Loading…
Frontal correction assessment in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using halo gravity traction before to posterior vertebral arthrodesis: a multicenter retrospective observational study
Purpose Preoperative preparation with halo gravity traction (HGT) has several advantages but is still controversial. A multicenter, observational, retrospective study was conducted to determine whether HGT provides better frontal correction in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Metho...
Saved in:
Published in: | European spine journal 2024-02, Vol.33 (2), p.713-722 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-8ec928bf15b16aadbbfc233a7033b62da7a41bbaf3fb4fe99d55cb8b36d304113 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-8ec928bf15b16aadbbfc233a7033b62da7a41bbaf3fb4fe99d55cb8b36d304113 |
container_end_page | 722 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 713 |
container_title | European spine journal |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Langlais, Tristan Josse, Antoine Violas, Philippe |
description | Purpose
Preoperative preparation with halo gravity traction (HGT) has several advantages but is still controversial. A multicenter, observational, retrospective study was conducted to determine whether HGT provides better frontal correction in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
Methods
Between 2010 and 2020, all patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) AIS with a Cobb angle greater than 80° were included. The included patients who underwent HGT were compared (complications rate and radiographic parameters) to patients who did not undergo traction (noHGT). For patients who underwent HGT, a spinal front X-ray at the end of the traction procedure was performed.
Results
Sixty-four in noHGT and forty-seven in HGT group were analyzed with a 31-month mean follow-up. The mean ratio of Cobb angle correction was 58.8% in noHGT and 63.6% in HGT group (
p
= 0.023). In HGT, this ratio reached 9% if the traction lasted longer than 30 days (
p
= 0.009). The complication rate was 11.7% with a rate of 6.2% in noHGT and 19.1% in HGT group (
p
= 0.07). In patient whose preoperative Cobb angle was greater than 90°, the mean ratio of Cobb angle correction increases to 6.7% (
p
= 0.035) and the complications rate increased to 14% in the no HGT group and decreased to 13% in the HGT group (
p
= 0.9).
Conclusion
HGT preparation in the management of correction of AIS with a Cobb angle greater than 90° is a technique providing a greater frontal correction gain with similar complication rate than PSF correction alone. We recommend a minimum halo duration of 4 weeks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00586-023-08062-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04475020v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933844299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-8ec928bf15b16aadbbfc233a7033b62da7a41bbaf3fb4fe99d55cb8b36d304113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwBzggS1zgEBh_5MPcqopSpJW4wNmyk8muq2y8eJyVtj-Q34XTlCJx4GTJfubxjP0WxWsOHzhA85EAqrYuQcgSWqhFefekOOdKihK0FE-Lc9AKyrrh-qx4QXQLwCsN9fPiTLZcVo3k58Wv6ximZEfWhRixSz5MzBIh0R6nxPzECI8Ykdk-jEjd_Wbvw8Gmne8YdWH0gTwxmuMW44nN5Kct29kxsG20R59OLEW7ih0OIatSYIdACaMPkWV5QhdzBzamXQw9ZtsnZtl-HpNf7sPIIqYY6LD0d0QWHGE82kWZyyjN_ell8WywI-Grh_Wi-HH9-fvVTbn59uXr1eWm7BToVLbYadG6gVeO19b2zg2dkNI2IKWrRW8bq7hzdpCDUwNq3VdV51on616C4lxeFO9Xbx7QHKLf23gywXpzc7kxyx4o1VQg4Liw71b2EMPPGSmZvc8POI52wjCTERqqSkCjVEbf_oPehjnm6RZKylYpoXWmxEp1-TEo4vDYAQezJMKsiTA5EeY-EeYuF715UM9uj_1jyZ8IZECuAOWjKf_h37v_o_0NfYfJEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933844299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Frontal correction assessment in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using halo gravity traction before to posterior vertebral arthrodesis: a multicenter retrospective observational study</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Langlais, Tristan ; Josse, Antoine ; Violas, Philippe</creator><creatorcontrib>Langlais, Tristan ; Josse, Antoine ; Violas, Philippe ; and the French Society of Orthopaedic Paediatric (SOFOP) ; and the French Society of Orthopaedic Paediatric (SOFOP)</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Preoperative preparation with halo gravity traction (HGT) has several advantages but is still controversial. A multicenter, observational, retrospective study was conducted to determine whether HGT provides better frontal correction in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
Methods
Between 2010 and 2020, all patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) AIS with a Cobb angle greater than 80° were included. The included patients who underwent HGT were compared (complications rate and radiographic parameters) to patients who did not undergo traction (noHGT). For patients who underwent HGT, a spinal front X-ray at the end of the traction procedure was performed.
