco, Peru, and convened focus groups and workshops during which participatory mapping, a serious game, a Bayesian belief network based on ILK were introduced. We inventoried 60 medicinal plants used to treat different illnesses, and analyzed the spatial distribution of the 7 plants that contribute the most to a good quality of life, and delineated their nonmedicinal uses. Based on the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services conceptual framework, we defined dimensions of a good quality of life according to indigenous and local worldviews. Medicinal plants contributed strongly to health and household security, among other contributions. Climate change and overexploitation were the main perceived threats to medicinal plants, despite the existence of formal and customary institutions to regulate trade. Our approach was flexible enough to integrate diverse forms of knowledge, as well as qualitative and quantitative information from, for example, the Bayesian belief network. Coproducción de conocimiento para mejorar la evaluación de las contribuciones de la naturaleza para las personas Resumen La ciencia de la sostenibilidad necesita nuevos enfoques para producir, compartir y utilizar los conocimientos, ya que existen grandes obstáculos para trasladar la investigación a la política y la práctica. Varios actores poseen conocimientos relevantes para la sostenibilidad, incluidos los pueblos originarios y locales que han desarrollado conocimientos, métodos y prácticas a lo largo de generaciones, que deben reflejarse en las evaluaciones de la biodiversidad y los ecosistemas. A pesar de los esfuerzos por integrar la coproducción de conocimientos, &lt;3% de la bibliografía sobre las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas (CNP) integra los conocimientos autóctonos y locales (CAL). Se necesitan urgentemente enfoques y herramientas para integrar mejor los sistemas de conocimiento científico y los conocimientos autóctonos y locales en las evaluaciones de los CNP. Para llenar este vacío, realizamos entrevistas con expertos en CAL de Abancay y Tamburco, Perú, y convocamos grupos focales y talleres durante los cuales se introdujeron el mapeo participativo, un juego serio y una red de creencia bayesiana basada en CAL. Inventariamos 60 plantas medicinales utilizadas para tratar diferentes enfermedades y analizamos la distribución espacial de las siete especies de plantas que más contribuyen a una buena calidad de vida y delineamos sus usos no medicinales. A partir del marco conceptual de la Plataforma Intergubernamental Científico‐Normativa sobre Diversidad Biológica y Servicios de los Ecosistemas, definimos las dimensiones de una buena calidad de vida según las cosmovisiones autóctonas y locales. Las plantas medicinales contribuían en gran medida a la salud y a la seguridad de los hogares, entre otras aportaciones. El cambio climático y la sobreexplotación fueron las principales amenazas percibidas para las plantas medicinales a pesar de la existencia de instituciones tradicionales que regulan el mercado. Nuestra estrategia fue lo suficientemente flexible para integrar el conocimiento diverso, así como la información cualitativa y cuantitativa, como por ejemplo la red de creencia bayesiana. 通过知识共创改进自然对人类贡献的评估 【摘要】可持续科学需要新的方法来生产、分享和利用知识, 这是因为将研究成果转化为政策和实践仍存在重大阻碍。该过程的各方参与者都拥有与可持续相关的知识, 包括土著人和当地人, 他们经过数代人的努力已经形成了生物多样性和生态系统评估所需的知识、方法和实践。然而, 即便人们已在努力将知识共创纳入主流, 但在关于自然对人类贡献的文献中, 仅有不到3%的文献整合了土著和地方知识 (Indigenous and local knowledge, ILK) 。因此, 目前急需建立在自然对人类贡献评估中更好地整合科学知识体系与 ILK 知识体系的方法和工具。为了填补这一空白, 本研究对秘鲁阿班凯和坦布尔科的 ILK 专家进行了访谈, 组织了焦点小组会议和研讨会, 介绍了参与式地图绘制、严肃游戏和基于 ILK 的贝叶斯信念网络。我们整理了 60 种用于治疗不同疾病的药用植物, 分析了对提高生活质量贡献最大的7种植物的空间分布, 并界定了它们的非药用用途。根据生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学政策平台的概念框架, 我们按照土著和地方世界观定义了优质生活的各个层面。我们发现, 药用植物除其他贡献外, 还对健康和家庭安全做出了巨大贡献。人们认为气候变化和过度开发是药用植物面临的主要威胁, 尽管已存在正式和惯例的贸易监管体系。我们的方法非常灵活, 可以整合各种形式的知识, 以及来自贝叶斯信念网络等定性和定量的信息。【翻译:胡怡思;审校:聂永刚】</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>37889094</pmid><doi>10.1111/cobi.14182</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2731-0098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2983-1644</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6385-3703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9592-4657</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7300-2811</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-8892
ispartof Conservation biology, 2023-12, Vol.37 (6), p.e14182-n/a
issn 0888-8892
1523-1739
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04298913v1
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Assessments
Bayes Theorem
Bayesian analysis
Bayesian belief networks
Bayesian theory
Belief networks
bienestar
Biodiversity
Climate change
Conservation of Natural Resources
Ecosystem
Ecosystem assessment
Ecosystem services
Environment and Society
Environmental Sciences
ethnopharmacology
etnofarmacología
Herbal medicine
Humans
ILK protein
investigación participativa
investigación transdisciplinaria
Knowledge
Life Sciences
mapeo de distribución botánica
medicina tradicional
Medicinal plants
Overexploitation
participatory research
Pharmaceutical sciences
Pharmacology
plant distribution mapping
Plants
Plants, Medicinal
Policy research
Probability theory
Quality of Life
red de creencia bayesiana
servicios ambientales
Spatial distribution
Sustainability
Sustainability science
Traditional medicine
transdisciplinary research
well‐being
传统医学
参与式研究
植物分布
民族药物学
生态系统服务
福祉
贝叶斯信念网络
跨学科研究
title Knowledge coproduction to improve assessments of nature's contributions to people
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A53%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge%20coproduction%20to%20improve%20assessments%20of%20nature's%20contributions%20to%20people&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=Vallet,%20Am%C3%A9line&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e14182&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14182-n/a&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cobi.14182&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2899315414%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3862-f83609d5b3080dd2ccab0c686a2e65ad9de634b45dfa3c8feb14e4c86dd494073%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2899315414&rft_id=info:pmid/37889094&rfr_iscdi=true