Clinical high risk for psychosis paradigm for CAP: do not throw the baby out with the bathwater

We would like to thank Rimvall and colleagues for their comments regarding our recent editorial on the deployment of clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) paradigms in child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP). We take this opportunity to precisely clarify the purpose of our statement and to enrich t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European child & adolescent psychiatry 2022-04, Vol.31 (4), p.685-687
Main Authors: Klauser, Paul, Revet, Alexis, Anagnostopoulos, Dimitri, Hebebrand, Johannes, Moreno, Carmen, Raynaud, Jean-Philippe, Armando, Marco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
High risk
Humans
Infants
Letter to the Editor
Life Sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Psychiatry
Psychosis
Psychotic Disorders / diagnosis
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We would like to thank Rimvall and colleagues for their comments regarding our recent editorial on the deployment of clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) paradigms in child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP). We take this opportunity to precisely clarify the purpose of our statement and to enrich this important debate.First, Rimvall and colleagues present CHR-P and patient-centered approaches as antinomic and mutually exclusive. This dichotomy is not supported by the current state of research in CHR-P. Recent models integrate CHR-P with precision as well as patient-centered medicine (e.g. Psychosis Polyrisk Scores (PPS), including genetic and non-genetic information ).
ISSN:1018-8827
1435-165X
DOI:10.1007/s00787-020-01624-2