Results
Sixty-four in noHGT and forty-seven in HGT group were analyzed with a 31-month mean follow-up. The mean ratio of Cobb angle correction was 58.8% in noHGT and 63.6% in HGT group (
p
= 0.023). In HGT, this ratio reached 9% if the traction lasted longer than 30 days (
p
= 0.009). The complication rate was 11.7% with a rate of 6.2% in noHGT and 19.1% in HGT group (
p
= 0.07). In patient whose preoperative Cobb angle was greater than 90°, the mean ratio of Cobb angle correction increases to 6.7% (
p
= 0.035) and the complications rate increased to 14% in the no HGT group and decreased to 13% in the HGT group (
p
= 0.9).
Conclusion
HGT preparation in the management of correction of AIS with a Cobb angle greater than 90° is a technique providing a greater frontal correction gain with similar complication rate than PSF correction alone. We recommend a minimum halo duration of 4 weeks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08062-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38135731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Arthrodesis ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neurosurgery ; Original Article ; Retrospective Studies ; Scoliosis ; Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging ; Scoliosis - surgery ; Spinal Fusion ; Spine ; Surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Traction ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 2024-02, Vol.33 (2), p.713-722</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-8ec928bf15b16aadbbfc233a7033b62da7a41bbaf3fb4fe99d55cb8b36d304113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-8ec928bf15b16aadbbfc233a7033b62da7a41bbaf3fb4fe99d55cb8b36d304113</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1427-5518</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38135731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://univ-lyon1.hal.science/hal-04475020$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langlais, Tristan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josse, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Violas, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>and the French Society of Orthopaedic Paediatric (SOFOP)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>and the French Society of Orthopaedic Paediatric (SOFOP)</creatorcontrib><title>Frontal correction assessment in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using halo gravity traction before to posterior vertebral arthrodesis: a multicenter retrospective observational study</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>Purpose
Preoperative preparation with halo gravity traction (HGT) has several advantages but is still controversial. A multicenter, observational, retrospective study was conducted to determine whether HGT provides better frontal correction in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
Methods
Between 2010 and 2020, all patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) AIS with a Cobb angle greater than 80° were included. The included patients who underwent HGT were compared (complications rate and radiographic parameters) to patients who did not undergo traction (noHGT). For patients who underwent HGT, a spinal front X-ray at the end of the traction procedure was performed.
Results
Sixty-four in noHGT and forty-seven in HGT group were analyzed with a 31-month mean follow-up. The mean ratio of Cobb angle correction was 58.8% in noHGT and 63.6% in HGT group (
p
= 0.023). In HGT, this ratio reached 9% if the traction lasted longer than 30 days (
p
= 0.009). The complication rate was 11.7% with a rate of 6.2% in noHGT and 19.1% in HGT group (
p
= 0.07). In patient whose preoperative Cobb angle was greater than 90°, the mean ratio of Cobb angle correction increases to 6.7% (
p
= 0.035) and the complications rate increased to 14% in the no HGT group and decreased to 13% in the HGT group (
p
= 0.9).
