Loading…
Understanding responsibility under uncertainty: A critical and scoping review of autonomous driving systems
Autonomous driving systems (ADS) operate in an environment that is inherently complex. As these systems may execute a task without the permission of a human agent, they raise major safety and responsibility issues. To identify the relevant issues for information systems, we conducted a critical and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of information technology 2024-09, Vol.39 (3), p.587-615 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-59ae710954c8a48438ab9fb9c04f48e3b0a151d41e0130eda5e0f477da8d67fe3 |
container_end_page | 615 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 587 |
container_title | Journal of information technology |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Rowe, Frantz Jeanneret Medina, Maximiliano Benoit Journé Coëtard, Emmanuel Myers, Michael |
description | Autonomous driving systems (ADS) operate in an environment that is inherently complex. As these systems may execute a task without the permission of a human agent, they raise major safety and responsibility issues. To identify the relevant issues for information systems, we conducted a critical and scoping review of the literature from many disciplines. The innovative methodology we used combines bibliometrics techniques, grounded theory and a critical conceptual framework to analyse the structure and research themes of the field. Our findings show that there are certain ironies in the way in which responsibility for apparently safe autonomous systems is apportioned. These ironies are interconnected and reveal that there remains significant uncertainty and ambiguity regarding the distribution of responsibility between stakeholders. The ironies draw attention to the challenges of safety and responsibility with ADS and possibly other cyber-physical systems in our increasingly digital world. We make seven recommendations related to (1) value sensitive design and system theory approaches; (2) stakeholders’ interests and interactions; (3) task allocation; (4) deskilling; (5) controllability; (6) responsibility (moral and legal); (7) trust. We suggest five areas for future IS research on ADS. These areas are related to socio-technical systems, critical research, safety, responsibility and trust. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/02683962231207108 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04440308v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_02683962231207108</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3110446015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-59ae710954c8a48438ab9fb9c04f48e3b0a151d41e0130eda5e0f477da8d67fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMoOKc_wFvAk4fOL03apt7GUCcMvLhzSNN0ZnZNTdJJ_70tFT2IlwTyPs_Llw-hawILQrLsDuKU0zyNY0piyAjwEzQjLE0jxmh2imZjHo3AObrwfg8AMc3zGXrfNqV2PsimNM0OO-1b23hTmNqEHndjOJxKuyBNE_p7vMTKmWCUrPHgYK9sO4lHoz-xrbDsgm3swXYel84cx9D3PuiDv0Rnlay9vvq-52j7-PC6Wkebl6fn1XITqTjnIUpyqYcf5AlTXDLOKJdFXhW5AlYxrmkBkiSkZEQDoaBLmWioWJaVkpdpVmk6R7dT75usRevMQbpeWGnEerkR4xswxoACP5KBvZnY1tmPTvsg9rZzzTCeoIQMYAokGSgyUcpZ752ufmoJiHH_4s_-B2cxOV7u9G_r_8IXkWGGOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3110446015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding responsibility under uncertainty: A critical and scoping review of autonomous driving systems</title><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Rowe, Frantz ; Jeanneret Medina, Maximiliano ; Benoit Journé ; Coëtard, Emmanuel ; Myers, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Frantz ; Jeanneret Medina, Maximiliano ; Benoit Journé ; Coëtard, Emmanuel ; Myers, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Autonomous driving systems (ADS) operate in an environment that is inherently complex. As these systems may execute a task without the permission of a human agent, they raise major safety and responsibility issues. To identify the relevant issues for information systems, we conducted a critical and scoping review of the literature from many disciplines. The innovative methodology we used combines bibliometrics techniques, grounded theory and a critical conceptual framework to analyse the structure and research themes of the field. Our findings show that there are certain ironies in the way in which responsibility for apparently safe autonomous systems is apportioned. These ironies are interconnected and reveal that there remains significant uncertainty and ambiguity regarding the distribution of responsibility between stakeholders. The ironies draw attention to the challenges of safety and responsibility with ADS and possibly other cyber-physical systems in our increasingly digital world. We make seven recommendations related to (1) value sensitive design and system theory approaches; (2) stakeholders’ interests and interactions; (3) task allocation; (4) deskilling; (5) controllability; (6) responsibility (moral and legal); (7) trust. We suggest five areas for future IS research on ADS. These areas are related to socio-technical systems, critical research, safety, responsibility and trust.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4437</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/02683962231207108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Cyber-physical systems ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Information systems ; Literature reviews ; System theory ; Systems theory ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Journal of information technology, 2024-09, Vol.39 (3), p.587-615</ispartof><rights>Association for Information Technology Trust 2023</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-59ae710954c8a48438ab9fb9c04f48e3b0a151d41e0130eda5e0f477da8d67fe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4203-7680 ; 0000-0001-8520-1570 ; 0000-0001-9207-6317</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,34135,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04440308$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Frantz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanneret Medina, Maximiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoit Journé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coëtard, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding responsibility under uncertainty: A critical and scoping review of autonomous driving systems</title><title>Journal of information technology</title><description>Autonomous driving systems (ADS) operate in an environment that is inherently complex. As these systems may execute a task without the permission of a human agent, they raise major safety and responsibility issues. To identify the relevant issues for information systems, we conducted a critical and scoping review of the literature from many disciplines. The innovative methodology we used combines bibliometrics techniques, grounded theory and a critical conceptual framework to analyse the structure and research themes of the field. Our findings show that there are certain ironies in the way in which responsibility for apparently safe autonomous systems is apportioned. These ironies are interconnected and reveal that there remains significant uncertainty and ambiguity regarding the distribution of responsibility between stakeholders. The ironies draw attention to the challenges of safety and responsibility with ADS and possibly other cyber-physical systems in our increasingly digital world. We make seven recommendations related to (1) value sensitive design and system theory approaches; (2) stakeholders’ interests and interactions; (3) task allocation; (4) deskilling; (5) controllability; (6) responsibility (moral and legal); (7) trust. We suggest five areas for future IS research on ADS. These areas are related to socio-technical systems, critical research, safety, responsibility and trust.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Cyber-physical systems</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>System theory</subject><subject>Systems theory</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0268-3962</issn><issn>1466-4437</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMoOKc_wFvAk4fOL03apt7GUCcMvLhzSNN0ZnZNTdJJ_70tFT2IlwTyPs_Llw-hawILQrLsDuKU0zyNY0piyAjwEzQjLE0jxmh2imZjHo3AObrwfg8AMc3zGXrfNqV2PsimNM0OO-1b23hTmNqEHndjOJxKuyBNE_p7vMTKmWCUrPHgYK9sO4lHoz-xrbDsgm3swXYel84cx9D3PuiDv0Rnlay9vvq-52j7-PC6Wkebl6fn1XITqTjnIUpyqYcf5AlTXDLOKJdFXhW5AlYxrmkBkiSkZEQDoaBLmWioWJaVkpdpVmk6R7dT75usRevMQbpeWGnEerkR4xswxoACP5KBvZnY1tmPTvsg9rZzzTCeoIQMYAokGSgyUcpZ752ufmoJiHH_4s_-B2cxOV7u9G_r_8IXkWGGOQ</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Rowe, Frantz</creator><creator>Jeanneret Medina, Maximiliano</creator><creator>Benoit Journé</creator><creator>Coëtard, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Myers, Michael</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4203-7680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-1570</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-6317</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Understanding responsibility under uncertainty: A critical and scoping review of autonomous driving systems</title><author>Rowe, Frantz ; Jeanneret Medina, Maximiliano ; Benoit Journé ; Coëtard, Emmanuel ; Myers, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-59ae710954c8a48438ab9fb9c04f48e3b0a151d41e0130eda5e0f477da8d67fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Cyber-physical systems</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>System theory</topic><topic>Systems theory</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Frantz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanneret Medina, Maximiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoit Journé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coëtard, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Journal of information technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rowe, Frantz</au><au>Jeanneret Medina, Maximiliano</au><au>Benoit Journé</au><au>Coëtard, Emmanuel</au><au>Myers, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding responsibility under uncertainty: A critical and scoping review of autonomous driving systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal of information technology</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>587</spage><epage>615</epage><pages>587-615</pages><issn>0268-3962</issn><eissn>1466-4437</eissn><abstract>Autonomous driving systems (ADS) operate in an environment that is inherently complex. As these systems may execute a task without the permission of a human agent, they raise major safety and responsibility issues. To identify the relevant issues for information systems, we conducted a critical and scoping review of the literature from many disciplines. The innovative methodology we used combines bibliometrics techniques, grounded theory and a critical conceptual framework to analyse the structure and research themes of the field. Our findings show that there are certain ironies in the way in which responsibility for apparently safe autonomous systems is apportioned. These ironies are interconnected and reveal that there remains significant uncertainty and ambiguity regarding the distribution of responsibility between stakeholders. The ironies draw attention to the challenges of safety and responsibility with ADS and possibly other cyber-physical systems in our increasingly digital world. We make seven recommendations related to (1) value sensitive design and system theory approaches; (2) stakeholders’ interests and interactions; (3) task allocation; (4) deskilling; (5) controllability; (6) responsibility (moral and legal); (7) trust. We suggest five areas for future IS research on ADS. These areas are related to socio-technical systems, critical research, safety, responsibility and trust.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/02683962231207108</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4203-7680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-1570</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-6317</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-3962 |
ispartof | Journal of information technology, 2024-09, Vol.39 (3), p.587-615 |
issn | 0268-3962 1466-4437 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04440308v1 |
source | Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Bibliometrics Cyber-physical systems Humanities and Social Sciences Information systems Literature reviews System theory Systems theory Uncertainty |
title | Understanding responsibility under uncertainty: A critical and scoping review of autonomous driving systems |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T07%3A56%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20responsibility%20under%20uncertainty:%20A%20critical%20and%20scoping%20review%20of%20autonomous%20driving%20systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20information%20technology&rft.au=Rowe,%20Frantz&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=587&rft.epage=615&rft.pages=587-615&rft.issn=0268-3962&rft.eissn=1466-4437&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/02683962231207108&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3110446015%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-59ae710954c8a48438ab9fb9c04f48e3b0a151d41e0130eda5e0f477da8d67fe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3110446015&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_02683962231207108&rfr_iscdi=true |