Conclusion
HGT preparation in the management of correction of AIS with a Cobb angle greater than 90° is a technique providing a greater frontal correction gain with similar complication rate than PSF correction alone. We recommend a minimum halo duration of 4 weeks.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Arthrodesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Scoliosis</subject><subject>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Scoliosis - surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Traction</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwBzggS1zgEBh_5MPcqopSpJW4wNmyk8muq2y8eJyVtj-Q34XTlCJx4GTJfubxjP0WxWsOHzhA85EAqrYuQcgSWqhFefekOOdKihK0FE-Lc9AKyrrh-qx4QXQLwCsN9fPiTLZcVo3k58Wv6ximZEfWhRixSz5MzBIh0R6nxPzECI8Ykdk-jEjd_Wbvw8Gmne8YdWH0gTwxmuMW44nN5Kct29kxsG20R59OLEW7ih0OIatSYIdACaMPkWV5QhdzBzamXQw9ZtsnZtl-HpNf7sPIIqYY6LD0d0QWHGE82kWZyyjN_ell8WywI-Grh_Wi-HH9-fvVTbn59uXr1eWm7BToVLbYadG6gVeO19b2zg2dkNI2IKWrRW8bq7hzdpCDUwNq3VdV51on616C4lxeFO9Xbx7QHKLf23gywXpzc7kxyx4o1VQg4Liw71b2EMPPGSmZvc8POI52wjCTERqqSkCjVEbf_oPehjnm6RZKylYpoXWmxEp1-TEo4vDYAQezJMKsiTA5EeY-EeYuF715UM9uj_1jyZ8IZECuAOWjKf_h37v_o_0NfYfJEQ</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Langlais, Tristan</creator><creator>Josse, Antoine</creator><creator>Violas, Philippe</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-5518</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Frontal correction assessment in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using halo gravity traction before to posterior vertebral arthrodesis: a multicenter retrospective observational study</title><author>Langlais, Tristan ; Josse, Antoine ; Violas, Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-8ec928bf15b16aadbbfc233a7033b62da7a41bbaf3fb4fe99d55cb8b36d304113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Arthrodesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Scoliosis</topic><topic>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Scoliosis - surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Traction</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langlais, Tristan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josse, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Violas, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>and the French Society of Orthopaedic Paediatric (SOFOP)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>and the French Society of Orthopaedic Paediatric (SOFOP)</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langlais, Tristan</au><au>Josse, Antoine</au><au>Violas, Philippe</au><aucorp>and the French Society of Orthopaedic Paediatric (SOFOP)</aucorp><aucorp>and the French Society of Orthopaedic Paediatric (SOFOP)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Frontal correction assessment in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using halo gravity traction before to posterior vertebral arthrodesis: a multicenter retrospective observational study</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><stitle>Eur Spine J</stitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>713</spage><epage>722</epage><pages>713-722</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Preoperative preparation with halo gravity traction (HGT) has several advantages but is still controversial. A multicenter, observational, retrospective study was conducted to determine whether HGT provides better frontal correction in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
Methods
Between 2010 and 2020, all patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) AIS with a Cobb angle greater than 80° were included. The included patients who underwent HGT were compared (complications rate and radiographic parameters) to patients who did not undergo traction (noHGT). For patients who underwent HGT, a spinal front X-ray at the end of the traction procedure was performed.
Results
Sixty-four in noHGT and forty-seven in HGT group were analyzed with a 31-month mean follow-up. The mean ratio of Cobb angle correction was 58.8% in noHGT and 63.6% in HGT group (
p
= 0.023). In HGT, this ratio reached 9% if the traction lasted longer than 30 days (
p
= 0.009). The complication rate was 11.7% with a rate of 6.2% in noHGT and 19.1% in HGT group (
p
= 0.07). In patient whose preoperative Cobb angle was greater than 90°, the mean ratio of Cobb angle correction increases to 6.7% (
p
= 0.035) and the complications rate increased to 14% in the no HGT group and decreased to 13% in the HGT group (
p
= 0.9).
Conclusion
HGT preparation in the management of correction of AIS with a Cobb angle greater than 90° is a technique providing a greater frontal correction gain with similar complication rate than PSF correction alone. We recommend a minimum halo duration of 4 weeks.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>38135731</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00586-023-08062-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-5518</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0940-6719 |
ispartof | European spine journal, 2024-02, Vol.33 (2), p.713-722 |
issn | 0940-6719 1432-0932 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04475020v1 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Adolescent Arthrodesis Humans Life Sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neurosurgery Original Article Retrospective Studies Scoliosis Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging Scoliosis - surgery Spinal Fusion Spine Surgery Surgical Orthopedics Traction Vertebrae |
title | Frontal correction assessment in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using halo gravity traction before to posterior vertebral arthrodesis: a multicenter retrospective observational study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T13%3A44%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Frontal%20correction%20assessment%20in%20severe%20adolescent%20idiopathic%20scoliosis%20surgery%20using%20halo%20gravity%20traction%20before%20to%20posterior%20vertebral%20arthrodesis:%20a%20multicenter%20retrospective%20observational%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Langlais,%20Tristan&rft.aucorp=and%20the%20French%20Society%20of%20Orthopaedic%20Paediatric%20(SOFOP)&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=713&rft.epage=722&rft.pages=713-722&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00586-023-08062-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2933844299%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-8ec928bf15b16aadbbfc233a7033b62da7a41bbaf3fb4fe99d55cb8b36d304113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933844299&rft_id=info:pmid/38135731&rfr_iscdi=true |